PROGRESS REPORT
SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT
FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A.
Gestión sustentable
FSC (FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL)FSC...
Market Communication :
Sustainability Certification / Responsible Management
Certifications
TRACK RECORD IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL, SSO
AND SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT
OHSA
S
18.00
1
1998
Signing of
Values CORMA
2003
...
Standards: CERTFOR
9 Principles
54 Criteria
193 Indicators
FSC
10 Principles
56 Critera
215 Indicators
Standards: FSC
OUTLINE OF PROCESS FOR
FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
1. Application
2. Pre-audit
3. Establishment of Evaluation Team
4. ...
SELECTION OF
CERTIFICATION ENTITY
(WOODMARK)
SELECTION OF
CERTIFICATION ENTITY
(WOODMARK)
PHASE ONE
7-15 SEP
PHASE ONE
7-1...
Stakeholders Interviews
Provinces Interviews
Talca 4
Linares 1
Cauquenes 8
Ñuble 10
Concepción 17
Bio Bio 3
Arauco 20
Mall...
FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009
Undertaken by Woodmark, Soil Association between 7 September and
8 Novemb...
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
•Arauco has a very high and efficient technical
standards.
•Stakeholders are focused on social and
env...
FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
KEY ISSUES TO DEAL WITH:
• Commitment with the commun...
Woodmark’s checklist has a total of 293 indicators
Pre-Audit Final Report raised “findings” for 82 indicators (28%)
In a M...
Results
RELEVANT ISSUES Final Report
Findings CARs
1 Labor 3 1
2Consultation, Participation, Conflicts 9 7
3Indigenous Com...
A goal that was set: cross-board responsibility
Taking on a series of baseline criteria to
deal with the process
F 1
F 2
F 3
F N
P1
P3
P2
The model: hybrid forums
BASE FORUM
ACTIVATION & METHODOLOGY
DEPLOYMENT OF FSC
CONTROVERSIES
DIAL...
Results
RELEVANT ISSUES Final Report
Findings CARs
1 Labor 3 1
2Consultation, Participation, Conflicts 9 7
3Indigenous Com...
WORK TEAMS FSC ISSUES
8 to 12 people
to be defined
Proposal of Thematic Forums (FH)
1 Labor (ILO Conventions 87 and 98)
2 ...
FORUM MEMBERS
EXPERTS
NON-EXPERTS
AFFECTED PARTIES
ENVIRONMENTAL
SOCIAL
ECONOM
IC
FCEL
BASA
FVAL
FASA
BioforestARAUCO
Corp
FSC BOARD
COMMITTEE
FOREST MANAGERS’
COMMITTEE
PROJECT’S EXECUTIVE
SECRETARIAT
EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE
BASE FORUM
THEMATIC
FOR...
A “brand” for the process:
Communication
Communication and
information platforms
Informative Bulletins
Communication
Thank you…
Ppt fasa 2010 para foros tematicos ingles
Ppt fasa 2010 para foros tematicos ingles
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Ppt fasa 2010 para foros tematicos ingles

974 views
811 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
974
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
16
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Ppt fasa 2010 para foros tematicos ingles

  1. 1. PROGRESS REPORT SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A. Gestión sustentable FSC (FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL)FSC (FOREST STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL) FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION PROCESSFOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION PROCESS Sustainable management
  2. 2. Market Communication : Sustainability Certification / Responsible Management Certifications
  3. 3. TRACK RECORD IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL, SSO AND SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT OHSA S 18.00 1 1998 Signing of Values CORMA 2003 Agreement signed with NGOs2001 ISO 14001 Sustainable Forest Management Track record
  4. 4. Standards: CERTFOR 9 Principles 54 Criteria 193 Indicators
  5. 5. FSC 10 Principles 56 Critera 215 Indicators Standards: FSC
  6. 6. OUTLINE OF PROCESS FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION 1. Application 2. Pre-audit 3. Establishment of Evaluation Team 4. Public consultation of stakeholders 5. Preparation: review of documentation 6. Main evaluation 7. Review (independent) and decision 8. Certification 9. Follow-up Audit (annual) Pre-Audit Main Audit Follow-up
  7. 7. SELECTION OF CERTIFICATION ENTITY (WOODMARK) SELECTION OF CERTIFICATION ENTITY (WOODMARK) PHASE ONE 7-15 SEP PHASE ONE 7-15 SEP PHASE TWO 26 OCT – 8 NOV PHASE TWO 26 OCT – 8 NOV • International Audit team and local experts • Stakeholders’ interviews (42) • Operations/sites visits (25) (Constitución, Chillán, Concepción, Arauco, Collipulli, Temuco, Valdivia) • FSC Chile-Woodmark Meeting • Weaknesses detected in the stakeholder consultation phase and deadline for completion is extended. • Organization and implementation of phase two of pre-audit • 137 stakeholders interviewed FSC PRE-AUDIT 2009
  8. 8. Stakeholders Interviews Provinces Interviews Talca 4 Linares 1 Cauquenes 8 Ñuble 10 Concepción 17 Bio Bio 3 Arauco 20 Malleco 16 Cautín 11 Valdivia 46 Ranco 1 137 88 1717 4646 2020 44 11 11 1111 1616 33 1010 Stakeholder Consultation
  9. 9. FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009 Undertaken by Woodmark, Soil Association between 7 September and 8 November 2009
  10. 10. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS •Arauco has a very high and efficient technical standards. •Stakeholders are focused on social and environmental issues. •Stakeholders do not differentiate between forest management and industrial operations (Cellulose). •Many perceptions are based on past activities of the last 25 years. FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009 Undertaken by Woodmark, Soil Association between 7 September and 8 November 2009
  11. 11. FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS KEY ISSUES TO DEAL WITH: • Commitment with the community • Native Forest Conversion/Restoration • Landscape-Scale Planning and Design Undertaken by Woodmark, Soil Association between 7 September and 8 November 2009
  12. 12. Woodmark’s checklist has a total of 293 indicators Pre-Audit Final Report raised “findings” for 82 indicators (28%) In a Main Audit, these “findings“ could be: - "Preconditions" - "Conditions“ - "Recommendations" FSC PRE-EVALUATION OF FORESTAL ARAUCO S.A., 2009 Undertaken by Woodmark, Soil Association between 7 September and 8 November 2009
  13. 13. Results RELEVANT ISSUES Final Report Findings CARs 1 Labor 3 1 2Consultation, Participation, Conflicts 9 7 3Indigenous Communities 11 10 4Social Impact Assessment 4 4 5Public information, Management Plan 8 5 6Contribution to local economies 2 1 7Replacement of Native Forest 2 1 8High Conservation Value Forests (BAVC) 3 3 9Landscape scale Management 9 10 10Soil and Water Management (Road Standards) 6 6 11Use of Chemical Products 3 2 12MFS Monitoring Systems and SGI Documentation 6 7 13Operational best practice (field) 16 11 82 68
  14. 14. A goal that was set: cross-board responsibility
  15. 15. Taking on a series of baseline criteria to deal with the process
  16. 16. F 1 F 2 F 3 F N P1 P3 P2 The model: hybrid forums BASE FORUM ACTIVATION & METHODOLOGY DEPLOYMENT OF FSC CONTROVERSIES DIALOGUE MAP OF CONTROVERSIES Experts StakeholdersCommunities Actors internal and external to the company
  17. 17. Results RELEVANT ISSUES Final Report Findings CARs 1 Labor 3 1 2Consultation, Participation, Conflicts 9 7 3Indigenous Communities 11 10 4Social Impact Assessment 4 4 5Public information, Management Plan 8 5 6Contribution to local economies 2 1 7Replacement of Native Forest 2 1 8Forests with High Conservation Value (BAVC) 3 3 9Landscape scale Management 9 10 10Soil and Water Management (Road Standards) 6 6 11Use of Chemical Products 3 2 12MFS Monitoring Systems and SGI Documentation 6 7 13Operational best practice (field) 16 11 82 68
  18. 18. WORK TEAMS FSC ISSUES 8 to 12 people to be defined Proposal of Thematic Forums (FH) 1 Labor (ILO Conventions 87 and 98) 2 Indigenous Communities 3 Socioeconomic Contribution to the Local Economy 4 Replacement of Native Forest(Nov 1994) 5 High Conservation Value Forests (BAVC) [ + wetlands ] 6 Landscape scale (size of stands, water, soil, esthetics…) 7 Soil and water management
  19. 19. FORUM MEMBERS EXPERTS NON-EXPERTS AFFECTED PARTIES ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL ECONOM IC FCEL BASA FVAL FASA BioforestARAUCO Corp
  20. 20. FSC BOARD COMMITTEE FOREST MANAGERS’ COMMITTEE PROJECT’S EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE BASE FORUM THEMATIC FORUMS (7) TECHNICAL TEAMS (7) 211 Indicators without findings IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS TECHNICAL TEAMS (6) 16 Indicators with findings for direct implementation 30 Indicators with findings of a technical nature. 36 Indicators with findings of a socio-technical nature (controversies) FSC PROJECT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
  21. 21. A “brand” for the process: Communication
  22. 22. Communication and information platforms Informative Bulletins Communication
  23. 23. Thank you…

×