Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

CM - robustezza resilienza CTA 2013

120

Published on

Corso di Costruzioni Metalliche: concetti di robustezza e reslienza applicati ad un caso reale

Corso di Costruzioni Metalliche: concetti di robustezza e reslienza applicati ad un caso reale

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
120
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Robustezza e Resilienza di Sistemi Strutturali e Infrastrutturali Franco Bontempi Professore Ordinario di Tecnica delle Costruzioni Facolta’ di Ingegneria Civile e Industriale Universita’ degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza 1
  • 2. Str o N GER 2 www.francobontempi.org
  • 3. Concepts 3
  • 4. Structural Robustness more robust AVAILABILITY ATTRIBUTE S MAINTAINABILITY SAFETY SECURITY INTEGRITY less robust STRUCTURAL QUALITY RELIABILITY NEGATIVE CAUSE FAULT THREATS ERROR FAILURE it is a defect and represents a potential cause of error, active or dormant the system is in an incorrect state: it may or may not cause failure permanent interruption of a system ability to perform a required function 4 under specified operating conditions
  • 5. Performance layout OBJECT SLS USE ULS Structural System ILS SAFETY NET Infrastructural System INTEGRITY D Mean Frequent Maximum Rare Accidental Exceptional Black Swan f(D) 5
  • 6. Life Cycle View RESILIENCE 6
  • 7. www.francobontempi.org Str o N GER CONSTRUCTIONS RESILIENCE NEW “As Designed” “As Built” EXISTING “As Actual” COLLAPSED “As Failed” 7
  • 8. CONSTRUCTIONS NEW Activities “As Designed” “As Built” EXISTING “As Actual” COLLAPSED Codes & Standards Information Retrivial Data Mining Risk Analysis Performance Based Design Dependability “As Failed” Conceptual Design Innovatice Concepts Structural Oprimization Advanced Materials Special Devices Structural Control Energy Harvesting DESIGN ENVIRONMENT / BOUNDARY CONDITIONS GEOLOGICAL ASPECTS EARTHQUAKES NATURAL Structural Identification Structural Health Monitoring Damage Assessment Remaining Capacity Structural Refurbishment Structural Augmentation Codes Compliance Historical and Monumental Costructions Back Analysis Forensic Engineering Legal Issues SOIL - STRUCTURE ACTIONS ANTROPIC Fire WIND - STRUCTURE ACCIDENTAL EXCEPTIONAL FSI Explosions HPLC LPHC Black Swan WAVE - STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS Components and Structures Testing Experimental Design 8 Rapid Prototyping
  • 9. Case 9
  • 10. 10
  • 11. www.francobontempi.org Str o N GER Seismic Action 11
  • 12. www.francobontempi.org Str o N GER Critical Node 12
  • 13. Infrastructure plan view Representation of the system Individuation of the system/network components 1 WU 7 2 4 3 6 WD HY CU 5 1 RETAINING WALL UP (WU) 2 RETAINING WALL DOWN (WD) 4 CONDUIT UP (CU) 5 CONDUIT ROSALBA 7 3 6 CR HYDROELECTRIC POWER STATION (HY) HYDRAULIC JUNCTION CB ELECTRICITY WATER Outputs CONDUIT PAVONCELLI BIS Node Congestion 13
  • 14. (0,62) (28.5,62) (53,56) (0,54) (63,45) WU (92,34) WD (92,32) HY (0,29) (92,29) CU CR CB (0,0) (92,0) System with Element connected in Series 14
  • 15. www.francobontempi.org Str o N GER System with Element connected in Parallel 15
  • 16. www.francobontempi.org Str o N GER Structural System Degradation 16
  • 17. Str o N GER 17 www.francobontempi.org
  • 18. www.francobontempi.org Damage at Local Level Str o N GER 18
  • 19. www.francobontempi.org Str o N GER Damage at Element Level 19
  • 20. www.francobontempi.org Str o N GER Damage at Structural Level 20
  • 21. Design 21
  • 22. 22
  • 23. 23
  • 24. 24
  • 25. 25
  • 26. Str o N GER 26 www.francobontempi.org
  • 27. Concepts again 27
  • 28. TIGHT couplings LOOSE www.francobontempi.org Str o N GER LINEAR interactions NONLINEAR Perrow 28
  • 29. Holistic View OBJECT FAR FIELD ZONE EXCHAGE ZONE STRUCTURE Local / Punctual Scale Global / Regional Scale NET INFRASTRUCTURE Structural System Also if artificial, these systems need to have necessarily evolutive soundness, ecological coherence and sustainability characteristics Infrastructural System 29
  • 30. Structural System 30
  • 31. RELIABILITY A way to assess the dependability of a system ATTRIBUTES AVAILABILITY MAINTAINABILITY SAFETY the trustworthiness of a system which allows reliance to be justifiably placed on the service it delivers SECURITY INTEGRITY DEPENDABILITY of STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS High level / active performance FAULT THREATS An understanding of the things that can affect the dependability of a system Dependability ERROR FAILURE Low level / passive performance it is a defect and represents a potential cause of error, active or dormant the system is in an incorrect state: it may or may not cause failure permanent interruption of a system ability to perform a required function under specified operating conditions FAULT TOLERANT DESIGN FAULT DETECTION MEANS FAULT DIAGNOSIS ways to increase the dependability of a system 31 FAULT MANAGING
  • 32. 32

×