Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Sample 4th Q - The real eve theory2.1
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.


Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Sample 4th Q - The real eve theory2.1


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide
  • What does it mean to add notes
  • Transcript

    • 1. Eve Theory By: Kamil Przychodzien & Alexander Kozeniauskas
    • 2. Objective
      • Is The Eve Theory fact or fiction, can this explain where we came from, and do we really have a common ancestor?
    • 3. Eve Theory
      • Was thought up by Rebecca Cann, Mark Stoneking, and Allan Wilson in 1987.
      • Mitochondrial Eve Theory
        • States that the mitochondrial DNA in all humans is inherited from one common female ancestor.
      • There are many theories of human evolution, but this is one of the more supported theories with evidence to back it up.
    • 4. Mitochondrial Eve Theory
      • The University of California Berkley used restriction enzymes to track the lineage of women from around the world.
      • From the findings of scientists it suggested that there were 2 common, but separate groups, such as Sub-Saharan Africans and North Africans.
      • The information from these studies was then used to come up with a mutation rate for Mitochondrial DNA to trace back to the common ancestor.
    • 5. What exactly is Mitochondrial Eve Theory?
      • This also refers to the Mitochondrial DNA:
        • Mitochondria have double-stranded DNA, thus replication of the mitochondrial DNA is independent of the DNA replication in the nucleus.
        • Only Women can pass on Mitochondria.
    • 6. Eve Theory
      • Functions of the Mitochondria are:
        • Generators of energy
        • Source of cellular respiration
        • Place of heat production
      • Mitochondria is much easier to study then nuclear DNA.
    • 7. Eve Theory
      • In male and female gametes the number of Mitochondria vary.
      • Sperm mitochondria are destroyed shortly after fertilization.
      • This helps explain why we can only track the lineages of mitochondria in women.
    • 8. Bottleneck
      • To explain the common ancestor for Mitochondrial Eve Theory is the bottleneck.
        • A severe population constriction, probably caused by disease or natural disaster such as climate fluctuations, fires, and earthquakes.
        • A reduction in size is the main effect of a bottleneck.
      Original Population Bottlenecking Event (natural disaster) Surviving Population
    • 9. Eve Theory
      • Mitochondrial DNA in our cells can still be found and tested in human fossils many thousands of years old.
      • Africa holds the oldest modern human fossils dating back about around 100,000 years ago, which helps support the Eve Theory.
    • 10. Eve Theory
      • According to the most common interpretation of the mitochondrial DNA data, the titles belong to the same hypothetical woman.
      • Family trees, or “phylogenies,” constructed on the basis of mitochondrial DNA comparisons show that the living humans whose mitochondrial lineages branched earliest from the tree are indigenous Africans, whereas the lineages of indigenous peoples on other continents all branch off from African lines.
      Common ancestor
    • 11. Conclusion
      • Mitochondrial DNA Analysis provided the scientific community with conceptive evidence.
      • A valuable finding regarding the most common ancestor is the she came from Africa which supports theories about the spread of hominids.
      • Africans have the greats diversity of Mitochondrial DNA sequences making it a supporting factor that is hard to dispute among researchers.