Math With Meaning

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Event

    Math With Meaning - Presentation Transcript

    1. Math With Meaning The argument for strong, relevant, and timely technical prerequisites. Thomas Frankie and Brian Schertz University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Engineer of the Future 2.0 Summit March 31 – April 1, 2009 Olin College Needham, MA
    2. Justification for Technical Prerequisites
      • Math is a prevalent component of engineering curricula.
      • These courses demonstrate the ability of the student to learn and apply difficult technical concepts to solve problems.
      • Math is the toolbox at the engineer’s disposal.
    3. Challenges Faced
      • Attrition due to traditional “weed-out” courses
      • Varying preparedness level of students that are retained
      • Inability to perform at higher levels due to rusty, unorganized, or incomplete toolboxes
      • Balance of these courses with important non-technical electives
    4. Further Fundamental Challenge
      • Engineering Professors:
        • Often lack a knowledge of the topics covered in courses in the math department
        • Do not know if and how certain material was taught in prerequisite courses
      • Mathematics Professors:
        • Often do not have an understanding of how the topics they teach will be applied in future engineering courses
        • Have limited contact with and investment in the engineering undergraduate students throughout their education
    5. How can courses better help the student?
      • Mathematics applied to engineering problems
      • Timely instruction of material
        • Not all at the beginning of the undergraduate years
        • Taught just in time to be effectively applied
      • Taught by faculty with an interest/investment in the students
        • Cooperation between Engineering and Math Departments
        • Beneficial to each department to have motivated students
    6. Traditional System vs. Proposed System Advanced mathematics taught within Math Department No math courses taught. Junior-Senior Years Toolbox growing, new pieces, continued use Rusty, unused toolbox Smaller, simpler, and more efficient toolbox New, cluttered, overly complex toolbox Applied Engineering Mathematics and Introductory Engineering Courses Standard Calculus Sequence in Math Department Freshmen-Sophomore Years Proposed System Traditional System
    7. Desired Effect/Intended Results
      • Students that are:
        • Still in the field of engineering
        • Better equipped and prepared
        • Thinking more critically
      • Students with:
        • More motivation
        • Complete toolboxes
    8. Examples of Existing Studies/Models
      • MIT Study (Karen Willcox, Gergana Bounova)
        • “ Mathematics in Engineering: Identifying, Enhancing and Linking the Implicit Mathematics Curriculum”
      • Wright State University Model
        • NSF Grant “A National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education”
        • http://www.engineering.wright.edu/cecs/engmath/
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Thomas FrankieThomas Frankie Nominate

    custom

    380 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    A short presentation highlighting some thoughts on more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 380
      • 380 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 7
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events