E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

Eastman Chemical Company manufactures and markets chemicals, fibers and plastics
worldwide. It provides key differentiated coatings, adhesives and specialty plastics products;
is the world’s largest producer of PET polymers for packaging; and is a major supplier of
cellulose acetate fibers. Founded in 1920 and headquartered in Kingsport, Tenn., Eastman is
a FORTUNE 500 company with 2005 sales of $7 billion and approximately 12,000 employees.
Eastman is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and its shares trade under the symbol
EMN. For more information about Eastman and its products, visit www.eastman.com.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
2005 2004 Change
Dollars in millions, except per share amounts
Operating Results
Sales $7,059 $6,580 7%
Gross profit 1,404 978 44%
Operating earnings 757 175 >100%
Net earnings 557 170 >100%
Net earnings per share
Basic 6.90 2.20 >100%
Diluted 6.81 2.18 >100%
Cash dividends per share 1.76 1.76 –
Other Financial Data
Impairments and restructuring charges, net 33 206 84%
Other operating income (2) (7) (71)%
Net cash provided by operating activities 769 494 56%
Capital expenditures 343 248 38%
Depreciation and amortization expense 304 322 (6)%
Selling, general and administrative expense 454 450 1%
Research and development costs $ 162 $ 154 5%
Front cover (left to right): Tony Foreman, Procurement Engineer; Gustavo Gouvea, Six Sigma Black Belt; Beat Zueger
Regional Business Director, Fibers; Heather Smoot, Market Insight and Strategy Specialist
Facing page (left to right): Suzanne Dobbs, Technologist, Technical Services; Deep Bhattacharya, Principal Research
Chemist; James Ray, Vice President and General Manager, Texas Operations
Back cover: Rhonda Williams, Operator, Gasification Department

At Eastman, we see the face of opportunity everywhere. In innovation,
leadership, possibility, collaboration and in caring about our local
communities. That’s why you’ll see the faces of Eastman throughout
these pages. They and their 12,000 colleagues around the world turn
opportunity into reality on a daily basis. They are the face of Eastman –
and so much more. In their heads is the knowledge to create market
value out of molecules. In their hearts is the passion to build customer
loyalty for products that are brand new. In their imagination is the vision
to deliver pioneering products. And in their hands is the capability and
commitment to make positive contributions where they live and work.
Eastman people bring their whole selves to the job every day. And that’s
why we are facing the future with confidence.

TO O U R STO C K H O L D E R S
From strengthening our global manufacturing
structure, to permanently reducing costs, to
making strategic divestitures, we have made
important changes throughout the Company.
2005 was a year of significant accomplishment were exacerbated by the hurricanes that
for Eastman. But it didn’t happen by chance. devastated the Gulf Coast. I am proud of our
From strengthening our global manufacturing employees and business partners who quickly
structure, to permanently reducing costs, to responded to these natural disasters and
making strategic divestitures, we have made demonstrated incredible ingenuity to mitigate
important changes throughout the Company. the subsequent supply chain disruptions.
As a result, we not only surpassed our goals, Their performance was truly remarkable.
we set new records.
CONTINUING TO DELIVER ON
• Earnings per share were the best in ten years. C O M M I T M E N T S You’ll recall that last year
• Sales revenue of $7 billion was the best in the we pledged to improve our performance,
Company’s history and reflects gains across strengthen our balance sheet and grow our
virtually all parts of the Company. earnings. As our 2005 results showed, we
• Gross profit increased by over $400 million, delivered on each of these commitments,
and gross margins improved to approximately and I’m confident we can build on our success
20 percent. through continued focus and dedication. My
• Return on invested capital (ROIC) improved confidence is supported by Eastman’s:
12 percentage points over 2004 levels, reach-
ing in excess of 19 percent for the year. • Solid base of businesses that provides
• Cash flow remained strong, enabling us to strong, steady financial performance;
further strengthen Eastman’s balance sheet, • Strategic plans to strengthen areas of the
fund the Company’s U.S. defined benefit Company that are more affected by cyclicality;
pension plans, support strategic growth • Focused growth strategy that leverages our
initiatives and reward our stockholders by unique technologies and advantaged cost
maintaining a solid dividend. position to deliver unique greener, smarter,
lower-cost value propositions, and;
These results are particularly notable given the • Track record of financial discipline which
volatility in raw material and energy costs which ensures we create – not consume – value
for our stockholders.
02 E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y

J. Brian Ferguson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Let me elaborate on each of these four points. our focus is on increasing the value creation
throughout our PET (polyethylene terephthalate)
S O L I D B A S E O F B U S I N E S S E S With a businesses, and though we are in the early
combined 2005 operating margin of over stages, we are taking strategic actions to
17 percent, Eastman’s CASPI (Coatings, accomplish this.
Adhesives, Specialty Polymers and Inks),
Fibers and Specialty Plastics segments provide Additionally, we expect our new low-cost and
energy-efficient IntegRex technology to drive
a solid base of earnings. In the aggregate, these
three businesses contributed $500 million, or further value, particularly in our North American
nearly two thirds, of Eastman’s operating earn- PET businesses. Without question, PET is a tough
ings in 2005. These businesses have a history of commodities business. Our vertically integrated
solid and steady performance, largely because PET facilities, however, have consistently demon-
of their differentiated product lines and unique strated profitability, with those in North America
market or cost positions. earning above the cost of capital five out of the
past six years. IntegRex plays an important part
in our ongoing efforts to strengthen our cost
S T R AT E G I C P L A N S T O S T R E N G T H E N
A R E A S O F T H E C O M PA N Y Our Performance position in our PET line of products. Our first
Chemicals and Intermediates (PCI) and Polymers facility using this technology is expected to come
businesses are important to Eastman, but on-line in the fourth quarter of this year and be
because they compete primarily on price, they fully operational during the first quarter of 2007.
are more affected by industry cycles. Our goal is With this new 350,000-metric-ton PET manufac-
to reduce the cyclicality and increase the prof- turing plant, which is being built at our site in
itability of these segments through a number Columbia, South Carolina, Eastman will have
of strategic portfolio management efforts. We the lowest conversion cost and lowest capital
expect to make measurable progress on efforts per pound of product for any PET process in
already underway in PCI. In Polymers, much of North America.
E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y 03

F O C U S E D G R O W T H S T R AT E G Y We have and occupy half the footprint of conventional
great confidence in the strength of our existing PET plants. This facility is expected to come
businesses, yet we also understand that a strat- on-line later this year, and as that happens,
egy to drive long-term growth is important if we we’ll share more about our plans to use
are to achieve our goals. Accordingly, we further rationalized PET assets to scale-up our unique,
refined a growth strategy last year that is high-performance copolyester product lines.
concentrated on a select set of initiatives that,
when layered onto our existing strong base of In our Fibers business, we’re exploring options
earnings, we believe will enable us to reach a for acetate tow capacity expansions in Europe
new level of success and value creation. and Asia that would allow us to leverage our
advantaged raw material position in this busi-
These initiatives target growth opportunities ness to meet projected annual increases in
in markets we know well, and where we have global demand. Another initiative in the early
a strong customer base. Additionally, as I stages of development is one we call “chemicals
explained to you in my letter last year, they from coal.” Through this effort, we are working
have the common theme of “greener, smarter, to build on our unique expertise in coal gasi-
lower-cost” running through them. Consumers fication, the cleanest coal technology, and in
look for products that have some combination producing low-cost commodity chemicals.
of being environmentally responsible, high You can expect to hear more about our progress
performance and economical. Our customers on these and other growth initiatives later in
are no different. Through our unique technolo- the year.
gies and cost advantages, we are positioned to
deliver on this value proposition. TRACK RECORD OF FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE
Eastman’s management team has a track record
An example of this is the previously mentioned of financial discipline, and we intend to maintain
IntegRex PET facility, which will use less energy that discipline as we fund growth in 2006.
04 E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y

Eastman’s management team has a
track record of financial discipline, and
we intend to maintain that discipline
as we fund growth in 2006.
I strongly believe in the long-term earnings disciplined way. This, along with our team of the
potential of our growth initiatives. Investing most dedicated and knowledgeable people in
in them is a priority for cash in the coming the business, gives me confidence that Eastman
year. We will diligently monitor our progress is poised to continue meeting its goals.
in these initiatives to ensure that we – and
you – are getting a sound return on our invest- But don’t just take my word for it. There
ment. Additionally, Eastman’s dividend will are 12,000 faces at Eastman that share my
remain a top priority – just as it has for the enthusiasm. All of us look forward to making
past 48 straight quarters. the most of the opportunities we have created
for ourselves and to proving that we have
Our financial objectives continue to be main- what it takes to create long and lasting value
taining an operating margin above 10 percent, for all of our stakeholders.
growing volume above GDP and delivering a
value-creating spread above the cost of capital. Sincerely,
FACING THE FUTURE WITH CONFIDENCE
Today Eastman is a stronger, more focused
company. We have a solid foundation of earn-
ings generated by financially sound, steady J. Brian Ferguson
businesses. We have plans and are taking Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
actions to strengthen the more cyclical areas
of the Company. We are committed to a strategy
that builds on Eastman’s unique technologies
and cost position to deliver a greener, smarter,
lower-cost value proposition for our customers
and profitable growth for our stockholders. And
we pledge to pursue this growth in a smart,
E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y 05

E A S T M A N AT- A - G L A N C E
C O AT I N G S , A D H E S I V E S ,
S P E C I A LT Y P O LY M E R S A N D I N K S
Key Products: Coatings Additives and Solvents: Cellulosic poly-
mers, adhesion promoters, Texanol ester alcohol, and solvents
that include ester, ketone, glycol ether, alcohol solvents
Adhesive Raw Materials: Hydrocarbon resins, rosin resins, resin
dispersions, polymer raw materials
Key Markets and Applications: Coatings Additives and Solvents:
Architectural latex paints, automotive OEM and refinish paints,
printing inks, industrial OEM paints
Adhesive Raw Materials: Adhesives (tapes and labels, packaging
adhesives, and nonwovens such as disposable diapers, feminine
products, pre-saturated wipes)
Key Raw Materials: Coatings Additives and Solvents: Acetone,
butane, coal, ethane, natural gas, propane, propylene, wood pulp
Adhesive Raw Materials: Butane, C9 resin oil, ethane, natural gas,
piperlene, propane, pygas
Key Competitors: BASF Corporation, Dow Chemical Company,
ExxonMobil Corporation
P O LY M E R S
Key Products: Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) polymers and Eastman products are found throughout
polyethylene (PE) products including low density polyethylene your house, but they’re not household
(LDPE) and linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) names. They’re the ingredients that give
strength and design and functionality to
Key Markets and Applications: Beverage and food packaging,
the things touching your life every day.
custom-care and cosmetics packaging, health care and pharma-
ceutical uses, household products, industrial packaging
Our more than 1,200 products are used
applications, extrusion coating, film and molding applications
in making everything from the packaging
for your food, drinks and personal care
Key Raw Materials: Ethane, ethylene glycol, paraxylene, propane,
products, to the fabric in your clothing
purified terephthalic acid (PTA), refinery liquids
and home furnishings, to the paint on your
Key Competitors: DAK Americas, Dow Chemical Company, house and automobile, to the plastics on
Equipolymers, Equistar Chemical Company, ExxonMobil your bicycle helmet and golf clubs. We
Corporation, Far Eastern Textiles Ltd., Huntsman Corporation, can be found in all these things, plus so
Invista, M&G, Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, NOVA Chemicals many more.
Corporation, Reliance Industries Ltd., Wellman Inc., Westlake
Chemical Corporation At home, at work and at play, we’re with
you all day, every day. Eastman products
make your life safer, easier, more conven-
ient and more enjoyable.
06 E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y

Packaging 43.99% Durables 4.81%
Tobacco 11.10% Graphic Imaging 4.47%
MAJOR MARKETS
Transportation 8.33% Agriculture 3.32%
BY REVENUE
Consumables 7.18% Distributed Resources 2.65%
P E R C E N TA G E
Building and Construction 6.52% Electronics 1.94%
Health/Wellness 5.69%
FIBERS
Key Products: Acetate tow, acetate yarn (Estron
and Chromspun acetate yarns), acetyl chemical
products (acetate flake, acetylation-grade acetic
acid, acetic anhydride), triacetin plasticizers
Key Markets and Applications: Cigarette
filters, apparel, home furnishings, industrial
applications
P E R F O R M A N C E C H E M I C A L S & I N T E R M E D I AT E S
Key Raw Materials: High sulfur coal, wood pulp
Key Competitors: Celanese Corporation,
Mitsubishi, Rhodia Key Products: Acetic anhydride, acetaldehyde,
oxo derivatives, plasticizers, glycols, polymer
intermediates, diketene derivatives, specialty
ketones, specialty andydrides
Key Markets and Applications: Agrochemical,
automotive, beverages, nutrition, pharmaceuti-
cals, coatings, flooring, medical devices, toys,
photographic and imaging, household products,
polymers, textiles, industrials
Key Raw Materials: Coal, ethane, natural gas,
propane
Key Competitors: BASF Corporation,
Celanese Corporation, Dow Chemical Company,
ExxonMobil Corporation
S P E C I A LT Y P L A S T I C S
Key Products: Engineering and Specialty Polymers: Polyesters, copolyesters, alloys, cellulose flake,
cellulosic plastics
Specialty Film and Sheet: Copolyesters, Eastar copolyester, Embrace copolyester, Spectar copolyester
Packaging, Film and Fiber: Cellulose esters, copolyesters, specialty polyesters, concentrates/additives
Key Markets and Applications: Engineering and Specialty Polymers: Durable goods, medical goods,
personal care and consumer goods
Specialty Film and Sheet: Packaging, in-store fixtures and displays, building and construction, medical
and electronic component trays, shrink label films, general purpose packaging, multilayer films
Packaging, Film and Fiber: Photographic film, optical film, fibers/nonwovens, tapes/labels
Key Raw Materials: Ethylene glycol, paraxylene, PTA
Key Competitors: Engineering and Specialty Polymers: Bayer AG, Dow Chemical Company, GE Plastics,
LANXESS Corporation, NOVA Chemicals Corporation
Specialty Film and Sheet: Atoglas, Bayer AG, CYRO Industries, Dow Chemical Company, GE Plastics,
INEOS, Selenis, SK Chemical Industries
Packaging, Film and Fiber: Acetati SpA, Daicel Chemical Industries
E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y 07

\"I embarrass my wife in supermarkets because I’m always picking up
objects and saying, ‘There's Eastman in this!’ It's gratifying to see our
products on store shelves and know that I helped put them there.\"
– Tom Pecorini, Ph.D., Senior Associate, Polymers Technology
In 2004, we launched www.EastmanInnovationLab.com. This award-winning site is an
interactive, community-based resource for designers and brand owners. Peter Anell,
founder and Chief Creative Officer of the Arnell Group, says, “The Eastman Innovation
Lab brings a visitor into a world that clearly conveys credibility and expertise.”
(Left to right): Cathy Combs, Manager, Employee Service Center & Payroll; Mike Cradic,
Technical Service Representative; Tom Pecorini, Senior Associate, Polymers Technology
08 E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y

THE FACE OF INNOVATION
It takes a combination of detective work, psychology and science to develop innovations that fulfill
unmet customer needs. We start with a fuzzy, gray area to be addressed somehow, in some way.
With a collaborative process and a common framework across all science and business disciplines,
we come to understand what’s needed, what’s technically possible and how to provide the best
value to customers.
S U C C E S S F R O M I N N O V AT I O N It’s hard to gaining great visibility, even though you can see
pinpoint where innovation comes from – and right through many of our products. At the Torino
even harder to turn promising projects into 2006 Olympic Games, the 12,000 transparent
market successes. Our work begins by talking seats in the new ice hockey stadium were
with customers at each point in the value chain – injection-molded using our high-performance
Durastar copolyester. In the rock-‘n’-roll world,
designers, brand owners, fabricators, retailers,
consumers – to understand their motivation and the award-winning RKS “Pop Series” open-
architecture electric guitar uses our Tenite cellu-
identify unmet needs in areas where we can
deliver value. We probe to find out what keeps losics to achieve tonal quality and translucent
them up at night and what bothers them about or opaque colors in its breakthrough, hollow-
existing products. Then we dig into our toolbox body design. In custom container packaging,
our Eastar copolyesters deliver design flexibility
of breakthrough technologies, chemical and
process expertise, or some other proprietary and glass-like clarity, allowing for the creation
know-how to create superior value propositions of clear handles for larger containers. Integrated
that benefit our customers and their customers. handles make pouring easier for kids, those with
disabilities, the elderly – for all of us.
B E T T E R I D E A S As performance needs change,
Embrace shrink film is an innovation our
so must our products. So when our U.S. architec-
tural coatings customers needed formulation customers like for its excellent printability,
solutions to meet VOC regulatory requirements, strength and durability. Yet they also wanted
we put our resources to work. The result was our a film that is more recycle-friendly and that
new, high-performance Optifilm Enhancer 400. provides protection against ultraviolet light.
Working together with our trusted brand of We listened, then went to work. Now, with
Texanol ester alcohol, Optifilm Enhancer 400 Embrace High Yield shrink film, customers can
gives our customers confidence that they can produce containers with the same bold graphics
meet environmental regulations without sacrific- while achieving higher yields per pound of resin,
ing quality. greater recyclability and better light-blocking
properties that preserve the contents’ flavor and
Another place to see Eastman innovation at work nutritional value.
is in our family of plastics. Here, our ingenuity is
E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y 09

THE FACE OF LEADERSHIP
The key to our market-leading standing is neither simply our size nor our longevity; it’s both
combined with our technology. In many areas, our technology is simply the best – and we continue
to make it better. Today we are the largest producer of PET polymers, and we intend to strengthen
our leadership position through our breakthrough IntegRex PET technology.
Building an entirely new technology platform And the effort paid off. In 2004 we announced
IntegRex, a breakthrough technology that
takes experience and knowledge. Creativity
alone won’t do it. You need a thorough founda- includes numerous innovations that reduce
tion in the science and the market. That’s the the number of intermediate process steps in
formula we used to develop our first patent in producing PET resin.
1973 for producing PET plastic containers for
IntegRex has become the launching point for
carbonated beverages. We’ve been an innovator
in the industry ever since. our uniquely integrated polyester strategy,
encompassing breakthrough PET technology,
L E A D I N G T E C H N O L O G Y In 2002, we took economies of scale and differentiated polyester
an entirely new approach to a seemingly products and solutions. This is only the leading
impossible project: strengthen Eastman’s world edge of what we can do in the polyester arena
leadership position by developing low-cost to maintain our leadership position through
PET process technology – all within 30 months. technology and innovation.
The technology had to reduce the space and
The code name for the IntegRex project was
resource requirements needed to build and
run a plant, increase production capacity VR-1, but we are also ready for VR-N, where “N”
considerably and be difficult to copy. stands for the infinite number of iterations left
in the innovation cycle. In early 2005, we broke
D O I N G T H I N G S D I F F E R E N T LY Three teams ground on the first world-scale facility using
IntegRex technology at our site in Columbia,
were assembled and given top-level support
and resources. Team members continually South Carolina; it is expected to come on-line
challenged themselves to do things differently, during the fourth quarter of 2006 and be fully
to break down barriers, shift paradigms, push operational in early 2007. It’s the next step in our
boundaries, and re-think conventional wisdom. commitment to maintain our leadership position
The enthusiasm was contagious. So was the through technology and innovation.
entrepreneurial thinking.
10 E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y

“I believe Eastman’s success comes from taking calculated risks in areas
we know and have capabilities. We are just now beginning to fully realize
the potential that IntegRex can have on extending our overall leadership
in polyesters.” – T.J. Stevens, Group Vice President, Polymers
Tom Winn, Chemical Engineer
E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y 11

“Working on chemicals from coal has been, and will always be, the
highlight of my career. What Eastman did in the ’70s and ’80s wasn’t
incremental; it was groundbreaking.” – Bill Trapp, Operations
Manager, Gasification Services
12 E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y

THE FACE OF POSSIBILITY
“What if…?” These two little words have led to some amazing transformations at Eastman. By
constantly challenging ourselves and thinking about the possibilities, we make Eastman a better
company. The results are visible in our product and technology development, our nonstop process
improvements and our exploration of new ideas. By asking “What if…,” we find new and unique
ways to create value for all our stakeholders.
What if we could eliminate a chunk of Eastman’s from petroleum. Reaching this point took some
raw materials costs – the largest cost compo- doing: the licensing and improvement of emerg-
nent in making chemicals? And what if we could ing coal gasification technology, invention of new
reduce dependence on petroleum and natural processes, and scale-up and commercialization
gas at the same time? Enter our chemicals from of downstream Eastman technologies to convert
coal initiative. While it seems particularly timely synthesis gas to acetyl chemicals. It also took a
with today’s volatile raw material prices, the leap of faith that we could make it reliable, effi-
original effort dates to the 1970s. cient and cost-effective to build. Our expertise in
chemical process development, manufacturing
M A K I N G C H E M I C A L S F R O M C O A L The and commercialization made success possible.
1973 oil embargo triggered petroleum short-
ages, skyrocketing prices and the seed of an For more than 20 years, our coal gasification
idea in the minds of Eastman leaders. What if plant has run at best-in-class production rates
the company could replace petroleum and natu- and now satisfies 100% of our demand for
ral gas with a more secure and domestically acetyl raw materials. In 2005, about 20% of
available raw material? The answer was coal, our product volume – and about 50% of our
the world’s most abundant fossil fuel. The fact operating earnings – came from acetyl chemicals
that the company’s largest manufacturing facil- produced by coal gasification. Now we wonder:
ity is located in the heart of the Appalachian What if we could expand our use of coal as a
coalfields seemed fortuitous. raw material?
Active research and development began on a R E P L I C AT I N G O U R S U C C E S S To answer
coal-based process and, in 1983, the Kingsport, this question, we have assembled teams of
Tenn., facility became the first commercial coal engineers and scientists, including some who
gasification plant in the U.S. – and the first to worked on the original plant, in order to repli-
produce acetyl chemicals from coal instead of cate our success. Our work continues, and we
are optimistic about the possibilities ahead.
Facing page (clockwise from top left): Brenda Barnicki, Director, Gasification Services; Matt Adams, Utility Operator,
Gasification Department; Jeff Fain, Team Manager, Acetic Anhydride Department; Bill Trapp, Operations Manager,
Gasification Services
E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y 13

THE FACE OF COLLABORATION
Eastman is more than a supplier; we’re a partner. We want our customers, and their customers, to
be successful. The “product” that leaves our gates can be a pellet, resin, flake, powder, solvent or
yarn. But with input from designers, brand owners, converters, even retailers, it becomes the juice
bottle or eyeglasses or fashionable dress you eventually see, and buy. We collaborate across the
whole value chain to deliver the right product, with the right characteristics at the right price.
Collaboration requires relationships, and rela- Eastman is helping Chico’s “control our own
tionships are built on trust. That’s why we work destiny,” says Chico’s CEO Scott Edmonds.
hard to maintain the trust of our customers. They “It’s great to deal with a company like Eastman.
appreciate our commitment and longevity, know- When they look me in the eye, shake my hand
ing we’re not “here today, gone tomorrow.” and tell me something will happen, it happens.”
S P I N N I N G A G R E AT YA R N One of our G O I N G E A S T Our China Technology Center
oldest businesses is breathing new life thanks in Shanghai is another tale of Eastman collab-
to a successful collaboration. Eastman acetate oration. Opening with great interest from our
yarn, soon to celebrate its 75th anniversary, customers in November 2005, it provides an
has faced tough challenges in recent years, operations base for technical service repre-
with threats from polyester and other fibers. sentatives across all Eastman businesses. With
But today this business is profitable and the new laboratory, we are able to target growth
thriving, and our growing relationship with markets in Asia and extend our technical capa-
specialty retailer Chico’s played a major role bilities to customers in the fastest growing
in both companies’ fortunes. region in the world.
When a major competitor announced it was We now can work more closely with our key
exiting the business in October 2004, represen- partners there and, in many cases, are bringing
tatives from Chico’s and Eastman’s acetate yarn them to the facility to collaborate in the work
business were on the phone with each other being done. This strategic investment represents
within days. Chico’s wanted a secure source of our latest commitment to the Asian market,
acetate yarn for its popular Travelers™ Collection providing faster technical assistance and facili-
of high fashion, high performance women’s tating strategic or joint development projects
clothing. With coal as our steady, economical and partnerships.
source of raw material, we were able to assure
Chico’s of a reliable supply of high quality
acetate yarn.
14 E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y

Brazilian cosmetic company Natura chose Eastman’s The Glass Polymer copolyester for several packaging
applications. “We always think of Eastman, not only because of its innovative materials, but also due to
the fact it is a company committed to help on the development of new projects, side by side with the
molder and with us. Eastman’s innovation, partnership spirit and support are what differentiate the
company from other resin producers.” – Renato Wakimoto, Packaging Development Manager, Natura
(Left to right): Scott Ballard,
Global Product Manager,
Coalescents & Specialty
Ketones; Andy Lu, Director,
Business and Commercial
Development, Asia Pacific
E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y 15

THE FACE OF CARING
Throughout our 86-year history, one constant has been our culture of caring. We live this value
every day by making sure our products and plants are safe, going to great lengths to protect the
environment and involving ourselves in our local communities.
W O R K I N G R E S P O N S I B LY As a Responsible from our foundation. Another is through the
Care® company, we use an industry-wide system generosity and volunteer efforts of our people.
to drive health, safety, environmental and secu- Their hearts and hands helped numerous
rity (HSES) performance. This helps us assess worthy causes in 2005, including:
our needs, set specific performance goals and
share our progress with the public. • Employees in Kingsport, Tenn., gave nearly
$2 million to the local United Way, and approx-
Many of our facilities were recognized for imately 600 employees volunteered during
their HSES achievements in 2005. Four manu- the agency’s Week of Caring.
facturing organizations were recognized for • In Zarate, Argentina, Eastman sponsored
improved energy efficiency, while 18 organiza- The Reading Room, a reading promotion
tions achieved “best ever” safety results. At program of “Fundación Leer,” in several
our Tennessee site, we converted our fleet of different schools throughout the area.
diesel equipment to use a biodiesel blend to • In Malaysia, employees received national
help reduce air pollution and our dependence recognition for their efforts to improve the
on foreign oil. performance of underprivileged students
on a nationalized test.
A G O O D N E I G H B O R Caring for others extends • In Singapore, employees organized a fundrais-
beyond our operational performance; we also ing fair at a children’s home for orphans to
want to be the neighbor of choice. One way we improve and upgrade the facility.
support our local communities is through grants
(Left to right): Eastman sponsored the
annual South Carolina Envirothon.
Employees in the Netherlands participated
in National Read a Story Day.
Eastman hosted a Health Fair for retirees,
active employees and their families.
In Texas, Eastman supported scholars at
Jarvis Christian College.
16 E A S T M A N C H E M I C A L C O M PA N Y

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark
One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
[X]
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
OR
[] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______________ to ______________
Commission file number 1-12626
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 62-1539359
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. employer
incorporation or organization) identification no.)
200 South Wilcox Drive
Kingsport, Tennessee 37660
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (423) 229-2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange on which registered
Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share New York Stock Exchange
(including rights to purchase shares of Common Stock or Participating Preferred Stock)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
____________________________________________________________________________________________
PAGE 1 OF 141 TOTAL SEQUENTIALLY NUMBERED PAGES
EXHIBIT INDEX ON PAGE 127
1

Yes No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the [X]
Securities Act.
Yes No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of [X]
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 [X]
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not [X]
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy
or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K.
Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the [X]
Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the [X]
Exchange Act).
The aggregate market value (based upon the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2005) of
the 81,373,319 shares of common equity held by nonaffiliates as of December 31, 2005 was approximately
$4,487,738,542 using beneficial ownership rules adopted pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, to exclude common stock that may be deemed beneficially owned as of December 31, 2005 by
the directors and executive officers and Eastman Chemical Company’s (“Eastman” or the “Company”) charitable
foundation, some of whom might not be held to be affiliates upon judicial determination. A total of 81,637,985
shares of common stock of the registrant were outstanding at December 31, 2005.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
\"2006 Proxy Statement\"), to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference in
Part III, Items 10 to 12 and 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the \"Annual Report\") as indicated herein.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Annual Report are forward-looking in nature as defined in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These statements, and other written and oral forward-looking statements made by the
Company from time to time, may relate to, among other things, such matters as planned and expected capacity
increases and utilization; anticipated capital spending; expected depreciation and amortization; environmental
matters; legal proceedings; exposure to, and effects of hedging of, raw material and energy costs and foreign
currencies; global and regional economic, political, and business conditions; competition; growth opportunities;
supply and demand, volume, price, cost, margin, and sales; earnings, cash flow, dividends, and other expected
financial conditions; expectations, strategies, and plans for individual assets and products, businesses, segments, and
divisions as well as for the whole of Eastman Chemical Company; cash requirements and uses of available cash;
financing plans; pension expenses and funding; credit ratings; anticipated restructuring, divestiture, and
consolidation activities; cost reduction and control efforts and targets; integration of acquired businesses;
development, production, commercialization, and acceptance of new products, services and technologies and related
costs; asset, business and product portfolio changes; and expected tax rates and net interest costs.
2

These plans and expectations are based upon certain underlying assumptions, including those mentioned with the
specific statements. Such assumptions are in turn based upon internal estimates and analyses of current market
conditions and trends, management plans and strategies, economic conditions, and other factors. These plans and
expectations and the assumptions underlying them are necessarily subject to risks and uncertainties inherent in
projecting future conditions and results. Actual results could differ materially from expectations expressed in the
forward-looking statements if one or more of the underlying assumptions and expectations proves to be inaccurate
or is unrealized. Certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements are included with such forward-looking statements and in Part II—Item 7—
\"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Forward-Looking
Statements and Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.\"
3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
PART I
1. Business 5
1A. Risk Factors 27
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 27
Executive Officers of the Company 28
2. Properties 30
3. Legal Proceedings 31
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 32
PART II
5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 33
6. Selected Financial Data 35
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations 36
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 69
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 70
9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure 121
9A. Controls and Procedures 121
9B. Other Information 121
PART III
10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 122
11. Executive Compensation 122
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters 122
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 123
14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 123
PART IV
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 124
SIGNATURES
Signatures 125
4

PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
CORPORATE OVERVIEW
History, Business, and Recent Results
Eastman Chemical Company (\"Eastman\" or the \"Company\") is a global chemical company which manufactures and
sells a broad portfolio of chemicals, plastics, and fibers. Eastman began business in 1920 for the purpose of
producing chemicals for Eastman Kodak Company's photographic business and became a public company,
incorporated in Delaware, as of December 31, 1993. Eastman has 17 manufacturing sites in 10 countries that supply
chemicals, plastics, and fibers products to customers throughout the world. The Company's headquarters and largest
manufacturing site are located in Kingsport, Tennessee.
In 2005, the Company had sales revenue of $7.1 billion, operating earnings of $757 million, and net earnings of
$557 million. Earnings per diluted share were $6.81 in 2005. Included in 2005 operating earnings were asset
impairments and restructuring charges of $33 million and other operating income of $2 million.
The Company’s products and operations are managed and reported in six operating segments aligned into three
divisions: Eastman, Voridian and Developing Businesses. Eastman Division consists of the Coatings, Adhesives,
Specialty Polymers, and Inks (“CASPI”) segment, the Performance Chemicals and Intermediates (“PCI”) segment
and the Specialty Plastics (“SP”) segment. Voridian Division consists of the Polymers segment and the Fibers
segment. Developing Businesses Division consists of the Developing Businesses (“DB”) segment. A segment is
determined primarily by the customer markets in which it sells its products and services. For additional information
related to the Company’s operating segments, see Note 21 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in
Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10K.
On March 6, 2006, the Company announced a realignment of its organizational structure and related senior
management assignments effective April 1, 2006. The new structure combines related assets and technologies to
facilitate growth in the Company's core businesses and take full advantage of new growth opportunities by focusing
on common technologies and streams. The new organization replaces the Eastman and Voridian divisions with the
Chemicals and Fibers Group and the Polyesters Group. The Chemicals and Fibers Group consists of CASPI, PCI,
and Fibers segments. The Polyesters Group consists of SP and Polymers segments.
Manufacturing Streams
Eastman's objective is to leverage its heritage of expertise and innovation in acetyl, polyester, and olefins
chemistries to drive growth, meet increasing demand and create new opportunities for the Company's products in
key markets including packaging, tobacco, durable goods, building and construction, and others. For each of these
chemistries, Eastman has developed a combination of assets and technologies that are operated within three
manufacturing 'streams'. In the acetyl stream, the Company begins with high sulfur coal which is then gasified in its
coal gasification facility. The resulting synthesis gas is converted into a number of chemicals including methanol,
methyl acetate, acetic acid and acetic anhydride. These chemicals are used in products throughout the Company
including acetate tow, acetate yarn and cellulose esters. The Company's ability to use coal is a competitive
advantage for raw materials and energy. The Company is investigating opportunities to further leverage its coal-
based process know-how in an effort referred to as \"chemicals from coal\". In the polyester stream, the Company
begins with purchased paraxylene and produces purified terephthalic acid (\"PTA\") and dimethyl terephthalate
(\"DMT\") which are the starting raw materials of most of its polyester competitors. PTA or DMT is then reacted
with ethylene glycol, which the Company both makes and purchases, along with other ingredients (some of which
the Company makes and are proprietary) to produce polyethylene terephthalate (\"PET\") and copolyesters. This
backward integration of its polyester manufacturing provides several competitive advantages. For PET, this allows
Eastman a cost advantage in a commodity market. For copolyester, Eastman adds a specialty monomer to provide
clear, tough, chemically resistant product characteristics. As a result, the Company's copolyesters can compete with
materials such as polycarbonate and acrylic. In the olefins stream, the Company begins primarily with propane and
ethane, which are then cracked at its facility in Longview, Texas into propylene and ethylene. The propylene is used
in oxo derivative products, while the ethylene is primarily used in polyethylene products.
5

The following chart shows markets and significant Eastman products by segment and manufacturing stream.
SEGMENTS ACETYL POLYESTER OLEFINS KEY PRODUCTS, MARKETS AND END
STREAM STREAM STREAM USES
Adhesives (tape, label, nonwovens), paint
and coatings (architectural, automotive,
CASPI industrial, and original equipment
X X
manufacturing \"OEM\")
Agrochemical, automotive, beverages,
nutrition, pharmaceuticals, coatings,
medical devices, toys, photographic and
PCI X X X
imaging, household products, polymers,
textiles, and consumer and industrials
Appliances, store fixtures and displays,
building and construction, electronic
packaging, medical devices and packaging,
personal care and cosmetics, performance
SP X X X
films, tape and labels, fibers/nonwovens,
photographic and optical film, graphic arts
and general packaging
Beverage and food packaging, custom-care
and cosmetic packaging, health care and
pharmaceutical uses, household products
Polymers and industrial packaging applications,
X X X
extrusion coating, film and molding
applications
Acetate tow, apparel, home furnishings, and
Fibers industrial applications
X
Cyclicality and Seasonality
Certain segments, particularly the PCI and Polymers segments, are impacted by the cyclicality of key products and
markets, while other segments are more sensitive to global economic conditions. Supply and demand dynamics
determine profitability at different stages of cycles and global economic conditions affect the length of each cycle.
Despite some sensitivity to global economic conditions, many of the products in the Fibers, CASPI and SP segments
provide a stable foundation of earnings.
The Company typically experiences seasonality in its earnings and cash flows. The Company's earnings are typically
higher in the second and third quarters, while cash from operations is stronger in the first and fourth quarters. Demand
for CASPI segment products is typically stronger in the second and third quarters due to increased use of coatings
products in the building and construction industries, while demand is weaker during the winter months because of
seasonal construction downturns. The PCI segment typically experiences a weaker fourth quarter, due in part to a
downturn in demand for products used in certain building and construction and agricultural markets. The Polymers
segment typically experiences stronger demand for PET polymers for beverage plastics during the second and early third
quarters due to higher consumption of beverages in the Northern hemisphere, while demand typically weakens during
the late third and fourth quarters.
6

EASTMAN DIVISION
Business and Industry Overview
Operating in a variety of markets with varying growth prospects and competitive factors, the segments in Eastman
Division manufacture a diverse portfolio of specialty and commodity chemicals and plastics that are used in a wide
range of consumer and industrial markets. Eastman Division has 13 manufacturing sites in 8 countries, selling more
than 1,650 products to more than 3,500 customers. Eastman Division is comprised of the CASPI, PCI, and SP
segments, which are more fully discussed below.
Strategy
The Company’s objectives for Eastman Division are to exploit growth opportunities in core businesses and improve
gross margins.
• Exploit Growth Opportunities in Core Businesses
Develop New Specialty Products and Expand into New Markets
The Company believes that it is a market leader based on sales in a number of Eastman Division’s product lines.
The Division is focused on growth through continued innovation and displacement of competitive products with
offerings that provide greater functionality or better value. This includes development of new products for
existing applications, and expansion into new applications with existing products.
Leverage Opportunities Created by the Broad Product Line
Eastman Division is able to offer a broad array of complementary products that customers would otherwise
need to obtain from multiple manufacturers. Its diverse portfolio and integrated manufacturing assets allow
Eastman Division to benefit from advancements and developments with respect to one product line by applying
them to other product lines. For example, efficiency is created through the operation of large integrated plants
that produce numerous products, which are used in, or sold by, multiple Eastman segments. This allows a
customer to place an order for multiple products, which may be produced by different segments, and have them
delivered from the same location, reducing costs and order time. Additionally, Eastman continues to leverage
the advantages of being an integrated polyester manufacturer. One opportunity identified is scaled
differentiation in the polyester stream, which is the potential for SP to utilize rationalized PET assets, as a result
of the new IntegRex facility, to reduce copolyester conversion cost. This would be expected to leverage the
synergies of the Polymers segment's advantaged cost structure and the SP segment's potential to expand quickly
into higher value growth markets.
Diversify Globally and Pursue Opportunities for Business Development
Eastman Division currently has in place and continues to pursue opportunities for joint ventures, equity
investments and other alliances. These strategic initiatives are expected to diversify and strengthen businesses
by providing access to new markets and high-growth areas as well as providing an efficient means of ensuring
that Eastman is involved in diverse technological innovations in or related to the chemicals industry. The
Company is committed to pursuing these initiatives in order to capitalize on new business concepts that
differentiate it from other chemical manufacturers and that will provide incremental growth beyond what is
organic to the chemicals industry and at lower capital investment. For example, Eastman is expanding its
manufacturing joint venture in Nanjing, China to meet the growing demand in Asia for hydrocarbon resins in
adhesives formulations. Additionally, Eastman is increasing copolyester intermediates capacity in order to meet
expected growth in global demand.
• Improve Gross Margins
Eastman Division continues to work to maximize the value of core businesses by improving gross margins through:
Enhancing pricing processes and strategies, and implementing pricing systems to improve responsiveness
to changes in operating costs and other factors impacting gross margins;
7

Institutionalizing cost reduction processes, including a Six Sigma quality improvement program aimed at
reducing costs, improving customer satisfaction, improving efficiency through reduction of variations and
defects, and focusing on business simplification and channels to market;
Implementing information technology solutions to maximize the Company’s enterprise resource planning
system used in production planning and other manufacturing processes to reduce safety stock, improve
responsiveness to demand forecasting, and increase manufacturing efficiency; and
Maintaining high utilization of manufacturing assets, particularly for intermediates and specialty polymers,
and pursuing high value debottlenecking opportunities and incremental expansions of current assets.
Related to the above activities, the Company continues to evaluate its portfolio of products and businesses in
Eastman Division, which could result in further restructuring, divestiture, or consolidation, particularly in the PCI
segment.
CASPI SEGMENT
• Overview
The CASPI segment manufactures liquid vehicles, additives, specialty polymers, and other raw materials which are
integral to the production of paints and coatings, inks, adhesives, and other formulated products. The CASPI
segment focuses on producing raw materials rather than finished products in order to develop long-term, strategic
relationships and achieve preferred supplier status with its customers. Growth in these markets in North America
and Europe typically approximates economic growth in general, due to the wide variety of end uses for these
applications and dependence on the economic conditions of the markets for durable goods, packaged goods,
automobiles, and housing. However, higher growth sub-markets exist within North America and Europe, driven by
customers' growing demands for performance requirements that are protective of the environment and meet
increasingly more stringent government regulation. For example, the coatings and adhesives industries are
promoting products and technologies designed to reduce air emissions. Growth in Asia and Latin America is
substantially higher than general economic growth, driven primarily by the increasing government regulations in
industrializing economies.
In 2005, the CASPI segment had sales revenue of $1.3 billion, which represented 18 percent of Eastman’s total sales
and 36 percent of Eastman Division’s total sales.
• Products
The CASPI segment's products consist of:
Coatings Additives and Solvents
The additives product lines consist of differentiated and proprietary products such as: cellulosic polymers,
which enhance the aesthetic appeal and improve the performance and metallic flake orientation of
industrial and automotive original equipment and refinish coatings and inks; Texanol™ ester alcohol,
which improves film formation and durability in architectural latex paints; and chlorinated polyolefins,
which promote the adherence of paints and coatings to plastic substrates. Solvents, which consist of ester,
ketone, glycol ether and alcohol solvents, are used in both paints and inks to maintain the formulation in
liquid form for ease of application. Environmental regulations that impose limits on the emission of
hazardous air pollutants continue to impact coatings formulations requiring compliant coatings raw
materials. Eastman’s coatings additives and solvents are currently used in compliant coatings. Additional
products are under development to meet the growing demand for waterborne (latex) and high solids
coatings that are more protective of the environment. Coatings additives and solvents comprised 59 percent
of the CASPI segment’s total sales for 2005.
8

Adhesives Raw Materials
The adhesives product line consists of hydrocarbon resins, rosin resins, resin dispersions, and polymer raw
materials. These products are sold to adhesive formulators and tape and label manufacturers for use as raw
materials in hot melt and pressure sensitive adhesives and as binders in nonwoven products (such as
disposable diapers, feminine products, and pre-saturated wipes). Eastman has a leadership position in
hydrogenated gum rosins used in adhesive and chewing gum applications. Eastman offers the broadest
product portfolio of raw materials for the adhesives industry, ranking as the second largest global tackifier
supplier. Adhesives raw materials comprised 41 percent of the CASPI segment’s total sales for 2005.
The profitability of CASPI products is sensitive to the global economy, exchange rates, and market trends and
broader chemical cycles, particularly the olefins cycle. CASPI's specialty products, which include coatings
additives, coalescents, and selected hydrocarbon resins, are less sensitive to the olefins cycle due to their functional
performance attributes. The cyclical commodity products, which include commodity solvents and polymer raw
materials, are impacted by the olefins cycle. The Company leverages its proprietary technologies, competitive cost
structure and integrated manufacturing facilities to maintain a strong competitive position throughout such cycles.
• Strategy
A key element of the CASPI segment growth strategy is the continued development of innovative product offerings,
building on proprietary technologies in high-growth markets and regions that meet customers’ evolving needs and
improve the quality and performance of customers’ end products. Eastman Division believes that its ability to
leverage its broad product line and research and development capabilities across this segment make it uniquely
capable of offering a broad array of solutions for new and emerging markets. CASPI is pursuing high value
incremental expansions of current manufacturing assets to ensure that adequate capacity is available to meet the
increasing demand for its differentiated products.
The CASPI segment is focused on the expansion of the coatings and inks additives and solvents product offerings
into other high-growth areas. These include market areas with growth due to specific market trends and product
developments, such as high solids and water-based coatings and inks, as well as growth in geographic areas due to
the level and timing of industrial development. The Company's global manufacturing presence positions it to take
advantage of areas of high industrial growth, particularly in Asia from its facility in Singapore and joint venture
operations in China.
The CASPI segment is also focused on the expansion of the adhesives raw materials product offerings into high-
growth markets and regions by leveraging applications technology and increasing production capacity. The segment
expects to take advantage of growth in demand for specialty hydrocarbon resins through the 25 percent expansion of
manufacturing operations in Middelburg, the Netherlands, and in the developing regions through the 30 percent
expansion of hydrocarbon resin production capacity at its joint venture operation in Nanjing, China. Additionally,
the CASPI segment has improved profitability within this group of product lines through cost reduction initiatives
and other projects that leverage best manufacturing practices, infrastructure, and business processes.
The Company intends to continue to leverage its resources to strengthen its CASPI innovation pipeline through
improved market connect and the expanded use of proprietary products and technologies. Although CASPI sales and
application development is often specialized by end-use market, developments in technology may be successfully
shared across multiple end-uses and markets.
9

• Customers and Markets
As a result of the variety of end uses for its products, the customer base in the CASPI segment is broad and diverse.
This segment has more than 1,500 customers around the world, and approximately 80 percent of its sales revenue in
2005 was attributable to approximately 100 customers. CASPI focuses on establishing long-term, customer service-
oriented relationships with its strategic customers in order to become their preferred supplier and to leverage these
relationships to pursue sales opportunities in previously underserved markets, as well as expand the scope of its
value-added services. However, from time to time, customers decide to develop products internally or diversify their
sources of supply that had been provided by Eastman. Growth in North American and European markets typically
coincide with economic growth in general, due to the wide variety of end uses for these applications and their
dependence on the economic conditions of the markets for durable goods, packaged goods, automobiles, and
housing.
• Competition
Competition within the CASPI segment's markets varies widely depending on the specific product or product group.
Because of the depth and breadth of its product offerings, Eastman does not believe that any one of its competitors
presently offers all of the products that it manufactures within the CASPI segment. However, many of the
Company’s competitors within portions of its CASPI segment are substantially larger companies, such as Dow
Chemical Company (“Dow”), BASF and Exxon Mobil Corporation, which have greater financial and other
resources than those of Eastman. Additionally, within each market in this segment, the Company competes with
other smaller, regionally focused companies that may have advantages based on location, local market knowledge,
manufacturing strength in a specific product, or other factors. At any time, any one or more of these competitors
could develop additional products that compete with, or that may make obsolete, some of Eastman’s current product
offerings.
Eastman does not believe that any of its competitors is dominant within the CASPI segment's markets. Further, the
Company attempts to maintain competitive advantages through its level of vertical integration, breadth of product
and technology offerings, low-cost manufacturing position, consistent product quality, and process and market
knowledge. In addition, Eastman attempts to leverage its strong customer base and long-standing customer
relationships to promote substantial recurring business, further strengthening its competitive position.
PCI SEGMENT
• Overview
The Company’s PCI segment manufactures diversified products that are sold externally, as well as used internally
by other segments. PCI's earnings are highly dependent on how the Company chooses to optimize the olefins
stream, and, to a lesser extent, the acetyls stream. In 2005, the PCI segment had external sales revenue of $1.6
billion, which represented 23 percent of Eastman’s total sales and 44 percent of Eastman Division's total sales.
Additionally, the PCI segment had interdivisional sales revenue for 2005 of $665 million.
• Products
The PCI segment offers over 150 products that include intermediates based on oxo and acetyl chemistries, and
performance and custom-manufactured chemicals. PCI segment's 2005 sales revenue was approximately 55 percent
olefin-based, 15 percent acetyl-based, 10 percent polymer-based, and 20 percent based on performance and custom
chemicals and other. Approximately 75 percent of PCI's sales revenue is generated in North America. Sales in all
regions are generated through a mix of the Company’s direct sales force and a network of distributors. The
Company's PCI segment is the largest marketer of acetic anhydride in the United States, an intermediate that is a
critical component of analgesics and other pharmaceutical and agricultural products, and is the only U.S. producer of
acetaldehyde, a key intermediate in the production of vitamins and other specialty products. Eastman manufactures
one of the broadest ranges of oxo aldehyde derivatives products in the world. The PCI segment’s other intermediate
products include plasticizers, glycols, and polymer intermediates. Many of the intermediate products in the PCI
segment are priced based on supply and demand of substitute and competing products. In order to maintain a
competitive position, the Company strives to operate with a low cost manufacturing base.
10

PCI also manufactures complex organic molecules such as diketene derivatives, specialty ketones, and specialty
anhydrides for fiber and food and beverage ingredients, which are typically used in specialty market applications.
PCI also engages in custom manufacturing where business is developed on a customer-by-customer basis. These
specialty and custom manufacturing products are typically priced based on the amount of value added rather than
supply and demand factors. PCI produces nonanoyloxybenzenesulfonate bleach activator (\"NOBS\") for a key
customer.
• Strategy
To build on and maintain its status as a low cost producer, PCI continuously focuses on cost control, operational
efficiency, and capacity utilization to maximize earnings. Through the PCI segment, the Company maximizes the
advantage of its highly integrated and world-scale manufacturing facilities. For example, the Kingsport, Tennessee
manufacturing facilities allow the PCI segment to produce acetic anhydride and other acetyl derivatives from coal
rather than natural gas or other petroleum feedstocks. Similarly, at the Longview, Texas facility, the PCI segment
utilizes propane and local ethane supplies along with Eastman's proprietary oxo-technology in the world’s largest
single-site, oxo aldehyde manufacturing facility to produce a wide range of alcohols, esters, and other derivative
products. These integrated facilities, combined with large scale production processes and a continuous focus on
additional process improvements, allow the PCI segment to remain cost competitive with, and for some products
cost-advantaged over, its competitors. A recent example of Eastman’s continuous pursuit of cost and productivity
improvement is the implementation of a successful cost reduction program within the acetyl production operations at
the Kingsport site. Benefits from this effort allow the PCI segment to take advantage of the Company's strategic
position within acetyl and related derivative markets.
The PCI segment selectively focuses on continuing to develop and access markets with high-growth potential for the
Company’s chemicals. The Company engages in customer focused research and development initiatives in order to
develop new products and find additional applications for existing products. In the future, the Company expects to
capitalize on such applications in the personal care and specialty solvents markets.
The Company continues to evaluate the various businesses and product lines within the PCI segment, which could
result in restructuring, divestiture, or consolidation to improve profitability.
• Customers and Markets
The PCI segment’s products are used in a variety of markets and end uses, including agrochemical, automotive,
beverages, nutrition, pharmaceuticals, coatings, flooring, medical devices, toys, photographic and imaging,
household products, polymers, textiles, and industrials. The markets for products with market-based pricing in the
PCI segment are cyclical. This cyclicality is caused by periods of supply and demand imbalance, either when
incremental capacity additions are not offset by corresponding increases in demand, or when demand exceeds
existing supply. Demand, in turn, is based on general economic conditions, raw material and energy prices,
consumer demand and other factors beyond the Company’s control. Eastman may be unable to increase or maintain
its level of PCI sales in periods of economic stagnation or downturn, and future PCI results may fluctuate from
period to period due to these economic conditions. The Company believes many of these markets are being
positively affected by the current olefins upcycle. However, product-specific olefin derivative markets display a
range of strength based upon prevailing supply/demand conditions.
An important trend within PCI's markets is a tendency toward increased regionalization of key markets, especially
acetyls and olefins, due to increased transportation costs. During 2005, the PCI segment entered into a long-term
arrangement with a Middle-Eastern company that will allow Eastman to leverage its proprietary acetyl technology to
obtain access to acetyl chemicals produced in the Middle East region. Additionally, the PCI segment is engaged in
continuous efforts directed toward optimizing product and customer mix. Approximately 80 percent of the PCI
segment’s sales revenue in 2005 was associated with 90 out of approximately 1,250 customers worldwide.
11

• Competition
Historically, there have been significant barriers to entry for competitors with respect to a majority of PCI's
products, primarily due to the fact that the relevant technology has been held by a small number of companies. As
this technology has become more readily available, competition from multinational chemical manufacturers has
intensified. Eastman competes with these and other producers primarily based on price, as products are
interchangeable, and, to a lesser extent, based on technology, marketing and other resources. Eastman’s major
competitors in this segment include large multinational companies such as Dow, Celanese Corporation, BASF, and
Exxon Mobil Corporation. While some of the Company’s competitors within the PCI segment have greater
financial resources than Eastman, which may better enable them to compete on price, the Company believes it
maintains a strong position due to the combination of its scale of operations, breadth of product line, level of
integration, and technology leadership.
SP SEGMENT
• Overview
The SP segment produces highly specialized copolyesters and cellulosic plastics that possess unique performance
properties for value-added end uses such as appliances, store fixtures and displays, building and construction,
electronic packaging, medical devices and packaging, personal care and cosmetics packaging, food and beverage
packaging, performance films, tape and labels, fibers/nonwovens, photographic and optical film, graphic arts and
general packaging. In 2005, the SP segment had sales revenue of $718 million, which represented approximately 10
percent of Eastman’s total sales and 20 percent of Eastman Division’s total sales.
The SP segment competes in the market for plastics that meet specific performance criteria, typically determined on
an application-by-application basis. Product development in the specialty plastics segment is dependent upon
Eastman’s ability to design plastics products that achieve performance characteristics specified by its customers,
while providing a better value proposition than alternative materials such as polycarbonate and acrylic. Increases in
market share are gained through the development of new applications, substitution of plastic for other materials, and
particularly, displacement of other plastic resins in existing applications. The SP segment produces polyesters,
specialty copolyesters, plastic sheeting, cellulose esters, and cellulosic plastics. The Company estimates that the
market growth for copolyesters, which has historically been high due to the relatively small market size, will
continue to be higher than general economic growth due to displacement opportunities. Eastman believes that the
cellulosic plastics markets growth will be flat or, at best, equal to the rate of growth of the economy in general.
Eastman’s specialty copolyesters, which generally are based on Eastman's market leading supply of cyclohexane
dimethanol (\"CHDM\") modified polymers, typically fill a market position between polycarbonates and acrylics.
Polycarbonates traditionally have had some superior performance characteristics, while acrylics have been less
expensive. Specialty copolyesters combine superior performance with competitive pricing and are being substituted
for both polycarbonates and acrylics based on their relative performance and pricing.
The SP segment also includes cellulosic plastics, which has historically been a steady business with strong operating
margins for the Company, and includes what Eastman believes is a market-leading position in North American
cellulose esters for tape and film products and cellulose plastics for molding applications.
Eastman has the ability within its SP segment to modify its polymers and plastics to control and customize their final
properties, creating numerous opportunities for new application development, including the expertise to develop
new materials and new applications starting from the molecular level in the research laboratory to the final designed
application in the customer’s plant. In addition, the SP segment has a long history of manufacturing excellence with
strong process improvement programs providing continuing cost reduction. Manufacturing process models and
information technology systems support global manufacturing sites and provide monitoring and information transfer
capability that speed up the innovation process.
12

• Products
The SP segment’s key products are:
Engineering and Specialty Polymers
Engineering and specialty polymers accounted for approximately 50 percent of the SP segment’s 2005 sales
revenue. These polymers include a broad line of polyesters, copolyesters, alloys, cellulose flake, and cellulosic
plastics that are sold to a diverse and highly fragmented customer base in numerous market segments on a
global basis. Approximately 45 percent of the revenues from engineering and specialty polymers are generated
in North America. Sales in all regions are generated through a mix of the Company’s direct sales force and a
network of distributors. Engineering and specialty polymers products are sold into three sectors: durable goods
(principally components used in appliances); medical goods (disposable medical devices, health care equipment
and instruments, and pharmaceutical packaging); and personal care and consumer goods (housewares,
cosmetics, eyewear, tools, toys, food and beverage packaging).
Engineering and specialty polymers products are heavily specification-driven. The Company works with OEM
companies to enable product designers to use polymers for a specified use in their products. Although the
average life cycle of many of these products is shrinking over time, the Company works to identify uses for the
polymers in products that will have multi-year lives. In working with OEM companies on new consumer
product designs, new polymer products are often developed for use in a particular type of end-use product.
Specialty Film and Sheet
Approximately 30 percent of the SP segment’s 2005 revenue resulted from sales of specialty film and sheet
products. The key end-use markets for specialty film and sheet are packaging, in-store fixtures and displays,
and building and construction. Direct customers are film and sheet producers, but marketing activities focus
downstream through designers, specifiers, OEMs and brand owners in targeted end-use markets.
In the packaging market, specialty film and sheet is sold to end-use markets including medical and electronic
component trays, shrink label films, general purpose packaging, and multilayer films. Copolyester use in these
markets is relatively mature with the exception of shrink label films. Competitive materials in these end-use
markets are typically PET polymers, acrylics, polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) and oriented polystyrene. Eastman’s
primary brands for these markets are Eastar and Embrace copolyesters.
In the display market, Spectar copolyester is marketed primarily for point of purchase displays including indoor
sign and store fixtures. Eastar copolyester is marketed into the graphics market. Copolyester use in these end-
use markets is expected to grow above display market rates as a result of new business growth. Competitive
materials in these end-use markets are polymethylmethacrylate (“PMMA”) and polycarbonate.
The building and construction end-use market continues to be a focus for growth in specialty film and sheet.
The Company is seeking a number of new opportunities within this market. The use of copolyester in this
market is expected to grow significantly above building and construction market rates due to current low
penetration of copolyester into targeted segments. Competitive materials for building and construction are
typically PMMA, polycarbonate, and glass.
13

Packaging, Film and Fiber
Packaging, film and fiber products, which represented approximately 20 percent of the SP segment’s 2005
revenue, include a range of specialty polymer products for markets such as photographic film, optical film,
fibers/nonwovens, and tapes/labels uses. Customers are typically manufacturers of film and fiber products,
employing a range of processing technologies, including film melt extrusion, solvent casting, and fiber
extrusion. These films and fibers products are further converted to produce value-added products, such as
photographic film, adhesive tape or nonwoven articles, which are sold as branded items. Products include
cellulose esters, copolyesters, specialty polyesters and concentrates/additives. Sales of products that are used as
raw materials in traditional photographic markets continue to be under pressure due to the conversion of
traditional photographic technology to digital imaging. SP has work underway in the liquid crystal displays
market to offset the impact of this conversion.
• Strategy
The SP segment is focused on delivering consistent gross margins and reinvesting for consistent growth. Over the
past two years, the SP segment has divested certain non-core businesses, shut-down certain non-integrated
manufacturing operations, and expanded certain integrated facilities. The Company continues to leverage the
advantages of being an integrated polyester manufacturer and will continue to pursue opportunities within the
integrated polyester stream. One such opportunity is scaled differentiation, which is the potential for SP to utilize
rationalized PET assets to reduce copolyester conversion costs and enhance its ability to market its products against
competitive materials. This opportunity is expected to capture the synergies of the Polymers segment's advantaged
cost structure and SP segment's ability to develop higher value markets. These synergies should enable SP to reduce
costs and expand production, increase the scale necessary to substitute for competitive materials, and focus on
targeted growth markets. The SP segment continues to pursue growth by investing in marketing, research and
development, and manufacturing to meet the needs of the global marketplace. For example, the segment is
completing a capital project to increase copolyester intermediates capacity in order to meet expected growth in
global demand.
Eastman has a broad portfolio of key monomers that can be combined in various ways to yield a range of polymers
with widely varying properties for different applications. Development of proprietary technology is currently
underway to enable the SP segment to produce a new family of products that would allow entry into applications
that have been beyond the reach of the current portfolio of copolyester products. This new technology is expected to
offer a combination of chemical and temperature resistance that should lend itself to a number of new applications
where these properties are important.
The Company competes in market niches requiring polymers with combinations of clarity, toughness, and chemical
resistance. The liquid crystal display market is a new focus of growth for SP. SP segment is investing in the
development of copolyester and cellulosic-plastic based product solutions for this high-growth market, with the
objective of becoming a strategic raw material supplier for liquid crystal display.
The SP segment develops product enhancements in order to respond to specific market needs, and expects this to
result in increased market penetration for existing products. Likewise, the introduction of new products will provide
access to previously underserved markets. In addition, the SP segment is focusing on global growth by investing
resources to provide product solutions to customers in previously underserved regional markets. The SP model of
innovation leverages a unique and growing portfolio of cellulosics and specialty copolyesters, such as Cadence, a
copolyester for calendared film applications, Embrace copolyester for shrink films, and Eastar and Durastar
copolyesters for cosmetic and household applications.
The Company is a major supplier of resins to the specialty film and sheet markets. With less than 10 percent of the
global specialty film and sheet end-use markets, substantial growth opportunities exist for Eastman. The growth
strategy is to penetrate new market segments or geographies and offer a substitute for other materials by providing
an improved value proposal or design flexibility that enhances the growth potential of the Company’s customers.
14

• Customers and Markets
The customer base in the SP segment is broad and diverse, consisting of over 700 companies worldwide in a variety
of industries. Approximately 80 percent of the SP segment’s 2005 revenue was attributable to approximately 70
customers. The SP segment seeks to develop mutually beneficial relationships with its customers throughout
various stages of product life cycles. By doing so, it is better able to understand its customers’ needs as those
customers develop new products, and more effectively bring new solutions to market.
• Competition
Competition in the SP segment varies as a function of where the products are in their life cycle. For example, the SP
segment's products in the introduction phase of the life cycle compete mainly on the basis of performance. As
products begin to advance in the life cycle, and substitute products come into existence, the basis of competition
begins to shift, taking into account factors such as price, customer service, and brand loyalty. At maturity, where one
or more competitors may have equivalent products in the market, competition is based primarily on price. Many
large, well-recognized manufacturers produce substitute products of different materials, some of which may offer
better performance characteristics than those of the Company's products, and others of which may be offered at a
lower price.
The SP segment has a full array of products moving across the life cycle as described above. For example, two
commonly used plastics materials in the heavy gauge sheet market are acrylic and polycarbonate. In general,
acrylics are lower in cost, while polycarbonates provide higher performance at a higher cost. Eastman’s products
capture portions of both markets. Customers of the SP segment can select from products that offer improved
performance over acrylics at a slightly higher cost, or products that are lower cost than polycarbonates while still
possessing excellent performance properties. In this way, the SP segment is able to meet the industry need for low-
cost, high performance plastics materials and maintain a significant advantage over its competitors. With regard to
engineering and specialty polymers products, the Company competes in market areas requiring polymers with
combinations of clarity, toughness, and chemical resistance. Eastman’s primary competitors for engineering and
specialty polymers are companies such as Bayer AG, Lanxess, Dow, GE Plastics, Nova and others, including
polycarbonate, acrylic and clear acrylonitrile butadiene styrene producers in regions outside North America.
Specialty film and sheet competitors also include polymer companies, such as GE Plastics, Bayer AG, Dow, Cyro,
Ineos, Atoglas, SK Chemical Industries, and Selenis, which sell copolyesters, polycarbonate, acrylic, and/or
polyvinyl chloride resins. Competition for packaging, film and fiber products is primarily from other producers of
polyester and producers of cellulose ester polymers such as Acetati SpA and Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd.
Competition with other polymers such as acrylic, PVC, polystyrene, polypropylene and polycarbonate is also
significant in several markets and applications. Channels to customers include corporate accounts, direct sales, e-
commerce, and distributors.
SP believes that it maintains competitive advantages over its competitors in the SP segment throughout the product
life cycle. At product introduction, the segment’s breadth of offerings combined with its research and development
capabilities and customer service orientation enable it to quickly bring a wide variety of products to market. As
products enter the growth phase of the life cycle, SP is able to continue to leverage its product breadth by receiving
revenues from multiple sources, as well as retaining customers from long-term relationships. As products become
price sensitive, SP can take advantage of Eastman's scale of operations and vertical integration to maintain superior
product conversion cost position.
SP believes it has competitive advantages in copolyester and cellulose ester plastics. However, new competitors
have begun selling copolyester products in the past few years. These new competitors cannot yet produce the wide
variety of specialty copolyesters offered by SP or offer the same level of technical assistance. Additionally, SP is
committed to increasing the utilization of current capacity and maintaining the cost advantages obtained from its
scale of operations and manufacturing expertise. There can be no assurance, however, that the SP segment will be
able to maintain this competitive advantage and if it is unable to do so, its results of operations could be adversely
affected.
15

EASTMAN DIVISION GENERAL INFORMATION
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
The Company markets Eastman Division products primarily through a global sales organization, which has a
presence in the United States and in over 35 other countries around the world. Eastman Division has a number of
broad product lines which require a sales and marketing strategy that is tailored to specific customers in order to
deliver high quality products and high levels of service to all of its customers worldwide. Technical expertise and
process knowledge are critical in determining the application of Eastman Division’s products for a particular
customer. Through a highly skilled and specialized sales force that is capable of providing customized business
solutions for each of its three operating segments, Eastman Division is able to establish long-term customer
relationships and strives to become the preferred supplier of specialty chemicals and plastics.
Eastman Division’s products are marketed through a variety of selling channels, with the majority of sales being direct
and the balance sold primarily through indirect channels such as distributors. Non-U.S. sales tend to be made more
frequently through distributors than U.S. sales. Eastman Division's customers throughout the world have the choice of
obtaining products and services through Eastman's website, www.eastman.com, through any of its global customer
service centers, or through any of Eastman's direct sales force or independent distributors. Customers who choose to use
the Company’s website can conduct a wide range of business transactions such as ordering online, accessing account and
order status, and obtaining product and technical data. Eastman is an industry leader in the implementation and
utilization of e-business technology for marketing and selling products to customers and was one of the first chemical
companies to offer this capability. Eastman views this as an opportunity to increase supply chain efficiency by having an
enterprise resource-planning platform with connectivity to customers. These sales and marketing capabilities combine to
reduce costs and provide a platform for growth opportunities for the Company by providing potential customers new
methods to access Eastman’s products.
Eastman Division’s products are shipped to customers directly from Eastman's manufacturing plants as well as from
distribution centers worldwide, with the method of shipment generally determined by the customer.
Intellectual Property and Trademarks
The Company considers its Eastman Division-related intellectual property portfolio to be a valuable corporate asset
which it expands and vigorously protects globally through a combination of patents that expire at various times,
trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. The Company’s primary strategy regarding its Eastman Division-related
intellectual property portfolio is to protect all innovations that provide its segments with a significant competitive
advantage. The Company also derives value from its intellectual property by licensing and selling patents and
expertise worldwide. In addition, when appropriate, the Company licenses technology from third parties that
complements Eastman Division’s strategic business objectives. Neither Eastman Division’s business as a whole nor
any particular segment is materially dependent upon any one particular patent, trademark, copyright, or trade secret.
As a producer of a broad and diverse portfolio of chemicals and plastics, Eastman Division’s intellectual property
and trademarks relate to a wide variety of products and processes. As the laws of many foreign countries do not
protect intellectual property to the same extent as the laws of the United States, Eastman Division cannot assure that
it will be able to adequately protect all of its intellectual property assets.
Research and Development
Eastman Division devotes significant resources to its research and development programs, which are primarily
targeted towards two objectives:
• developing new products, processes, and markets through applications research; and
• improving existing products and processes to lower costs, improve product quality, and reduce potential
environmental impact.
16

Eastman Division's research and development efforts match technology strengths with the streams and market needs
to develop new products and improve existing products. In 2005, Eastman opened a new laboratory in Shanghai to
support the development of new coatings formulations and performance-enhancing applications for North Asia-
based customers. Material Difference, a new material sampling strategy for Tenite cellulosics, a versatile, durable,
and attractive cellulosic plastic, was launched in 2005. In addition, Eastman Division's research and development
efforts have resulted in development of products such as: The Glass Polymer, a copolyester product line for
cosmetic packaging that offers a unique combination of toughness, aesthetic appeal, and chemical resistance;
Tacolyn 3509, a low surface tension resin dispersion for use in waterborne adhesives for tapes and labels; and
Cadence copolyester, an environmentally superior, halogen-free alternative to many other resins used in the film
calendaring industry meeting a major objective of providing smarter and greener solutions.
VORIDIAN DIVISION
Business and Industry Overview
The Voridian Division consists of the Polymers segment and the Fibers segment. The Polymers segment contains
two principal product lines, PET and polyethylene (“PE”). The PET product line is large, global in scope and has
the largest capacity share of all competitors in the polyesters for packaging industry. The PE product line is
primarily North American in scope and has a relatively small market share. The Fibers segment is made up of
acetate tow, acetate yarn, and acetyl chemical products. Voridian is one of the two largest worldwide producers of
acetate tow and the largest producer of acetate yarn. Globally positioned to serve its growing markets, Voridian has
eight manufacturing plants in six countries, as well as access to PET production through two contract manufacturing
arrangements in Asia that are currently inactive.
Strategy
Voridian Division participates in price sensitive markets where product performance is a requirement for
involvement and low cost is the primary driver for success. As a result, the division’s strategic goals focus on
maintaining quality products, operational excellence, and its global position as an efficient producer of polymers and
fibers. The key elements of this strategy include:
• Operational Efficiency
Voridian Division is a global leader in market share in two of its major product markets and expects to continue
to leverage its product knowledge, experience, and scale to further reduce production costs and increase output.
Because the Company is a highly integrated major PET producer and one of only a few integrated acetate fiber
producers, Voridian intends to develop further efficiencies to enhance its cost position.
• Capital Efficiency
Voridian Division seeks to expand its production capabilities in a capital-efficient manner. Efforts will include:
maximizing capacity utilization at existing manufacturing facilities; reducing bottlenecks at those facilities;
asset expansions utilizing IntegRex technologies, which are expected to allow greater production in less space;
and smart growth through participation in strategic manufacturing alliances and contract manufacturing or toll
arrangements.
• Superior Process Technology
Voridian Division has a demonstrated expertise in developing and implementing improved process
technologies. Through efficient use of research and development, Voridian intends to continue that trend and to
develop increasingly efficient technologies with the goal of lowering manufacturing costs and improving
operating margins. In March 2005, the Company began construction in Columbia, South Carolina of the first
manufacturing facility utilizing IntegRex technology, a breakthrough technology for the manufacture of PET
resin. This technology is expected to enhance the cost position and overall efficiency of the PET manufacturing
process, allowing Voridian to meet future market demand with the most advanced manufacturing facilities in
the world.
17

• Quality and Innovation
Voridian Division’s product quality and innovation make it a recognized industry leader in the markets in which
it participates. Through the efficient use of research and development, Voridian expects to continue to develop
and commercialize new products and processes where customer needs and consumer preference offer improved
returns or increased market share.
POLYMERS SEGMENT
• Overview
In 2005, the Polymers segment had revenues of $2.5 billion, which represented 36 percent of the Company’s total
sales and 74 percent of Voridian’s total sales. The segment consists of two principal product lines, PET and PE.
Both the PET and PE product lines compete to a large degree on price. Both can also be characterized as capital
intensive. Success in each is impacted by attaining low cost positions through technology innovation,
manufacturing scale, capacity utilization, access to reliable and competitive utilities, energy and raw materials,
efficient manufacturing processes and efficient distribution.
PET production is vertically integrated back to the raw material paraxylene for a substantial majority of its capacity.
The Polymers segment's PET product line for the packaging market is the world’s largest based on capacity share; is
the most global based on manufacturing sites; and is the broadest based on formula diversity. PET is used in a wide
variety of packaging products including for carbonated soft drinks, water, juice, personal care items, household
cleaners, beer and food containers. The Polymers segment has PET manufacturing sites in the United States,
Mexico, Argentina, Great Britain, Spain, and the Netherlands. In addition, the Polymers segment has access to PET
production through contract manufacturing arrangements at two sites in Asia. The Polymers segment competes
primarily in North America, Latin America, and Europe. The PE product lines are manufactured entirely in the
United States and have a relatively small market share.
• Products
PET
PET is used in beverage and food packaging and other applications such as custom-care and cosmetics
packaging, health care and pharmaceutical uses, household products and industrial packaging applications. PET
offers fast and easy processing, and the packaging characteristics are: superb clarity, excellent colorability and
color consistency, durability and strength, impact and chemical resistance, and high heat stability. Packages
made from PET are characterized by their light weight, high strength, durability, clarity, low cost, safety, and
recyclability. PET accounted for 80 percent of the revenue in the Polymers segment.
PE
The Polymers segment also offers a PE product line manufactured in the United States including low density
polyethylene (\"LDPE\") and linear low density polyethylene (“LLDPE”). The LLDPE products are produced
using the Company’s proprietary Energx manufacturing technology for gas-phase polyethylene production.
Polymers' PE products are used primarily for extrusion coating, film, and molding applications. The LDPE and
LLDPE product lines accounted for approximately 20 percent of the Polymers segment’s sales revenue in 2005.
• Strategy
Growth
The Polymers segment intends to capitalize on the growth in the PET industry with timely and efficient capacity
additions including debottlenecking existing production processes, asset expansions, new assets, contract-
manufacturing arrangements, and manufacturing alliances. This growth strategy will rely on continuous
process technology improvements from the efficient use of research and development, as well as the
rationalization of smaller scale PET assets, which could be redirected to manufacturing copolyester products.
18

Capitalizing on the Company’s new IntegRex technology, in March 2005 the Company began construction of a
new 350-thousand-metric-ton expansion at its PET polymers site in Columbia, South Carolina. The new
facility is expected to be fully operational in the fourth quarter of 2006 and at full capacity in time for the peak
2007 demand season. Because this new facility is expected to have the lowest cost of manufacturing of all
North American PET producers, volume growth from this facility is not expected to be impacted by Asian PET
polymer imports into the region. The Company is also evaluating an option for another IntegRex facility in
North America.
Innovation
The Polymers segment expects to continue to provide customers with innovative new products and incremental
improvements in existing products. Voridian currently maintains the industry’s broadest product offering for
PET polymers including: Voridian Aqua polymer for the water bottle market, Heatwave polymer for hotfill
markets, Versatray polymer for the dual ovenable tray market and Vitiva polymer for ultraviolet light sensitive
applications.
• Customers and Markets
The largest 54 customers within the Polymers segment accounted for more than 80 percent of the segment’s total
sales revenue in 2005. These customers are primarily PET container suppliers to large volume beverage markets
such as carbonated soft drinks, water, and juice, with strong participation in custom areas such as food, liquor, sport
and fruit beverages, health and beauty aids, and household products. In 2005, the worldwide market for PET,
including containers, film and sheet, was approximately 11 million metric tons. Demand for PET has grown briskly
over the past several years, driven by its popularity as a substitute for glass and aluminum. PET has already made
significant inroads in soft drink and water bottles, and producers are currently targeting markets such as hot-fill
soups and sauces and containers for beer. Industry analysts report that PET consumption grew worldwide from 1.0
million metric tons in 1989 to approximately 11 million metric tons in 2005, a compound annual growth rate of 15
percent. Global demand for PET is expected to grow approximately 6-8 percent annually over the next several years.
In the LDPE product line, Voridian is a significant producer of materials used in extrusion coating applications and
is one of only two North American producers of acrylate copolymers. In the LLDPE market, Voridian employs its
proprietary Energx technology to produce products that compete in higher strength film and packaging markets.
• Competition
Major competitors for the Polymers segment include DAK Americas, Equipolymers, Far Eastern Textiles Ltd.,
Invista, M&G, Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, Reliance Industries Ltd., Wellman Inc., Dow Chemical Company,
ExxonMobil Corporation, Equistar Chemical Company, Nova Chemicals Corporation, Westlake Chemical
Corporation, and Huntsman Corporation.
PET
The strong growth in demand for PET, coupled with ease of access to conventional manufacturing technology,
has resulted in the presence of over 100 significant resin producers in this market in 2005, up from fewer than
20 in 1995. The Polymers segment is a global competitor with manufacturing sites in North America, Latin
America and Western Europe, as well as the aforementioned contract manufacturing arrangements in Asia. The
level of competition, however, varies by region. Competition is primarily on the basis of price with product
performance, quality, service, and reliability also being requirements for participation.
Industry pricing is strongly affected by raw material costs and capacity utilization. PET global supply has
exceeded demand since 1997 as a result of capacity being introduced into the market at a rate exceeding that of
demand growth. While the demand for PET continues to increase steadily, excess capacity, primarily in Asia,
remains. Excess Asian capacity is expected to continue to have an adverse impact on PET pricing worldwide.
19

PE
The Polymers segment is a niche polyethylene producer due to its size and ability to target specific markets.
Competitive advantage in these markets is achieved through operating efficiencies and new product offerings.
Some polyethylene producers are substantially larger than the Polymers segment, and have greater market
presence and resources devoted to polyethylene. This may allow them, or other competitors, to price competing
products at lower levels, or devote substantial resources to product development.
FIBERS SEGMENT
• Overview
The Fibers segment manufactures Estron acetate tow and Estrobond triacetin plasticizers, which are used primarily
in cigarette filters; Estron natural and Chromspun solution dyed acetate yarns for use in apparel, home furnishings
and industrial fabrics; and acetate flake and acetyl raw materials for other acetate fiber producers. The Fibers
segment is one of the world’s two largest suppliers of acetate tow and has been a market leader in the manufacture
and sale of acetate tow since it began producing the product in the early 1950s. The Fibers segment is the world’s
largest producer of acetate yarn. In 2005, the Fibers segment had sales revenue of approximately $869 million,
which represented 12 percent of the Company’s total sales and 26 percent of Voridian’s total sales.
The Fibers segment’s long history and experience in the fibers markets are reflected in its operating expertise, both
within the Company and in support of its customers’ processes. The Fibers segment’s expertise in internal operating
processes allows it to achieve a consistently high level of product quality, a differentiating factor in the industry.
Further, the segment’s fully integrated facilities from coal-based acetyl raw materials through acetate tow and yarn
allow a reduction in dependence on petrochemicals from third parties. Also, the Fibers segment employs the only
continuous flake manufacturing process that can use multiple sources of pulp as raw material. As a result, the
segment has qualified all major, high purity, pulp suppliers that make pulp suitable for acetate fibers. The Fibers
segment is confident that it has one of the most secure pulp supply positions despite the continuing consolidation of
the pulp industry. The Fibers' segment management believes that all of these factors combine to make it a leader in
performance, reliability of supply, and cost position.
The Fibers segment's high-quality products, technical expertise, and superior customer service are its key
competitive strengths. The Fibers segment’s industry knowledge and knowledge of customers’ processes allow it to
assist its customers in maximizing their processing efficiencies, promoting repeat sales and mutually beneficial,
long-term customer relationships. The segment’s scale, strong customer base, long-standing customer relationships,
and expert technical service contribute to its market-leading position. The Fibers segment's goal is to build on these
strengths to improve its strategic position.
• Products
Voridian’s main products in the Fibers segment are acetate tow, acetate yarn, and acetyl chemical products.
Acetate Tow
The Fibers segment manufactures acetate tow according to customer specifications for use in the manufacture
of cigarette filters. World-wide demand for acetate tow is expected to increase by approximately 3 percent per
year through 2010.
Acetate Yarn
The Fibers segment is the market leader producing both Estron and Chromspun acetate yarns. These products
are used in fabrics for apparel, home furnishings, and industrial applications. The Fibers segment's acetate
yarns have excellent textile mill processability that provide high textile mill efficiency. From a retail
customer’s perspective, garments containing acetate yarns have rich colors, silky feel, supple drape,
breathability, and comfort. Chromspun acetate yarn is available in more than 20 colors.
Acetyl Chemical Products
Acetyl chemicals products sold primarily to other acetate fiber producers include acetate flake, acetylation-
grade acetic acid, and acetic anhydride. In addition, The Fibers segment manufactures triacetin plasticizers for
use by cigarette manufacturers as a bonding agent in cigarette filters.
20

• Strategy
Voridian’s strategy in the Fibers segment is as follows:
Position for Growth
In the Fibers segment, Voridian focuses on high quality products, excellent customer service, operational
efficiencies, and potential alliances to take advantage of global market growth.
The Company is considering the expansion of its acetate tow capacity in Europe with a target date of 2008. The
expansion site would be located in a European Union (\"EU\") country to better serve existing customers in
Western Europe and the growing demand from Eastern Europe. Due to the recent addition of 10 countries, the
EU now includes many member countries in Eastern Europe where the demand for filter tow is growing. The
acetate flake raw material for the capacity expansion would be sourced from existing flake capacity in
Kingsport, Tennessee.
The Company is also considering the construction of a new 25-30 KMT per year acetate tow plant in Asia, a
major growth region, with a target date of 2009. This capacity would be approximately 5 percent of current
global capacity and would be expected to be rapidly utilized due to its location in a major growth region. The
Company would likely supply acetate flake raw material for this expansion from its Kingsport site.
The Fibers segment is increasing acetate yarn capacity by approximately 5 percent with this expansion to be on-
stream by mid 2006.
Continue to Capitalize on Expertise
The Fibers segment emphasizes incremental product and process improvements to continue to meet customers’
evolving needs and to maximize efficiencies in the supply chain through collaborative planning. The Fibers
segment intends further to focus on refining its processes to lower manufacturing costs and provide additional
product quality and operations improvements.
Maintain Cost-Effective Operations and Consistent Cash Flows
The Fibers segment expects to continue to operate in a cost effective manner, capitalizing on its scale and
vertical integration, and intends to make further productivity and efficiency improvements through continued
investments in research and development. The Company plans to reinvest in the Fibers business to continue to
improve product performance and productivity in order to generate consistently strong earnings and cash flows.
• Customers and Markets
The customer base in the Fibers segment is relatively concentrated, consisting of approximately 190 companies,
primarily those involved in the production of cigarettes and in the textiles industry. The largest 20 customers within
the Fibers segment include multinational as well as regional cigarette producers, textile industry fabric
manufacturers and acetate fiber producers. These largest customers accounted for greater than 80 percent of the
segment’s total sales revenue in 2005.
The Fibers segment engages in collaborative planning with its customers to maximize supply chain management.
These customer-focused efforts, combined with Fibers' long history and product quality reputation, have resulted in
many long-term customer relationships, a key competitive advantage.
The Fibers segment is well known for its expert technical service, which provides its customers with regular reviews
of their processes and provides process training to some of its customers' employees to assist them in the efficient
use of Fibers’ products.
21

• Competition
Competitors in the fibers market for acetate tow include one global competitor, Celanese Corporation; three multi-
regional competitors; and two regional companies. For acetate yarn, major competitors include two companies that
target multi-regional markets and several regional players.
In the acetate tow market, two major competitors have joint venture capacity in China, and one of these competitors
completed an expansion of its joint venture facilities in 2005. Another competitor has announced plans for
expanding capacity to be completed in 2006. Increased local production in China may diminish access to this
market by Eastman and other competitors over time. However, current global capacity utilization rates are expected
to remain high given the world-wide growth rate in demand and the industry structure changes that occurred in 2005
when a major competitor closed a North American acetate tow production facility.
In 2005, a major competitor exited the acetate filament yarn market. As a direct result, the Company became the
world leader in acetate yarn production, the only acetate yarn producer vertically integrated in acetate flake
production, and the only acetate yarn producer in North America. The yarn market tightened significantly as the
competitor's yarn inventory was consumed in the world marketplace, and world prices for acetate yarn increased to
profitable levels during late 2005. The Fibers segment is well positioned to serve this market due to an in depth
knowledge of end use markets; careful selection of a balanced portfolio of markets, customers, and products; and a
highly integrated, large scale manufacturing operation.
VORIDIAN DIVISION GENERAL INFORMATION
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
Voridian primarily markets its products through direct sales channels; however, it employs contract representatives
and resellers where beneficial. As part of its commitment to customer and technical service which leads to increased
repeat sales, Voridian periodically provides audits of customers’ processes, as well as process training to some of its
customers' employees. Voridian is committed to maintaining its high level of customer service by remaining current
with customer needs, market trends, and performance requirements.
Through the use of e-business platforms that improve connectivity and reduce costs, Voridian offers its customers an
internet option, www.voridian.com, for placing and tracking orders and generating reports. Voridian also provides
integrated direct capabilities to customers, allowing enhanced collaborative planning to improve supply chain
efficiencies.
Intellectual Property and Trademarks
The Company believes that significant advantages can be obtained through its continued focus on branding its
products and, for this reason, considers its Voridian Division-related intellectual property portfolio to be a valuable
corporate asset which it expands and vigorously protects globally through a combination of patents that expire at
various times, trademarks, licenses, copyrights, and trade secrets. The Company expects to expand its portfolio of
technologies licensed to other companies in the future. To date, the Company has selectively licensed a limited
portfolio of patented polyester intermediates and polyethylene technologies. Voridian Division’s intellectual
property portfolio is an important asset. However, neither its business as a whole nor any particular segment is
materially dependent upon any one particular patent, trademark, copyright, or trade secret. As the laws of many
foreign countries do not protect intellectual property to the same extent as the laws of the United States, Voridian
Division cannot assure that it will be able to adequately protect its intellectual property assets.
22

Research and Development
Polymers Segment
Voridian directs its research and development programs for the Polymers segment toward three key objectives:
• Lowering manufacturing costs through process technology innovations and process improvement efforts;
• Developing new products and services in PET polymers that both meet customers' fitness for use
requirements and are protective of the environment through applications research and customer feedback;
and
• Εnhancing product quality by improvement in manufacturing technology and processes.
Voridian’s research and development efforts in the Polymers segment have resulted in significant improvements
in manufacturing process efficiencies and are continuing to yield sustainable competitive advantage. In 2004,
over two years of significant, concentrated research and development efforts resulted in the announcement of
IntegRex technology, a breakthrough innovation in the integrated manufacturing of paraxylene to PET resin,
specifically designed for packaging applications. In 2005, research and development efforts further enhanced
IntegRex technology in parallel with commencement of construction of the first IntegRex manufacturing facility
in Columbia, South Carolina. In September 2005, the Company announced it was evaluating a second world-
class facility in North America utilizing these further refinements to IntegRex technology.
Fibers Segment
Research and development efforts for the Fibers segment are primarily focused on incremental process and
product improvements, as well as cost reduction, with the objectives of increasing sales and reducing costs.
Recent achievements have included fiber product advancements that allow improved processability on
customers’ equipment and improved packaging design. The Fibers segment also engages in research to assist
acetate tow customers in the cigarette industry in the effective use of Voridian products and in the customers’
own filter product development efforts.
DEVELOPING BUSINESSES DIVISION
Developing Businesses Segment
The DB segment includes new businesses that leverage the Company’s technology expertise, intellectual property,
and know-how into business models that extend to new customers and markets, and is an extension of the corporate
research and development function. The DB segment expands on the Company’s core business of chemicals,
plastics, and fibers manufacturing to develop growth platforms that allow it to take advantage of its technological
capabilities and operational skills. It uses a disciplined stage gating process in evaluating projects to weigh expected
returns against investment levels at various stages of development. Those that meet the initial requirements go on to
the next stage where a cross-functional team of experts from marketing, technology, business, and finance determine
if there is a compelling business plan and a viable means for capturing value from it.
The segment includes early stage businesses, including Eastman’s Gasification Services and Centrus Corporation
(\"Centrus\"), a food safety diagnostics business, which was sold in February 2006. The business operations of the
Company's logistics subsidiary, Cendian Corporation (\"Cendian\"), were discontinued during 2005, and the logistics
services being performed for Eastman by Cendian were fully integrated back into Eastman in April 2005.
23

EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY GENERAL INFORMATION
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials and Energy
Eastman purchases a substantial portion, estimated to be approximately 75 percent, of its key raw materials and
energy through long-term contracts, generally of three to five years initial duration with renewal or cancellation
options for each party. Most of those agreements do not require the Company to purchase materials or energy if its
operations are reduced or idle. The cost of raw materials and energy is generally based on market price at the time of
purchase, although derivative financial instruments, valued at quoted market prices, have been utilized to mitigate
the impact of short-term market price fluctuations. Key raw materials and purchased energy include propane, ethane,
paraxylene, ethylene glycol, PTA, natural gas, coal, cellulose, methanol, electricity, and a wide variety of precursors
for specialty organic chemicals. The Company has multiple suppliers for most key raw materials and energy and
uses quality management principles, such as the establishment of long-term relationships with suppliers and on-
going performance assessment and benchmarking, as part of the supplier selection process. When appropriate, the
Company purchases raw materials from a single source supplier to maximize quality and cost improvements, and
has developed contingency plans that would minimize the impact of any supply disruptions from single source
suppliers.
While temporary shortages of raw materials and energy may occasionally occur, these items are generally
sufficiently available to cover current and projected requirements. However, their continuous availability and price
are subject to unscheduled plant interruptions occurring during periods of high demand, or due to domestic or world
market and political conditions, changes in government regulation, natural disasters, war or other outbreak of
hostilities. Eastman’s operations or products have in the past and may in the future, at times, be adversely affected
by these factors. The Company’s cost of raw materials and energy as a percent of total cost of operations was
estimated to be approximately 65 percent for 2005, compared with 55 percent in 2004 and 50 percent in 2003.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures were $343 million, $248 million, and $230 million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The
Company expects that 2006 capital spending will be up to $450 million which will exceed estimated 2006
depreciation and amortization of approximately $300 million as it funds targeted growth efforts.
Employees
Eastman employs approximately 12,000 men and women worldwide. Approximately 6 percent of the total
worldwide labor force is represented by unions, mostly outside the United States.
Customers
Eastman has an extensive customer base and, while it is not dependent on any one customer, loss of certain top
customers could adversely affect the Company until such business is replaced. The top 100 customers accounted for
approximately 60 percent of the Company's 2005 sales revenue.
Intellectual Property and Trademarks
While the Company’s intellectual property portfolio is an important Company asset which it expands and vigorously
protects globally through a combination of patents that expire at various times, trademarks, copyrights, and trade
secrets, neither its business as a whole nor any particular segment is materially dependent upon any one particular
patent, trademark, copyright, or trade secret. As a producer of a broad and diverse portfolio of both specialty and
commodity chemicals, plastics, and fibers, Eastman owns over 900 active United States patents and more than 900
active foreign patents, expiring at various times over several years, and also owns over 3,000 active worldwide
trademarks. The Company’s intellectual property relates to a wide variety of products and processes. As the laws of
many foreign countries do not protect intellectual property to the same extent as the laws of the United States,
Eastman cannot assure that it will be able to adequately protect its intellectual property assets.
24

Research and Development
For 2005, 2004 and 2003, Eastman’s research and development expenses totaled $162 million, $154 million and
$173 million, respectively. Research and development expenses are expected to increase slightly in 2006 as the
Company will continue to increase its technology efforts associated with new products and process technologies.
Environmental
Eastman is subject to laws, regulations, and legal requirements relating to the use, storage, handling, generation,
transportation, emission, discharge, disposal and remediation of, and exposure to, hazardous and non-hazardous
substances and wastes in all of the countries in which it does business. These health, safety and environmental
considerations are a priority in the Company’s planning for all existing and new products and processes. The Health,
Safety, Environmental and Security Committee of Eastman’s Board of Directors reviews the Company's policies
and practices concerning health, safety and the environment and its processes for complying with related laws and
regulations, and monitors related matters.
The Company’s policy is to operate its plants and facilities in a manner that protects the environment and the health
and safety of its employees and the public. The Company intends to continue to make expenditures for
environmental protection and improvements in a timely manner consistent with its policies and with the technology
available. In some cases, applicable environmental regulations such as those adopted under the U.S. Clean Air Act
and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and related actions of regulatory agencies, determine the timing and
amount of environmental costs incurred by the Company.
The Company accrues environmental costs when it is probable that the Company has incurred a liability and the
amount can be reasonably estimated. In some instances, the amount cannot be reasonably estimated due to
insufficient data, particularly in the nature and timing of the future performance. In these cases, the liability is
monitored until such time that sufficient data exists. With respect to a contaminated site, the amount accrued
reflects the Company’s assumptions about remedial requirements at the site, the nature of the remedy, the outcome
of discussions with regulatory agencies and other potentially responsible parties at multi-party sites, and the number
and financial viability of other potentially responsible parties. Changes in the estimates on which the accruals are
based, unanticipated government enforcement action, or changes in health, safety, environmental, chemical control
regulations, and testing requirements could result in higher or lower costs.
The Company's cash expenditures related to environmental protection and improvement were estimated to be
approximately $198 million, $184 million and $187 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These amounts
pertain primarily to operating costs associated with environmental protection equipment and facilities, but also
include expenditures for construction and development. The Company does not expect future environmental capital
expenditures arising from requirements of recently promulgated environmental laws and regulations to materially
increase the Company's planned level of annual capital expenditures for environmental control facilities.
Other matters pertaining to health, safety, and the environment are discussed in Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes 1 and 12 to the Company’s consolidated
financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Backlog
On January 1, 2006, Eastman’s backlog of firm sales orders was estimated to be approximately $295 million
compared with approximately $306 million at January 1, 2005. All orders are expected to be filled in 2006. The
Company manages its inventory levels to control the backlog of products depending on customers' needs. In areas
where the Company is the single source of supply, or competitive forces or customers' needs dictate, the Company
may carry additional inventory to meet customer requirements.
Financial Information About Geographic Areas
For information about revenues and long-lived assets based on geographic areas, see Note 21 to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
25

Available Information – SEC Filings and Corporate Governance Materials
The Company makes available free of charge, through the “Investors – SEC Filings” section of its Internet website
(www.eastman.com), its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-
K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with, or furnishing it to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Once filed with the SEC, such documents may be read and/or
copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the
SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers, including Eastman Chemical Company, that electronically file with the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
The Company also makes available free of charge, through the “Investors – Corporate Governance” section of its
internet website (www.eastman.com), the Corporate Governance Guidelines of its Board of Directors, the charters
of each of the committees of the board, and codes of ethics and business conduct for directors, officers and
employees. Such materials are also available in print upon the written request of any stockholder to Eastman
Chemical Company, P.O. Box 431, Kingsport, Tennessee 37662-5280, Attention: Investor Relations.
Shareholder Information
Corporate Offices Address: See Cover Page to this Form 10-K
Telephone: 877-EMN-INFO (877-366-4636)
Corporate Website: www.eastman.com
Annual Meeting:
Toy F. Reid Employee Center
Kingsport, Tennessee
Thursday, May 4, 2006
11:30 a.m. (ET)
Stock Exchange Listing:
Eastman Chemical Company common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker
symbol \"EMN.\" Most newspaper tables list the Company's stock as \"EmanChem.\"
Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar:
Inquiries and changes to stockholder accounts should be directed to our transfer agent:
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
In the United States: 800-937-5449
Outside the United States: (1) 212-936-5100 or (1) 718-921-8200
Website: //www.amstock.com
New York Stock Exchange and Securities and Exchange Commission Certifications
In 2005, the Company submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (the \"NYSE\") the certification of the Chief
Executive Officer that he was not aware of any violation by Eastman Chemical Company of the NYSE's corporate
governance listing standards as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company
Manual. In addition, the Company has filed with the SEC, as exhibits to this Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Chief Executive Officer's and Chief Financial Officer's certifications regarding the quality
of the Company's public disclosure, disclosure controls and procedures, and internal controls over financial
reporting as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules.
26

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
For identification and discussion of the most significant risks applicable to the Company and its business, see Part II
– Item 7 – \"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Forward-
Looking Statements and Risk Factors of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
27

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
Certain information about the Company's executive officers is provided below:
J. Brian Ferguson, age 51, is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Ferguson joined the Company
in 1977. He was named Vice President, Industry and Federal Affairs in 1994, became Managing Director, Greater
China in 1996, was named President, Eastman Chemical Asia Pacific in 1998, became President, Polymers Group in
1999, became President, Chemicals Group in 2001, and was elected to his current position in 2002.
James P. Rogers, age 54, was appointed Executive Vice President of the Company and President of Eastman
Division effective November 2003. Mr. Rogers joined the Company in 1999 as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer and in 2002, was also appointed Chief Operations Officer of Eastman Division. Mr. Rogers served
previously as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GAF Materials Corporation (“GAF”). He also
served as Executive Vice President, Finance, of International Specialty Products, Inc., which was spun off from
GAF in 1997.
Allan R. Rothwell, age 58, is Executive Vice President of the Company and President of Voridian Division and has
announced his retirement effective April 1, 2006. Mr. Rothwell joined the Company in 1969, became Vice
President and General Manager, Container Plastics Business Organization in 1994, and was appointed Vice
President, Corporate Development and Strategy in 1997. He was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer in 1998, became President, Chemicals Group in 1999, became President, Polymers Group in 2001, and was
appointed to his current position in 2002.
Theresa K. Lee, age 53, is Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary. Ms. Lee joined
Eastman as a staff attorney in 1987, served as Assistant General Counsel for the health, safety, and environmental
legal staff from 1993 to 1995, and served as Assistant General Counsel for the corporate legal staff from 1995 until
her appointment as Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Secretary in 1997. She became Vice President,
General Counsel, and Secretary of Eastman in 2000 and was appointed to her current position in 2002.
Richard A. Lorraine, age 60, joined Eastman in November 2003 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Lorraine served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Occidental Chemical
Corporation from 1995 until 2003, and at ITT Automotive Group as President of the Aftermarket Group from 1990
to 1995 and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1985 to 1990. Mr. Lorraine started his career with
Westinghouse Electric Corporation, where he held various financial positions.
Gregory O. Nelson, age 54, is Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer. Dr. Nelson joined Eastman in
1982 as a research chemist and held a number of positions in the research and development organization. He
became Director, Polymers Research Division in 1995 and was named Vice President, Polymers Technology in
1997. He was appointed to his present position in 2001 and named Senior Vice President in 2002.
Norris P. Sneed, age 50, is Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Communications and Public Affairs. Mr.
Sneed joined the Company in 1979 as a chemical engineer. In 1989, he was assigned to Eastman’s Arkansas
Operations where he was superintendent for different manufacturing and new business development departments. In
1997, he served as assistant to the CEO. He was named managing director for Eastman’s Argentina operations in
1999, Vice President of Organization Effectiveness in the Human Resources, Communications and Public Affairs
organization in 2001, and was appointed to his current position in June 2003.
Curtis E. Espeland, age 41, is Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company. Mr. Espeland joined
Eastman in 1996. At Eastman, Mr. Espeland has served as Director of Internal Auditing and Director of Financial
Services, Asia Pacific, was named Assistant Controller of the Company and Controller of the Company in 2002, and
was appointed to his current position in May 2005. Prior to joining Eastman, he was an audit and business advisory
manager with Arthur Andersen LLP.
28

On March 6, 2006, the Company announced a realignment of its organizational structure and related senior
management assignments effective April 1, 2006. For additional information, see Part I, Item 1 of this 2005 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. James P. Rogers will be President, Chemicals and Fibers Group, which includes additional
responsibilities from his current position as Executive Vice President and includes chemicals and fibers marketing
development and innovation. Mr. Rogers will also have corporate responsibility for the supply chain, worldwide
manufacturing support, and the management of the regions outside the United States. Gregory O. Nelson will be
Executive Vice President, Polyesters Group, which includes polyesters marketing development and innovation.
Ronald C. Lindsay, age 47, has been appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer replacing
Gregory O. Nelson in that position. Mr. Lindsay is currently Vice President and General Manager of the Company's
PCI segment. Mr. Lindsay joined Eastman in 1980 as a chemical engineer and held a number of positions within the
manufacturing and development organizations. He became Director, Manufacturing PCI segment in 2001 and
Director, PCI segment business projects in 2002. He became Vice President and General Manager of Intermediates
business organization in 2003 and was named to his current position in 2005.
29

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
PROPERTIES
At December 31, 2005, Eastman operated 17 manufacturing sites in 10 countries. Utilization of these facilities may
vary with product mix and economic, seasonal, and other business conditions, but none of the principal plants are
substantially idle. The Company's plants, including approved expansions, generally have sufficient capacity for
existing needs and expected near-term growth. These plants are generally well maintained, in good operating
condition, and suitable and adequate for their use. Unless otherwise indicated, all of the properties are owned. The
locations and general character of the major manufacturing facilities are:
Segment using manufacturing facility
Location CASPI PCI SP Polymers Fibers
USA
Batesville, Arkansas x x
Jefferson, Pennsylvania x
Columbia, South Carolina x x
Kingsport, Tennessee x x x x x
Longview, Texas x x x
Franklin, Virginia* x
Europe
Workington, England x x
Middelburg, the Netherlands x
Rotterdam, the Netherlands** x
San Roque, Spain x x x
Llangefni, Wales x
Asia Pacific
Kuantan, Malaysia** x
Jurong Island, Singapore** x x
Zibo City, China*** x x
Latin America
Zarate, Argentina x
Cosoleacaque, Mexico x
Uruapan, Mexico x
* indicates a location that Eastman leases from a third party.
** indicates a location that Eastman leases from a third party under a long-term ground lease.
*** Eastman holds a 51 percent share in the joint venture Qilu Eastman Specialty Chemical Ltd.
In addition, Eastman has a 50 percent interest in Primester, a joint venture that manufactures cellulose acetate at
Eastman's Kingsport, Tennessee plant. The production of cellulose acetate is an intermediate step in the manufacture
of acetate tow and other cellulose acetate based products. The Company also has a 50 percent interest in a
manufacturing facility in Nanjing, China. The Nanjing facility produces Eastotac hydrocarbon tackifying resins for
pressure-sensitive adhesives, caulks, and sealants. Eastotac hydrocarbon resins are also used to produce hot melt
adhesives for packaging applications in addition to glue sticks, tapes, labels, and other adhesive applications.
Eastman has distribution facilities at all of its plant sites. In addition, the Company owns or leases over 100 stand-
alone distribution facilities in the United States and 17 other countries. Corporate headquarters are in Kingsport,
Tennessee. The Company's regional headquarters are in Miami, Florida; Capelle aan den Ijsel, the Netherlands; Zug,
Switzerland; Singapore; and Kingsport, Tennessee. Technical service is provided to the Company's customers from
technical service centers in Kingsport, Tennessee; Kirkby, England; Shanghai, China and Singapore. Customer
service centers are located in Kingsport, Tennessee; Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Miami, Florida; Orange, California
and Singapore.
A summary of properties, classified by type, is contained in Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial
statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10K.
30

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
General
From time to time, the Company and its operations are parties to, or targets of, lawsuits, claims, investigations and
proceedings, including product liability, personal injury, asbestos, patent and intellectual property, commercial,
contract, environmental, antitrust, health and safety, and employment matters, which are being handled and
defended in the ordinary course of business. While the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters,
it does not believe, based upon currently available facts, that the ultimate resolution of any such pending matters,
including the sorbates litigation and the asbestos litigation, will have a material adverse effect on its overall financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, adverse developments could negatively impact earnings or
cash flows in a particular future period.
Sorbates Litigation
Two civil cases relating to sorbates remain. The first is a case filed by a multi-state class of indirect purchasers
seeking claimed damages, whose claims have been dismissed by Tennessee's trial court and that state's court of
appeals. The Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims, and subsequently the trial
court denied a motion to amend the complaint, ruling the case over. The Company believes that an appeal of this
determination is likely. The second is a case filed by New York's attorney general, also seeking claimed damages.
The trial court has dismissed New York's claims, and the plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal. Briefing on the
state's appeal is not yet underway.
Asbestos Litigation
Over the years, Eastman has been named as a defendant, along with numerous other defendants, in lawsuits in
various state courts in which plaintiffs alleged injury due to exposure to asbestos at Eastman’s manufacturing sites
and sought unspecified monetary damages and other relief. Historically, these cases have been dismissed or settled
without a material effect on Eastman’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
In recently filed cases, plaintiffs allege exposure to asbestos-containing products allegedly made by Eastman. Based
on its investigation to date, the Company has information that it manufactured limited amounts of an asbestos-
containing plastic product between the mid-1960’s and the early 1970’s. The Company’s investigation has found no
evidence that any of the plaintiffs worked with or around any such product alleged to have been manufactured by the
Company. The Company intends to defend vigorously the approximately1500 pending claims or to settle them on
acceptable terms.
The Company has finalized an agreement with an insurer that issued primary general liability insurance to certain
predecessors of the Company prior to the mid-1970's, pursuant to which that insurer will provide coverage for a
portion of certain of the Company's defense costs and payments of settlements or judgments in connection with
asbestos-related lawsuits.
Evaluation of the allegations and claims made in recent asbestos-related lawsuits continue to be reviewed by the
Company. Based on such evaluation to date, the Company continues to believe that the ultimate resolution of
asbestos cases will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash
flows, although these matters could result in the Company being subject to monetary damages, costs or expenses,
and charges against earnings in particular periods. To date, costs incurred by the Company related to the recent
asbestos-related lawsuits have not been material.
31

Middelburg (Netherlands) Environmental Proceeding
In June 2005, Eastman Chemical Middelburg, B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, (the \"Subsidiary\")
received a summons from the Middelburg (Netherlands) District Court Office to appear before the economic
magistrate of that District and respond to allegations that the Subsidiary's manufacturing facility in Middelburg has
exceeded certain conditions in the permit that allows the facility to discharge wastewater into the municipal
wastewater treatment system. The summons proposed penalties in excess of $100,000 (USD) as a result of the
alleged violations. A hearing in this matter took place on July 28, 2005, at which time the magistrate bifurcated the
proceeding into two phases: a compliance phase and an economic benefit phase. With respect to the compliance
phase, the magistrate levied a fine of less than $100,000. With respect to the economic benefit phase, where the
prosecutor's proposed penalty in excess of $100,000 remains pending, the magistrate instructed the parties to submit
their respective positions in writing for his review and deliberation. In accordance with the schedule imposed by the
magistrate, the Subsidiary submitted its initial written position on September 30, 2005. The prosecution submitted
its initial written position on December 23, 2005. The Subsidiary intends to vigorously contest this matter,
including the assessment of an economic benefit penalty, but given the early stage of the proceeding, the ultimate
outcome cannot presently be determined. This disclosure is made pursuant to SEC Regulation S-K, Item 103,
Instruction 5.C., which requires disclosure of administrative proceedings commenced under environmental laws that
involve governmental authorities as parties and potential monetary sanctions in excess of $100,000. The
Company believes that the ultimate resolution of this proceeding will not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the Company's stockholders during the fourth quarter of 2005.
32

PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a) The Company's common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol EMN. The following table presents the
high and low sales prices of the common stock on the NYSE and the cash dividends per share declared by the
Company's Board of Directors for each quarterly period of 2004 and 2005.
Cash
Dividends
High Low Declared
First Quarter $ 43.70 $ 38.00 $ 0.44
2004
Second Quarter 46.97 41.90 0.44
Third Quarter 47.77 42.19 0.44
Fourth Quarter 58.17 44.86 0.44
61.80 50.40 0.44
First Quarter $ $ $
2005
Second Quarter 60.80 47.40 0.44
Third Quarter 58.38 44.10 0.44
Fourth Quarter 56.77 45.34 0.44
As of December 31, 2005, there were 81,637,985 shares of the Company's common stock issued and outstanding,
which shares were held by 31,657 stockholders of record. These shares include 106,771 shares held by the
Company's charitable foundation. The Company has declared a cash dividend of $0.44 per share during the first
quarter of 2006. Quarterly dividends on common stock, if declared by the Company's Board of Directors, are usually
paid on or about the first business day of the month following the end of each quarter. The payment of dividends is a
business decision to be made by the Board of Directors from time to time based on the Company's earnings,
financial position and prospects, and such other considerations as the Board considers relevant. Accordingly, while
management currently expects that the Company will continue to pay the quarterly cash dividend, its dividend
practice may change at any time.
See Part III — Item 12 — “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters—Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” of this 2005 Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K.
33

(c) Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Approximate
Dollar
Value (in
Total Number of Millions) that
Total Shares Purchased as May Yet Be
Part of Publicly Purchased Under
Number Average Price
of Shares Announced Plans the Plans or
Paid Per
Programs
Purchased Share or Programs
(3) (3)
Period (1) (2)
October 1- 31, 2005 3,482 $ 47.05 0 $ 288
November 1-30, 2005 25,178 $ 54.98 0 $ 288
December 1-31, 2005 1,126 $ 51.71 0 $ 288
Total 29,786 0
(1) Shares surrendered to the Company by employees to satisfy individual tax withholding obligations upon
vesting of previously issued shares of restricted common stock and shares surrendered by employees as
payment to the Company of the purchase price for shares of common stock under the terms of previously
granted stock options. Shares are not part of any Company repurchase plan.
(2) Average price paid per share reflects the weighted average of the closing price of Eastman common stock
on the business days the shares were surrendered by the employee stockholder.
(3) The Company was authorized by the Board of Directors on February 4, 1999 to repurchase up to $400
million of its common stock. Common share repurchases under this authorization in 1999, 2000 and 2001
were $51 million, $57 million and $4 million, respectively. The Company has not repurchased any
common shares under this authorization after 2001. For additional information see Note 14 to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
34

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Summary of Operating Data
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Sales $ 7,059 $ 6,580 $ 5,800 $ 5,320 $ 5,390
Operating earnings (loss) 757 175 (267) 208 (120)
Earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principles 557 170 (273) 79 (175)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles, net -- -- 3 (18) --
Net earnings (loss) 557 170 (270) 61 (175)
Basic
Earnings (loss) per share before
cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles $ 6.90 $ 2.20 $ (3.54) $ 1.02 $ (2.28)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles, net -- -- 0.04 (0.23) --
Net earnings (loss) per share $ 6.90 $ 2.20 $ (3.50) $ 0.79 $ (2.28)
Diluted
Earnings (loss) per share before
cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles $ 6.81 $ 2.18 $ (3.54) $ 1.02 $ (2.28)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles, net -- -- 0.04 (0.23) --
Net earnings (loss) per share $ 6.81 $ 2.18 $ (3.50) $ 0.79 $ (2.28)
Statement of Financial Position Data
Current assets $ 1,924 $ 1,768 $ 2,010 $ 1,547 $ 1,464
Net properties 3,162 3,192 3,419 3,753 3,627
Total assets 5,773 5,839 6,244 6,287 6,092
Current liabilities 1,051 1,099 1,477 1,247 960
Long-term borrowings 1,621 2,061 2,089 2,054 2,143
Total liabilities 4,161 4,655 5,201 5,016 4,710
Total stockholders’ equity 1,612 1,184 1,043 1,271 1,382
Dividends declared per share 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76
In 2002, the Company adopted the non-amortization provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 142. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 142, results for the years after 2001 do not include
certain amounts of amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets that are included in prior years’
financial results. If the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 had been applied in the prior years, the
Company would not have recognized amortization expense of $18 million in 2001.
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company’s method of accounting for environmental closure and postclosure costs
changed as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” If the
provisions of SFAS No. 143 had been in effect in prior years, the impact on the Company’s financial results would
have been immaterial. For additional information see Note 24 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in
Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On July 31, 2004, the Company completed the sale of certain businesses, product lines and related assets within the
Coatings, Adhesives, Specialty Polymers and Inks (\"CASPI\") segment. For more information regarding the impact
of this divestiture on financial results, refer to the CASPI segment discussion of Part II, Item 7 – \"Management
Discussion and Analysis\" section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
35

In second quarter 2005, the Company completed the sale of its equity investment in Genencor International, Inc.
(\"Genencor\"). For more information, refer to Note 5 of the Company's consolidated financial statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In the second quarter 2005, the Company completed the early repayment of $500 million of its outstanding long-
term bonds. For more information, refer to Note 8 of Part II, Item 8 – \"Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data\" of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM Page
Critical Accounting Policies 37
2005 Overview 40
Results of Operations
Summary of Consolidated Results – 2005 Compared with 2004 41
Summary by Operating Segment 44
Summary by Customer Location – 2005 Compared with 2004 49
Summary of Consolidated Results – 2004 Compared with 2003 50
Summary by Operating Segment 54
Summary by Customer Location – 2004 Compared with 2003 58
Liquidity, Capital Resources, and Other Financial Information 59
Environmental 63
Inflation 64
Recently Issued Accounting Standards 64
Outlook 66
Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors 66
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon the
consolidated financial statements for Eastman Chemical Company (\"Eastman\" or the \"Company\"), which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and should be read in
conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. All references to earnings per share contained in this report are diluted earnings per share unless
otherwise noted.
36

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States, the Company’s management must make decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related
disclosures. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and
assumptions on which to base estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the
Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts, impaired assets,
environmental costs, U.S. pension and other post-employment benefits, litigation and contingent liabilities, and
income taxes. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company’s management believes the critical
accounting policies described below are the most important to the fair presentation of the Company’s financial
condition and results. These policies require management’s more significant judgments and estimates in the
preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its
customers to make required payments. The Company believes, based on historical results, the likelihood of actual
write-offs having a material impact on financial results or earnings per share is low. However, if one of the
Company’s key customers were to file for bankruptcy, or otherwise be unable to make its required payments, or
there was a significant continued slow down in the economy, the Company could be forced to increase its
allowances. This could result in a material charge to earnings. For trade receivables of $595 million and $690
million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, the Company’s allowances were $20 million and $15 million,
respectively.
Impaired Assets
The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Such events and
circumstances include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of the asset, adverse change
in the extent or manner in which the asset is being used, significant changes in business climate, or current or
projected cash flow losses associated with the use of the assets. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is
considered impaired when the total projected undiscounted cash flows from such asset is separately identifiable and
is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value
exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. For long-lived assets to be held and used, fair value of fixed (tangible)
assets and definite-lived intangible assets is determined primarily using either the projected cash flows discounted at
a rate commensurate with the risk involved or an appraisal. For long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale or other
than by sale, fair value is determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for disposal costs.
The provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (\"SFAS\") No. 142 \"Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets,\" require that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested at least annually for impairment and
require reporting units to be identified for the purpose of assessing potential future impairments of goodwill. The
carrying value of goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles is considered impaired when their fair value, as
established by appraisal or based on undiscounted future cash flows of certain related products, is less than their
carrying value. The Company conducts its annual testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment in the third quarter of each year, unless events warrant more frequent testing.
37

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As the Company’s assumptions related to long-lived assets are subject to change, additional write-downs may be
required in the future. If estimates of fair value less costs to sell are revised, the carrying amount of the related asset
is adjusted, resulting in a charge to earnings. The Company recorded fixed (tangible) asset impairments of $9
million and definite-lived intangible asset impairments of $3 million during 2005. The Company recorded fixed
(tangible) asset impairments of $134 million, definite-lived intangible asset impairments of $5 million, and
indefinite lived intangible asset impairments of $1 million during 2004. The Company recorded fixed (tangible)
asset impairments of $291 million, definite-lived intangible asset impairments of $128 million, indefinite lived
intangible asset impairments of $47 million, and goodwill impairments of $34 million during 2003.
Environmental Costs
The Company accrues environmental remediation costs when it is probable that the Company has incurred a liability
at a contaminated site and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When a single amount cannot be reasonably
estimated but the cost can be estimated within a range, the Company accrues the minimum amount. This
undiscounted accrued amount reflects the Company’s assumptions about remediation requirements at the
contaminated site, the nature of the remedy, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other
potentially responsible parties at multi-party sites, and the number and financial viability of other potentially
responsible parties. Changes in the estimates on which the accruals are based, unanticipated government
enforcement action, or changes in health, safety, environmental, and chemical control regulations and testing
requirements could result in higher or lower costs. Estimated future environmental expenditures for remediation
costs range from the minimum or best estimate of $21 million to the maximum of $42 million at December 31,
2005.
In accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” the Company also establishes
reserves for closure/postclosure costs associated with the environmental and other assets it maintains. Environmental
assets, as defined in SFAS No. 143, include but are not limited to waste management units, such as landfills, water
treatment facilities, and ash ponds. When these types of assets are constructed or installed, a reserve is established
for the future costs anticipated to be associated with the retirement or closure of the asset based on an expected life
of the environmental assets and the applicable regulatory closure requirements. These future expenses are charged
into earnings over the estimated useful life of the assets. Currently, the Company estimates the useful life of each
individual asset up to 50 years. If the Company changes its estimate of the asset retirement obligation costs or its
estimate of the useful lives of these assets, expenses to be charged into earnings could increase or decrease.
The Company’s reserve for environmental contingencies was $51 million and $56 million at December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively, representing the minimum or best estimate for remediation costs and, for asset retirement
obligation costs, the best estimate of the amount accrued to date over the regulated assets' estimated useful lives.
United States Pension and Other Post-employment Benefits
The Company maintains defined benefit pension plans that provide eligible employees with retirement benefits.
Additionally, Eastman provides life insurance and health care benefits for eligible retirees and health care benefits
for retirees’ eligible survivors. The costs and obligations related to these benefits reflect the Company’s assumptions
related to general economic conditions (particularly interest rates) and expected return on plan assets. At December
31, 2005, the Company assumed a discount rate of 5.62 percent and an expected return on assets of 9 percent. The
cost of providing plan benefits also depends on demographic assumptions including retirements, mortality, turnover,
and plan participation.
38

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table illustrates the sensitivity to a change in the expected return on assets and assumed discount rate
for U.S. pension plans and other postretirement welfare plans:
Impact on
December 31, 2005 Impact on
Impact on Projected Benefit December 31, 2005 Benefit
Change in 2006 Pre-tax U.S. Obligation for U.S. Obligation for Other U.S.
Assumption Benefits Expense Pension Plans Postretirement Plans
25 basis point
decrease in discount
rate +$6 Million +$52 Million +$23 Million
25 basis point
increase in discount
rate -$6 Million -$47 Million -$23 Million
25 basis point
decrease in expected
return on assets +$2 Million No Impact N/A
25 basis point
increase in expected
return on assets -$2 Million No Impact N/A
The expected return on assets and assumed discount rate used to calculate the Company’s pension and other post-
employment benefit obligations are established each December 31. The expected return on assets is based upon the
long-term expected returns in the markets in which the pension trust invests its funds, primarily the domestic,
international, and private equities markets. The assumed discount rate is based upon a portfolio of approximately
570 grade Aa corporate bonds, which are used to develop a yield curve. This yield curve is applied to the expected
durations of the pension and post-employment benefit obligations. If actual experience differs from these
assumptions, the difference is recorded as an unrecognized actuarial gain (loss) and then amortized into earnings
over a period of time, which may cause the expense related to providing these benefits to increase or decrease. The
charges applied to earnings in 2005, 2004, and 2003 due to the amortization of these unrecognized actuarial losses,
largely due to actual experience versus assumptions of discount rates, were $56 million, $44 million, and $32
million, respectively. The actual return on assets has exceeded the expected return for the last 3 years and a 1
percent increase or decrease in the health care trend would have had no material impact.
The Company does not anticipate that a change in pension and other post-employment obligations caused by a
change in the assumed discount rate will impact the cash contributions to be made to the pension plans during 2006.
However, an after-tax charge or credit will be recorded directly to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),
a component of stockholders’ equity, as of December 31, 2006 for the impact on the pension’s projected benefit
obligation of the change in interest rates, if any. While the amount of the change in these obligations does not
correspond directly to cash funding requirements, it is an indication of the amount the Company will be required to
contribute to the plans in future years. The amount and timing of such cash contributions is dependent upon interest
rates, actual returns on plan assets, retirement, attrition rates of employees, and other factors. For further
information regarding pension and other post-employment obligations, see Note 10 to the Company’s consolidated
financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
39

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Litigation and Contingent Liabilities
From time to time, the Company and its operations are parties to or targets of lawsuits, claims, investigations and
proceedings, including product liability, personal injury, asbestos, patent and intellectual property, commercial,
contract, environmental, antitrust, health and safety, and employment matters, which are handled and defended in
the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues a liability for such matters when it is probable that a liability
has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When a single amount cannot be reasonably
estimated but the cost can be estimated within a range, the Company accrues the minimum amount. The Company
expenses legal costs, including those expected to be incurred in connection with a loss contingency, as incurred.
The Company believes the amounts reserved are adequate for such pending matters; however, results of operations
could be affected by significant litigation adverse to the Company.
Income Taxes
The Company records deferred tax assets and liabilities based on temporary differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in
which the differences are expected to reverse. The ability to realize the deferred tax assets is evaluated through the
forecasting of taxable income using historical and projected future operating results, the reversal of existing
temporary differences, and the availability of tax planning strategies. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce
deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. In the event that the actual
outcome of future tax consequences differs from our estimates and assumptions, the resulting change to the
provision for income taxes could have a material adverse impact on the consolidated results of operations and
statement of financial position. As of December 31, 2005, a valuation allowance of $197 million has been provided
against the deferred tax assets.
2005 OVERVIEW
Sales revenue of $7.1 billion for full year 2005 was the highest in the Company's history and a 7 percent
increase over 2004. Operating earnings were $757 million in 2005, a $582 million increase from 2004 and the
best since 1995. These results reflect the Company's successful implementation of a turnaround strategy to
improve profitability which included extensive restructuring, divestitures, and consolidation within the
Company, improved pricing strategies and processes and ongoing cost reductions.
The significant increases in sales revenue and operating earnings were primarily driven by increased selling prices
throughout the Company in response to increasing raw material and energy costs, and were aided by strong
economic growth. Operating earnings were also positively impacted by the successful completion of previously
announced restructuring, divestiture and consolidation actions in 2004; a continued focus on more profitable
businesses and product lines across the Company's portfolio of businesses, including acetyl, olefins, and polyester
stream optimization; and cost reduction efforts. Included in 2005 results were a $171 million pre-tax gain on the
sale of the Company's equity investment in Genencor International, Inc. (\"Genencor\"), a $46 million charge
associated with the early repayment of long-term debt, and $33 million in asset impairments and restructuring
charges. In the second half of 2005, the Company also mitigated the negative effects of the Gulf Coast hurricanes
on raw material costs and availability through pricing strategies, effective inventory management and procurement
strategies.
The Company's cash flow from operations for 2005 increased by $270 million compared with 2004 primarily due to
the significant increase in earnings. The Company used cash from operations, combined with proceeds from the sale
of the Company's investment in Genencor, to reduce net debt (long and short term debt minus cash and cash
equivalents) by $636 million. Throughout 2005, the Company maintained financial discipline while improving
profitability.
With the successful implementation of the Company's turnaround strategy, as evidenced by the improved operating
results and strengthened financial profile, the Company believes that it is positioned for profitable growth. This
growth will be focused in markets in which the Company has expertise and deep understanding, and where it can
leverage the technological innovation it has built over the past 85 years.
40

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SUMMARY OF CONSOLIDATED RESULTS - 2005 COMPARED WITH 2004
The Company’s results of operations as presented in the Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K are summarized and analyzed below:
Product Exchange
Volume Price Mix Rate
2005 2004 Change Effect Effect Effect Effect
(Dollars in millions)
$ 7,059 $ 6,580 7% (7)% 15% (1)% --%
Sales
Sales revenue for 2005 increased compared with 2004 primarily due to increased selling prices of approximately $1
billion throughout the Company that more than offset a decrease in volume resulting from divested businesses and
product lines in 2004. The increase in selling prices was primarily in response to an increase in raw material and
energy costs and the Company’s efforts to improve profitability.
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 Change
$ 1,404 $ 978 44 %
Gross Profit
As a percentage of sales 19.9% 14.9%
Gross profit for 2005 increased compared with 2004 primarily due to the following factors:
• increased selling prices across all segments, primarily in response to higher raw material and energy costs
which increased more than $500 million;
• a continued focus on more profitable businesses and product lines; and
• cost reduction programs.
The above items more than offset higher raw material and energy costs primarily attributable to paraxylene,
propane, natural gas, coal and ethylene glycol. The Company expects that raw material and energy costs will
continue to be volatile during 2006.
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 Change
$ 454 $ 450 1%
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (\"SG&A\")
162 154 5%
Research and Development Expenses (\"R&D\")
$ 616 $ 604 2%
As a percentage of sales 8.7% 9.2%
SG&A costs for 2005 increased slightly compared with 2004 due primarily to higher incentive compensation
resulting from improved Company performance and higher bad debt expense, which more than offset decreases
resulting from the previous divestiture of certain businesses and product lines within the Coatings, Adhesives,
Specialty Polymers and Inks (\"CASPI\") segment and the shutdown of operations at Cendian Corporation
(\"Cendian\").
R&D expenses for 2005 increased compared with 2004 primarily due to expenditures on growth initiatives in the
Specialty Plastics (\"SP\") and Developing Businesses (\"DB\") segments, which more than offset decreases resulting
from the previous divestiture of certain businesses and product lines within the CASPI segment.
41

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Impairments and Restructuring Charges, Net
Impairments and restructuring charges totaled $33 million during 2005, consisting of non-cash asset impairments of
$12 million and restructuring charges of $21 million. During 2004, these charges totaled $206 million, consisting of
non-cash asset impairments of $140 million and restructuring charges of $66 million. For more information
regarding asset impairments and restructuring charges, see Note 16 to the Company’s consolidated financial
statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Operating Income
Other operating income of $2 million for 2005 included a $2 million gain associated with a change in estimates for
contingencies related to the 2004 divestiture of certain businesses and product lines within the CASPI segment.
Other operating income of $7 million in 2004 resulted from the sale of Ariel Research Corporation (“Ariel”),
formerly part of the DB segment.
Operating Earnings
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2005 2004 Change
Operating earnings $ 757 $ 175 $ >100%
Operating earnings for 2005 increased $582 million. Key factors in the improved results, aided by strong economic
growth, were:
• increased selling prices throughout the Company of approximately $1 billion in response to increasing raw
material and energy costs;
• lower asset impairment and restructuring charges of $33 million in 2005 compared to $206 million in
2004;
• completion of previously announced restructuring, divestiture and consolidation actions in 2004;
• a continued focus on more profitable businesses and product lines across the Company's portfolio of
businesses, including acetyl, olefins, and polyester stream optimization; and
• continued cost reduction efforts.
The above items more than offset an estimated $500 million increase in raw materials and energy costs and $33
million in asset impairments and restructuring charges.
Interest Expense, Net
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 Change
Gross interest costs $ 118 $ 126
Less: capitalized interest 5 3
Interest expense 113 123 (9) %
Interest income 13 8
Interest expense, net $ 100 $ 115 (14) %
Lower gross interest costs for 2005 compared to 2004 reflected lower average debt levels primarily due to the early
extinguishment of debt in second quarter 2005, partially offset by higher average interest rates.
Higher interest income for 2005 compared to 2004 reflected higher invested cash balances as well as higher average
interest rates, resulting in lower net interest expense.
42

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For 2006, the Company expects net interest expense to decrease compared with 2005 primarily due to lower
expected gross interest costs as a result of lower average borrowings, increased capitalized interest and higher
interest income.
Income from Equity Investment in Genencor
Income from equity investment in Genencor includes the Company's portion of earnings from its equity investment
in Genencor. In second quarter 2005, the Company completed the sale of its equity interest in Genencor for net cash
proceeds of approximately $417 million. The book value of the investment prior to sale was $246 million resulting
in a pre-tax gain on the sale of $171 million.
Early Debt Extinguishment Costs
In the second quarter 2005, the Company completed the early repayment of $500 million of its outstanding long-
term debt for $544 million in cash and recorded a charge of $46 million for early debt extinguishment costs
including $2 million in unamortized bond issuance costs. The book value of the purchased debt was $500 million.
Other (Income) Charges, net
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 Change
Other income $ (11) $ (10) $ (1)
Other charges 12 20 (8)
Other (income) charges, net $ 1 $ 10 $ (9)
Included in other income are the Company’s portion of earnings from its equity investments (excluding Genencor);
gains on the sale of certain technology business venture investments, royalty income and net gains on foreign
exchange transactions. Included in other charges are net losses on foreign exchange transactions, the Company’s
portion of losses from its equity investments (excluding Genencor); write-downs to fair value of certain technology
business venture investments due to other than temporary declines in value and fees on securitized receivables.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 Change
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $ 226 $ (106) > 100 %
Effective tax rate 29 % N/A
The 2005 effective tax rate was impacted by $13 million of deferred tax benefit resulting from the reversal of capital
loss carryforward valuation reserves, $14 million of tax benefit resulting from the change in reserves for tax
contingencies due to the favorable resolution of prior periods' tax contingencies and a $12 million charge resulting
from the repatriation of $321 million of foreign earnings and capital pursuant to provisions of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004.
The 2004 effective tax rate was impacted by $90 million of deferred tax benefits resulting from the expected
utilization of a capital loss resulting from the sale of certain businesses and product lines and related assets in the
CASPI segment and $26 million of tax benefit resulting from the favorable resolution of a prior year capital loss
refund claim. In addition, the effective tax rate for 2004 was impacted by the treatment of asset impairments and
restructuring charges resulting in lower expected tax benefits in certain jurisdictions.
The Company expects its effective tax rate in 2006 will be approximately 33 percent.
43

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Earnings
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2005 2004
Net earnings $ 557 $ 170
Earnings per share
Basic $ 6.90 $ 2.20
Diluted 6.81 2.18
SUMMARY BY OPERATING SEGMENT
The Company’s products and operations are managed and reported in three divisions comprising six operating
segments. Eastman Division consists of the CASPI segment, the Performance Chemicals and Intermediates (\"PCI\")
segment, and the SP segment. Voridian Division contains the Polymers segment and the Fibers segment. The
Developing Businesses Division consists of the DB segment.
For 2005 and 2004, the Company’s divisional structure provided for goods and services to be transferred between
the divisions at predetermined prices. Accordingly, the divisional structure resulted in the recognition of
interdivisional sales revenue and operating earnings. Such interdivisional transactions are eliminated in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
For additional information and analysis of the results of the Company’s operating segments, see Note 21 to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K and
Exhibits 99.01 and 99.02 to this Annual Report.
EASTMAN DIVISION
CASPI Segment
Continuing Product Lines(1)
All Product Lines
Change Change
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 $ % 2004 $ %
External Sales $ 1,299 $ 1,554 $ (255) (16) % $ 1,113 $ 186 17 %
Volume effect (464) (30) % (23) (2) %
Price effect 192 13 % 192 18 %
Product mix effect 13 1% 13 1%
Exchange rate effect 4 -- % 4 -- %
229 67 162 >100 % 152 77 51 %
Operating earnings
Asset impairments and
restructuring charges, net 4 81 (77) 9 (5)
Other operating income 2 -- 2 >100 % -- 3 >100 %
(1)
These businesses and product lines exclude acrylate ester monomers, composites (unsaturated polyester resins),
inks and graphic arts raw materials, liquid resins, powder resins and textile chemicals divested on July 31, 2004 as
well as other restructuring, divestiture and consolidation activities that the Company has completed related to these
businesses and product lines.
44

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The decrease in external sales revenue of $255 million was due to lower sales volume resulting from the
aforementioned sale of certain businesses and product lines within the segment. Sales revenue for continuing
product lines increased $186 million, with selling prices positively impacting revenues 18 percent, driven by cyclical
commodity products.
The increase in operating earnings was the result of increased selling prices that more than offset higher raw
material costs; lower asset impairment and restructuring charges; an increased focus on more profitable businesses
and product lines, including the aforementioned sale of certain businesses and product lines within the segment;
improved gross profit margins, particularly for cyclical commodity product lines; and the impact of cost reduction
efforts.
Operating earnings for 2005 and 2004 were reduced by asset impairments and restructuring charges totaling
approximately $4 million and $81 million, respectively. These charges are more fully described in Note 16 in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Operating earnings for 2005 included $2 million of other operating income related to a change in estimates for
contingencies associated with the aforementioned sale of certain businesses and product lines within the segment.
PCI Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions)
2005 2004 $ %
External sales $ 1,627 $ 1,347 $ 280 21 %
Volume effect 64 5%
Price effect 244 18 %
Product mix effect (30) (2) %
Exchange rate effect 2 -- %
Interdivisional sales 665 583 82 14 %
Operating earnings 161 16 145 >100 %
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net 11 38 (27) (71 %
The increase in external sales revenue of $280 million was primarily due to higher selling prices which had a
positive impact on revenues of $244 million, and higher sales volumes, which had a positive impact on revenues of
$64 million. Selling prices and sales volume were higher particularly in the intermediates product lines in response
to significant increases in raw material and energy costs, an upturn in the olefins cycle, and improved market
conditions in acetyl product lines. The sales volume increase was also attributed to long-term arrangements with
key customers and increased production capacity.
The increase in operating earnings of $145 million was primarily due to increases in selling prices and ongoing cost
reduction efforts that more than offset higher raw material and energy costs. Operating earnings for 2005 included
$10 million of operating earnings from the achievement of certain milestones under an acetyls technology licensing
agreement.
Operating earnings for 2005 include $11 million in asset impairments and restructuring charges for previously
impaired sites. Operating earnings for 2004 include $38 million in asset impairments related to assets at the
Company's Batesville, Arkansas and Longview, Texas facilities, as well as severance charges. The Company
continues to identify and implement projects to reduce costs and address the performance of underperforming PCI
product lines.
45

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SP Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions)
2005 2004 $ %
External sales $ 718 $ 644 $ 74 12 %
Volume effect (2) -- %
Price effect 75 12 %
Product mix effect (1) -- %
Exchange rate effect 2 -- %
Interdivisional sales 48 51 (3) (6) %
Operating earnings 64 13 51 >100 %
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net -- 53 (53) -- %
External sales revenue increased $74 million due to higher selling prices, which had a positive impact of $75
million. Despite higher sales volume for copolyester product lines, particularly for consumer and medical goods,
overall sales volume declined primarily due to the lower sales volume of acetate used in photographic film.
Operating earnings increased by $51 million compared to 2004 due to lower asset impairments and restructuring
charges, higher selling prices, improved product mix, and ongoing cost reduction efforts partially offset by higher
raw material and energy costs, and expenditures related to growth initiatives. Operating earnings for 2004 included
asset impairments and restructuring charges of $53 million related primarily to the closure of the Hartlepool, United
Kingdom manufacturing facility, as well as severance charges.
VORIDIAN DIVISION
Polymers Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions)
2005 2004 $ %
External sales $ 2,519 $ 2,183 $ 336 15 %
Volume effect (97) (5) %
Price effect 424 19 %
Product mix effect (4) -- %
Exchange rate effect 13 1%
Interdivisional sales 87 69 18 27 %
Operating earnings 159 25 134 >100 %
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net -- 13 (13) -- %
46

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The increase in external sales revenue of $336 million was primarily due to increased selling prices, which had a
positive impact of $424 million. The increased selling prices were mainly the result of efforts to offset volatile raw
material and energy costs. The lower sales volume was attributed to several factors: the effects of higher and
volatile raw material and energy costs in North America due to the Gulf Coast hurricanes, including the impact of
lower raw material costs for Asian producers of PET polymers to North America and customers working down
inventories; and low PET polymers industry operating rates in Europe and Latin America due to a combination of
lower than expected demand and overcapacity in southern and eastern Europe and Asian imports in South America.
Operating earnings increased as higher selling prices and reduced costs attributed to ongoing cost reduction efforts
more than offset higher raw material and energy costs, resulting in improved margins, primarily in the polyethylene
markets and North American PET markets, prior to the Gulf Coast hurricanes. Operating earnings for 2004 were
also reduced by asset impairments and restructuring charges of $13 million related to severance.
In early March, 2005, the Company broke ground on the first commercial scale PET polymers plant based upon
Eastman's IntegRex technology. The plant will be a 350,000 metric ton facility and is expected to begin production
in fourth quarter 2006. Research and development efforts further enhanced IntegRex technology in parallel with
construction of the first IntegRex manufacturing facility. In September 2005, the Company announced it was
evaluating a second world-class facility in North America utilizing these further refinements to IntegRex technology.
The Company is evaluating its strategic options related to its non-integrated PET assets outside the U.S.
Fibers Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions)
2005 2004 $ %
External sales $ 869 $ 731 $ 138 19 %
Volume effect 51 7%
Price effect 76 11 %
Product mix effect 10 1%
Exchange rate effect 1 -- %
Interdivisional sales 99 88 11 12 %
Operating earnings 207 146 61 42 %
External sales revenue increased $138 million due to higher selling prices and increased sales volume. The higher
sales volume was attributed to stronger demand for acetate tow, primarily in China, due to higher cigarette
production volumes, a trend towards longer cigarette filters and substitution of acetate tow for polypropylene in
cigarette filters. Demand for acetate tow in Eastern Europe is increasing due to increased cigarette production
volumes. Market share for acetate yarn increased due to the exit of a major competitor from the acetate yarn market.
Operating earnings increased due to higher sales volumes and increased selling prices that more than offset higher
raw material and energy costs.
The Company believes the segment has modest growth potential in future years and is evaluating growth options in
Europe and Asia.
47

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
DEVELOPING BUSINESSES DIVISION
Developing Businesses Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 $ %
External sales $ 27 $ 121 $ (94) (78) %
Interdivisional sales 61 424 (363) (86) %
Operating loss (70) (86) 16 19 %
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net 18 21 (3) (14)%
Other operating income -- 7 (7) -- %
The decrease in external and interdivisional sales revenue was primarily due to the shutdown of Cendian in the first
half of 2005, which resulted in the termination of third party contracts and the reintegration of Cendian's logistics
functions into the Company, and the divestiture of Ariel in fourth quarter 2004.
Operating results for the segment improved due to the shutdown of Cendian and reintegration of the Company's
logistics function. Results included asset impairments and restructuring charges of $18 million, primarily related to
Cendian. With the shutdown of Cendian, the DB segment consists of investments in early-stage businesses, which the
Company continually evaluates using a disciplined stage-gating process.
48

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SUMMARY BY CUSTOMER LOCATION – 2005 COMPARED WITH 2004
Sales Revenue (excluding interdivisional sales)
Exchange
Product
Price Mix Rate
Volume
(Dollars in millions)
Effect Effect
2005 2004 Change Effect Effect
United States and
Canada 4,098 3,723 10 % (5) % 19 % (4) % -- %
$ $
Europe, Middle East,
and Africa 1,344 1,467 (8) % (15) % 5% 1% 1%
Asia Pacific 930 785 18 % 4% 12 % 2% -- %
Latin America 687 605 14 % (8) % 20 % 1% 1%
7,059 6,580
$ $
Sales revenue in the United States and Canada increased primarily due to higher selling prices, particularly for the
Polymers, PCI, and CASPI segments, which had a $723 million positive impact on sales revenue. The higher
selling prices mostly related to sales of PET polymers, polyethylene, intermediates chemicals, and other cyclical
commodity product lines and were primarily in response to increases in raw material and energy costs and high
industry-wide capacity utilization. Lower overall sales volumes had a $208 million negative impact on sales
revenue and were primarily due to the impact of the restructuring, divestiture, and consolidation activities in the
CASPI segment, partially offset by significantly higher sales volumes in the PCI segment. The Cendian shutdown
was reflected in product mix which had a $140 million negative impact on sales revenue.
Sales revenue in Europe, the Middle East and Africa decreased primarily due to lower sales volumes, mainly the
result of the impact of the restructuring, divestiture, and consolidation activities in the CASPI segment, which had a
$224 million negative impact on sales revenue. Higher selling prices, particularly for PET polymers, had a $77
million positive impact on sales revenue.
Sales revenue in Asia Pacific increased primarily due to higher overall selling prices across all segments which had
a $92 million positive impact on sales revenue. Higher sales volumes, particularly for the Fibers segment, had a $34
million positive impact on sales revenue.
Sales revenue in Latin America increased primarily due to higher selling prices, partially offset by lower sales
volume. Higher selling prices, particularly for PET polymers, had a $119 million positive impact on sales revenue.
Lower sales volume, particularly for PET polymers and polyethylene, had a $49 million negative impact on sales
revenue.
With a substantial portion of sales to customers outside the United States, Eastman is subject to the risks associated
with operating in international markets. To mitigate its exchange rate risks, the Company frequently seeks to
negotiate payment terms in U.S. dollars and euros. In addition, where it deems such actions advisable, the Company
engages in foreign currency hedging transactions and requires letters of credit and prepayment for shipments where
its assessment of individual customer and country risks indicates their use is appropriate. For more information on
these practices see Note 9 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Part II--Item 7A--\"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.\"
49

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SUMMARY OF CONSOLIDATED RESULTS - 2004 COMPARED WITH 2003
Product Exchange
Volume Price Mix Rate
2004 2003 Change Effect Effect Effect Effect
(Dollars in millions)
$ 6,580 $ 5,800 13% 4% 6% 1% 2%
Sales
Sales revenue increased for 2004 compared with 2003 primarily due to increased selling prices, particularly for the
Polymers and the PCI segments, increased sales volumes, and favorable foreign currency exchange rates, of
approximately $363 million, $243 million, and $128 million, respectively. The increase in selling prices was
primarily in response to an increase in raw material and energy costs and the Company’s efforts to improve
profitability.
(Dollars in millions) 2004 2003 Change
978 $ 810 21 %
Gross Profit $
As a percentage of sales 14.9 % 14.0 %
Gross profit for 2004 increased compared with 2003 primarily due to the following factors:
• increased selling prices in response to higher raw material costs, particularly in Polymers and PCI, and the
Company’s continued efforts to improve profitability;
• increased volumes, excluding restructured, divested, and consolidated businesses and product lines, across
all segments due to strengthening general economic conditions and the substitution of other materials with
SP and Polymers products;
• focus on more profitable product lines, achieved by a variety of actions, including restructuring, divestiture,
and consolidation activity, as well as improving product mix, particularly in CASPI, SP, and Fibers; and
• improved cost structure through restructuring efforts and cost reduction programs.
The above items more than offset higher raw material and energy costs primarily attributable to paraxylene, ethylene
glycol, propane, coal, and natural gas.
The Company continued to implement a variety of cost control measures to manage discretionary spending. Of the
measures taken, a change in vacation policy favorably impacted 2003 results by approximately $40 million. This
change in vacation policy did not have a significant impact on 2004 results.
(Dollars in millions) 2004 2003 Change
450 $ 414 9%
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses $
154 173 (11) %
Research and Development Expenses
604 $ 587
$
As a percentage of sales 9.2% 10.1%
The increase in SG&A expenses for 2004 compared with 2003 was primarily due to higher compensation and
employee related costs as well as higher professional service fees. Research and development expenses for 2004
were lower compared to 2003 primarily due to reduced labor costs as well as reduced project spending within
Voridian Division.
50

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Impairments and Restructuring Charges, Net
Impairments and restructuring charges totaled $206 million during 2004, consisting of non-cash asset impairments
of $140 million and restructuring charges of $66 million. These charges totaled $523 million during 2003, consisting
of non-cash asset impairments of $500 million and restructuring charges of $23 million. Effective January 1, 2004,
certain commodity product lines were transferred from the PCI segment to the CASPI segment, which resulted in
the reclassification of asset impairment and severance charges of approximately $42 million for 2003. For more
information regarding asset impairments and restructuring charges, see Note 16 to the Company’s consolidated
financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Operating Income
(Dollars in millions) 2004 2003 Change
Other operating income $ (7) $ (33) $ 26
Other operating income for 2004 totaled approximately $7 million from the gain on sale of Ariel in the fourth
quarter, reflected in the DB segment.
Other operating income for 2003 totaled approximately $33 million and reflected gains of approximately $20
million on the sale of the Company’s high-performance crystalline plastic assets in first quarter, and approximately
$13 million on the sale of the Company’s colorant product lines and related assets in fourth quarter. These items
were reflected within the SP and CASPI segments, respectively.
Interest Expense, Net
(Dollars in millions) 2004 2003 Change
Gross interest costs $ 126 $ 133
Less: capitalized interest 3 3
Interest expense 123 130 (5) %
Interest income 8 6
Interest expense, net $ 115 $ 124 (7) %
Lower gross interest costs for 2004 compared to 2003 reflected lower average debt levels due to paydown of debt
throughout the year, which were partially offset by higher average interest rates.
Operating Earnings (Loss)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2004 2003
Operating earnings (loss) $ 175 $ (267)
Operating results for 2004 increased $442 million over results for 2003. This improvement included a $317 million
reduction in asset impairments and restructuring charges partially offset by lower other operating income of $26
million. In addition, earnings were positively impacted by the following factors:
• increased selling prices of approximately $350 million;
• increased volumes, excluding restructured, divested, and consolidated businesses and product lines;
• focus on more profitable product lines and the impact of favorable product mix;
• improved cost structure; and
• favorable impact of foreign exchange.
51

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The above items more than offset an estimated $600 million increase in raw materials and energy costs.
Other operating income of $7 million in 2004 resulted from the sale of Ariel, formerly part of the Company’s DB
segment. Other operating income in 2003 included a $20 million gain from the sale of the Company’s high-
performance crystalline plastics assets, which were formerly a part of the SP segment, and a gain of $13 million
from the sale of the Company’s colorant product lines and related assets, which were formerly part of the CASPI
segment.
Operating results for 2003 were impacted by a reduction in costs of approximately $40 million as a result of the
previously discussed change in vacation policy. This policy was part of cost reduction measures implemented by
the Company in the first quarter 2003. This change in policy impacted 2003 only. Also positively impacting 2003
results was a gain of approximately $14 million recorded as a credit to cost of sales on the earnings statement from
the insurance settlement related to the 2002 operational disruptions at the Company’s Rotterdam, the Netherlands
and Columbia, South Carolina facilities.
Other (Income) Charges, net
(Dollars in millions) 2004 2003 Change
Other income $ (10) $ (18) $ 8
Other charges 20 18 2
Other (income) charges, net $ 10 $ -- $ 10
Included in other income are the Company’s portion of earnings from its equity investments (excluding Genencor),
gains on the sale of certain technology business venture investments, royalty income, and net gains on foreign
exchange transactions. For both periods presented, included in other charges are net losses on foreign exchange
transactions, the Company’s portion of losses from its equity investments (excluding Genencor), write-downs to fair
value of certain technology business venture investments due to other than temporary declines in value, and fees on
securitized receivables.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
(Dollars in millions) 2004 2003 Change
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $ (106) $ (108) (2.0) %
Effective tax rate N/A 28%
The 2004 effective tax rate was impacted by $90 million of deferred tax benefits resulting from the expected
utilization of a capital loss resulting from the sale of certain businesses and product lines and related assets in the
CASPI segment and $26 million of tax benefit resulting from the favorable resolution of a prior year capital loss
refund claim. In addition, the effective tax rates for both 2004 and 2003 were impacted by the treatment of asset
impairments and restructuring charges resulting in lower expected tax benefits in certain jurisdictions. The 2003
effective tax rate was also impacted by non-deductible goodwill impairments. Both rates are impacted by the impact
of foreign rate variances and extraterritorial income exclusion benefits on normal taxable earnings. In both years, the
Company recorded benefits from the extraterritorial income exclusion.
Cumulative Effect of Changes in Accounting Principles, Net
(Dollars in millions) 2004 2003
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net $ -- $ 3
52

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SFAS No. 143
As required by SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” at January 1, 2003, the Company
recognized existing asset retirement obligations adjusted for cumulative accretion to the date of adoption, asset
retirement costs capitalized as an increase to the carrying amount of the associated long-lived asset and accumulated
depreciation on those capitalized costs. As a result of adoption of this standard, the Company recognized an after-tax
credit to earnings of $3 million during the first quarter 2003, primarily related to a reduction in certain
environmental liabilities. For more information regarding SFAS No. 143, see Note 24 to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Net Earnings (Loss)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2004 2003
Net earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of change in $ $
accounting principle 170 (273)
Net earnings (loss) 170 (270)
Earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
Basic $ 2.20 $ (3.54)
Diluted 2.18 (3.54)
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic $ 2.20 $ (3.50)
Diluted 2.18 (3.50)
53

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SUMMARY BY OPERATING SEGMENT
EASTMAN DIVISION
CASPI Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions) 2004 2003 $ %
Total external sales $ 1,554 $ 1,683 (129) (8) %
Volume effect (194) (11) %
Price effect 41 2%
Product mix effect (16) (1) %
Exchange rate effect 40 2%
Sales – restructured, divested, and consolidated product lines (1) 441 719 (278) (39) %
Sales – continuing product lines 1,113 964 149 15 %
Interdivisional Sales 1 -- 1 -- %
Total operating earnings (loss) 67 (402) 469 >100 %
Operating earnings (loss) – restructured, divested, and consolidated
product lines (1) (2) (85) (538) 453 84 %
Operating earnings – continuing product lines 152 136 16 12 %
Total asset impairments and restructuring charges 81 462 (381)
Asset impairments and restructuring charges – restructured,
divested, and consolidated product lines (1) 72 457 (385)
Asset impairments and restructuring charges – continuing product
lines 9 5 4
Other operating income -- 13 (13)
These businesses and product lines include acrylate ester monomers, composites (unsaturated polyester resins),
(1)
inks and graphic arts raw materials, liquid resins, powder resins and textile chemicals divested on July 31, 2004 as
well as other restructuring, divestiture and consolidation activities that the Company has completed related to these
businesses and product lines.
Includes allocated costs consistent with the Company’s historical practices, some of which remain and were
(2)
reallocated to the remainder of the segment and other segments subsequent to restructure, consolidation and
divestiture.
On July 31, 2004, the Company completed the sale of certain businesses, product lines and related assets within the
CASPI segment. This sale includes portions of the resins and monomers, and inks and graphic arts product groups.
As a result, the Company has presented CASPI segment sales revenue, operating earnings, and asset impairments
and restructuring charges for restructured, divested, and consolidated product lines and continuing product lines. For
additional information, see Exhibits 99.01 and 99.02 filed with this report.
54

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
External sales revenue decreased $129 million due to lower sales volume resulting from the divestiture discussed
above. Excluding the sales from these sources for both 2004 and 2003, sales revenue increased by 15 percent
primarily due to an 11 percent increase in volume. Continuing businesses benefited from improved end-market
demand attributable to strong economic growth and successful marketing of existing products in new applications.
Operating earnings increased $453 million due to lower asset impairment and restructuring charges of
approximately $381 million as well as a continued focus on more profitable businesses and product lines, increased
sales volume, and continued cost reduction efforts that were partially offset by higher raw materials and energy
costs, especially propane.
PCI Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions)
2004 2003 $ %
External sales $ 1,347 $ 1,098 $ 249 23 %
Volume effect 133 12 %
Price effect 117 11 %
Product mix effect (10) (1) %
Exchange rate effect 9 1%
Interdivisional sales 583 495 88 18 %
Operating earnings 16 (45) 61 >100 %
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net 38 57 (19)
The increase in external sales revenue of $249 million was primarily due to increased sales volume and higher
selling prices. The increase in volume had a positive impact on sales revenue of $133 million and was attributable to
improved end-market demand as a result of strong economic growth and implementation of long-term supply
arrangements with key customers. Additionally, higher selling prices, as a result of significantly increased raw
material and energy costs, had a positive impact on sales revenues of $117 million. The increase in interdivisional
sales was due to both higher selling prices as a result of higher raw material and energy costs and increased volume.
Operating earnings increased $61 million, partially due to a decrease in asset impairment and restructuring charges
of $19 million. Operating earnings were also favorably impacted by higher sales volume, higher selling prices, and
continued cost reduction efforts that more than offset higher raw materials and energy prices. Volume growth was
primarily due to improved end-market demand as a result of strong economic growth, implementation of long-term
supply arrangements with key customers and debottlenecking of production capacity at the Longview, Texas site.
Asset impairment and restructuring charges of $38 million in 2004 relate to manufacturing facilities in the
Company’s Batesville, Arkansas and Longview, Texas sites. Asset impairment and restructuring charges of $57
million in 2003 related to the Company’s manufacturing site in Llangefni, Wales.
55

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SP Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions)
2004 2003 $ %
External sales $ 644 $ 559 $ 85 15 %
Volume effect 65 12 %
Price effect 6 1%
Product mix effect -- -- %
Exchange rate effect 14 2%
Interdivisional sales 51 49 2 4%
Operating earnings 13 63 (50) ( 79) %
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net 53 1 52
Other operating income -- 20 (20)
The increase in external sales revenue of $85 million for 2004 compared with 2003 was primarily due to higher sales
volume attributed to strong market demand for products in both new and existing applications including eyewear,
housewares, and cosmetics packaging in North America and Asia Pacific regions. The increase in volume had a
positive impact on sales revenue of $65 million.
Operating earnings for 2004 decreased $50 million compared with 2003 primarily due to asset impairments and
restructuring charges of $53 million related primarily to the closure of the Hartlepool, United Kingdom
manufacturing site as well as severance charges related to the Company’s employee separation programs. Operating
earnings in 2003 included a gain of $20 million on the sale of the segment’s high performance crystalline plastics
assets. In addition, the operating earnings improved year over year due to increased sales volumes, a continued focus
on more profitable businesses and product lines, and continued cost reduction efforts that more than offset higher
raw materials and energy costs.
VORIDIAN DIVISION
Polymers Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions)
2004 2003 $ %
External sales $ 2,183 $ 1,756 $ 427 24 %
Volume effect 156 9%
Price effect 211 12 %
Product mix effect 4 -- %
Exchange rate effect 56 3%
Interdivisional sales 69 68 1 1%
Operating earnings 25 62 (37) ( 60) %
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net 13 2 11
56

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
External sales revenue increased $427 million primarily due to higher selling prices and increased sales volume.
Higher selling prices had a positive impact on sales revenue of $211 million, primarily in response to higher raw
material and energy costs and improving market conditions in the second half of 2004. The volume increase was
mostly a result of continued strong end-market demand for PET polymers and continued substitution for other
competitive materials in North America, Latin America, and Europe and had a positive impact on sales revenue of
$156 million.
Operating earnings decreased $37 million, including an asset impairment and restructuring charge increase of $11
million. Operating earnings were also impacted by increased selling prices and higher sales volumes that were more
than offset by higher raw material and energy costs, particularly for paraxylene and ethylene glycol. Included in the
2003 results is a $14 million gain in 2003 from an insurance settlement related to the 2002 operational disruptions at
the Company’s Rotterdam, the Netherlands and Columbia, South Carolina facilities.
Fibers Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions)
2004 2003 $ %
External sales $ 731 $ 635 $ 96 15 %
Volume effect 83 13 %
Price effect (13) (2) %
Product mix effect 17 3%
Exchange rate effect 9 1%
Interdivisional sales 88 80 8 10 %
Operating earnings 146 125 21 17 %
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net -- 1 (1)
External sales revenue increased $96 million. Increased sales volume had a positive impact of $83 million and
improved product mix had a $17 million impact on revenue. The increase in sales volume and favorable shift in
product mix were primarily attributable to acetyl chemicals in North America and acetate tow in the Asia Pacific
region.
Operating earnings increased $21 million primarily due to increased sales volume that was partially offset by higher
raw material and energy costs.
DEVELOPING BUSINESSES DIVISION
Fibers Segment
Change
(Dollars in millions)
2004 2003 $ %
External sales $ 121 $ 69 $ 52 75 %
Interdivisional sales 424 396 28 7%
Operating earnings (86) (65) (21) (32) %
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net 21 -- 21
Other operating income 7 -- 7
57

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
External sales revenue increased $52 million primarily due to the implementation of third-party contracts at
Cendian. The increase in interdivisional sales revenue for 2004 was primarily due to the increase in logistics
services provided by Cendian to Eastman Division and Voridian Division business segments and the increase in
sales volumes in those segments.
Operating losses increased $21 million primarily due to asset impairments and restructuring charges of $21 million
mainly related to the restructuring of Cendian. Also included in 2004 operating results was a $7 million gain from
the sale of Ariel.
In 2004, the operating results for the DB segment were below the Company’s expectations, primarily due to the
inability of Cendian to achieve sufficient margins to offset operating costs. As a result, the Company decided it
would reintegrate its logistics function. This reintegration was completed in second quarter 2005.
SUMMARY BY CUSTOMER LOCATION – 2004 COMPARED WITH 2003
Sales Revenue (excluding interdivisional sales)
Exchange
Product
Price Mix Rate
Volume
(Dollars in millions)
2004 2003 Change Effect Effect Effect Effect
United States and
Canada 3,723 3,302 13 % 6% 8% (1) % -- %
$ $
Europe, Middle East,
and Africa 1,467 1,368 7% (5) % 2% 1% 9%
Asia Pacific 785 643 22 % 9% 6% 6% 1%
Latin America 605 487 24 % 11 % 11 % 1% 1%
6,580 5,800
$ $
The increase in sales revenue in the United States and Canada for 2004 compared with 2003 was primarily due to
higher selling prices, particularly for the Polymers and PCI segment, which had a positive impact on sales revenue
of $247 million. The higher selling prices mostly related to sales of intermediates chemicals, PET polymers, and
polyethylene, and were primarily in response to increases in raw material and energy costs and high industry-wide
capacity utilization. While the impact of the restructuring, divestiture, and consolidation activities in the CASPI
segment had a negative impact on sales revenue, overall higher sales volumes, particularly for the Polymers and PCI
segment, had a positive impact on sales revenue of $192 million.
2004 sales revenue in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa increased compared with 2003 due to favorable shifts in
foreign currency exchange rates which had a positive impact on sales revenue of $119 million, primarily due to the
strengthening of the euro. 2004 sales volume declined 4 percent due to the impact of the restructuring, divestiture,
and consolidation activities in the CASPI segment. In all other segments, 2004 sales volumes increased compared to
2003.
2004 sales revenue in the Asia Pacific region increased significantly compared with 2003 primarily due to higher
sales volume, particularly in the Fibers segment, which had a positive impact on sales revenue of $57 million. A
favorable shift in product mix and higher selling prices, particularly for intermediates products in the PCI segment,
contributed $42 million and $36 million, respectively, to sales revenue.
2004 sales revenue in Latin America increased significantly compared with 2003 primarily due to higher sales
volumes and higher selling prices, primarily related to PET polymers, each of which had a positive impact on sales
revenue of $55 million.
58

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES, AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Cash Flows
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities $ 764 $ 494 $ 244
Investing activities (18) (148) (160)
Financing activities (547) (579) 397
Net change in cash and cash equivalents $ 199 $ (233) $ 481
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 524 $ 325 $ 558
Cash provided by operating activities increased $270 million in 2005 compared with 2004 primarily as a result of a
significant increase in earnings and a decrease in working capital requirements, partially offset by $165 million in
contributions to U.S. defined benefit pension plans. The decrease in working capital requirements related primarily
to accounts receivable, largely the result of improved collection performance which more than offset the increase in
sales, partially offset by an increase in inventories. The Company made $3 million in contributions to U.S. defined
benefit pension plans in 2004.
Cash provided by operating activities increased $250 million in 2004 compared with 2003 primarily as a result of a
reduction in cash funding for U.S. defined benefit pension plans. Contributions to the Company's U.S. defined
benefit pension plans were $238 million in 2003. In addition, net earnings increased in 2004 due to higher gross
margins and lower asset impairment charges, and were partially offset by additional increases in working capital,
primarily accounts receivable. The additional increase in accounts receivable was the result of the significant
increase in sales in fourth quarter 2004 partially offset by improved collection performance.
Cash used in investing activities decreased $130 million in 2005 compared with 2004 largely due to $417 million in
net proceeds from the sale of the Company's investment in Genencor in the second quarter 2005. In addition, in the
second quarter 2005, the Company received payment for the $50 million note it received in the sale of certain
businesses and product lines in the CASPI segment. In 2004, the Company received $115 million in net cash
proceeds associated with such sale, as well as $12 million in proceeds from the sale of Ariel. In the fourth quarter
2005, the Company provided a line of credit up to $125 million to Primester, a joint venture in which Eastman has a
50 percent interest, which Primester fully utilized to repay its third-party borrowings, which had previously been
guaranteed by Eastman. In addition, the Company used an additional $95 million for additions to properties and
equipment in 2005 as compared with 2004.
Cash used in investing activities in 2004 decreased $12 million compared with 2003. In 2004, the Company sold
certain businesses and product lines in its CASPI segment as well as Ariel, resulting in total net proceeds of $127
million. In 2003, the Company sold its high-performance crystalline plastics assets and its colorant product lines
and related assets for $70 million. The Company used an additional $18 million for additions to properties and
equipment in 2004 as compared with 2003. In 2003, the Company received a return of a deposit of approximately
$15 million.
Cash used in financing activities in 2005 totaled $547 million and included the Company's early repayment of $500
million of its outstanding long-term debt, and a decrease in credit facility and other short-term borrowings, including
bank overdrafts, of $150 million, offset by cash received from stock option exercises of $98 million. See Note 8 to
the Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K for
information regarding the early extinguishment of debt. In addition, the Company borrowed $191 million from a
new credit facility in the fourth quarter 2005, the proceeds of which provided a significant part of the funding for the
repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings under the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act.
59

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cash used in financing activities in 2004 totaled $579 million and reflects the January 2004 repayment of $500
million of 6 3/8% notes and a decrease in commercial paper, credit facility, and other short-term borrowings,
including bank overdrafts, of $19 million, offset by cash from stock option exercises of $77 million.
Cash provided by financing activities in 2003 totaled $397 million primarily due to proceeds from long term
borrowings of $495 million and an increase in commercial paper and other short-term borrowings, including bank
overdrafts, of $39 million.
The payment of dividends is also reflected in financing activities in all periods.
In 2006, priorities for use of available cash will be to pay the quarterly cash dividend, fund targeted growth
initiatives, and fund defined benefit pension plans.
Liquidity
At December 31, 2005, the Company had credit facilities with various U.S. and foreign banks totaling
approximately $890 million. These credit facilities consist of a $700 million revolving credit facility (the \"Credit
Facility\") expiring in April 2009, and a 160 million euro credit facility (\" the Euro Facility\") which expires in
December, 2010 and has options for two one-year extensions. Borrowings under these credit facilities are subject to
interest at varying spreads above quoted market rates. These credit facilities require facility fees on the total
commitment that are based on Eastman’s credit rating. In addition, these credit facilities contain a number of
covenants and events of default, including the maintenance of certain financial ratios. Eastman was in compliance
with all such covenants for all periods presented. At December 31, 2005, the Company’s credit facility borrowings
totaled $214 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.01 percent. At December 31, 2004, the Company's
credit facility borrowings were $146 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 2.98 percent.
The Credit Facility provides liquidity support for commercial paper borrowings and general corporate purposes.
Accordingly, any outstanding commercial paper borrowings reduce borrowings available under the Credit Facility.
Since the Credit Facility expires in April 2009, any commercial paper borrowings supported by the Credit Facility
are classified as long-term borrowings because the Company has the ability to refinance such borrowings on a long-
term basis.
Eastman fully utilized the Euro Facility in the fourth quarter 2005 by borrowing $189 million. These funds
comprised a significant portion of the funding for the 2005 repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings under the
provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act.
The Company has effective shelf registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue
a combined $1.1 billion of debt or equity securities.
In the second quarter 2005, Eastman completed the sale of its equity interest in Genencor for approximately $417
million in net cash proceeds after tax. This action, combined with strong operating results, allowed the Company to
complete the early repayment of $500 million of its outstanding debt in second quarter 2005, further strengthening
its financial position.
During 2005, the Company contributed $165 million to U.S. defined benefit pension plans. The Company
anticipates contributing approximately $75 million to U.S. defined benefit pension plans during 2006.
Cash flows from operations and the sources of capital described above are expected to be available and sufficient to
meet foreseeable cash flow requirements including those requirements related to the normal seasonal increase in
working capital expected in the first half of the year. However, the Company’s cash flows from operations can be
affected by numerous factors including risks associated with global operations, raw materials availability and cost,
demand for and pricing of Eastman’s products, capacity utilization, and other factors described under \"Forward-
Looking Statements and Risk Factors\" below. Furthermore, the Company believes maintaining a financial profile
consistent with an investment grade company is important to its long term strategic and financial flexibility.
60

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures were $343 million, $248 million, and $230 million for 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. The
increase of $95 million in 2005 compared with 2004 was primarily due to spending on the new PET facility in South
Carolina, utilizing IntegRex technology, as well as other growth initiatives. The Company expects that 2006 capital
spending will be up to $450 million which will exceed estimated 2006 depreciation and amortization of
approximately $300 million. In 2006, the Company will continue to pursue projects including a copolyester
intermediates expansion, the new PET facility in South Carolina, utilizing IntegRex technology, and other growth
initiatives.
Other Commitments
At December 31, 2005, the Company’s obligations related to notes and debentures totaled approximately $1.4
billion to be paid over a period of approximately 20 years. Other borrowings, related primarily to credit facility
borrowings, totaled approximately $214 million.
The Company had various purchase obligations at December 31, 2005 totaling approximately $1.7 billion over a
period of approximately 15 years for materials, supplies and energy incident to the ordinary conduct of business.
The Company also had various lease commitments for property and equipment under cancelable, noncancelable, and
month-to-month operating leases totaling approximately $208 million over a period of several years. Of the total
lease commitments, approximately 15 percent relate to machinery and equipment, including computer and
communications equipment and production equipment; approximately 50 percent relate to real property, including
office space, storage facilities and land; and approximately 35 percent relate to railcars.
In addition, the Company had other liabilities at December 31, 2005 totaling approximately $1.2 billion related to
pension, retiree medical, and other post-employment obligations.
The obligations described above are summarized in the following table:
(Dollars in Payments Due For
millions)
Notes and Credit Purchase Operating Other
Period Debentures Facility Obligations Leases Liabilities Total
Borrowings (a)
2006 $ $ 291 $ 44 $ 473
4 $ -- $ 134
2007 282 36 405
-- -- 87
2008 177 23 340
72 -- 68
2009 172 19 293
12 25 65
2010 162 16 429
-- 189 62
2011 and
1,323 --
beyond 658 70 765 2,816
Total $ $ 1,742 $ 208 $ 4,756
1,411 $ 214 $ 1,181
(a) Amounts represent the current estimated cash payments to be made by the Company for pension and other post-
employment benefits in the periods indicated. The amount and timing of such payments is dependent upon interest
rates, health care trends, actual returns on plan assets, retirement and attrition rates of employees, continuation or
modification of the benefit plans, and other factors. Such factors can significantly impact the amount and timing of
any future contributions by the Company.
61

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Notes and debentures at December 31, 2005 decreased approximately $500 million compared with December 31,
2004 primarily due to the early repayment of $500 million of its outstanding long-term debt during second quarter
2005. Credit facility borrowings increased approximately $70 million at December 31, 2005 compared to December
31, 2004 due to the funding for the 2005 repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings under the provisions of the
American Jobs Creation Act. Purchase obligations decreased approximately $200 million at December 31, 2005
compared to December 31, 2004 due to consumption of ethylene glycol and polypropylene under existing contracts.
Other liabilities decreased approximately $120 million at December 31, 2005 compared with December 31, 2004
due primarily to contributions to the Company's defined benefit pension plans.
Off Balance Sheet and Other Financing Arrangements
If certain operating leases are terminated by the Company, it guarantees a portion of the residual value loss, if any,
incurred by the lessors in disposing of the related assets. The Company believes, based on current facts and
circumstances, that a material payment pursuant to such guarantees in excess of the payments included above is
remote. Under these operating leases, the residual value guarantees at December 31, 2005 totaled $85 million and
consisted primarily of leases for railcars, company aircraft, and other equipment. Leases with guarantee amounts
totaling $4 million, $27 million, and $54 million will expire in 2006, 2008, and 2012, respectively.
As described in Note 5 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual
Report on Form 10-K, Eastman has a 50 percent interest in and serves as the operating partner in Primester, a joint
venture which manufactures cellulose acetate at the Company's Kingsport, Tennessee plant. During fourth quarter
2005, the Company provided a line of credit to the joint venture of up to $125 million, which Primester fully utilized
to pay the principal amount of the joint venture's third-party borrowings, previously guaranteed by Eastman.
As described in Note 11 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, Eastman entered into an agreement in
1999 that allows it to generate cash by reducing its working capital through the sale of undivided interests in certain
domestic trade accounts receivable under a planned continuous sale program to a third party. Under this agreement,
receivables sold to the third party totaled $200 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004. Undivided interests in
designated receivable pools were sold to the purchaser with recourse limited to the purchased interest in the
receivable pools.
The Company did not have any other material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships,
including special purpose entities, for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements with contractually
narrow or limited purposes. Thus, Eastman is not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market, or credit
risk related to the above or any other such relationships.
The Company has evaluated material relationships including the guarantees related to the third-party borrowings of
joint ventures described above and has concluded that the entities are not Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) or, in
the case of Primester, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. As such, in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board (\"FASB\") Interpretation Number 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (\"FIN
46R\"), the Company is not required to consolidate these entities. In addition, the Company has evaluated long-term
purchase obligations with two entities that may be VIEs at December 31, 2005. These potential VIEs are joint
ventures from which the Company has purchased raw materials and utilities for several years and purchases
approximately $60 million of raw materials and utilities on an annual basis. The Company has no equity interest in
these entities and has confirmed that one party to each of these joint ventures does consolidate the potential VIE.
However, due to competitive and other reasons, the Company has not been able to obtain the necessary financial
information to determine whether the entities are VIEs, and if one or both are VIEs, whether or not the Company is
the primary beneficiary.
62

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Guarantees and claims also arise during the ordinary course of business from relationships with suppliers,
customers, and non-consolidated affiliates when the Company undertakes an obligation to guarantee the
performance of others if specified triggering events occur. Non-performance under a contract could trigger an
obligation of the Company. These potential claims include actions based upon alleged exposures to products,
intellectual property and environmental matters, and other indemnifications. The ultimate effect on future financial
results is not subject to reasonable estimation because considerable uncertainty exists as to the final outcome of
these claims. However, while the ultimate liabilities resulting from such claims may be significant to results of
operations in the period recognized, management does not anticipate they will have a material adverse effect on the
Company's consolidated financial position or liquidity.
See Note 10 to the Company's consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K for off balance sheet post-employment benefit obligations.
Treasury Stock Transactions
The Company is currently authorized to repurchase up to $400 million of its common stock. No shares of Eastman
common stock were repurchased by the Company during 2005, 2004 or 2003. A total of 2,746,869 shares of
common stock at a cost of approximately $112 million, or an average price of approximately $41 per share, have
been repurchased under the authorization. Repurchased shares may be used to meet common stock requirements for
compensation and benefit plans and other corporate purposes.
Dividends
The Company declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.44 per share for a total of $1.76 per share in 2005, 2004, and
2003, respectively.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Certain Eastman manufacturing sites generate hazardous and nonhazardous wastes of which the treatment, storage,
transportation, and disposal are regulated by various governmental agencies. In connection with the cleanup of
various hazardous waste sites, the Company, along with many other entities, has been designated a potentially
responsible party (\"PRP\") by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act, which potentially subjects PRPs to joint and several liability for such
cleanup costs. In addition, the Company will be required to incur costs for environmental remediation and closure
and postclosure under the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Adequate reserves for environmental
contingencies have been established in accordance with Eastman’s policies as described in Note 1 to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Because of expected
sharing of costs, the availability of legal defenses, and the Company’s preliminary assessment of actions that may be
required, it does not believe its liability for these environmental matters, individually or in the aggregate, will be
material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
The Company accrues environmental remediation costs when it is probable that the Company has incurred a liability
at a contaminated site and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When a single amount cannot be reasonably
estimated but the cost can be estimated within a range, the Company accrues the minimum amount. This
undiscounted accrued amount reflects the Company’s assumptions about remediation requirements at the
contaminated site, the nature of the remedy, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other
potentially responsible parties at multi-party sites, and the number and financial viability of other potentially
responsible parties. Changes in the estimates on which the accruals are based, unanticipated government
enforcement action, or changes in health, safety, environmental, and chemical control regulations and testing
requirements could result in higher or lower costs. Estimated future environmental expenditures for remediation
costs range from the minimum or best estimate of $21 million to the maximum of $42 million at December 31,
2005.
63

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In addition to remediation activities, the Company establishes reserves for closure/postclosure costs associated with
the environmental assets it maintains. Environmental assets include but are not limited to waste management units,
such as landfills, water treatment facilities, and ash ponds. When these types of assets are constructed or installed, a
reserve is established for the anticipated future costs associated with the closure of the asset based on its expected
life and the applicable regulatory closure requirements. These future expenses are charged into earnings over the
estimated useful life of the assets.
In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations”
(\"FIN 47\"), which was effective for the Company on December 31, 2005. FIN 47 requires an entity to recognize a
liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability can be reasonably estimated. The
Interpretation also clarifies that the term Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation (\"CARO\") refers to a legal
obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on
a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would
have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. The Company
performed a thorough examination of various asset categories. Although it may have CAROs at certain of its
facilities, including, but not limited to, the potential for asbestos abatement activities, the Company is unable to
determine potential settlement dates to be used in fair value calculations for estimating these obligations as a result
of an absence of plans or expectations to undertake a major renovation or demolition project that would require the
removal of asbestos. The Company continues to monitor these conditional obligations, as well as any new ones that
may develop, and will record reserves associated with them when and to the extent that more detailed information
becomes available concerning applicable retirement costs. The recorded obligations did not have a material impact
on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Reserves related to environmental assets accounted for approximately 60 percent of the total environmental reserve
at December 31, 2005. Currently, the Company’s environmental assets are expected to be no longer useable at
different times over the next 50 years. If the Company were to invest in numerous new environmental assets, or,
these assets were to require closure a significant number of years before the Company anticipated they would, the
amortization on them would increase, and could have a material negative impact on the Company’s financial
condition and results of operations. The Company views the likelihood of this occurrence to be remote, and does not
anticipate, based on its past experience with this type of planned remediation, that an additional accrual related to
environmental assets will be necessary.
INFLATION
In recent years, general economic inflation has not had a material adverse impact on Eastman's costs. The cost of
raw materials is generally based on market price, although derivative financial instruments were utilized, as
appropriate, to mitigate short-term market price fluctuations. For additional information see Note 9 to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In November, 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4”. The Statement adopts the International Accounting Standards Board’s view related to
inventories that abnormal amounts of idle capacity and spoilage costs should be excluded from the cost of inventory
and expensed when incurred. Additionally, the Statement clarifies the meaning of the term 'normal capacity'. The
provisions of this Statement will be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June
15, 2005. The Company has evaluated the effect of SFAS No. 151 and determined that it does not materially impact
its consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results from operations.
64

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In December, 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(Revised), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123(R) revises
SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 25- \"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees\". SFAS No. 123(R) requires all companies that award
their employees stock-based compensation to recognize these transactions in their financial statements based on the
grant-date fair value of the award. This differs from the requirements of SFAS No. 123 which permitted the option
of adopting SFAS No. 123 and reflecting these transactions in the financial statements or the continued application
of APB Opinion No. 25 requiring only pro forma disclosure of the effects on net earnings and earnings per share as
if SFAS No. 123 had been adopted. Through the end of 2005, the Company has elected to continue the application
of APB Opinion No. 25 with the pro forma disclosure required for SFAS No. 123. However, the Company is
required to implement the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) effective January 1, 2006.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires the Company, as of the required effective date of application, to implement the standard
using a modified version of prospective application. Under this method, compensation expense is recognized for the
following: 1) the portion of outstanding awards at the effective date of implementation for which the requisite
employee service has not yet been rendered, based upon the grant-date fair value of those awards calculated under
SFAS No. 123 for pro forma disclosure purposes, and 2) all new awards, modified awards, repurchased awards, or
cancelled awards after the effective date of implementation.
Under previous reporting guidance, the following types of share-based compensation awards have been recorded in
the financial statements: 1) unrestricted common stock awards, 2) restricted common stock awards, 3) stock
appreciation rights payable in cash and 4) long-term performance awards payable in the form of shares of common
stock or cash. The implementation of SFAS No. 123(R) includes the additional requirement to recognize
compensation expense of stock option awards in the financial statements. The outstanding quantity and value of
existing stock option awards at December 31, 2005 for which the requisite service period has not been provided and
for which compensation expense will be recognized in the financial statements after the effective date of application
total 1,990,617 options and approximately $17 million over three years. The Company did not modify any awards
granted prior to January 1, 2006 to affect early vesting which would have eliminated the required service period to
be provided after the effective date of application and eliminated recognition of compensation expense related
thereto. Further, there have not been any changes in the quantity or type of share-based payment awards solely due
to the implementation of SFAS No. 123(R).
The determination of the grant-date fair value of share-based compensation awards is based upon observable prices
of financial equity instruments actively traded in open markets or, if not available, as in the case of the Company's
stock option awards and stock appreciation rights awards, an option pricing financial model should be used to
estimate the fair value of the award. Eastman has relied upon the use of the Black-Scholes-Merton model to
determine the value of its stock options and stock appreciation rights under SFAS No. 123 and will continue to do so
under SFAS No. 123(R). As discussed in Note 15 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the use of any financial model may require the use of highly
subjective input assumptions that may materially affect the fair value estimate. Refer to this footnote to review these
assumptions for 2005, 2004 and 2003.
All share-based employee compensation expense will be reflected in the earnings statement within the selling,
general and administrative expense line item with an offset to paid-in-capital or non-current liabilities in the
statement of financial position dependent upon classification as a liability award or equity award. Awards classified
as liabilities require the use of cash or other assets to effect payment while equity awards reflect payment through
stock issuances. The federal income tax and state income tax consequences of recognition for share-based
compensation are reflected in the earnings statement as a credit to current period income tax expense with an offset
in the statement of financial position as deferred income taxes in the other non-current assets line item.
Additionally, SFAS No. 123(R) requires that cash inflows related to the realized tax benefits in excess of the amount
recorded in the financial statements be recognized in the statement of cash flows as a cash inflow from financing and
a cash outflow from operating activities.
65

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OUTLOOK
For 2006, the Company expects:
• that the volatility of raw material and energy costs will continue and that the Company will continue to pursue
pricing strategies and ongoing cost control initiatives to offset the effects on gross profit;
• strong volumes will be maintained due to continued economic strength, continued substitution of Eastman
products for other materials, and new applications for existing products;
• that pension and other post-employment benefit expenses will be similar to 2005 levels;
• to contribute approximately $75 million to the Company’s U.S. defined benefit pension plans;
• net interest expense to decrease compared with 2005 primarily as a result of anticipated lower average
borrowings, increased capitalized interest and higher interest income;
• the effective tax rate to be approximately 33 percent;
• to continue to evaluate its portfolio, which could lead to further restructuring, divestiture, or consolidation of
product lines as it continues to focus on profitability;
• capital expenditures to increase to up to $450 million and exceed estimated depreciation and amortization of
approximately $300 million; in 2006, the Company plans to complete construction of the new PET facility in
South Carolina, utilizing IntegRex technology, and pursue a copolyester intermediates expansion and other
targeted growth initiatives; and
• that priorities for use of available cash will be to pay the quarterly cash dividend and fund targeted growth
initiatives and defined benefit pension plans.
See “Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors\" below.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS
The expectations under \"Outlook\" and certain other statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may be
forward-looking in nature as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements and
other written and oral forward-looking statements made by the Company from time to time may relate to, among
other things, such matters as planned and expected capacity increases and utilization; anticipated capital spending;
expected depreciation and amortization; environmental matters; legal proceedings; exposure to, and effects of
hedging of, raw material and energy costs and foreign currencies; global and regional economic, political, and
business conditions; competition; growth opportunities; supply and demand, volume, price, cost, margin, and sales;
earnings, cash flow, dividends and other expected financial conditions; expectations, strategies, and plans for
individual assets and products, businesses, segments and divisions as well as for the whole of Eastman Chemical
Company; cash requirements and uses of available cash; financing plans; pension expenses and funding; credit
ratings; anticipated restructuring, divestiture, and consolidation activities; cost reduction and control efforts and
targets; integration of acquired businesses; development, production, commercialization and acceptance of new
products, services and technologies and related costs; asset, business and product portfolio changes; and expected
tax rates and net interest costs.
66

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
These plans and expectations are based upon certain underlying assumptions, including those mentioned with the
specific statements. Such assumptions are in turn based upon internal estimates and analyses of current market
conditions and trends, management plans and strategies, economic conditions and other factors. These plans and
expectations and the assumptions underlying them are necessarily subject to risks and uncertainties inherent in
projecting future conditions and results. Actual results could differ materially from expectations expressed in the
forward-looking statements if one or more of the underlying assumptions and expectations proves to be inaccurate
or is unrealized. In addition to the factors described in this report, the following are some of the important factors
that could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from those in any such forward-looking
statements:
• The Company is reliant on certain strategic raw materials for its operations and utilizes risk management tools,
including hedging, as appropriate, to mitigate short-term market fluctuations in raw material costs. There can
be no assurance, however, that such measures will result in cost savings or that all market fluctuation exposure
will be eliminated. In addition, natural disasters, changes in laws or regulations, war or other outbreak of
hostilities, or other political factors in any of the countries or regions in which the Company operates or does
business, or in countries or regions that are key suppliers of strategic raw materials, could affect availability and
costs of raw materials.
• While temporary shortages of raw materials and energy may occasionally occur, these items have historically
been sufficiently available to cover current and projected requirements. However, their continuous availability
and price are impacted by natural disasters, plant interruptions occurring during periods of high demand,
domestic and world market and political conditions, changes in government regulation, and war or other
outbreak of hostilities. Eastman’s operations or products may, at times, be adversely affected by these factors.
• The Company's competitive position in the markets in which it participates is, in part, subject to external factors
in addition to those that the Company can impact. Natural disasters, changes in laws or regulations, war or
other outbreak of hostilities, or other political factors in any of the countries or regions in which the Company
operates or does business, or in countries or regions that are key suppliers of strategic raw materials, could
negatively impact the Company’s competitive position and its ability to maintain market share. For example,
supply and demand for certain of the Company's products is driven by end-use markets and worldwide
capacities which, in turn, impact demand for and pricing of the Company's products.
• Limitation of the Company's available manufacturing capacity due to significant disruption in its manufacturing
operations, including natural disasters, could have a material adverse affect on sales revenue, costs and results
of operations and financial condition.
• The Company has an extensive customer base; however, loss of, or material financial weakness of, certain of
the largest customers could adversely affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations until
such business is replaced and no assurances can be made that the Company would be able to regain or replace
any lost customers. In addition, the Company's competitive position may be adversely impacted by low cost
competitors in certain regions and customers developing internal or alternative sources of supply.
• In addition to productivity and cost reduction initiatives, the Company is striving to improve margins on its
products through price increases where warranted and accepted by the market; however, the Company's
earnings could be negatively impacted should such increases be unrealized, not be sufficient to cover increased
raw material and energy costs, or have a negative impact on demand and volume. There can be no assurances
that price increases will be realized or will be realized within the Company’s anticipated timeframe.
• The Company is endeavoring to exploit growth opportunities in certain core businesses by developing new
products, expanding into new markets, and tailoring product offerings to customer needs. There can be no
assurance that such efforts will result in financially successful commercialization of such products or
acceptance by existing or new customers or new markets.
67

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
• The Company has made, and intends to continue making, strategic investments, including IntegRex technology,
and has entered, and expects to continue to enter, into strategic alliances in technology, services businesses, and
other ventures in order to build, diversify, and strengthen certain Eastman capabilities and to maintain high
utilization of manufacturing assets. There can be no assurance that such investments and alliances will achieve
their underlying strategic business objectives or that they will be beneficial to the Company's results of
operations.
• The Company has undertaken and expects to continue to undertake productivity and cost reduction initiatives
and organizational restructurings to improve performance and generate cost savings. There can be no assurance
that these will be completed as planned or beneficial or that estimated cost savings from such activities will be
realized.
• The Company's facilities and businesses are subject to complex health, safety and environmental laws and
regulations, which require and will continue to require significant expenditures to remain in compliance with
such laws and regulations currently and in the future. The Company's accruals for such costs and associated
liabilities are subject to changes in estimates on which the accruals are based. The amount accrued reflects the
Company’s assumptions about remediation requirements at the contaminated site, the nature of the remedy, the
outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other potentially responsible parties at multi-party sites,
and the number and financial viability of other potentially responsible parties. Changes in the estimates on
which the accruals are based, unanticipated government enforcement action, or changes in health, safety,
environmental, chemical control regulations and testing requirements could result in higher or lower costs.
• The Company and its operations from time to time are parties to or targets of lawsuits, claims, investigations,
and proceedings, including product liability, personal injury, asbestos, patent and intellectual property,
commercial, contract, environmental, antitrust, health and safety, and employment matters, which are handled
and defended in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes amounts reserved are adequate for
such pending matters; however, results of operations could be affected by significant litigation adverse to the
Company.
• The Company has deferred tax assets related to capital and operating losses. The Company establishes
valuation allowances to reduce these deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
The Company’s ability to utilize these deferred tax assets depends on projected future operating results, the
reversal of existing temporary differences, and the availability of tax planning strategies. Realization of these
assets is expected to occur over an extended period of time. As a result, changes in tax laws, assumptions with
respect to future taxable income and tax planning strategies could result in adjustments to these assets.
The foregoing list of important factors does not include all such factors nor necessarily present them in order of
importance. This disclosure, including that under \"Outlook\" and \"Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors,\"
and other forward-looking statements and related disclosures made by the Company in this Annual Report on Form
10-K and elsewhere from time to time, represents management's best judgment as of the date the information is
given. The Company does not undertake responsibility for updating any of such information, whether as a result of
new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. Investors are advised, however, to consult
any further public Company disclosures (such as in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in
Company press releases) on related subjects.
68

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to changes in financial market conditions in the normal course of its business due to its use
of certain financial instruments as well as transacting in various foreign currencies and funding foreign operations.
To mitigate the Company's exposure to these market risks, Eastman has established policies, procedures, and
internal processes governing its management of financial market risks and the use of financial instruments to
manage its exposure to such risks.
The Company determines its market risk utilizing sensitivity analysis, which measures the potential losses in fair
value resulting from one or more selected hypothetical changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates,
and/or commodity prices.
The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates primarily as a result of its borrowing activities, which include
long-term borrowings used to maintain liquidity and to fund its business operations and capital requirements.
Currently, these borrowings are predominately U.S. dollar denominated. The nature and amount of the Company's
long-term and short-term debt may vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions, and other
factors. In 2005, for purposes of calculating the market risks associated with the fair value of interest-rate-sensitive
instruments, the Company changed to a one percent absolute shift in interest rates from a 10 percent relative shift in
interest rates which was used in 2004. For 2005 and 2004, the market risks associated with the fair value of interest-
rate-sensitive instruments, assuming an instantaneous absolute shift in interest rates of 1 percent were approximately
$134 million and $158 million, respectively. This exposure is primarily related to long-term debt with fixed interest
rates.
The Company's operating cash flows and borrowings denominated in foreign currencies are exposed to changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. The Company continually evaluates its foreign currency exposure based on current
market conditions and the locations in which the Company conducts business. In order to mitigate the effect of
foreign currency risk, the Company enters into forward exchange contracts to hedge certain firm commitments
denominated in foreign currencies and currency options to hedge probable anticipated but not yet committed export
sales and purchase transactions expected within no more than five years and denominated in foreign currencies. The
gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the value of related exposures. It is the Company's policy to
enter into foreign currency transactions only to the extent considered necessary to meet its objectives as stated
above. The Company does not enter into foreign currency transactions for speculative purposes. At December 31,
2005, the Company had no outstanding forward exchange contracts or currency options. For 2005, the market risks
associated with borrowings denominated in foreign currencies assuming a 10 percent adverse move in the U.S.
dollar relative to each foreign currency was approximately $19 million and an additional $1.9 million for each
additional one percentage point adverse change in foreign currency rates. For 2004, the market risks associated with
forward exchange contracts utilizing a modified Black-Scholes option pricing model and a 10 percent adverse move
in the U.S. dollar relative to each foreign currency hedged by the Company were approximately $15 million and an
additional $1.4 million for each additional one percentage point adverse change in foreign currency exchange rates.
At December 31, 2004, the Company's outstanding borrowings denominated in foreign currencies were immaterial.
Further adverse movements in foreign currencies would create losses in fair value; however, such losses would not
be linear to that disclosed above. This exposure, which is primarily related to foreign currency options purchased by
the Company to manage fluctuations in foreign currencies, is limited to the dollar value of option premiums payable
by the Company for the related financial instruments. Furthermore, since the Company utilizes currency-sensitive
derivative instruments for hedging anticipated foreign currency transactions, a loss in fair value for those
instruments is generally offset by increases in the value of the underlying anticipated transactions.
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in market prices for certain of its major raw materials and energy. To
mitigate short-term fluctuations in market prices for certain commodities, principally propane and natural gas, the
Company enters into forwards and options contracts. For 2005 and 2004, the market risks associated with options
and swaps for feedstock and natural gas assuming an instantaneous parallel shift in the underlying commodity price
of 10 percent were $2 million and $1 million, respectively, and an additional $0.1 million for each one percentage
point move in closing prices thereafter for both periods.
69

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM Page
Management's Responsibility for Financial Statements 71
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 72
Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss), Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Retained Earnings 74
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position 75
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 76
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies 77
Note 2. Inventories 83
Note 3. Properties and Accumulated Depreciation 83
Note 4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets 84
Note 5. Equity Investments and Other Noncurrent Assets and Liabilities 85
Note 6. Payables and Other Current Liabilities 86
Note 7. Borrowings 86
Note 8. Early Extinguishment of Debt 87
Note 9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments 88
Note 10. Retirement Plans 89
Note 11. Commitments 96
Note 12. Environmental Matters 98
Note 13. Legal Matters 98
Note 14. Stockholders' Equity 99
Note 15. Stock Based Compensation Plans 101
Note 16. Impairments and Restructuring Charges, Net 103
Note 17. Other Operating Income 108
Note 18. Other (Income) Charges, Net 109
Note 19. Income Taxes 109
Note 20. Supplemental Cash Flow Information 112
Note 21. Segment Information 112
Note 22. Quarterly Sales and Earnings Data - Unaudited 117
Note 23. Recently Issued Accounting Standards 118
Note 24. Cumulative Effect of Changes in Accounting Principles, Net of Tax 119
Note 25. Reserve Rollforward 120
70

MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the accompanying consolidated financial
statements of Eastman appearing on pages 74 through 120. Eastman has prepared these consolidated
financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and
the statements of necessity include some amounts that are based on management's best estimates and
judgments.
Eastman's accounting systems include extensive internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance
of the reliability of its financial records and the proper safeguarding and use of its assets. Such controls are
based on established policies and procedures, are implemented by trained, skilled personnel with an
appropriate segregation of duties, and are monitored through a comprehensive internal audit program. The
Company's policies and procedures prescribe that the Company and all employees are to maintain the
highest ethical standards and that its business practices throughout the world are to be conducted in a
manner that is above reproach.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, who were responsible for conducting their audit in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Their report is included
herein.
The Board of Directors exercises its responsibility for these financial statements through its Audit
Committee, which consists entirely of nonmanagement Board members. The independent registered public
accounting firm and internal auditors have full and free access to the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee meets periodically with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and Eastman's director of internal
auditing, both privately and with management present, to discuss accounting, auditing, policies and
procedures, internal controls, and financial reporting matters.
/ s / J. Brian Ferguson / s / Richard A. Lorraine
J. Brian Ferguson Richard A. Lorraine
Chairman of the Board and Senior Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
March 13, 2006
71

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Eastman Chemical Company:
We have completed integrated audits of Eastman Chemical Company’s 2005 and 2004 consolidated
financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, and an
audit of its 2003 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated financial statements
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) on
page 124 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eastman Chemical Company and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2003 Eastman Chemical
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations”.
Internal control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 based on criteria established in Internal Control –
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the
COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal
control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding
of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
72

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that
receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/ s / PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 13, 2006
73

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (LOSS),
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) and RETAINED EARNINGS
For years ended December 31,
2005 2004 2003
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Earnings (Loss)
Sales $ 7,059 $ 6,580 $ 5,800
Cost of sales 5,655 5,602 4,990
Gross profit 1,404 978 810
Selling, general and administrative expenses 454 450 414
Research and development expenses 162 154 173
Asset impairments and restructuring charges, net 33 206 489
Goodwill impairments -- -- 34
Other operating income (2) (7) (33)
Operating earnings (loss) 757 175 (267)
Interest expense, net 100 115 124
Income from equity investment in Genencor (173) (14) (10)
Early debt extinguishment costs 46 -- --
Other (income) charges, net 1 10 --
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles 783 64 (381)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 226 (106) (108)
Earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles 557 170 (273)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net -- -- 3
Net earnings (loss) $ 557 $ 170 $ (270)
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic
Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles $ 6.90 $ 2.20 $ (3.54)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net -- -- 0.04
Net earnings (loss) per share $ 6.90 $ 2.20 $ (3.50)
Diluted
Before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles $ 6.81 $ 2.18 $ (3.54)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net -- -- 0.04
Net earnings (loss) per share $ 6.81 $ 2.18 $ (3.50)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net earnings (loss) $ 557 $ 170 $ (270)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in cumulative translation adjustment (94) 36 150
Change in minimum pension liability, net of tax (7) (6) 19
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net of tax 3 (12) 5
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of tax 1 -- --
Total other comprehensive income (loss) (97) 18 174
Comprehensive income (loss) $ 460 $ 188 $ (96)
Retained Earnings
Retained earnings at beginning of period $ 1,509 $ 1,476 $ 1,882
Net earnings (loss) 557 170 (270)
(143)
Cash dividends declared (137) (136)
Retained earnings at end of period $ 1,923 $ 1,509 $ 1,476
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
74

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
December 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
Assets 2005 2004
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 524 $ 325
Trade receivables, net of allowance of $20 and $15 575 675
Miscellaneous receivables 81 104
Inventories 671 582
Other current assets 73 82
Total current assets 1,924 1,768
Properties
Properties and equipment at cost 9,597 9,628
Less: Accumulated depreciation 6,435 6,436
Net properties 3,162 3,192
Goodwill 312 314
Other noncurrent assets 375 565
Total assets $ 5,773 $ 5,839
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Payables and other current liabilities $ 1,047 $ 1,098
Borrowings due within one year 4 1
Total current liabilities 1,051 1,099
Long-term borrowings 1,621 2,061
Deferred income tax liabilities 317 210
Post-employment obligations 1,017 1,112
Other long-term liabilities 155 173
Total liabilities 4,161 4,655
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock ($0.01 par value– 350,000,000 shares authorized; shares
issued – 89,566,115 and 87,257,499 at December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively) 1 1
Additional paid-in capital 320 210
Retained earnings 1,923 1,509
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (200) (103)
2,044 1,617
Less: Treasury stock at cost (8,034,901 and 8,043,513 shares at December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively) 432 433
Total stockholders’ equity 1,612 1,184
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 5,773 $ 5,839
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
75

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For years ended December 31,
2005 2004 2003
(Dollars in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings (loss) $ 557 $ 170 $ (270)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 304 322 367
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net -- -- (3)
Asset impairments 12 140 500
Gains on sale of assets -- (8) (33)
Income from equity investment in Genencor (173) (14) (10)
Early debt extinguishment costs 46 -- --
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes 115 (136) (137)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions
and divestitures:
(Increase) decrease in trade receivables 60 (133) (46)
(Increase) decrease in inventories (110) 18 41
Increase (decrease) in trade payables 71 49 (2)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities for employee benefits and
incentive pay (63) 71 (214)
Other items, net (50) 15 48
Net cash provided by operating activities 769 494 241
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to properties and equipment (343) (248) (230)
Proceeds from sale of assets 50 127 71
Proceeds from sale of equity investment in Genencor, net 417 -- --
Loan to joint venture (125) -- --
Additions to capitalized software (11) (14) (15)
Other items, net (6) (13) 14
Net cash used in investing activities (18) (148) (160)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in commercial paper, credit facility, and
other short-term borrowings (150) (19) 39
Proceeds from long-term borrowings 189 -- 495
Repayment of borrowings (544) (500) (5)
Dividends paid to stockholders (142) (137) (136)
Proceeds from stock option exercises and other items 100 77 4
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (547) (579) 397
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (5) -- 3
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 199 (233) 481
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 325 558 77
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 524 $ 325 $ 558
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
76

1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Financial Statement Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Eastman Chemical Company and subsidiaries (\"Eastman\" or the
\"Company\") are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
and of necessity include some amounts that are based upon management estimates and judgments. Future
actual results could differ from such current estimates. The consolidated financial statements include
assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses of all majority-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures. Eastman
accounts for other joint ventures and investments in minority-owned companies where it exercises
significant influence on the equity basis. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in
consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash, time deposits, and readily marketable securities with maturities of
three months or less at the purchase date.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company
maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers
to make required payments. The allowances are based on the number of days an individual receivable is
delinquent and management’s regular assessment of the financial condition of the Company’s customers.
The Company considers that a receivable is delinquent if it is unpaid after the terms of the related invoice
have expired. The Company evaluates the allowance based on a monthly assessment of the aged
receivables. Write-offs are done at the time a customer receivable is deemed uncollectible.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The Company determines the cost of most raw
materials, work in process, and finished goods inventories in the United States by the last-in, first-out
(\"LIFO\") method. The cost of all other inventories, including inventories outside the United States, is
determined by the average cost method, which approximates the first-in, first-out (\"FIFO\") method. The
Company writes-down its inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the
difference between the carrying value of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions
about future demand and market conditions.
Properties
The Company records properties at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to earnings; replacements
and betterments are capitalized. When Eastman retires or otherwise disposes of assets, it removes the cost
of such assets and related accumulated depreciation from the accounts. The Company records any profit or
loss on retirement or other disposition in earnings. Asset impairments are reflected as increases in
accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation
Depreciation expense is calculated based on historical cost and the estimated useful lives of the assets
(buildings and building equipment 20 to 50 years; machinery and equipment 3 to 33 years), generally using
the straight-line method.
77

Computer Software Costs
Capitalized software costs are amortized primarily on a straight-line basis over three years, the expected
useful life of such assets, beginning when the software project is substantially complete and placed in
service. Capitalized software in 2005, 2004 and 2003 was approximately $11 million, $14 million, and $15
million, respectively. During those same periods, approximately $16 million, $18 million, and $23 million,
respectively, of previously capitalized costs were amortized. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the
unamortized capitalized software costs were $24 million and $29 million, respectively.
Impaired Assets
The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets,
when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Such
events and circumstances include, but are not limited to, significant decreases in the market value of the
asset, adverse change in the extent or manner in which the asset is being used, significant changes in
business climate, or current or projected cash flow losses associated with the use of the assets. The
carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the total projected undiscounted cash
flows from such asset is separately identifiable and is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is
recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset.
For long-lived assets to be held and used, fair value of fixed (tangible) assets and definite-lived intangible
assets is determined primarily using either the projected cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with
the risk involved or an appraisal. For long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale or other than by sale, fair
value is determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for disposal costs.
The provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (\"SFAS\") No. 142 \"Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets,\" require that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested at least annually for
impairment and require reporting units to be identified for the purpose of assessing potential future
impairments of goodwill. The carrying value of goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles is considered
impaired when their fair value, as established by appraisal or based on undiscounted future cash flows of
certain related products, is less than their carrying value. The Company conducts its annual testing of
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment in the third quarter of each year, unless
events warrant more frequent testing.
Investments
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts in which the Company is a primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity, if applicable, or the accounts of the Company and all its subsidiaries in which a
controlling interest is maintained. For those consolidated subsidiaries in which the Company’s ownership
is less than 100 percent, the interests of the other stockholders are included in other long-term liabilities.
Investments in affiliates over which the Company has significant influence but not a controlling interest are
carried on the equity basis. Under the equity method of accounting, these investments are included in other
noncurrent assets. The Company includes its share of earnings and losses of such investments in other
income and charges and its share of other comprehensive income (loss) in the appropriate component of
other accumulated comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity.
Marketable securities held by the Company, currently common or preferred stock, are deemed by
management to be available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with net unrealized gains or losses
reported as a component of other accumulated comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders' equity.
Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method
for determining the cost of securities. The Company includes these investments in other noncurrent assets.
78

Other equity investments, for which fair values are not readily determinable, are carried at historical cost
and are included in other noncurrent assets.
The Company records an investment impairment charge when it believes an investment, accounted for by
the Company as a marketable security or recorded at historical cost, has experienced a decline in value that
is other than temporary.
Pension and Other Post-employment Benefits
The Company maintains defined benefit plans that provide eligible employees with retirement benefits.
Additionally, Eastman provides life insurance and health care benefits for eligible retirees and health care
benefits for retirees’ eligible survivors. The costs and obligations related to these benefits reflect the
Company’s assumptions related to general economic conditions (particularly interest rates), expected return
on plan assets, rate of compensation increase for employees, and health care cost trends. The cost of
providing plan benefits depends on demographic assumptions including retirements, mortality, turnover,
and plan participation.
Environmental Costs
The Company accrues environmental remediation costs when it is probable that the Company has incurred
a liability at a contaminated site and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When a single amount
cannot be reasonably estimated but the cost can be estimated within a range, the Company accrues the
minimum amount. This undiscounted accrued amount reflects the Company’s assumptions about
remediation requirements at the contaminated site, the nature of the remedy, the outcome of discussions
with regulatory agencies and other potentially responsible parties at multi-party sites, and the number and
financial viability of other potentially responsible parties. Changes in the estimates on which the accruals
are based, unanticipated government enforcement action, or changes in health, safety, environmental, and
chemical control regulations and testing requirements could result in higher or lower costs.
The Company also establishes reserves for closure/postclosure costs associated with the environmental and
other assets it maintains. Environmental assets include but are not limited to waste management units, such
as landfills, water treatment facilities, and ash ponds. When these types of assets are constructed or
installed, a reserve is established for the future costs anticipated to be associated with the closure of the site
based on an expected life of the environmental assets and the applicable regulatory closure requirements.
These expenses are charged into earnings over the estimated useful life of the assets. Currently, the
Company estimates the useful life of each individual asset up to 50 years. If the Company changes its
estimate of the asset retirement obligation costs or its estimate of the useful lives of these assets, the
expenses to be charged into earnings could increase or decrease.
In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (\"FASB\") issued Interpretation No. 47,
“Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (\"FIN 47\"), which was effective for the
Company on December 31, 2005. FIN 47 requires an entity to recognize a liability for a conditional asset
retirement obligation when incurred if the liability can be reasonably estimated. The Interpretation also
clarifies that the term Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation (\"CARO\") refers to a legal obligation to
perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a
future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity
would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation.
The Company performed a thorough examination of various asset categories. Although it may have
CAROs at certain of its facilities, including, but not limited to, the potential for asbestos abatement
activities, the Company is unable to determine potential settlement dates to be used in fair value
calculations for estimating these obligations as a result of an absence of plans or expectations to undertake
a major renovation or demolition project that would require the removal of asbestos. The Company
continues to monitor these conditional obligations, as well as any new ones that may develop, and will
record reserves associated with them when and to the extent that more detailed information becomes
available concerning applicable retirement costs. Those obligations recorded did not have a material
impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
79

Accruals for environmental liabilities are included in other long-term liabilities and exclude claims for
recoveries from insurance companies or other third parties. Environmental costs are capitalized if they
extend the life of the related property, increase its capacity, and/or mitigate or prevent future
contamination. The cost of operating and maintaining environmental control facilities is charged to
expense.
The Company's cash expenditures related to environmental protection and improvement were estimated to
be approximately $198 million, $184 million and $187 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These
amounts pertain primarily to operating costs associated with environmental protection equipment and
facilities, but also include expenditures for construction and development. The Company does not expect
future environmental capital expenditures arising from requirements of recently promulgated
environmental laws and regulations to materially increase the Company's planned level of annual capital
expenditures for environmental control facilities.
For additional information see Notes 12 and 25.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instruments are used by the Company in the management of its exposures to
fluctuations in foreign currency, raw materials and energy costs, and interest rates. Such instruments are
used to mitigate the risk that changes in exchange rates or raw materials and energy costs will adversely
affect the eventual dollar cash flows resulting from the hedged transactions.
The Company enters into forward exchange contracts to hedge certain firm commitments denominated in
foreign currencies and currency options and forwards to hedge probable anticipated, but not yet committed,
export sales and purchase transactions expected within no more than five years and denominated in foreign
currencies (principally the British pound, Canadian dollar, euro, and the Japanese yen). To mitigate short-
term fluctuations in market prices for propane and natural gas (major raw materials and energy used in the
manufacturing process), the Company enters into forwards and options contracts. From time to time, the
Company also utilizes interest rate derivative instruments, primarily swaps, to hedge the Company's
exposure to movements in interest rates.
The Company's forwards and options contracts are accounted for as hedges because the derivative
instruments are designated and effective as hedges and reduce the Company's exposure to identified risks.
Gains and losses resulting from effective hedges of existing assets, liabilities, firm commitments, or
anticipated transactions are deferred and recognized when the offsetting gains and losses are recognized on
the related hedged items and are reported as a component of operating earnings.
Deferred currency option premiums are generally included in other assets. The related obligation for
payment is generally included in other liabilities and is paid in the period in which the options are exercised
or expire and forward exchange contracts mature.
Litigation and Contingent Liabilities
The Company and its operations from time to time are parties to or targets of lawsuits, claims,
investigations, and proceedings, including product liability, personal injury, asbestos, patent and
intellectual property, commercial, contract, environmental, antitrust, health and safety, and employment
matters, which are handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues a
liability for such matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be
reasonably estimated. When a single amount cannot be reasonably estimated but the cost can be estimated
within a range, the Company accrues the minimum amount. The Company expenses legal costs, including
those expected to be incurred in connection with a loss contingency, as incurred.
80

Revenue Recognition and Customer Incentives
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered, the price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and
collectability is reasonably assured.
The Company records estimated obligations for customer programs and incentive offerings, which consist
primarily of revenue or volume-based amounts that a customer must achieve over a specified period of
time, as a reduction of revenue to each underlying revenue transaction as the customer progresses toward
reaching goals specified in incentive agreements. These estimates are based on a combination of forecast
of customer sales and actual sales volumes and revenues against established goals, the customer’s current
level of purchases, and Eastman’s knowledge of customer purchasing habits, and industry pricing practice.
The incentive payment rate may be variable, based upon the customer reaching higher sales volume or
revenue levels over a specified period of time in order to receive an agreed upon incentive payment.
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs
Shipping and handling fees related to sales transactions are billed to customers and are recorded as sales
revenue. Shipping and handling costs incurred are recorded in cost of sales.
Restructuring of Operations
The Company records restructuring charges incurred in connection with consolidation of operations, exited
business lines, or shutdowns of specific sites that are expected to be substantially completed within 12
months. These restructuring charges are recognized as incurred, and are associated with site closures, legal
and environmental matters, demolition, contract terminations, or other costs directly related to the
restructuring. The Company records severance charges for involuntary employee separations when the
separation is probable and reasonably estimable. The Company records severance charges for voluntary
employee separations ratably over the remaining service period of those employees.
Stock-based Compensation
As permitted by SFAS No. 123 \"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,\" Eastman continued to apply
intrinsic value accounting under the requirements of Accounting Principles Board (\"APB\") Opinion No. 25
for its stock option plans through December 31, 2005. Under APB Opinion No. 25, compensation cost for
stock options, if any, is measured as the excess of the quoted market price of the stock at the date of grant
over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Eastman adopted disclosure-only provisions of
SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure
- an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123” through December 31, 2005. The Company’s pro forma net
earnings and pro forma earnings per share based upon the fair value at the grant dates for stock option
awards under Eastman’s plans are disclosed below.
81

If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense as required by SFAS No. 123 based upon
the fair value at the grant dates for stock option awards under these plans, the Company's net earnings (loss)
and earnings (loss) per share would have been impacted as follows:
(In millions, except per share amounts) 2005 2004 2003
Net earnings (loss), as reported $ 557 $ 170 $ (270)
Add: Stock-based employee compensation
expense included in net earnings, as reported 11 5 1
Deduct: Total additional stock-based employee
compensation cost, net of tax, that would have
been included in net earnings (loss) under fair
value method 14 10 11
Pro forma net earnings (loss) $ 554 $ 165 $ (280)
Basic earnings (loss) per share As reported $6.90 $2.20 $(3.50)
Pro forma $6.85 $2.13 $(3.62)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share As reported $6.81 $2.18 $(3.50)
Pro forma $6.78 $2.12 $(3.62)
In December 2004, SFAS No. 123(R) – Share Based Payment was released and supersedes SFAS No. 123,
SFAS No. 148 and APB Opinion No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R) is required to be implemented January 1, 2006
for calendar year-end companies. SFAS No. 123(R) retains most of the requirements of SFAS No. 123 and
SFAS No. 148 by requiring companies to record compensation expense in the financial statements for stock
option awards determined at the grant date fair value. For more information regarding the implementation
of SFAS No. 123(R) and the impact to the Company, see Note 23.
Compensated Absences
The Company accrues compensated absences and related benefits as current charges to earnings in the
period earned.
Other Income and Other Charges
Included in other income and other charges are results from equity investments, royalty income, gains or
losses on foreign exchange transactions, certain litigation costs, fees on securitized receivables and other
miscellaneous items.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes has been determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for
income taxes. Under this approach, deferred taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur
when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid. The provision for income taxes
represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the
year. Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax bases of the Company’s assets
and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. Valuation
allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will
not be realized. Provision has been made for income taxes on unremitted earnings of subsidiaries and
affiliates, except for subsidiaries in which earnings are deemed to be permanently reinvested.
82

Reclassifications
The Company has reclassified certain 2004 and 2003 amounts to conform to the 2005 presentation.
2. INVENTORIES
December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004
At FIFO or average cost (approximates current cost)
Finished goods $ 664 $ 550
Work in process 207 171
Raw materials and supplies 247 216
Total inventories 1,118 937
LIFO Reserve (447) (355)
Total inventories $ 671 $ 582
Inventories valued on the LIFO method were approximately 65 percent of total inventories in each of the
periods.
3. PROPERTIES AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004
Properties at Cost
Balance at beginning of year $ 9,628 $ 9,861
Capital expenditures 343 248
Deductions (374) (481)
Balance at end of year $ 9,597 $ 9,628
Properties
Land $ 42 $ 52
Buildings and building equipment 861 888
Machinery and equipment 8,495 8,599
Construction in progress 199 89
Balance at end of year $ 9,597 $ 9,628
Accumulated Depreciation
Balance at beginning of year $ 6,436 $ 6,442
Provision for depreciation 287 302
Fixed asset impairments 9 134
Deductions (297) (442)
Balance at end of year $ 6,435 $ 6,436
Cumulative construction-period interest of $352 million and $348 million, reduced by accumulated
depreciation of $287 million and $302 million, is included in cost of properties at December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
Interest capitalized during 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $5 million, $3 million, and $3 million, respectively.
Depreciation expense was $287 million, $302 million, and $334 million for 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
83

Deductions in 2004 include the sale of certain businesses and product lines and related assets in the
Coatings, Adhesives, Specialty Polymers, and Inks (\"CASPI\")segment.
4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Following are the Company’s amortizable intangible assets and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The
difference between the gross carrying amount and net carrying amount for each item presented is
attributable to impairments and accumulated amortization.
As of December 31, 2005 As of December 31, 2004
Gross Net
Gross Net
Carrying Carrying
Carrying Carrying
(Dollars in millions) Amount Amount Amount
Amount
Amortizable intangible assets
Developed technology $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2
Customer lists 3 1 3 1
Patents and patent licenses 10 6 8 8
Total $ 15 $ 9 $ 13 $ 11
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Trademarks 14 14
Other intangible assets $ 23 $ 25
Other intangible assets are included in other noncurrent assets on the balance sheet.
During the fourth quarter 2005, the Company recorded approximately $3 million in intangible asset
impairments related to patents.
Amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets was approximately $1 million, $2 million, and
$10 million, respectively, for 2005, 2004, and 2003. Estimated amortization expense for the five
succeeding years is less than $1 million per year.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill follow:
Total
CASPI Other Eastman
Segment Segments Chemical
(Dollars in millions)
Reported balance at December 31, 2003 $ 308 $ 9 $ 317
Divestitures -- (3) (3)
Reported balance at December 31, 2004 308 6 314
Currency translation adjustments (2) -- (2)
Reported balance at December 31, 2005 $ 306 $ 6 $ 312
Additional information regarding the impairment of goodwill and the adoption of SFAS No. 142 is
available in Note 16.
84

5. EQUITY INVESTMENTS AND OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
On April 21, 2005, the Company completed the sale of its equity investment in Genencor International, Inc.
(\"Genencor\") for cash proceeds of approximately $417 million, net of $2 million in fees. The book value
of the investment prior to sale was $246 million, and the Company recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale of
$171 million.
As of December 31, 2004, Eastman owned 25 million shares, or approximately 42 percent, of the
outstanding common shares of Genencor, a publicly traded biotechnology company engaged in the
discovery, development, manufacture, and marketing of biotechnology products for the industrial
chemicals, agricultural, and health care markets, and a developer of integrated genomics technology. This
investment was accounted for under the equity method and was included in other noncurrent assets in 2004
and 2003. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s investment in Genencor, including preferred stock and
accumulated dividends receivable, was $242 million. At December 31, 2004, the fair market value of the
Company’s common stock investment in Genencor was $16.40 per share, or $410 million.
Summarized financial information for Genencor is shown on a 100 percent basis.
2004 2003
(Dollars in millions)
Statement of Earnings Data
Revenues $ 410 $ 383
Costs of products sold 226 207
Net earnings (loss) 26 23
Statement of Financial Position Data
Current assets $ 371
Noncurrent assets 381
Total assets 752
Current liabilities 114
Noncurrent liabilities 73
Total liabilities 187
Redeemable preferred stock 184
In addition, Eastman has a 50 percent interest in and serves as the operating partner in Primester, a joint
venture which manufactures cellulose acetate at Eastman's Kingsport, Tennessee plant. This investment is
accounted for under the equity method. During fourth quarter 2005, the Company provided a line of credit
to the joint venture of up to $125 million, which Primester fully utilized to repay the principal amount of
the joint venture's third-party borrowings, previously guaranteed by Eastman. The Company holds an
interest-bearing note receivable. Eastman's investment in the joint venture at December 31, 2005 was
approximately $86 million, which was comprised of the recognized portion of the venture's accumulated
deficits and the line of credit of $125 million. Such amount was included in other noncurrent assets.
Eastman had a negative investment in the joint venture at December 31, 2004 of approximately $40
million, which was included in other long-term liabilities and represented the recognized portion of the
venture's accumulated deficits. The Company provides certain utilities and general plant services to the
joint venture. In return for Eastman providing those services, the joint venture paid Eastman a total of $39
million in three equal installments in 1991, 1992, and 1993. Eastman has amortized the deferred credit to
earnings over the 10-year period of the utilities and plant services contract, which concluded in April 2004.
Eastman also owns a 50 percent interest in Nanjing Yangzi Eastman Chemical Ltd. (“Nanjing”), a company
which manufactures Eastotac hydrocarbon tackifying resins for the adhesives market. This joint venture is
accounted for under the equity method and is included in other noncurrent assets. At December 31, 2005
and 2004, the Company’s investment in Nanjing was approximately $5 million and $4 million,
respectively.
85

6. PAYABLES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004
Trade creditors $ 534 $ 474
Accrued payrolls, vacation, and variable-incentive compensation 154 124
Accrued taxes 49 94
Post-employment obligations 134 131
Interest payable 31 34
Bank overdrafts 10 40
Other 135 201
Total $ 1,047 $ 1,098
The current portion of post-employment obligations is an estimate of the Company’s anticipated funding
for the next twelve months.
7. BORROWINGS
December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004
Borrowings consisted of:
3 1/4% notes due 2008 $ 72 $ 250
6.30% notes due 2018 185 253
7% notes due 2012 142 399
7 1/4% debentures due 2024 497 497
7 5/8% debentures due 2024 200 200
7.60% debentures due 2027 297 297
Credit facility borrowings 214 146
Other 18 20
Total borrowings 1,625 2,062
Borrowings due within one year (4) (1)
Long-term borrowings $ 1,621 $ 2,061
At December 31, 2005, the Company had credit facilities with various U.S. and foreign banks totaling
approximately $890 million. These credit facilities consist of a $700 million revolving credit facility (the
\"Credit Facility\") expiring in April 2009, as well as a 160 million euro credit facility (\"Euro Facility\")
which expires in December 2010, and has options for two one-year extensions. Borrowings under these
credit facilities are subject to interest at varying spreads above quoted market rates. These credit facilities
require facility fees on the total commitment that are based on Eastman’s credit rating. In addition, these
credit facilities contain a number of covenants and events of default, including the maintenance of certain
financial ratios. At December 31, 2005, the Company’s credit facility borrowings totaled $214 million at a
weighted-average interest rate of 3.01 percent. At December 31, 2004, the Company's credit facility
borrowings were $146 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 2.98 percent
The Credit Facility provides liquidity support for commercial paper borrowings and general corporate
purposes. Accordingly, any outstanding commercial paper borrowings reduce borrowings available under
the Credit Facility. Since the Credit Facility expires in April 2009, any commercial paper borrowings
supported by the Credit Facility are classified as long-term borrowings because the Company has the ability
to refinance such borrowings on a long-term basis.
Eastman fully utilized the Euro Facility in the fourth quarter 2005 which provided the Company $189
million. These funds comprised a significant portion of the funding for the 2005 dividend repatriation
under the American Jobs Creation Act. See Note 19 for more information on the American Jobs Creation
Act.
86

The Company completed the early repayment of $500 million of its outstanding long-term bonds in the
second quarter 2005. See Note 8 for further information regarding the early extinguishment of this debt.
The Company entered into interest rate swaps in the third quarter 2003 that converted the effective interest
rate on $250 million of the $400 million 7% notes due in 2012 to variable rates. In the second quarter
2004, the Company entered into interest rate swaps that converted the effective interest rate on $100
million of the $400 million 7% notes due in 2012 to variable rates. The Company settled $50 million of
these interest rate swaps during the first quarter 2005. Cash proceeds received and the gain resulting from
the settlement were immaterial. During the second quarter 2005, the Company received cash proceeds and
recognized a gain of approximately $2 million resulting from the settlement of $155 million of these
interest rate swaps in connection with the early extinguishment of debt. The average rate on the variable
portion was 6.75 percent at December 31, 2005 and 5.18 percent at December 31, 2004. The recording of
the fair value of the interest rate swaps and the corresponding debt resulted in a decrease of $6 million in
long-term borrowings and other noncurrent assets at December 31, 2005. The fair values of the interest
rate swaps were a liability of $4 million at December 31, 2005, and an asset of $2 million at December 31,
2004.
The Company entered into interest rate swaps in the fourth quarter 2003 that converted the effective
interest rate of $150 million of the $250 million 6.30% notes due in 2018 to variable rates. The average
rate on the variable portion was 5.16 percent at December 31, 2005, and 3.71 percent at December 31,
2004. The recording of the fair value of the interest rate swaps and the corresponding debt resulted in a
slight decrease in long-term borrowings and other noncurrent assets at December 31, 2005. The fair values
of the interest rate swaps were assets of $5 million at December 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004,
respectively.
8. EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
In the second quarter 2005, the Company completed the early repayment of $500 million of its outstanding
long-term bonds for $544 million in cash, which resulted in a charge of $46 million for early debt
extinguishment costs including $2 million in unamortized bond issuance costs. The book value of the
purchased debt was $500 million, as follows:
(Dollars in millions) Book
Value
3 1/4% notes due 2008 $ 178
6.30% notes due 2018 68
7% notes due 2012 254
Total $ 500
87

9. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004
Recorded Fair Recorded Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
(Dollars in millions)
Long-term borrowings $ 1,621 $ 1,770 $ 2,061 $ 2,300
The fair value for fixed-rate borrowings is based on current interest rates for comparable securities. The
Company's floating-rate borrowings approximate fair value.
Hedging Programs
Financial instruments held as part of the hedging programs discussed below are recorded at fair value based
upon comparable market transactions as quoted by the broker.
The Company is exposed to market risk, such as changes in currency exchange rates, raw material and
energy costs and interest rates. The Company uses various derivative financial instruments pursuant to the
Company's hedging policies to mitigate these market risk factors and their effect on the cash flows of the
underlying transactions. Designation is performed on a specific exposure basis to support hedge
accounting. The changes in fair value of these hedging instruments are offset in part or in whole by
corresponding changes in the cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged. The Company does
not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
Currency Rate Hedging
The Company manufactures and sells its products in a number of countries throughout the world and, as a
result, is exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. To manage the volatility relating to
these exposures, the Company nets the exposures on a consolidated basis to take advantage of natural
offsets. To manage the remaining exposure, the Company enters into forward exchange contracts to hedge
certain firm commitments denominated in foreign currencies and currency options and forwards to hedge
probable anticipated, but not yet committed, export sales transactions expected within no more than five
years and denominated in foreign currencies (principally the British pound, Canadian dollar, euro and the
Japanese yen). These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges. The mark-to-market gains or losses on
qualifying hedges are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the extent effective,
and reclassified into sales in the period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Raw Material and Energy Hedging
Raw materials and energy sources used by the Company are subject to price volatility caused by weather,
supply conditions, economic variables and other unpredictable factors. To mitigate short-term fluctuations
in market prices for propane and natural gas, the Company enters into forwards and options contracts.
These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges. The mark-to-market gains or losses on qualifying
hedges are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the extent effective, and
reclassified into cost of sales in the period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. In
evaluating effectiveness, the Company excludes the time value of certain options.
88

Interest Rate Hedging
The Company's policy is to manage interest cost using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt. To manage
this mix in a cost-efficient manner, the Company enters into interest rate swaps in which the Company
agrees to exchange the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an
agreed upon notional principal amount. These swaps are designated to hedge the fair value of underlying
debt obligations with the interest rate differential reflected as an adjustment to interest expense over the life
of the swaps. As these instruments are 100 percent effective, there is no impact on earnings due to hedge
ineffectiveness.
From time to time, the Company also utilizes interest rate derivative instruments, primarily swaps, to hedge
the Company’s exposure to movements in interest rates on anticipated debt offerings. These instruments
are designated as cash flow hedges and are typically 100 percent effective. As a result, there is no current
impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness. The mark-to-market gains or losses on these hedges are
included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the extent effective, and are reclassified into
interest expense over the period of the related debt instruments.
At December 31, 2005, mark-to-market losses from raw material, currency, energy and certain interest rate
hedges that were included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) totaled approximately $5
million. If realized, substantially all of these losses will be reclassified into earnings during the next 12
months. The mark-to-market gains or losses on non-qualifying, excluded and ineffective portions of
hedges are immediately recognized in cost of sales or other income and charges. Such amounts had a
negative $6 million impact on earnings during 2005.
At December 31, 2004, mark-to-market losses from raw material, currency, energy and certain interest rate
hedges that were included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) totaled approximately $8
million. Substantially all of these losses were reclassified into earnings during 2005. The mark-to-market
gains or losses on non-qualifying, excluded and ineffective portions of hedges are immediately recognized
in cost of sales or other income and charges. Such amounts had a negative $5 million impact on earnings
during 2004.
10. RETIREMENT PLANS
Eastman maintains defined benefit plans that provide eligible employees with retirement benefits. Prior to
2000, benefits were calculated using a defined benefit formula based on age, years of service, and the
employee’s final average compensation as defined in the plans. Effective January 1, 2000, the Company's
defined benefit pension plan, the Eastman Retirement Assistance Plan, was amended. Employees' accrued
pension benefits earned prior to January 1, 2000 are calculated based on previous plan provisions using the
employee's age, years of service and final average compensation as defined in the plans. The amended
defined benefit pension plan uses a pension equity formula based on age, years of service and final average
compensation to calculate an employee's retirement benefits from January 1, 2000 forward. Benefits
payable will be the combined pre-2000 and post-1999 benefits.
Benefits are paid to employees from trust funds. Contributions to the plan are made as permitted by laws
and regulations. The pension trust fund does not directly own any of the Company’s common stock.
Pension coverage for employees of Eastman's international operations is provided, to the extent deemed
appropriate, through separate plans. The Company systematically provides for obligations under such plans
by depositing funds with trustees, under insurance policies or by book reserves.
Below is a summary balance sheet of the change in plan assets during 2005 and 2004, the funded status of
the plans, amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Position, and a Summary of Benefit Costs.
89

The assumptions used to develop the projected benefit obligation for the Company's significant defined
benefit pension plans are also provided in the following tables.
Summary Balance Sheet
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation, beginning of year 1,382 1,346
$ $
Service cost 43 41
Interest cost 80 82
Actuarial loss 77 56
New plans -- 11
Plan amendments 7 11
Effect of currency exchange (23) 17
Benefits paid (89) (182)
Benefit obligation, end of year 1,477 1,382
$ $
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year 878 903
$ $
Actual return on plan assets 100 107
New plans -- 21
Effect of currency exchange (14) 10
Company contributions 177 15
Benefits paid (87) (178)
Fair value of plan assets, end of year 1,054 878
$ $
Benefit obligation in excess of plan assets 423 504
$ $
Unrecognized actuarial loss (555) (536)
Unrecognized prior service credit 46 54
Net amount recognized, end of year (86) 22
$ $
Amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Position consist of:
Prepaid benefit cost (105) (2)
$ $
Intangible assets (15) (16)
Accrued benefit cost 19 24
Additional minimum liability 417 409
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (402) (393)
Net amount recognized, end of year (86) 22
$ $
The accumulated benefit obligation basis at the end of 2005 and 2004 was $1,388 million and $1,309
million, respectively. The Company uses a measurement date of December 31 for the majority of its
pension plans.
90

A summary of the components of net periodic benefit cost recognized for Eastman's significant defined
benefit pension plans follows:
Summary of Benefit Costs
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost $ 43 $ 41 $ 42
Interest cost 80 82 84
Expected return on assets (79) (82) (82)
Curtailment charge -- 2 --
Amortization of:
Prior service credit (9) (10) (11)
Actuarial loss 36 27 19
Net periodic benefit cost $ 71 $ 60 $ 52
2005 2004 2003
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations for years ended December 31:
Discount rate 5.51% 5.67% 6.18%
Expected return on assets 8.59% 8.65% 8.88%
Rate of compensation increase 3.75% 3.78% 3.77%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net
periodic pension cost for years ended December 31:
Discount rate 5.67% 6.18% 6.72%
Expected return on assets 8.65% 8.88% 8.94%
Rate of compensation increase 3.78% 3.77% 4.00%
The fair value of plan assets for domestic plans at December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $939 million and $773
million, respectively, while the fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2005 and 2004 for non-U.S. plans
was $115 million and $105 million, respectively. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the expected long-term
rate of return on the U.S. plan assets was 9 percent, while the expected long-term rate of return on non-U.S.
plan assets was 5.75 percent and 6.12 percent at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The target
allocation for the Company’s U.S. pension plans for 2006 and the asset allocation at December 31, 2005
and 2004, by asset category, is as follows:
Target
Allocation for Plan Assets at Plan Assets at
2006 December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004
Asset category
Equity securities 70% 78% 77%
Debt securities 10% 9% 11%
Real estate 5% 3% 4%
Other investments 15% 10% 8%
Total 100% 100% 100%
91

The asset allocation for the Company’s non-U.S. pension plans at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
target allocation for 2006, by asset category, is as follows:
Target
Allocation for Plan Assets at Plan Assets at
2006 December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004
Asset category
Equity securities 50% 49% 42%
Debt securities 45% 45% 46%
Real estate 5% 5% 5%
Other investments -- 1% 7%
Total 100% 100% 100%
The Company’s investment strategy for its defined benefit pension plans is to maximize long-term rate of
return on plan assets within an acceptable level of risk in order to minimize the cost of providing pension
benefits. The investment policy establishes a target allocation range for each asset class and the fund is
managed within those ranges. The plans use a number of investment approaches including equity, real
estate, and fixed income funds in which the underlying securities are marketable in order to achieve this
target allocation. The U.S. plan also invests in private equity and other funds.
The expected rate of return was determined by modeling the expected long-term rates of return for broad
categories of investments held by the plan against a number of various potential economic scenarios.
The Company anticipates pension contributions to its U.S. defined benefit plans for 2006 to be
approximately $75 million, including quarterly contributions as required by the Internal Revenue Code
section 412.
Benefits expected to be paid from pension plans are as follows:
(Dollars in millions) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011-2015
US plans $86 $90 $96 $96 $97 $601
International plans $3 $3 $3 $4 $4 $19
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS
The Company sponsors a defined contribution employee stock ownership plan (the \"ESOP\"), a qualified
plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, which is a component of the Eastman Investment
Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (\"EIP/ESOP\"). Eastman anticipates that it will make annual
contributions for substantially all U.S. employees equal to 5 percent of eligible compensation to the ESOP,
or for employees who have five or more prior ESOP contributions, to either the Eastman Stock Fund or
other investment funds within the EIP. Employees may diversify to other investment funds within the EIP
from the ESOP at any time without restrictions. Allocated shares in the ESOP totaled 1,980,906; 2,210,590;
and 2,582,229 shares as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Dividends on shares held by
the EIP/ESOP are charged to retained earnings. All shares held by the EIP/ESOP are treated as outstanding
in computing earnings per share.
Charges for domestic contributions to the EIP/ESOP were $33 million, $34 million, and $35 million for
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
92

POSTRETIREMENT WELFARE PLANS
Eastman provides life insurance and health care benefits for eligible retirees, and health care benefits for
retirees' eligible survivors. In general, Eastman provides those benefits to retirees eligible under the
Company's U.S. pension plans. Similar benefits are also provided to retirees of Holston Defense
Corporation (“HDC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that, prior to January 1, 1999, operated
a government-owned ammunitions plant. HDC’s contract with the Department of Army (“DOA”) provided
for reimbursement of allowable costs incurred by HDC including certain postretirement welfare costs, for
as long as HDC operated the plant. After the contract was terminated at the end of 1998, the Army has not
contributed further to these costs. The Company continues to accrue and pay for the costs related to HDC
retirees while pursuing extraordinary relief from the DOA for reimbursement of these and other previously
expensed employee benefit costs. Given the uncertain outcome of discussions with the DOA, the Company
will begin recognizing the impact of any reimbursement in the period settled by recording an unrecognized
gain which will be amortized into earnings over a period of time.
A few of the Company's non-U.S. operations have supplemental health benefit plans for certain retirees, the
cost of which is not significant to the Company.
During the second quarter 2004, the Company announced an amendment to its health and dental benefit
plans such that future health and dental benefits to certain retirees will be fixed at a certain contribution
amount, not to be increased. As a result, the Company remeasured these plans as of June 1, 2004 resulting
in a reduction of the Company’s benefit obligation by approximately $240 million. The discount rate used
at the time of the remeasurement was adjusted from 6.25 percent at December 31, 2003 to 6.50 percent at
June 1, 2004 based on increases in interest rates. The effect of this change is reflected in the results below.
93

Summary Balance Sheet
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation, beginning of year $ 795 $ 977
Service cost 8 7
Interest cost 43 52
Plan participants’ contributions 12 8
Actuarial (gain) loss (23) 37
Plan amendments -- (240)
Benefits paid (56) (55)
Settlements and curtailments -- 9
Benefit obligation, end of year $ 779 $ 795
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year $ 13 $ 19
Company contributions 37 41
Plan participants’ contributions 12 8
Benefits paid (56) (55)
Fair value of plan assets, end of year $ 6 $ 13
Benefit obligation in excess of plan assets $ 773 $ 782
Unrecognized actuarial loss (325) (367)
Unrecognized prior service credit 235 258
Net amount recognized, end of year $ 683 $ 673
Amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Position consist of:
Accrued benefit cost, current $ 34 $ 41
Accrued benefit cost, non-current 649 632
Net amount recognized, end of year $ 683 $ 673
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost follows:
Summary of Benefit Costs
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost $ 8 $ 7 $ 8
Interest cost 43 52 58
Expected return on assets (1) (1)
Curtailment gain -- (3) --
Amortization of:
Prior service credit (23) (15) (4)
Actuarial loss 20 17 13
Net periodic benefit cost $ 48 $ 57 $ 74
94

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine end of
year benefit obligations: 2005 2004 2003
Discount rate 5.62% 5.75% 6.25%
Rate of compensation increase 3.75% 3.75% 3.75%
Health care cost trend
Initial 8.00% 9.00% 10.00%
Decreasing to ultimate trend of 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
in year 2009 2009 2009
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine end of
year net benefit cost: 2005 2004 2003
Discount rate 5.75% 6.25% 6.75%
Rate of compensation increase 3.75% 3.75% 4.00%
Health care cost trend
Initial 9.00% 10.00% 10.00%
Decreasing to ultimate trend of 5.00% 5.00% 5.25%
in year 2009 2009 2007
Benefits expected to be paid for post-employment obligations are as follows:
(Dollars in millions)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011-2015
U.S plans $46 $46 $46 $46 $46 $243
An 8 percent rate of increase in per capita cost of covered health care benefits is assumed for 2006. The rate
is assumed to decrease gradually to 5 percent for 2009 and remain at that level thereafter. A 1 percent
increase or decrease in health care trend would have had no material impact on the 2005 service and
interest costs or the 2005 benefit obligation.
In May, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (\"FSP\") 106-2, providing final guidance on
accounting for the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (the \"Act\").
Under the provisions of FSP 106-2, the Company determined that its health care plans were not actuarially
equivalent to Medicare Part D. In January, 2005, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released
final regulations implementing the Act. The Company has determined that, although its plans are believed
to be actuarially equivalent and eligible for certain subsidies under the most recent regulations,
implementation of these regulations will have an immaterial impact on its overall financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows and therefore are not reflected in the above amounts.
95

11. COMMITMENTS
Purchase Obligations and Lease Commitments
At December 31, 2005, the Company had various purchase obligations totaling approximately $1.7 billion
over a period of approximately 15 years for materials, supplies, and energy incident to the ordinary conduct
of business. The Company also had various lease commitments for property and equipment under
cancelable, noncancelable, and month-to-month operating leases totaling approximately $208 million over
a period of several years. Of the total lease commitments, approximately 15 percent relate to machinery
and equipment, including computer and communications equipment and production equipment;
approximately 50 percent relate to real property, including office space, storage facilities and land; and
approximately 35 percent relate to railcars. Rental expense, net of sublease income, was approximately
$64 million, $65 million, and $64 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The obligations described above are summarized in the following table:
(Dollars in
Payments Due For
millions)
Credit
Facility
Notes and Purchase Operating
Debentures Borrowings Obligations Leases
Period Total
291
2006 $ 4 $ -- $ $ 44 $ 339
282
2007 -- -- 36 318
177
2008 72 -- 23 272
172
2009 12 25 19 228
162
2010 -- 189 16 367
2011 and
beyond 1,323 -- 70 2,051
658
1,742
Total $ 1,411 $ 214 $ $ 208 $ 3,575
Accounts Receivable Securitization Program
In 1999, the Company entered into an agreement that allows the Company to sell certain domestic accounts
receivable under a planned continuous sale program to a third party. The agreement permits the sale of
undivided interests in domestic trade accounts receivable. Receivables sold to the third party totaled $200
million at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Undivided interests in designated receivable pools
were sold to the purchaser with recourse limited to the purchased interest in the receivable pools. Average
monthly proceeds from collections reinvested in the continuous sale program were approximately $292
million and $268 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Guarantees
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” an
interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and Rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34.” FIN
45 clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” relating to the guarantor’s
accounting for, and disclosure of, the issuance of certain types of guarantees. Disclosures about each group
of similar guarantees are provided below.
96

Residual Value Guarantees
If certain operating leases are terminated by the Company, it guarantees a portion of the residual value loss,
if any, incurred by the lessors in disposing of the related assets. Under these operating leases, the residual
value guarantees at December 31, 2005 totaled $85 million and consisted primarily of leases for railcars,
company aircraft, and other equipment. Leases with guarantee amounts totaling $4 million, $27 million,
and $54 million will expire in 2006, 2008, and 2012, respectively. The Company believes, based on current
facts and circumstances, that the likelihood of a material payment pursuant to such guarantees is remote.
Other Guarantees
Guarantees and claims also arise during the ordinary course of business from relationships with suppliers,
customers and non-consolidated affiliates when the Company undertakes an obligation to guarantee the
performance of others if specified triggering events occur. Non-performance under a contract could trigger
an obligation of the Company. These potential claims include actions based upon alleged exposures to
products, intellectual property and environmental matters, and other indemnifications. The ultimate effect
on future financial results is not subject to reasonable estimation because considerable uncertainty exists as
to the final outcome of these claims. However, while the ultimate liabilities resulting from such claims may
be significant to results of operations in the period recognized, management does not anticipate they will
have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or liquidity.
Product Warranty Liability
The Company warrants to the original purchaser of its products that it will repair or replace without charge
products if they fail due to a manufacturing defect. However, the Company’s historical claims experience
has not been material. The estimated product warranty liability for the Company's products as of December
31, 2005 is approximately $1 million. The Company accrues for product warranties when it is probable that
customers will make claims under warranties relating to products that have been sold and a reasonable
estimate of the costs can be made.
Variable Interest Entities
The Company has evaluated material relationships including the guarantees related to the third-party
borrowings of joint ventures described above and has concluded that the entities are not Variable Interest
Entities (“VIEs”) or, in the case of Primester, a joint venture that manufactures cellulose acetate at the
Company's Kingsport, Tennessee plant, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. As such,
in accordance with FASB Interpretation Number 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (\"FIN
46R\"), the Company is not required to consolidate these entities. In addition, the Company has evaluated
long-term purchase obligations with two entities that may be VIEs at December 31, 2005. These potential
VIEs are joint ventures from which the Company has purchased raw materials and utilities for several years
and purchases approximately $60 million of raw materials and utilities on an annual basis. The Company
has no equity interest in these entities and has confirmed that one party to each of these joint ventures does
consolidate the potential VIE. However, due to competitive and other reasons, the Company has not been
able to obtain the necessary financial information to determine whether the entities are VIEs, and if one or
both are VIEs, whether or not the Company is the primary beneficiary.
97

12. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Certain Eastman manufacturing sites generate hazardous and nonhazardous wastes, the treatment, storage,
transportation, and disposal of which are regulated by various governmental agencies. In connection with
the cleanup of various hazardous waste sites, the Company, along with many other entities, has been
designated a potentially responsible party (\"PRP\"), by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, which potentially subjects
PRPs to joint and several liability for such cleanup costs. In addition, the Company will be required to
incur costs for environmental remediation and closure and postclosure under the federal Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act. Adequate reserves for environmental contingencies have been established
in accordance with Eastman’s policies described in Note 1. Because of expected sharing of costs, the
availability of legal defenses, and the Company’s preliminary assessment of actions that may be required, it
does not believe its liability for these environmental matters, individually or in the aggregate, will be
material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The
Company’s reserve for environmental contingencies was $51 million and $56 million at December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively, representing the minimum or best estimate for remediation costs and, for asset
retirement obligation costs, the amount accrued to date over the regulated assets' estimated useful lives.
Estimated future environmental expenditures for remediation costs range from the minimum or best
estimate of $21 million to the maximum of $42 million at December 31, 2005 and the minimum or best
estimate of $25 million to the maximum of $45 million at December 31, 2004.
13. LEGAL MATTERS
General
From time to time, the Company and its operations are parties to, or targets of, lawsuits, claims,
investigations and proceedings, including product liability, personal injury, asbestos, patent and intellectual
property, commercial, contract, environmental, antitrust, health and safety, and employment matters, which
are being handled and defended in the ordinary course of business. While the Company is unable to predict
the outcome of these matters, it does not believe, based upon currently available facts, that the ultimate
resolution of any such pending matters, including the sorbates litigation and the asbestos litigation
described in the following paragraphs, will have a material adverse effect on its overall financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows. However, adverse developments could negatively impact earnings or
cash flows in a particular future period.
Sorbates Litigation
Two civil cases relating to sorbates remain. The first is a case filed by a multi-state class of indirect
purchasers seeking claimed damages, whose claims have been dismissed by Tennessee's trial court and that
state's court of appeals. The Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims, and
subsequently the trial court denied a motion to amend the complaint, ruling the case over. The Company
believes an appeal of this determination is likely. The second is a case filed by New York's attorney
general, also seeking claimed damages. The trial court has dismissed New York's claims, and the plaintiffs
have filed a notice of appeal. Briefing on the state's appeal is not yet underway.
Asbestos Litigation
Over the years, Eastman has been named as a defendant, along with numerous other defendants, in lawsuits
in various state courts in which plaintiffs alleged injury due to exposure to asbestos at Eastman’s
manufacturing sites and sought unspecified monetary damages and other relief. Historically, these cases
have been dismissed or settled without a material effect on Eastman’s financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows.
98

In recently filed cases, plaintiffs allege exposure to asbestos-containing products allegedly made by
Eastman. Based on its investigation to date, the Company has information that it manufactured limited
amounts of an asbestos-containing plastic product between the mid-1960’s and the early 1970’s. The
Company’s investigation has found no evidence that any of the plaintiffs worked with or around any such
product alleged to have been manufactured by the Company. The Company intends to defend vigorously
the approximately1,500 pending claims or to settle them on acceptable terms.
The Company has finalized an agreement with an insurer that issued primary general liability insurance to
certain predecessors of the Company prior to the mid-1970's, pursuant to which that insurer will provide
coverage for a portion of certain of the Company's defense costs and payments of settlements or judgments
in connection with asbestos-related lawsuits.
Evaluation of the allegations and claims made in recent asbestos-related lawsuits continue to be reviewed
by the Company. Based on such evaluation to date, the Company continues to believe that the ultimate
resolution of asbestos cases will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows, although these matters could result in the Company being subject to monetary
damages, costs or expenses, and charges against earnings in particular periods. To date, costs incurred by
the Company related to the recent asbestos-related lawsuits have not been material.
14. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
A reconciliation of the changes in stockholders’ equity for 2003, 2004, and 2005 is provided below:
Common Accumulated
Stock at Other Treasury Total
Stock at Stockholders’
Par Paid-in Retained Comprehensive
Value Capital Earnings Income (Loss) Cost Equity
(Dollars in millions) $ $
$ $ $ $
Balance at January 1, 2003 1 119 1,882 (295) (436) 1,271
Net Loss (270) (270)
Cash Dividends(2) (136) (136)
Other Comprehensive Loss 174 174
Stock Option Exercises and
other Items (1) 3 1 4
Balance at December 31, 2003 1 122 1,476 (121) (435) 1,043
Net Earnings 170 170
Cash Dividends(2) (137) (137)
Other Comprehensive Income 18 18
Stock Option Exercises and
88 2 90
other Items
Balance at December 31, 2004 1 210 1,509 (103) (433) 1,184
Net Earnings 557 557
Cash Dividends(2) (143) (143)
Other Comprehensive Income (97) (97)
Stock Option Exercises and
other Items (1) 110 1 111
Balance at December 31, 2005 1 320 1,923 (200) (432) 1,612
(1)
The tax benefits relating to the difference between the amounts deductible for federal income taxes over
the amounts charged to income for book value purposes have been credited to paid-in capital.
(2)
Includes cash dividends paid of $142 million and dividends declared but unpaid.
The Company is authorized to issue 400 million shares of all classes of stock, of which 50 million may be
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 350 million may be common stock, par value $0.01 per
share. The Company declared dividends of $1.76 per share in each of 2005, 2004 and 2003.
99

The Company established a benefit security trust in 1997 to provide a degree of financial security for
unfunded obligations under certain plans and contributed to the trust a warrant to purchase up to 1 million
shares of common stock of the Company for par value. The warrant, which remains outstanding, is
exercisable by the trustee if the Company does not meet certain funding obligations, which obligations
would be triggered by certain occurrences, including a change in control or potential change in control, as
defined, or failure by the Company to meet its payment obligations under covered unfunded plans. Such
warrant is excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the conditions upon which
the warrant becomes exercisable have not been met.
The additions to paid-in capital for 2005 and 2004 are primarily the result of stock option exercises by
employees. The additions to paid-in capital for 2003 primarily reflect the vesting of restricted stock.
The Company is currently authorized to repurchase up to $400 million of its common stock. No shares of
Eastman common stock were repurchased by the Company during 2005, 2004, and 2003 under any
publicly announced plan. A total of 2,746,869 shares of common stock at a cost of approximately $112
million, or an average price of approximately $41 per share, have been repurchased under the authorization.
Repurchased shares may be used to meet common stock requirements for compensation and benefit plans
and other corporate purposes.
The Company's charitable foundation held the following shares of the Company's common stock at
December 31 2005, 2004 and 2003: 106,771 shares, 122,725 shares and 144,825 shares, respectively.
For 2005, 2004, and 2003, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to compute
basic earnings per share was 80.7 million, 77.6 million, and 77.1 million, respectively, and for diluted
earnings per share was 81.8 million, 78.3 million, and 77.1 million, respectively, reflecting the effect of
dilutive options outstanding. Excluded from the 2005 calculation were shares underlying options to
purchase 878,442 shares of common stock at a range of prices from $54.25 to $67.50, because the exercise
price of the options was greater than the average market price of the underlying common shares. Excluded
from the 2004 calculation were shares underlying options to purchase 5,667,339 shares of common stock at
a range of prices from $45.44 to $67.50, because the exercise price of the options was greater than the
average market price of the underlying common shares. As a result of the net loss reported for 2003,
common shares underlying options to purchase 10,338,100 shares of common stock at a range of prices
from $29.90 to $73.94 have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share.
Shares of common stock issued (1) 2005 2004 2003
Balance at beginning of year 87,257,499 85,296,460 85,233,216
Issued for employee compensation and benefit
plans 2,308,616 1,961,039 63,244
Balance at end of year 89,566,115 87,257,499 85,296,460
(1)
Includes shares held in treasury.
100

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Unfunded
Additional Unrealized Accumulated
Other
Cumulative Minimum Gains (Losses) Unrealized
(Dollars in Comprehensive
Translation Losses on
Pension on Cash Flow
millions) Hedges Investments Income (Loss)
Adjustment Liability
Balance at
December 31,
$ 119 $ (242) $ 4 $ (2) $ (121)
2003
Period change 36 (6) (12) -- 18
Balance at
December 31,
2004 $ 155 $ (248) $ (8) $ (2) $ (103)
Period change (94) (7) 3 1 (97)
Balance at
December 31,
2005 $ 61 $ (255) $ (5) $ (1) $ (200)
The $36 million period change in 2004 includes a $50 million increase in cumulative translation adjustment
partially offset by $14 million that was included in measuring the gain/loss on the sale of certain businesses
and product lines within the CASPI segment completed July 31, 2004.
Except for cumulative translation adjustment, amounts of other comprehensive income (loss) are presented
net of applicable taxes. Because cumulative translation adjustment is considered a component of
permanently invested, unremitted earnings of subsidiaries outside the United States, no taxes are provided
on such amounts.
15. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Omnibus Plans
Eastman's 2002 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan (the \"2002 Omnibus Plan\"), which is
substantially similar to and intended to replace the 1997 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan (the
\"1997 Omnibus Plan\"), which replaced the 1994 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan (the “1994
Omnibus Plan”), provides for grants to employees of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options,
tandem and freestanding stock appreciation rights (“SAR’s”), performance shares and various other stock
and stock-based awards. Certain of these awards may be based on criteria relating to Eastman performance
as established by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors.
No new awards have been made under the 1994 Omnibus Plan or the 1997 Omnibus Plan following the
effectiveness of the 2002 Omnibus Plan. Outstanding grants and awards under the 1994 Omnibus Plan or
the 1997 Omnibus Plan are unaffected by the replacement of the 1997 Omnibus Plan (and 1994 Omnibus
Plan) by the 2002 Omnibus Plan. The 2002 Omnibus Plan provides that options can be granted through
May 2, 2007, for the purchase of Eastman common stock at an option price not less than 100 percent of the
per share fair market value on the date of the stock option's grant. Substantially all grants awarded under
the 1994 Omnibus Plan, the 1997 Omnibus Plan, and the 2002 Omnibus Plan have been at option prices
equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. Options typically vest in equal increments on either the
first two or three anniversaries of the grant date and expire ten years after grant. There is a maximum of 7.5
million shares of common stock available for option grants and other awards during the term of the 2002
Omnibus Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock with respect to one or more options
and/or SARs that may be granted during any one calendar year under the 2002 Omnibus Plan to the Chief
Executive Officer or to any of the next four most highly compensated executive officers (each a \"Covered
Employee\") is 300,000. The maximum fair market value of any awards (other than options and SARs) that
may be received by a Covered Employee during any one calendar year under the 2002 Omnibus Plan is the
equivalent value of 200,000 shares of common stock as of the first business day of such calendar year.
101

Director Long-Term Compensation Plan
Eastman's 2002 Director Long-Term Compensation Plan (the \"2002 Director Plan\"), which is substantially
similar to and intended to replace the 1999 Director Long-Term Compensation Plan (the “1999 Director
Plan”), which formerly replaced the 1994 Director Long-Term Compensation Plan (the “1994 Director
Plan”), provides for grants of nonqualified stock options and restricted shares to nonemployee members of
the Board of Directors. No new awards have been made under the 1994 Director Plan or the 1999 Director
Plan, following the effectiveness of the 2002 Director Plan. Outstanding grants and awards under the 1994
Director Plan or the 1999 Director Plan are unaffected by the replacement of the 1999 Director Plan (and
the 1994 Director Plan) with the 2002 Director Plan. Shares of restricted stock are granted upon the first
day of the directors' initial term of service and nonqualified stock options and shares of restricted stock are
granted each year following the annual meeting of stockholders. The 2002 Director Plan provides that
options can be granted through the later of May 1, 2007, or the date of the annual meeting of stockholders
in 2007 for the purchase of Eastman common stock at an option price not less than the stock's fair market
value on the date of the grant. The options vest in 50 percent increments on the first two anniversaries of
the grant date and expire ten years after grant. The maximum number of shares of common stock that are
available for grant of awards under the 2002 Director Plan during its term is 200,000.
Stock Option Balances and Activity
SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148 require that stock option awards be valued at fair value determined by
market price, if actively traded in a public market or, if not, calculated using an option pricing financial
model. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model which requires input of highly
subjective assumptions. The assumptions used in the determination of fair value for stock options awarded
in 2005, 2004 and 2003 are provided in the table below:
Assumptions 2005 2004 2003
Expected volatility rate 22.90% 28.00% 27.90%
Expected dividend yield 3.29% 3.80% 5.90%
Average risk-free interest rate 4.48% 3.46% 3.50%
Expected forfeiture rate Actual Actual Actual
Expected term years 5.00 6.00 6.00
Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of
traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value
estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure
of the fair value of its employee stock options.
102

A summary of the status of the Company's stock option plans is presented below:
2005 2004 2003
Weighted-
Weighted-
Weighted-
Average
Average
Average
Exercise
Exercise
Exercise
Price
Options Price Options
Options Price
Outstanding at
beginning of year 8,155,100 47 10,338,100 45 8,511,597 $ 49
$ $
Granted 1,275,700 54 1,051,500 45 1,987,100 30
Exercised (2,342,600) 43 (1,954,200) 41 -- --
Cancelled,
forfeited or
expired (471,400) 64 (1,280,300) 44 (160,597) 45
Outstanding at end
of year 6,616,800 $ 48 8,155,100 $ 47 10,338,100 $ 45
Options exercisable
at year-end 4,688,000 6,091,100 7,412,800
Available for grant
at end of year 2,954,500 4,503,500 5,778,900
The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $10.26, $9.36 and
$4.55, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005:
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Weighted-
Weighted-
Average
Remaining Average
Number Weighted- Number
Contractual Exercisable Exercise
Range of Exercise Outstanding at Average
at 12/31/05 Price
Prices 12/31/05 Life (Years) Exercise Price
$30-42 776,800 7.0 $ 30 723,200 $ 30
$43-46 1,032,100 5.6 45 730,600 46
$47-49 2,183,300 6.5 48 1,817,500 48
$50-74 2,624,600 5.6 55 1,416,700 56
6,616,800 6.1 $ 48 4,688,000 $ 47
16. IMPAIRMENTS AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES, NET
Impairments and restructuring charges totaled $33 million during 2005, consisting of non-cash asset
impairments of $12 million and restructuring charges of $21 million. Impairments and restructuring
charges totaled $206 million during 2004, consisting of non-cash asset impairments of $140 million and
restructuring charges of $66 million. Effective January 1, 2004, certain commodity product lines were
transferred from the Performance Chemicals and Intermediates (“PCI”) segment to the CASPI segment,
which resulted in the reclassification of asset impairment and severance charges of approximately $42
million for 2003.
103

The following table summarizes the 2005, 2004 and 2003 charges:
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Eastman Division segments:
CASPI:
Fixed asset impairments $-- $57 $235
Intangible asset impairments -- 6 175
Goodwill impairments -- -- 34
Severance charges -- 12 15
Site closure costs 4 6 3
PCI:
Fixed asset impairments 8 27 55
Severance charges 3 10 2
Site closure costs -- 1 --
Specialty Plastics (“SP”):
Fixed asset impairments -- 41 --
Severance charges -- 10 1
Site closure costs -- 2 --
Total Eastman Division 15 172 520
Voridian Division segments:
Polymers:
Fixed asset impairments -- -- 1
Severance charges -- 13 1
Fibers:
Severance charges -- -- 1
Total Voridian Division -- 13 3
Developing Businesses Division:
Developing Businesses (\"DB\"):
Fixed asset impairments 1 9 --
Intangible asset impairments 3 -- --
Severance costs -- 8 --
Restructuring charges 14 4 --
Total Developing Businesses Division 18 21 --
Total Eastman Chemical Company $33 $206 $523
Total asset impairments and restructuring charges, net 33 206 489
Total goodwill impairments -- -- 34
Total Eastman Chemical Company $33 $206 $523
104

2005
During 2005, the Company recorded $33 million in restructuring charges. These charges consist of
approximately $8 million of fixed asset impairments related to the Company's PCI manufacturing facilities
outside the United States, $14 million in restructuring charges related to the shutdown of Cendian
Corporation (\"Cendian\"), the Company's logistics subsidiary, $4 million of fixed and intangible asset
impairments related to the Company's DB segment, $3 million in severance charges related to the
separation of approximately 90 employees at the Company's Batesville, Arkansas manufacturing facility,
and $4 million in site closure costs related to the previously announced closures of certain manufacturing
facilities.
2004
In the fourth quarter 2004, the Company recorded restructuring charges of approximately $18 million,
consisting of asset impairments of $9 million and site closure and other restructuring charges of $9 million.
The non-cash asset impairments relate to the adjustment to fair value of assets at Cendian, impacting the
DB segment, resulting from a decision to reintegrate Cendian’s logistics activities. In addition, the
Company recognized restructuring charges of $9 million primarily related to actual and expected severance
of Cendian and other employees, as well as site closure charges primarily related to previously announced
manufacturing plant closures.
In the third quarter 2004, the Company recognized restructuring charges of approximately $42 million,
including asset impairments of approximately $28 million, for assets at the Company’s Batesville,
Arkansas and Longview, Texas manufacturing facilities. These impairments primarily related to certain
fixed assets in the performance chemicals product lines in the PCI segment that management decided to
rationalize due to increased foreign competition. Also in third quarter, the CASPI segment incurred
approximately $2 million in site closure charges primarily related to previously announced manufacturing
plant closures, while the DB segment recognized approximately $4 million in severance and restructuring
charges related to the reorganization of Cendian. Severance charges of $2 million, $3 million, $2 million,
and $1 million were also recognized in the CASPI, PCI, SP, and Polymers segments, respectively. These
charges resulted from the Company's voluntary termination program as well as ongoing cost reduction
efforts.
In the second quarter 2004, the Company recognized $79 million in restructuring charges, including asset
impairments of $62 million related to assets held for sale. The assets were part of the Company’s sale of
certain businesses and product lines within the CASPI segment, which was completed July 31, 2004. Those
product lines include: certain acrylic monomers; composites (unsaturated polyester resins); inks and
graphic arts raw materials; liquid resins; powder resins; and textile chemicals. The charges reflect
adjustment of the recorded values of these assets to the expected sales proceeds. Also in second quarter
2004, the Company recognized an additional $4 million of site closure costs related primarily to previously
announced manufacturing plant closures. These charges had an impact of approximately $2 million each to
the CASPI and SP segments. Severance charges of $5 million, $4 million, $2 million, $1 million, and $1
million were also recognized in the CASPI, PCI, SP, Polymers, and DB segments, respectively. These
charges resulted from the Company's voluntary termination program as well as ongoing cost reduction
efforts.
105

In the first quarter 2004, the Company recognized $67 million in restructuring charges, including
approximately $40 million of asset impairments and $5 million of severance charges primarily related to
the closure of its copolyester manufacturing facility in Hartlepool, United Kingdom. The decision to close
the Hartlepool site, which manufactured products that are within the Company’s SP segment’s product
lines, was made in order to consolidate production at other sites to create a more integrated and efficient
global manufacturing structure. Accordingly, the carrying value of the manufacturing fixed assets was
written down to fair value as established by appraisal and available market data. In addition, the Company
recognized $1 million of fixed asset impairments and $1 million of site closure costs related to additional
impairments within the CASPI reorganization and changes in estimates for previously accrued amounts.
Severance charges of $4 million, $3 million, $1 million, $11 million, and $1 million were also recognized
in the CASPI, PCI, SP, Polymers, and DB segments, respectively, as a result of ongoing cost reduction
efforts.
2003
CASPI Segment
In the third quarter, the Company reorganized the operating structure within its CASPI segment and
changed the segment’s business strategy in response to the financial performance of certain underlying
product lines. Prior to the third quarter 2003, management was pursuing growth strategies aimed at
significantly improving the financial performance of these product groups. However, due to the continued
operating losses and deteriorating market conditions, management decided to pursue alternative strategies
including restructuring, divestiture, and consolidation. This change affected both the manner in which
certain assets are used and the financial outlook for these product groups, thus triggering the impairments
and certain restructuring charges.
The third quarter fixed asset impairment charges of approximately $234 million primarily related to assets
associated with the above mentioned underperforming product lines, and primarily impacted manufacturing
sites in the North American and European regions that were part of the Lawter International, Inc.
(“Lawter”), McWhorter Technologies, Inc. (“McWhorter”), and Chemicke Zavody Sokolov (“Sokolov”)
acquisitions. Within these product lines, nine sites in North America and six sites in Europe were impaired.
As the undiscounted future cash flows could not support the carrying value of the assets, the fixed assets
were written down to fair value, as established primarily by appraisal.
The third quarter intangible asset impairments charges related to definite-lived intangible assets of
approximately $128 million and indefinite-lived intangibles of approximately $47 million. The definite-
lived intangibles related primarily to developed technology and customer lists, and the indefinite-lived
intangibles primarily related to trademarks. These intangible assets were primarily associated with the
acquisitions of Lawter and McWhorter. As the undiscounted future cash flows could not support the
carrying value of the definite-lived intangible assets, these assets were written down to fair value, as
established primarily by appraisal. Indefinite-lived intangible assets were written down to fair value, as
established by appraisal.
106

Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, \"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,\" the Company defined “reporting
units” as one level below the operating segment level and considered the criteria set forth in SFAS No. 142
in aggregating the reporting units. This resulted in the CASPI segment being deemed a single reporting
unit. In the third quarter 2003, the reorganization of the operating structure within the CASPI segment
resulted in new reporting units one level below the operating segment. Due to the change in strategy and
lack of similar economic characteristics, these reporting units did not meet the criteria necessary for
aggregation. As a result, the goodwill associated with the CASPI segment was reassigned to the new
reporting units based upon relative fair values. The reporting unit that contained the above-mentioned
product lines was assigned $34 million of goodwill out of the total CASPI segment goodwill of $333
million. Because the Company determined that this reporting unit could no longer support the carrying
value of its assigned goodwill, the full amount of that goodwill was impaired. The fair value of the other
reporting unit within CASPI was sufficient to support the carrying value of the remainder of the goodwill.
In the fourth quarter, the Company recognized fixed asset impairments and site closure costs of $1 million
and $3 million, respectively. The fixed asset impairments relate to additional impairments associated with
the CASPI reorganization, as discussed above. The site closure charges relate primarily to additional costs
related to the closure of the Company’s Dusseldorf manufacturing site.
Other Segments
In the second quarter, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of approximately $15 million
related to the impairment of certain fixed assets used in certain of the PCI segment’s performance
chemicals product lines that are located in Llangefni, Wales. In response to industry conditions, during the
second quarter 2003 the Company revised its strategy and the earnings forecast for the products
manufactured by these assets. As the undiscounted future cash flows could not support the carrying value
of the assets, the fixed assets were written down to fair value, as established primarily by discounted future
cash flows of the impacted assets.
In the third and fourth quarter, the PCI segment incurred charges of $40 million related to the impairment
of fixed assets used in performance chemicals product lines as a result of increased competition and
changes in business strategy in response to a change in market conditions and the financial performance of
these product lines. Within the specialty organic chemicals product lines, the fixed asset impairments
charge related to assets located at the Kingsport, Tennessee facility.
In the fourth quarter 2003, an asset impairment charge of $1 million was recorded related to certain
research and development assets classified as held for sale. The fair value of these assets was determined
using the estimated proceeds from sale less cost to sell. These charges impacted the Polymers segment.
During 2003, the Company recognized $20 million in severance costs for the actual and probable employee
separations from consolidation and restructuring activities in the CASPI segment and ongoing cost
reduction efforts throughout the Company. These changes are reflected in CASPI, PCI, SP, Polymers, and
Fibers segments of $15 million, $2 million, $1 million, $1 million, and $1 million, respectively.
107

The following table summarizes the charges and changes in estimates described above, other asset
impairments and restructuring charges, the non-cash reductions attributable to asset impairments, and the
cash reductions in shutdown reserves for severance costs and site closure costs paid:
Balance at
Balance at
Cash December 31,
January 1, Provision/ Non-cash
(Dollars in millions)
Reductions 2003
2003 Adjustments Reductions
Noncash charges -- $ 500 $ (500) $ -- $ --
$
Severance costs 2 20 -- (12) 10
Site closure costs 7 3 -- (5) 5
Total 9 $ 523 $ (500) $ (17) $ 15
$
Balance at
Balance at
December 31,
January 1, Provision/ Non-cash Cash
Adjustments Reductions Reductions 2004
2004
Noncash charges $ -- $ 140 $ (140) $ -- $ --
Severance costs 10 53 -- (37) 26
Site closure costs 5 13 -- (9) 9
Total $ 15 $ 206 $ (140) $ (46) $ 35
Balance at
Balance at
December 31,
Provision/ Non-cash Cash
January 1,
Reductions 2005
2005 Adjustments Reductions
Noncash charges $ -- $ 12 (12) -- --
Severance costs 26 3 -- (26) 3
Site closure costs 9 18 (1) (19) 7
Total $ 35 $ 33 (13) (45) 10
A majority of all severance and site closure costs are expected to be applied to the reserves within one year.
Actual and probable involuntary separations totaled approximately 90 employees during 2005. As of the
end of 2005, substantially all separations accrued for were completed.
Actual and probable involuntary separations totaled approximately 1,200 employees during 2004. As of the
end of 2004, substantially all separations accrued for were completed.
During 2003, terminations related to actual and probable involuntary separations totaled approximately 500
employees. As of the end of 2003, approximately 350 of these terminations had occurred, with the
remaining primarily relating to previously announced consolidation and restructuring activities of certain
European CASPI manufacturing sites that were completed in early 2004.
17. OTHER OPERATING INCOME
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Other operating income $ (2) $ (7) $ (33)
Other operating income for 2005 primarily reflects a gain associated with a change in estimates for
contingencies related to the 2004 divestiture of certain businesses and product lines within the CASPI
segment.
108

Other operating income for 2004 totaled approximately $7 million resulting from a gain on the sale of Ariel
Research Corporation (“Ariel”) in the fourth quarter, which was reflected in the DB segment.
Other operating income for 2003 totaled approximately $33 million and reflected gains of approximately
$20 million on the sale of the Company’s high-performance crystalline plastic assets in the first quarter,
and approximately $13 million on the sale of the Company’s colorant product lines and related assets in the
fourth quarter. These items were reflected within the SP and CASPI segments, respectively.
18. OTHER (INCOME) CHARGES, NET
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Other income $ (11) $ (10) $ (18)
Other charges 12 20 18
Other (income) charges, net $ 1 $ 10 $ --
Included in other income are the Company’s portion of earnings from its equity investments (excluding
Genencor); gains on the sale of certain technology business venture investments, royalty income, and net
gains on foreign exchange transactions. For all periods presented, included in other charges are net losses
on foreign exchange transactions, the Company’s portion of losses from its equity investments (excluding
Genencor); write-downs to fair value of certain technology business venture investments due to other than
temporary declines in value, and fees on securitized receivables.
19. INCOME TAXES
Components of earnings (loss) before income taxes and the provision (benefit) for U.S. and other income
taxes follow:
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
United States $ 698 $ 65 $ (309)
Outside the United States 85 (1) (72)
Total $ 783 $ 64 $ (381)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
United States
Current $ 80 $ 16 $ 16
Deferred 112 (128) (102)
Outside the United States
Current 25 8 10
Deferred (6) (8) (29)
State and other
Current 6 6 3
Deferred 9 -- (6)
Total $ 226 $ (106) $ (108)
109

The following represents the deferred tax charge (benefit) recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity.
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Minimum pension liability $ 4 $ 2 $ (12)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments (1) 7 (3)
Total $ (3) $ 9 $ (15)
Differences between the provision (benefit) for income taxes and income taxes computed using the U.S.
federal statutory income tax rate follow:
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Amount computed using the statutory rate $ 275 $ 23 $ (133)
State income taxes, net 5 (1) (4)
Foreign rate variance (4) 4 27
Extraterritorial income exclusion (12) (10) (9)
Domestic Manufacturing Deduction (5) -- --
ESOP dividend payout (2) (2) (2)
Capital loss benefits (13) (116) --
Change in reserves for tax contingencies (14) (2) --
Goodwill Impairment -- -- 12
Donation of intangibles (12) (2) --
Other 8 -- 1
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $ 226 $ (106) $ (108)
The 2005 effective tax rate was impacted by a $11 million tax charge resulting from the repatriation of
$321 million of foreign earnings and capital pursuant to provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 (\"Jobs Act\"). The Jobs Act created a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate
accumulated income earned abroad by providing an 85 percent dividends received deduction for certain
dividends from controlled foreign corporations.
The 2004 effective tax rate was impacted by $90 million of deferred tax benefits resulting from the
expected utilization of a capital loss resulting from the sale of certain businesses and product lines and
related assets in the CASPI segment and $26 million of tax benefit resulting from the favorable resolution
of a prior year capital loss refund claim.
110

The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities follow:
December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004
Deferred tax assets
Post-employment obligations $ 412 $ 444
Net operating loss carry forwards 130 204
Capital loss carry forwards 93 130
Other 123 163
Total deferred tax assets 758 941
Less valuation allowance (197) (221)
Deferred tax assets less valuation allowance $ 561 $ 720
Deferred tax liabilities
Depreciation $ ( 692) $ ( 677)
Inventory reserves (42) (41)
Other (66) (118)
Total deferred tax liabilities $ (800) $ (836)
Net deferred tax liabilities $ (239) $ (116)
As recorded in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position:
Other current assets $ 39 $ 48
Other noncurrent assets 45 52
Payables and other current liabilities (6) (6)
Deferred income tax liabilities (317) (210)
Net deferred tax liabilities $ (239) $ (116)
Unremitted earnings of subsidiaries outside the United States, considered to be reinvested indefinitely,
totaled $305 million at December 31, 2005. It is not practicable to determine the deferred tax liability for
temporary differences related to those unremitted earnings.
For certain consolidated foreign subsidiaries, income and losses directly flow through to taxable income in
the United States. These entities are also subject to taxation in the foreign tax jurisdictions. Net operating
loss carryforwards exist to offset future taxable income in foreign tax jurisdictions and valuation
allowances are provided to reduce deferred related tax assets if it is more likely than not that this benefit
will not be realized. Changes in the estimated realizable amount of deferred tax assets associated with net
operating losses for these entities could result in changes in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance in
the foreign tax jurisdiction. At the same time, because these entities are also subject to tax in the United
States, a deferred tax liability for the expected future taxable income will be established concurrently.
Therefore, the impact of any reversal of valuation allowances on consolidated income tax expense will only
be to the extent that there are differences between the United States statutory tax rate and the tax rate in the
foreign jurisdiction. A valuation allowance of $89 million at December 31, 2005, has been provided against
the deferred tax asset resulting from these operating loss carryforwards.
At December 31, 2005, foreign net operating loss carryforwards totaled $408 million. Of this total, $92
million will expire in 3 to 15 years; and $316 million will never expire.
111

Amounts due to and from tax authorities as recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position:
December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004
Payables and other current liabilities $ 9 $ 55
Other long-term liabilities 32 27
Total income taxes payable $ 41 $ 82
20. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003
Cash paid for interest and income taxes is as follows:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized $ 126 $ 135 $ 133
Income taxes paid (received) 138 (3) (43)
Derivative financial instruments and related gains and losses are included in cash flows from operating
activities.
Non-cash portion of earnings from the Company’s equity investments are $2 million, $15 million, and $12
million for 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
21. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company’s products and operations are managed and reported in three divisions comprising six
operating segments. Eastman Division consists of the CASPI segment, the PCI segment, and the SP
segment. Voridian Division contains the Polymers segment and the Fibers segment. The Developing
Businesses Division consists of the DB segment.
For 2005 and 2004, the Company’s divisional structure provided for goods and services to be transferred
between the divisions at predetermined prices that may have been in excess of cost. Accordingly, the
divisional structure resulted in the recognition of interdivisional sales revenue and operating earnings. Such
interdivisional transactions are eliminated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The CASPI segment manufactures raw materials, additives and specialty polymers, primarily for the paints
and coatings, inks, and adhesives markets. The CASPI segment's products consist of liquid vehicles,
coatings additives, and hydrocarbon resins and rosins and rosin esters. Liquid vehicles, such as ester,
ketone and alcohol solvents, maintain the binders in liquid form for ease of application. Coatings additives,
such as cellulosic polymers, Texanol ester alcohol and chlorinated polyolefins, enhance the rheological,
film formation and adhesion properties of paints, coatings and inks. Hydrocarbon resins and rosins and
rosin esters are used in adhesive, ink, and polymers compounding applications. Additional products are
developed in response to, or in anticipation of, new applications where the Company believes significant
value can be achieved. On July 31, 2004, the Company completed the sale of certain businesses, product
lines and related assets within the CASPI segment. The divested businesses and product lines were
composites (unsaturated polyester resins), certain acrylic monomers, inks and graphic arts raw materials,
liquid resins, powder resins, and textile chemicals.
112

The PCI segment manufactures diversified products that are used in a variety of markets and industrial and
consumer applications, including chemicals for agricultural intermediates, fibers, food and beverage
ingredients, photographic chemicals, pharmaceutical intermediates, polymer compounding and chemical
manufacturing intermediates. The PCI segment also offers custom manufacturing services through its
custom synthesis business.
The SP segment’s key products include engineering and specialty polymers, specialty film and sheet
products, and packaging film and fiber products. Included in these are highly specialized copolyesters and
cellulosic plastics that possess unique performance properties for value-added end uses such as appliances,
store fixtures and displays, building and construction, electronic packaging, medical packaging, personal
care and cosmetics, performance films, tape and labels, fiber, photographic and optical film, graphic arts,
and general packaging.
The Polymers segment manufactures and supplies PET polymers for use primarily in beverage and food
packaging, including carbonated soft drinks, water, juices, sports drinks, beer and food containers that are
suitable for both conventional and microwave oven use. The Polymers segment also manufactures low-
density polyethylene and linear low-density polyethylene, which are used primarily in extrusion coating,
film and molding applications.
The Fibers segment manufactures Estron acetate tow and Estrobond triacetin plasticizers which are used
primarily in cigarette filters; Estron and Chromspun acetate yarns for use in apparel, home furnishings and
industrial fabrics; acetate flake for use by other acetate tow producers; and acetyl chemicals.
The DB segment includes new businesses and certain investments in growth opportunities that leverage the
Company’s technology expertise, intellectual property and know-how into business models that extend to
new customers and markets. The segment includes Centrus, a business in food safety diagnostics; and
Eastman’s gasification services. The DB segment also includes the results of Cendian, which was
shutdown in 2005 and Ariel, which was sold in fourth quarter 2004.
2005
(Dollars in millions)
Interdivisional
Sales
Total Sales External Sales
Sales by Division and Segment
Eastman Division Segments
CASPI $ 1,301 $ 2 $ 1,299
PCI 2,292 665 1,627
SP 766 48 718
Total 4,359 715 3,644
Voridian Division Segments
Polymers 2,606 87 2,519
Fibers 968 99 869
Total 3,574 186 3,388
Developing Businesses Division
DB 88 61 27
Total 88 61 27
Total Eastman Chemical Company $ 8,021 $ 962 $ 7,059
113

2004
(Dollars in millions)
Interdivisional
Total Sales Sales External Sales
Sales by Division and Segment
Eastman Division Segments
CASPI $ 1,555 $ 1 $ 1,554
PCI 1,930 583 1,347
SP 695 51 644
Total 4,180 635 3,545
Voridian Division Segments
Polymers 2,252 69 2,183
Fibers 819 88 731
Total 3,071 157 2,914
Developing Businesses Division
DB 545 424 121
Total 545 424 121
Total Eastman Chemical Company $ 7,796 $ 1,216 $ 6,580
(Dollars in millions) 2003*
Interdivisional External
Total Sales Sales Sales
Sales by Division and Segment
Eastman Division Segments
CASPI $ 1,683 $ -- $ 1,683
PCI 1,593 495 1,098
SP 608 49 559
Total 3,884 544 3,340
Voridian Division Segments
Polymers 1,824 68 1,756
Fibers 715 80 635
Total 2,539 148 2,391
Developing Businesses Division
DB 465 396 69
Total 465 396 69
Total Eastman Chemical Company $ 6,888 $ 1,088 $ 5,800
* Sales revenue for 2003 has been realigned to reflect certain product movements between CASPI and PCI
segments effective in the first quarter 2004.
114

(Dollars in millions)
Operating Earnings (Loss) (1) 2003 (2)
2005 2004
Eastman Division Segments
CASPI $ 229 $ 67 $ (402)
PCI 161 16 (45)
SP 64 13 63
Total 454 96 (384)
Voridian Division Segments
Polymers 159 25 62
Fibers 207 146 125
Total 366 171 187
Developing Businesses Division
DB (70) (86) (65)
Total (70) (86) (65)
Eliminations 7 (6) (5)
Total Eastman Chemical Company $ 757 $ 175 $ (267)
(1) Operating earnings (loss) includes the impact of asset impairments and restructuring charges,
goodwill impairments, and other operating income and expense as described in Notes 16 and 17.
(2) Operating earnings for 2003 have been realigned to reflect certain product movements between
CASPI and PCI segments effective in the first quarter 2004.
115

2003*
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2004
Assets
Eastman Division Segments
CASPI $ $ $
1,393 1,486 1,792
PCI 1,589 1,627 1,685
SP 689 702 762
Total 3,671 3,815 4,239
Voridian Division Segments
Polymers 1,416 1,414 1,351
Fibers 675 580 614
Total 2,091 1,994 1,965
Developing Businesses Division
DB 11 30 40
Total 11 30 40
Total Eastman Chemical Company $ $ $
5,773 5,839 6,244
Depreciation Expense
Eastman Division Segments
CASPI $ $ $
55 57 79
PCI 76 87 94
SP 47 43 41
Total 178 187 214
Voridian Division Segments
Polymers 74 72 69
Fibers 35 39 37
Total 109 111 106
Developing Businesses Division
DB -- 4 14
Total -- 4 14
Total Eastman Chemical Company $ $ $
287 302 334
Capital Expenditures
Eastman Division Segments
CASPI $ $ $
46 50 77
PCI 63 65 56
SP 67 36 7
Total 176 151 140
Voridian Division Segments
Polymers 137 67 52
Fibers 28 14 34
Total 165 81 86
Developing Businesses Division
DB 2 16 4
Total 2 16 4
Total Eastman Chemical Company $ $ $
343 248 230
* Assets for 2003 have been realigned to reflect certain product movements between CASPI and PCI
segments effective in the first quarter 2004.
116

2005 2004 2003
(Dollars in millions)
Geographic Information
Revenues
United States $ 3,886 $ 3,456 $ 3,074
All foreign countries 3,173 3,124 2,726
Total $ 7,059 $ 6,580 $ 5,800
Long-Lived Assets, Net
United States $ 2,508 $ 2,481 $ 2,542
All foreign countries 654 711 877
Total $ 3,162 $ 3,192 $ 3,419
22. QUARTERLY SALES AND EARNINGS DATA – UNAUDITED
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
2005
Sales $ 1,762 $ 1,752 $ 1,816 $ 1,729
Gross profit 399 374 352 279
Asset impairment and restructuring charges 9 10 4 10
Net earnings 162 206 123 66
Net earnings per share (1)
Basic $ 2.04 $ 2.55 $ 1.51 $ 0.81
Diluted $ 2.00 $ 2.51 $ 1.50 $ 0.81
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter2 Quarter2
Quarter Quarter
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
2004
Sales $ 1,597 $ 1,676 $ 1,649 $ 1,658
Gross profit 235 270 257 216
Asset impairment and restructuring charges 67 79 42 18
Net earnings (loss) (6) 84 38 54
Net earnings (loss) per share (1)
Basic $ (0.07) $ 1.08 $ 0.50 $ 0.69
Diluted $ (0.07) $ 1.07 $ 0.49 $ 0.68
(1)
Each quarter is calculated as a discrete period; the sum of the four quarters may not equal the calculated
full-year amount.
(2)
On July 31, 2004, the Company completed the sale of certain businesses, product lines and related assets
within the CASPI segment.
117

23. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In November, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4”. The standard adopts the International Accounting Standards Board’s
view related to inventories that abnormal amounts of idle capacity and spoilage costs should be excluded
from the cost of inventory and expensed when incurred. Additionally, the Statement clarifies the meaning
of the term 'normal capacity'. The provisions of this Statement will be effective for inventory costs incurred
during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company has evaluated the effect of SFAS No. 151
and determined that it does not materially impact its consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results
from operations.
In December, 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123(R)
revises SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25-
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R) requires all companies that award their
employees stock-based compensation to recognize these transactions in their financial statements based on
the grant-date fair value of the award. This differs from the requirements of SFAS No. 123 which
permitted the option of adopting SFAS No. 123 and reflecting these transactions in the financial statements
or the continued application of APB Opinion No. 25 requiring only pro forma disclosure of the effects on
net earnings and earnings per share as if SFAS No. 123 had been adopted. Through the end of 2005, the
Company has elected to continue application of APB Opinion No. 25 with the pro forma disclosure
required for SFAS No. 123. However, the Company is required to implement the provisions of SFAS No.
123(R) effective January 1, 2006.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires the Company, as of the required effective date of application, to implement the
standard using a modified version of prospective application. Under this method, compensation expense is
recognized for the following: 1) the portion of outstanding awards at the effective date of implementation
for which the requisite employee service has not yet been rendered, based upon the grant-date fair value of
those awards calculated under SFAS No. 123 for pro forma disclosure purposes, and 2) all new awards,
modified awards, repurchased awards, or cancelled awards after the effective date of implementation.
Under previous reporting guidance, the following types of share-based compensation awards have been
recorded in the financial statements: 1) unrestricted common stock awards, 2) restricted common stock
awards, 3) stock appreciation rights payable in cash and 4) long-term performance awards payable in the
form of shares of common stock or cash. The implementation of SFAS No. 123(R) includes the additional
requirement to recognize compensation expense of stock option awards in the financial statements. The
outstanding quantity and value of existing stock option awards at December 31, 2005 for which the
requisite service period has not been provided and for which compensation expense will be recognized in
the financial statements after the effective date of application total 1,990,617 options and approximately
$17 million over three years. The Company did not modify any awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 to
affect early vesting which would have eliminated the required service period to be provided after the
effective date of application and eliminated recognition of compensation expense related thereto. Further,
there have not been any changes in the quantity or type of share-based payment awards solely due to the
implementation of SFAS No. 123(R).
118

The determination of the grant-date fair value of share-based compensation awards is based upon
observable prices of financial equity instruments actively traded in open markets or, if not available, as in
the case of the Company's stock option awards and stock appreciation rights awards, an option pricing
financial model should be used to estimate the fair value of the award. Eastman has relied upon the use of
the Black-Scholes-Merton model to determine the value of its stock options and stock appreciation rights
under SFAS No. 123 and will continue to do so under SFAS No. 123(R). As discussed in Note 15 to the
Company’s consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.,
the use of any financial model may require the use of highly subjective input assumptions that may
materially affect the fair value estimate. Refer to this footnote to review these assumptions for 2005, 2004
and 2003.
All share-based employee compensation expense will be reflected in the earnings statement within the
selling, general and administrative expense line item with an offset to paid-in-capital or non-current
liabilities in the statement of financial position dependent upon classification as a liability award or equity
award. Awards classified as liabilities require the use of cash or other assets to effect payment while equity
awards reflect payment through stock issuances. The federal income tax and state income tax
consequences of recognition for share-based compensation are reflected in the earnings statement as a
credit to current period income tax expense with an offset in the statement of financial position as deferred
income taxes in the other non-current assets line item. Additionally, SFAS No. 123(R) requires that cash
inflows related to the realized tax benefits in excess of the amount recorded in the financial statements be
recognized in the statement of cash flows as a cash inflow from financing and a cash outflow from
operating activities.
24. CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES, NET OF TAX
SFAS No. 143
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company’s method of accounting for environmental closure and postclosure
costs changed as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.”
Upon the initial adoption of the provision, entities are required to recognize a liability for any existing asset
retirement obligations adjusted for cumulative accretion to the date of adoption of this Statement, an asset
retirement cost capitalized as an increase to the carrying amount of the associated long-lived asset, and
accumulated depreciation on that capitalized cost. In accordance with SFAS No. 143, the Company
recorded asset retirement obligations primarily related to closure and postclosure environmental liabilities
associated with certain property plant and equipment. This resulted in the Company recording asset
retirement obligations of $28 million and an after-tax credit to earnings of $3 million.
If the asset retirement obligation measurement and recognition provisions of SFAS No. 143 had been in
effect on January 1, 2002, the aggregate carrying amount of those obligations on that date would have been
$27 million. If the amortization of asset retirement cost and accretion of asset retirement obligation
provisions of SFAS No. 143 had been in effect during 2002, the impact on “Earnings before cumulative
effect of changes in accounting principle” would have been immaterial.
119

25. RESERVE ROLLFORWARDS
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Additions
Charged
(Dollars in millions) to Cost Balance at
Balance at Charged
December
January and to Other
Expense Deductions 31, 2003
1, 2003 Accounts
Reserve for:
Doubtful accounts and
returns $ 32 $ 8 $ -- $ 12 $ 28
Environmental
contingencies 60 1 -- -- 61
Deferred tax valuation
allowance 132 43 -- -- 175
$ 224 $ 52 $ -- $ 12 $ 264
Balance at Balance at
January December
1, 2004 31, 2004
Reserve for:
Doubtful accounts and
returns $ 28 $ 4 $ -- $ 17 $ 15
Environmental
contingencies 61 -- -- 5 56
Deferred tax valuation
allowance 175 39 7 -- 221
$ 264 $ 43 $ 7 $ 22 $ 292
Balance at
Balance at
December
January
31, 2005
1, 2005
Reserve for:
Doubtful accounts and
returns $ 15 $ 9 $ -- $ 4 $ 20
Environmental
contingencies 56 4 -- 9 51
Deferred tax valuation
allowance 221 (21) (3) -- 197
$ 292 $ (8) $ (3) $ 13 $ 268
120

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. An evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive
Officer (\"CEO\") and Chief Financial Officer (\"CFO\"), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2005.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under
the supervision of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that:
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that
receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of management and the directors of the Company; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s
financial statements.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2005 based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this
assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2005.
Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the fourth quarter of 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
121

PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE
REGISTRANT
The material under the heading \"Proposals to be Voted Upon at the Annual Meeting--Item 1--Election of
Directors\" up to (but not including) the subheading \"Director Independence,\" the material under the
subheading \"Board Committees--Audit Committee\" (except for the material under the subheading \"Board
Committees--Audit Committee--Audit Committee Report\", which is not incorporated by reference herein),
and the material in Note 14 to the Summary Compensation Table under the heading \"Executive
Compensation--Compensation Tables\", each as included and to be filed in the 2006 Proxy Statement, is
incorporated by reference herein in response to this Item. Certain information concerning executive
officers of the Company is set forth under the heading \"Executive Officers of the Company\" in Part I of this
Annual Report.
The Company has adopted a code of ethics and business conduct applicable to the chief executive officer,
chief financial officer and the controller of the Company. See “Part I - Item 1. Business - Available
Information - SEC Filings and Corporate Governance Materials”.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The material under the headings \"Proposals to be Voted Upon at the Annual Meeting--Item 1--Election of
Directors--Director Compensation\" as included and to be filed in the 2006 Proxy Statement is incorporated
by reference herein in response to this Item. In addition, the material under the heading \"Executive
Compensation\" as included and to be filed in the 2006 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference herein
in response to this Item, except for the material under the subheadings \" -- Compensation and Management
Development Committee Report on Executive Compensation\" and \" -- Performance Graph,\" which are not
incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The material under the headings \"Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers--Common Stock\"
and \"Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners\" as included and to be filed in the 2006 definitive
Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference herein in response to this Item.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders
Stockholders approved the Company’s 1994, 1997, and 2002 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plans;
the 1994, 1999, and 2002 Director Long-Term Compensation Plans; and the 1996 Non-Employee Director
Stock Option Plan. Although stock and stock-based awards are still outstanding under the 1994 and 1997
Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plans, as well as the 1994 and 1999 Director Long-Term
Compensation Plans, no new shares are available under these plans for future grants.
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders
Stockholders have approved all compensation plans under which shares of Eastman common stock may be
issued.
122

Summary Equity Compensation Plan Information Table
The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2005 with respect to compensation
plans under which shares of Eastman common stock may be issued.
Number of Securities
Number of Remaining Available
Weighted-
Securities to be for Future Issuance
Average Under Equity
Issued upon
Exercise Price
Exercise of Compensation Plans
of Outstanding
Outstanding (Excluding Securities
Options reflected in Column (a))
Options
Plan Category (b)
(a) (c)
Equity compensation
plans approved by
(1) (2)
6,616,800 $48 2,954,500
stockholders
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by stockholders -- -- --
6,616,800 $48 2,954,500
TOTAL
(1)
Represents shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options granted under
Eastman Chemical Company’s 1994, 1997, and 2002 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plans; the
1994, 1999, and 2002 Director Long-Term Compensation Plans; and the 1996 Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan.
(2)
Shares of common stock available for future grants under the Company’s 2002 Omnibus Long-Term
Compensation Plan, the 2002 Director Long-Term Compensation Plan, and the 1996 Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
There are no transactions or relationships since the beginning of the last completed fiscal year required to
be reported in response to this Item.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information concerning amounts billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant
and pre-approval of such services by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors under the
heading \"Item 2 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Accountants\" as included and to be filed in
the 2006 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference herein in response to this Item.
123

PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Page
(a) 1. Consolidated Financial Statements:
Management's Responsibility for Financial Statements 71
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 72
Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss), Comprehensive
Income (Loss), and Retained Earnings 74
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position 75
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 76
Notes to Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements 77
2. Exhibits filed as part of this report are listed in the Exhibit Index 127
beginning at page 127
(b) The Exhibit Index and required Exhibits to this report are included
beginning at page 127
124

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Eastman Chemical Company
By: / s / J. Brian Ferguson
J. Brian Ferguson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 13, 2006
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER:
/ s / J. Brian Ferguson Chairman of the Board of Directors March 13, 2006
J. Brian Ferguson and Chief Executive Officer
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER:
/ s / Richard A. Lorraine Senior Vice President and March 13, 2006
Richard A. Lorraine Chief Financial Officer
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER:
/ s / Curtis E. Espeland Vice President and March 13, 2006
Curtis E. Espeland Chief Accounting Officer
125

SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
DIRECTORS:
/ s / Michael P. Connors Director March 13, 2006
Michael P. Connors
/ s / Stephen R. Demeritt Director March 13, 2006
Stephen R. Demeritt
/ s / Donald W. Griffin Director March 13, 2006
Donald W. Griffin
/ s / Robert M. Hernandez Director March 13, 2006
Robert M. Hernandez
/ s / Renee J. Hornbaker Director March 13, 2006
Renẻe J. Hornbaker
/ s / Howard L. Lance Director March 13, 2006
Howard L. Lance
/ s / Thomas H. McLain Director March 13, 2006
Thomas H. McLain
/ s / David W. Raisbeck Director March 13, 2006
David W. Raisbeck
/ s / Peter M. Wood Director March 13, 2006
Peter M. Wood
126

Sequential
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Page
Number Description Number
3.01 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Eastman Chemical Company, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to Eastman Chemical Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001
3.02 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Eastman Chemical Company, as amended
December 4, 2003 (incorporated herein by referenced to Exhibit 3.02 to Eastman
Chemical Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 (the “2003 10-K”))
4.01 Form of Eastman Chemical Company common stock certificate as amended February
1, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to Eastman Chemical
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001)
4.02 Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement dated as of December 13, 1993, between
Eastman Chemical Company and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as
Rights Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Eastman Chemical
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the Eastman Investment
Plan, File No. 33-73810)
4.03 Indenture, dated as of January 10, 1994, between Eastman Chemical Company and The
Bank of New York, as Trustee (the \"Indenture\") (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4(a) to Eastman Chemical Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
January 10, 1994 (the \"8-K\"))
4.04 Form of 7 1/4% Debentures due January 15, 2024 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4(d) to the 8-K)
4.05 Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Sections 201 and 301 of the Indenture (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Eastman Chemical Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated June 8, 1994 (the \"June 8-K\"))
4.06 Form of 7 5/8% Debentures due June 15, 2024 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4(b) to the June 8-K)
4.07 Form of 7.60% Debentures due February 1, 2027 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.08 to Eastman Chemical Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1996 (the \"1996 10-K\"))
4.08 Form of 7% Notes due April 15, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.09
to Eastman Chemical Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2002)
4.09 Officer's Certificate pursuant to Sections 201 and 301 of the Indenture related to 7.60%
Debentures due February 1, 2027 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.09 to
the 1996 10-K)
4.10 $200,000,000 Accounts Receivable Securitization agreement dated April 13, 1999
(amended April 11, 2000), between the Company and Bank One, N.A., as agent.
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, in lieu of filing a copy of such
agreement, the Company agrees to furnish a copy of such agreement to the
Commission upon request
4.11 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2004 (the \"Credit
Agreement\") among Eastman Chemical Company, the Lenders named therein, and
Citicorp USA, Inc., as Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to
Eastman Chemical Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004)
127

Sequential
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Page
Number Description Number
4.12 Form of 3 ¼% Notes due June 16, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.13 to Eastman Chemical Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003)
4.13 Form of 6.30% Notes due 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to
Eastman Chemical Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003)
4.14 Amendments to Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2 to Eastman Chemical Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K dated December 4, 2003)
10.01* Amended and Restated Eastman Chemical Company Benefit Security Trust dated
January 2, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.04 to Eastman
Chemical Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002, (the \"September 30, 2002 10-Q\")
10.02* Eastman Unit Performance Plan as amended and restated January 1, 2004
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.09 to the 2003 10-K)
10.03* 2002 Director Long-Term Compensation Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by
reference to Appendix A to Eastman Chemical Company’s 2002 Annual Meeting
Proxy Statement)
10.04* Amended and Restated Eastman Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated herein by referenced to Exhibit 10.05 to Eastman Chemical
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002)
10.05* Eastman Excess Retirement Income Plan, amended and restated effective January 1,
2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Eastman Chemical
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
(the \"2001 10-K\")
10.06* Eastman Unfunded Retirement Income Plan, amended and restated effective January
1, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the 2001 10-K)
10.07* Form of Executive Severance Agreements (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to Eastman Chemical Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001 and superseded by the form of Executive Change-in-
Control Severance Agreements filed as Exhibit 10.30 hereto)
10.08* Unit Performance Plan (\"UPP\") performance measures and goals, specific target
objectives with respect to such performance goals, the method for computing the
amount of the UPP award allocated to the award pool if the performance goals are
attained, and the eligibility criteria for employee participation in the UPP, for the
2005 performance year (incorporated herein by reference to Eastman Chemical
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 2, 2004)
10.09* 2002 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to
Appendix A to Eastman Chemical Company’s 2002 Annual Meeting Proxy
Statement)
10.10* 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.02 to Eastman Chemical Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 1996)
10.11* Amended Director Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.02 to Eastman Chemical Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002)
128

Sequential
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Page
Number Description Number
10.12* Employment Agreement between Eastman Chemical Company and James P. Rogers
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to Eastman Chemical Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999)
10.13* Eastman 2000-2002 Long-Term Performance Subplan of 1997 Omnibus Long-Term
Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Eastman
Chemical Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1999 (the \"1999 10-K\"))
10.14* Form of Award Notice for Stock Options Granted to Managers under Omnibus Long-
Term Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the
1999 10-K)
10.15* Form of Indemnification Agreements between Theresa K. Lee, Gregory O. Nelson,
James P. Rogers and Eastman Chemical for service as directors of Genencor
International, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to Eastman
Chemical Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2000)
Notice of Restricted Stock Granted Pursuant to the Eastman Chemical Company 2002
10.16* Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan, dated October 7, 2002 (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the September 30, 2002 10-Q)
10.17* Amended and Restated Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of Eastman
Chemical Company, dated January 2, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.02 to the September 30, 2002 10-Q)
10.18* Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated January 2, 2002
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the September 30, 2002 10-Q)
10.19* Form of Indemnification Agreements with Directors and Executive Officers
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the 2003 10-K)
10.20* Notice of Restricted Stock Granted Pursuant to the Eastman Chemical Company 2002
Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan, dated February 5, 2004 (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the 2003 10-K)
10.21* Notice of Restricted Stock Granted Pursuant to the Eastman Chemical Company 2002
Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan, dated January 1, 2004 (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the 2003 10-K)
10.22* Notice of Restricted Stock Granted Pursuant to the Eastman Chemical Company 2002
Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan, dated January 1, 2004 (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the 2003 10-K)
10.23* Notice of Restricted Stock Granted Pursuant to the Eastman Chemical Company 2002
Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan, dated December 3, 2003 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the 2003 10-K)
10.24* Notice of Performance Shares Granted Pursuant to the Eastman Chemical Company
2002 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan, dated January 1, 2004 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the 2003 10-K)
10.25* Notice of Performance Shares Granted Pursuant to the Eastman Chemical Company
2002 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan, dated January 1, 2004 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the 2003 10-K)
129

Sequential
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Page
Number Description Number
10.26* Eastman 2004-2005 Performance Share Award Subplan of the 2002 Omnibus
Long-Term Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32
to the 2003 10-K)
10.27* Eastman 2004-2006 Performance Share Award Subplan of the 2002 Omnibus
Long-Term Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33
to the 2003 10-K)
10.28* Form of Award Notice of Nonqualified Stock Option Granted to Executive
Officers Pursuant to the Eastman Chemical Company 2002 Omnibus Long-Term
Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to Eastman
Chemical Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (the “September 30, 2004 10-Q”)
10.29* Form of Performance Share Award Subplan of the 2002 Omnibus Long-Term
Compensation Plan 2005 – 2007 Performance Period Effective January 1, 2005
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the September 30, 2004 10-
Q)
10.30* Form of Executive Change-in-Control Severance Agreements (incorporated
herein by reference to Eastman Chemical Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated December 5, 2005 regarding New Executive Change-in-Control Severance
Agreements, which supersede the former Executive Severance Agreements
referenced in Exhibit 10.07 hereto)
10.31* Unit Performance Plan (\"UPP\") performance measures and goals, specific target
objectives with respect to such performance goals, the method for computing the
amount of the UPP award allocated to the award pool if the performance goals are
attained, and the eligibility criteria for employee participation in the UPP, for the
2006 performance year (incorporated herein by reference to Eastman Chemical
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 6, 2005)
12.01 Statement re: Computation of Ratios of Earnings (Loss) to Fixed Charges 131
21.01 Subsidiaries of the Company 132 - 134
23.01 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 135
31.01 Rule 13a – 14(a) Certification by J. Brian Ferguson, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer, for the year ended December 31, 2005 136
31.02 Rule 13a – 14(a) Certification by Richard A. Lorraine, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, for the year ended December 31, 2005 137
32.01 Section 1350 Certification by J. Brian Ferguson, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, for the year ended December 31, 2005 138
32.02 Section 1350 Certification by Richard A. Lorraine, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, for the year ended December 31, 2005 139
99.01 CASPI segment detail of sales revenue, operating earnings (loss) and asset
impairments and restructuring charges 140
99.02 Eastman Chemical Company detail of sales revenue and Eastman Division detail
of sales revenue 141
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement filed pursuant to Item 601(b) (10) (iii) of Regulation S-K.
130

EXHIBIT 12.01
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS (LOSS) TO FIXED CHARGES
Dollars in millions) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
Earnings (loss) before income
taxes and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle $ 783 $ 64 $ (381) $ 84 $ (291)
Add:
Interest expense 113 123 130 128 146
Appropriate portion of rental
expense (1) 21 21 21 28 28
Amortization of capitalized
interest 11 15 12 13 15
Earnings (loss) as adjusted $ 928 $ 223 $ (218) $ 253 $ (102)
Fixed charges:
Interest expense $ 113 $ 123 $ 130 $ 128 $ 146
Appropriate portion of rental
expense (1) 21 21 21 28 28
Capitalized interest 5 3 3 4 5
Total fixed charges $ 139 $ 147 $ 154 $ 160 $ 179
Ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed
charges 6.7x 1.5x (A) 1.6x (B)
For all periods presented, the interest component of rental expense is estimated to equal one-third of such
(1)
expense.
Due to the net loss reported, the coverage ratio was less than 1x. To achieve a coverage ratio of 1x, additional
(A)
pre-tax earnings of $372 million would have been required for 2003.
Due to the net loss reported, the coverage ratio was less than 1x. To achieve a coverage ratio of 1x, additional
(B)
pre-tax earnings of $281 million would have been required for 2001.
131

EASTMAN CHEMICAL Exhibit 21.01
COMPANY
SUBSIDIARIES
JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION OR
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY ORGANIZATION
Altovar Ltd. United Kingdom
Cendian Corporation Delaware
Cendian Argentina, S.R.L. Argentina
Cendian Asia Pacific Pte Ltd Singapore
Cendian, B.V. Netherlands
Cendian de Mexico, S. DE. R.L.
Mexico
DE C.V.
Cendian do Brasil Ltda Brazil
Cendian holding, B.V. Netherlands
Cendian International, Inc. Delaware
Cendian Servicious, S. DE R.L.
Mexico
DE C.V.
Centrus International, Inc. Delaware
Centrus International Canada
Canada
Company
Eastman Belgium B.V.B.A. Belgium (Kallo)
Eastman Benelux B.V.B.A. Belgium (Kallo)
Eastman Cayman Financial
Cayman Islands
Services Limited
Eastman Chemical, Asia Pacific
Singapore
Pte. Ltd.
Eastman Chemical (Malaysia)
Malaysia
Sdn. Bhd.
Eastman Chemical B.V. Netherlands
Eastman Chemical Barcelona,
Spain
S.A.
Eastman Chemical Canada, Inc. Canada
Eastman Chemical Company
Delaware
Foundation, Inc.
Eastman Chemical Company
Delaware
Investments, Inc.
Eastman Chemical Deutschland
Germany
GmbH
Eastman Chemical, Europe,
Delaware
Middle East, and Africa, Ltd
Eastman Chemical Financial
Delaware
Corporation
Eastman Chemical Finland Oy Finland
Eastman Chemical Holding
Germany
GmbH
132

EASTMAN CHEMICAL Exhibit 21.01
COMPANY
SUBSIDIARIES
JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY OR ORGANIZATION
Eastman Chemical Holdings,
Mexico
S.A. de C.V.
Eastman Chemical Italia S.r.l. Italy
Eastman Chemical Japan Limited Japan
Eastman Chemical Korea Ltd. Korea
Eastman Chemical Latin
Delaware
America, Inc.
Eastman Chemical Ltd. New York
Eastman Chemical Luxembourg
Luxembourg
S.a.r.l.
Eastman Chemical Middelburg,
Netherlands
B.V.
Eastman Chemical Resins, Inc. Delaware
Eastman Chemical Singapore Pte.
Singapore
Ltd.
Eastman Chemical Uruapan, S.A.
Mexico
de C.V.
Eastman Cogen Management
Texas
L.L.C.
Eastman Cogeneration L.P. Texas
Eastman Company Delaware
Eastman Company UK Limited United Kingdom
Eastman do Brasil Ltda. Brazil
Eastman Espana S. L. Spain
Eastman Gasification Services Delaware
Company
Eastman International
Tennessee
Management Company
Eastman Malta Limited Malta
Eastman Netherlands B.V. Netherlands
Eastman Servicios Corporativos,
Mexico
S.A. de C.V.
Eastman SE, Inc. Delaware
Eastman (Shanghai) Chemical
China
Commercial Co., Ltd.
Eastman (Shanghai) Chemical
China
Trading Co., Ltd.
Enterprise Genetics, Inc. Nevada
GLC Associates Nevada
Hartlepet Limited United Kingdom
Holston Defense Corporation Virginia
133

EASTMAN CHEMICAL Exhibit 21.01
COMPANY
SUBSIDIARIES
JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY OR ORGANIZATION
Jager Chemie France S.A.R.L. France
Kingsport Hotel, L.L.C. Tennessee
Lawter International Products,
Singapore
Pte. Ltd.
McWhorter Holdings Ltd. United Kingdom
Mustang Pipeline Company Texas
Nanjing Yangzi Eastman
China
Chemical Ltd.
Pinto Pipeline Company of Texas Texas
Primester New York
Qilu Eastman Specialty
China
Chemicals, Ltd
Shanghai Eastman Consulting
China
Company Ltd
Voridian (Gibraltar) Limited United Kingdom
Voridian (U.K.) United Kingdom
Voridian AG Switzerland
Voridian Argentina S.R.L. Argentina
Voridian B.V. Netherlands
Voridian Canada Company Nova Scotia
Voridian Company Delaware
Voridian de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Mexico
Voridian do Brasil Ltda. Brazil - partnership
Voridian England Ltd. United Kingdom
Voridian Espana S.A. Spain
Voridian Europoort B.V. Netherlands
Voridian Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Voridian Holdings S.L. Spain
Voridian Holdings U.K. Limited United Kingdom
Voridian Hong Kong Limited Hong Kong
Voridian International, Limited United Kingdom
Voridian Polymer Ltd. United Kingdom
Voridian Singapore Pte. Ltd. Singapore
Voridian Spain L.L.C. Delaware
Workington Investments Limited United Kingdom
134

EXHIBIT 23.01
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-113693
and No. 333-62597) and Form S-8 (No. 33-73808, No. 33-73810, No. 33-73812, No. 33-77844 and No. 333-
124558) of Eastman Chemical Company of our report dated March 13, 2006, relating to the financial statements,
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
/ s / PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 13, 2006
135

Exhibit 31.01
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a) Certifications
I, J. Brian Ferguson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Eastman Chemical Company, certify
that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Eastman Chemical Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 13, 2006
/ s / J. Brian Ferguson
J. Brian Ferguson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
136

Exhibit 31.02
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a) Certifications
I, Richard A. Lorraine, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Eastman Chemical Company, certify
that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Eastman Chemical Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 13, 2006
/ s / Richard A. Lorraine
Richard A. Lorraine
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
137

Exhibit 32.01
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Section 1350 Certifications
In connection with the Annual Report of Eastman Chemical Company (the \"Company\") on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the \"Report\"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eastman Chemical
Company and will be retained by Eastman Chemical Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Date: March 13, 2006
/ s / J. Brian Ferguson
J. Brian Ferguson
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.
138

Exhibit 32.02
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Section 1350 Certifications
In connection with the Annual Report of Eastman Chemical Company (the \"Company\") on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the \"Report\"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eastman Chemical
Company and will be retained by Eastman Chemical Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Date: March 13, 2006
/ s / Richard A. Lorraine
Richard A. Lorraine
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.
139

EXHIBIT 99.01
TABLE 5 – CASPI SEGMENT DETAIL OF SALES REVENUE, OPERATING EARNINGS (LOSS) AND ASSET
IMPAIRMENTS AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
First Second Third Fourth Twelve
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Months
(Dollars in millions) 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005
Sales Revenue
Sales revenue – CASPI restructured, divested,
and consolidated product lines (1) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Sales revenue – continuing product lines 319 325 333 322 1,299
Total sales revenue $ 319 $ 325 $ 333 $ 322 $ 1,299
Operating Earnings (Loss) and Asset Impairments and Restructuring Charges
Operating loss – CASPI restructured, divested,
and consolidated product lines (1) (2) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Operating earnings – continuing product lines 67 64 64 34 229
Total Operating earnings (loss) $ 67 $ 64 $ 64 $ 34 $ 229
Asset impairments and restructuring charges –
CASPI restructured, divested, and
consolidated product lines (1) $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 4
Asset impairments and restructuring charges –
-- -- -- -- --
continuing product lines
Total asset impairments and restructuring charges $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 1 $ 4
Other operating income – CASPI
restructured, divested, and consolidated
product lines (1) $ (2) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ (2)
Other operating income – continuing product
lines -- -- -- -- --
Total other operating income $ (2) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ (2)
First Second Third Fourth Twelve
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Months
(Dollars in millions) 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004
Sales Revenue
Sales revenue – CASPI restructured, divested,
and consolidated product lines (1) $ 174 $ 193 $ 74 $ -- $ 441
Sales revenue – continuing product lines 265 283 283 282 1,113
Total sales revenue $ 439 $ 476 $ 357 $ 282 $ 1,554
Operating Earnings (Loss) and Asset Impairments and Restructuring Charges
Operating loss – CASPI restructured, divested,
and consolidated product lines (1) (2) $ (11) $ (72) $ (2) $ -- $ (85)
Operating earnings – continuing product lines 41 48 40 23 152
Total Operating earnings (loss) $ 30 $ (24) $ 38 $ 23 $ 67
Asset impairments and restructuring charges –
CASPI restructured, divested, and
consolidated product lines (1) 5 66 1 -- 72
Asset impairments and restructuring charges –
1 3 3 2 9
continuing product lines
Total asset impairments and restructuring charges $ 6 $ 69 $ 4 $ 2 $ 81
(1)
These businesses and product lines include acrylate ester monomers, composites (unsaturated polyester resins), inks and
graphic arts raw materials, liquid resins, powder resins and textile chemicals divested on July 31, 2004 as well as other
restructuring, divestiture and consolidation activities that the Company has completed related to these businesses and
product lines.
(2)
Includes allocated costs consistent with the Company’s historical practices, some of which may remain and could be
reallocated to the remainder of the segment and other segments.
140

EXHIBIT 99.02
TABLE 4a– EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY DETAIL OF SALES REVENUE
First Second Third Fourth Twelve
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Months
2005 2005 2005 2005 2005
(Dollars in millions)
Sales Revenue $ 1,762 $ 1,752 $ 1,816 $ 1,729 $ 7,059
Less: CASPI restructured, divested, and
consolidated product lines (1) -- -- -- -- --
Sales revenue – continuing product lines $ 1,762 $ 1,752 $ 1,816 $ 1,729 $ 7,059
First Second Third Fourth Twelve
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Months
2004 2004 2004 2004 2004
(Dollars in millions)
Sales Revenue $ 1,597 $ 1,676 $ 1,649 $ 1,658 $ 6,580
Less: CASPI restructured, divested, and
consolidated product lines (1) 174 193 74 -- 441
Sales revenue – continuing product lines $ 1,423 $ 1,483 $ 1,575 $ 1,658 $ 6,139
TABLE 4b– EASTMAN DIVISION DETAIL OF SALES REVENUE
First Second Third Fourth Twelve
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Months
2005 2005 2005 2005 2005
(Dollars in millions)
Sales Revenue $ 885 $ 902 $ 940 $ 917 $ 3,644
Less: CASPI divested/consolidated product
lines (1) -- -- -- -- --
Sales revenue – continuing product lines $ 885 $ 902 $ 940 $ 917 $ 3,644
First Second Third Fourth Twelve
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Months
2004 2004 2004 2004 2004
(Dollars in millions)
Sales Revenue $ 886 $ 943 $ 892 $ 824 $ 3,545
Less: CASPI divested/consolidated product
lines (1) 174 193 74 -- 441
Sales revenue – continuing product lines $ 712 $ 750 $ 818 824 $ 3,104
(1)
These businesses and product lines include acrylate ester monomers, composites (unsaturated polyester resins),
inks and graphic arts raw materials, liquid resins, powder resins and textile chemicals divested on July 31, 2004 as
well as other restructuring, divestiture and consolidation activities that the Company has completed related to these
businesses and product lines.
141

(This page intentionally left blank)

(This page intentionally left blank)

(This page intentionally left blank)

Stockholder Information
Eastman Chemical Company and Subsidiaries
Corporate Offices Stock Price
Eastman Chemical Company Cash
200 S. Wilcox Drive Dividends
P. O. Box 431 High Low Declared
Kingsport, TN 37660-5280 U.S.A. 2004
http://www.eastman.com First Quarter $43.70 $38.00 $0.44
Second Quarter $46.97 $41.90 $0.44
Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar
Third Quarter $47.77 $42.19 $0.44
Inquiries and changes to stockholder accounts should be directed to
Fourth Quarter $58.17 $44.86 $0.44
our transfer agent:
2005
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company First Quarter $61.80 $50.40 $0.44
59 Maiden Lane Second Quarter $60.80 $47.40 $0.44
New York, NY 10038 Third Quarter $58.38 $44.10 $0.44
In the United States: 800-937-5449
Fourth Quarter $56.77 $45.34 $0.44
Outside the United States: (1) 212-936-5100 or (1) 718-921-8200
http://www.amstock.com Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Annual Report are forward-looking
Annual Meeting
in nature as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Toy F. Reid Employee Center
Act of 1995. These statements, and other written and oral
Kingsport, Tennessee
forward-looking statements made by the Company from time to
Thursday, May 4, 2006
time, may relate to, among other things, such matters as
11:30 a.m. (ET)
planned and expected capacity increases and utilization;
anticipated capital spending; expected depreciation and
Eastman Stockholder Information
amortization; environmental matters; legal proceedings;
877-EMN-INFO (877-366-4636)
exposure to, and effects of hedging of, raw material and energy
http://www.eastman.com
costs and foreign currencies; global and regional economic,
Annual Report on Form 10-K political, and business conditions; competition; growth
This Annual Report to Shareholders includes Eastman's Annual
opportunities; supply and demand, volume, price, cost, margin,
Report on Form 10-K (with exhibits) for the year ended December
and sales; earnings, cash flow, dividends, and other expected
31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
financial conditions; expectations, strategies, and plans for
This information is also available via the Internet at Eastman's Web
individual assets and products, businesses, segments, and
site (www.eastman.com) in the investor information section, and
divisions as well as for the whole of Eastman Chemical
on the SEC's website (www.sec.gov).
Company; cash requirements and uses of available cash;
financing plans; pension expenses and funding; credit ratings;
Stock Exchange Listing
anticipated restructuring, divestiture, and consolidation
Eastman Chemical Company common stock is listed and traded on
activities; cost reduction and control efforts and targets;
the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol EMN.
integration of acquired businesses; development, production,
Dividends commercialization, and acceptance of new products, services
Quarterly dividends on common stock, if declared by the Board of and technologies and related costs; asset, business and product
Directors, are usually paid on or about the first business day of the portfolio changes; and expected tax rates and net interest costs.
month following the end of each quarter. Dividends declared were
These plans and expectations are based upon certain underlying
$1.76 in 2005, 2004 and 2003.
assumptions, including those mentioned with the specific
Stockholders of record at year-end 2005: 31,657 statements. Such assumptions are in turn based upon internal
Shares outstanding at year-end 2005: 81,637,985 estimates and analyses of current market conditions and trends,
Employees at year-end 2005: 12,000 management plans and strategies, economic conditions, and
other factors. These plans and expectations and the assumptions
underlying them are necessarily subject to risks and
uncertainties inherent in projecting future conditions and
results. Actual results could differ materially from expectations
expressed in the forward-looking statements if one or more of
the underlying assumptions and expectations proves to be
inaccurate or is unrealized. Certain important factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those in
the forward-looking statements are included with such
forward-looking statements and in \"Item 1A -- Risk
Factors\" in the Annual Report on Form 10-K included with
this Annual Report.

B OA R D O F D I R E C TO R S
(Left to right): Renée Hornbaker, Michael Connors, Thomas McLain, Robert Hernandez, Peter Wood, Brian Ferguson,
Stephen Demeritt, David Raisbeck, Donald Griffin, Howard Lance
M I C H A E L P. C O N N O R S , 5 0 THOMAS H. MCLAIN, 48
2, 3, 4, 5 1, 3, 4
Former Member, VNU Executive Board Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President,
Former Chairman and CEO of VNU Media Nabi Biopharmaceuticals
Measurement & Information Group and
Chairman of VNU World Directories D AV I D W . R A I S B E C K , 5 6 2, 3, 4, 5
Vice Chairman, Cargill, Incorporated
S T E P H E N R . D E M E R I T T, 6 2 2, 3, 4, 5
Retired Vice Chairman, General Mills, Inc. PETER M. WOOD, 67 1, 3, 4
Former Managing Director, J. P. Morgan & Company
J. BRIAN FERGUSON, 51
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Eastman Chemical Company Ages as of March 1, 2006
D O N A L D W. G R I F F I N , 6 9 Committees:
2, 3, 4, 5
Retired Chairman of the Board, Olin Corporation
Audit Committee: Peter M. Wood, Chair
1
ROBERT M. HERNANDEZ, 61 Compensation and Management Development
1, 3, 4 2
Chairman of the Board, RTI International Metals, Inc. Committee: Donald W. Griffin, Chair
Finance Committee: David W. Raisbeck, Chair
3
RENÉE J. HORNBAKER, 53 1, 3, 4
Health, Safety, Environmental and Security Committee:
4
Consultant to the Chief Executive Officer,
Robert M. Hernandez, Chair
CompuCom Systems, Inc.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:
5
H O WA R D L . L A N C E , 5 0 2, 3, 4, 5
Stephen R. Demeritt, Chair
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer,
Harris Corporation
This report was printed on Domtar EarthChoice®
papers which are endorsed by the Rainforest
Alliance and all come from well managed forests
and certified to the international standards of the
Design: www.crittgraham.com Forest Stewardship Council (FSC).
xx-xxx-xxxx

Eastman Chemical Company Kingsport, Tennessee, U.S.A. 423.229.2000 www.eastman.com