Mobile Real-time Video Surveillance
        Ksenia Coffman, Firetide
     IWCE 2010: Wireless Killer Apps
              Ma...
Users of Wireless Video Surveillance




Public Safety         Municipalities        Transportation           Industrial

...
Wireless Options




                   3
Point to Point




Pros
   Dedicated connection
   Highest bandwidth for backhaul
Cons
   Does not scale; no flexibility
 ...
Point to Multi-Point




Pros
   Simplicity of design
   Cost effective when tall assets are available
Cons
   Limited sca...
Multi-Point to Multi-Point (Mesh)




Pros
   Reach & scalability with multi-hop connections
   Flexibility – can be deplo...
Mobile Real-time Video –
Killer App Enabled by Mesh




                             7
Mobile Video: Real-time Visibility




                                     8
Wireless-enabled Campus




                          9
Cal State Long Beach PD

37 cameras
How used
   Overt surveillance
   Integrated with
   dispatch
   Wireless offload for
...
Outfitting Patrol with Mobile Video




                                      11
Transit Security




                   12
Video Streaming: Seoul Subway

World’s first subway installation of this kind
Real-time video from trains @ 50 mph
Extreme...
Wireless ‘Look-in’: MBTA, Boston

• 500 busses, 8 cameras each
• Mobile-to-mobile surveillance
• Passenger and operator sa...
Critical Infrastructure & Industrial Ops




                                           15
Open Pit Mining




Diagnostics & weight data
Video surveillance – operator safety
& location

                           ...
Key Requirements for Mobile Video

Fixed and/or mobile infrastructure
High throughput
Low latency < 1.5 ms per hop
Low pac...
Wireless Saves Time, Money




                LA County Sheriff’s Dept.   Buffalo, NY
Rockford, IL                       ...
Thank You!

For a copy of the presentation, please contact:
           Ksenia Coffman, Firetide
           kcoffman@fireti...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

IWCE 2010: Wireless Killer Apps - Mobile Real-time Video Surveillance

2,609

Published on

Presentation from IWCE 2010, a public safety wireless conference: Wireless Killer Apps - Mobile Real-time Video Surveillance

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
4 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,609
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
169
Comments
0
Likes
4
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

IWCE 2010: Wireless Killer Apps - Mobile Real-time Video Surveillance

  1. 1. Mobile Real-time Video Surveillance Ksenia Coffman, Firetide IWCE 2010: Wireless Killer Apps March 12, 2010 1
  2. 2. Users of Wireless Video Surveillance Public Safety Municipalities Transportation Industrial Utilities Service Providers Federal/Military 2
  3. 3. Wireless Options 3
  4. 4. Point to Point Pros Dedicated connection Highest bandwidth for backhaul Cons Does not scale; no flexibility Single point of failure 4
  5. 5. Point to Multi-Point Pros Simplicity of design Cost effective when tall assets are available Cons Limited scalability: bandwidth divided by # of subscribers LOS required to each subscriber unit Base station creates a single point of failure 5
  6. 6. Multi-Point to Multi-Point (Mesh) Pros Reach & scalability with multi-hop connections Flexibility – can be deployed a PtP, PtMP or mesh Distributed intelligence vs command-and-control approach of PtMP Cons Variable performance from different vendors More complex design vs PtP or PtMP 6
  7. 7. Mobile Real-time Video – Killer App Enabled by Mesh 7
  8. 8. Mobile Video: Real-time Visibility 8
  9. 9. Wireless-enabled Campus 9
  10. 10. Cal State Long Beach PD 37 cameras How used Overt surveillance Integrated with dispatch Wireless offload for ALPR cameras Funding PD budget 10
  11. 11. Outfitting Patrol with Mobile Video 11
  12. 12. Transit Security 12
  13. 13. Video Streaming: Seoul Subway World’s first subway installation of this kind Real-time video from trains @ 50 mph Extremely harsh conditions 13
  14. 14. Wireless ‘Look-in’: MBTA, Boston • 500 busses, 8 cameras each • Mobile-to-mobile surveillance • Passenger and operator safety; liability protection 14
  15. 15. Critical Infrastructure & Industrial Ops 15
  16. 16. Open Pit Mining Diagnostics & weight data Video surveillance – operator safety & location 16
  17. 17. Key Requirements for Mobile Video Fixed and/or mobile infrastructure High throughput Low latency < 1.5 ms per hop Low packet jitter (variation in latency) Zero packet loss & end-to-end QoS Specialized infrastructure required APs not suitable for real-time, high-bandwidth mobile video surveillance 17
  18. 18. Wireless Saves Time, Money LA County Sheriff’s Dept. Buffalo, NY Rockford, IL Denver / DNC ‘08 Dallas, TX NASA Dryden Yuma Intl Airport Downtown Chicago 18
  19. 19. Thank You! For a copy of the presentation, please contact: Ksenia Coffman, Firetide kcoffman@firetide.com See more case studies at: www.firetide.com/video2 Follow Firetide on twitter: http://twitter.com/firetide 19
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×