Reliability Organization part 1
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Reliability Organization part 1

on

  • 579 views

How does one setup and organize a reliability program. Central team or dispersed? A two part essay on what I've seen and what I believe is important.

How does one setup and organize a reliability program. Central team or dispersed? A two part essay on what I've seen and what I believe is important.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
579
Views on SlideShare
579
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Reliability Organization part 1 Document Transcript

  • 1. f m sre liabilit y.co m http://www.fmsreliability.co m/educatio n/reliability-o rganizatio n-part-1/ Reliability Organization part 1 Organizational Structure and Decision Making Both organizational structure and decision-making policies have an impact on improving product reliability. T he f ormer is more quantif iable whereas the latter involves more intangible subtleties. First, in this post I’ll discuss the connection between organizational structure and reliability, and in a f ollow-up post I’ll address reliability and decision f ocus, still within the structure of an organization. Reliability Organization T here is no single organizational structure that leads to improved product reliability perf ormance over any other structure. Both centrally and distributed reliability teams have been successf ul and have f ailed to create reliable products. Both small cross-f unctional teams and large f unctional silo organizations have been successf ul and f ailed. Even the presence or absence of reliability prof essionals on staf f is not an indicator of reliability perf ormance. Top perf orming organizations use a common language around product reliability and possess a culture that encourages and enables individuals to make inf ormed decisions related to reliability. Individuals across the organization know their role to both use and share inf ormation essential to making decisions. T here is an overriding context f or reliability decisions that balances the needs to meet customer expectations f or reliability along with other criteria. Alignment exists among the organization’s mission, plans, priorities, and behaviors related to reliability. Product reliability is not the only element that benef its f rom a proactive culture. Whether top perf orming organizations enjoy a proactive culture that naturally includes reliability activities to make decisions or evolved while improving product reliability to become a proactive organization with collateral benef its f or other areas of running the business remains unclear. T he latter is more likely, since it takes leadership to build and maintain a proactive organization, although some organizations f ocus on building a proactive reliability program and develop the benef its later in other f unctions of the business. Moving the organizational block around the organizational chart may have some value, although it is not directly related to improving product reliability. It entails a more f undamental change than developing the reporting structures to transition f rom a reactive to proactive reliability program.