Equity, Health Quality and Shared Decision Making<br />Aligning Forces for Quality National Meeting<br />Using Health Info...
We Believe Patients Should Be<br />
Shared decision making is an essential ingredient of patient centered care.<br />
Every medical encounter involves decisions<br />
Shared Decision Making<br />Interactive process between patient and clinician<br />Engages the patient in decision making<...
What is on the Policy Horizon?<br />
Federal Health Care Reform<br />HR3590 Section 936<br />Program to Facilitate Shared Decision Making <br />Purpose is to f...
Key Aspects of Legislation<br />Priority - preference sensitive care<br />Produce patient decision aids<br />Set quality s...
Section 3021 CMS Innovation Center <br />Test innovative payment models to reduce expenditures and to enhance quality of c...
Patient Centered Medical Home<br />Accountable Care Organizations<br />Meaningful use of HIT<br />All providing opportunit...
State Policy and Reform<br />
States Explore Shared Decision Making<br />Bridget M. Kuehn <br />JAMA. 2009;301(24):2539-2541.<br />
Common Elements<br /><ul><li>Preference-sensitive conditions
Platform for pilot projects
Certification/quality standards
Professional training
Evaluation</li></li></ul><li>Implementing Shared Decision MakingBuilding a Foundation of Learning Partners<br />
Supporting the Concept<br /><ul><li>Patient decision aids work
Both patients and physicians support it
Models are demonstrating value/benefit</li></ul>O’Connor et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009<br />
Foundation Demonstration Sites<br />A diverse group of provider organizations<br />Academic and community-based<br />Prima...
Implementation Tasks<br />
System-wide implementation for 12 elective surgical procedures<br />Patient portal viewing<br />New EPIC Smart Phrases to ...
Demonstrating and Understanding Value<br />
Decisions, Decisions<br />Doctors are using new tools to help patients make choices about treatment options.<br />Urologis...
Shared Decision Making and Targeted Communities<br />
What We Know<br /><ul><li>Older and less educated – less confident in ability to participate in medical decisions
Greater need for extra information/support
With info/support in place – benefit at least as much as others</li></li></ul><li>Education<br />Rovner and colleagues<br ...
Men who attended college and men who did not
Less educated start with less knowledge/readiness
Post PDA comparable increases</li></li></ul><li>Age<br />Dartmouth – Routine Decision Aids<br />65+ score as high or highe...
desire to be involved
recommending others use PDAs</li></li></ul><li>Low Numeracy<br />Galesic<br /><ul><li>Compared poorly designed vs. well de...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Equity, Health Quality and Shared Decision Making

632

Published on

Presentation given at the Aligning Forces for Quality National Meeting.

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
632
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
22
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Equity, Health Quality and Shared Decision Making

  1. 1. Equity, Health Quality and Shared Decision Making<br />Aligning Forces for Quality National Meeting<br />Using Health Information for Decision Making: The Consumer Perspective<br />Lyn Paget, MPH<br />May 13, 2010<br />
  2. 2. We Believe Patients Should Be<br />
  3. 3.
  4. 4. Shared decision making is an essential ingredient of patient centered care.<br />
  5. 5. Every medical encounter involves decisions<br />
  6. 6. Shared Decision Making<br />Interactive process between patient and clinician<br />Engages the patient in decision making<br />Provides patient with accurate, unbiased and understandable information about choices (risks & benefits associated with choice)<br />Incorporates patient’s preferences and values<br />(Charles C, Soc Sci Med 1997; 44:681)<br />
  7. 7.
  8. 8. What is on the Policy Horizon?<br />
  9. 9. Federal Health Care Reform<br />HR3590 Section 936<br />Program to Facilitate Shared Decision Making <br />Purpose is to facilitate collaborative process between patients and providers .. and to incorporate patient preferences and values into medical plan.<br />
  10. 10. Key Aspects of Legislation<br />Priority - preference sensitive care<br />Produce patient decision aids<br />Set quality standards & certify decision aids<br />Create Shared Decision Making Resource Centers<br />Provider development, use and assessment of SDM techniques using certified decision aids<br />
  11. 11. Section 3021 CMS Innovation Center <br />Test innovative payment models to reduce expenditures and to enhance quality of care.<br />18 different models<br />9) “Assisting applicable individuals in making informed health care choices by paying providers for using patient decision support tools that improve individual understanding of medical options”<br />
  12. 12. Patient Centered Medical Home<br />Accountable Care Organizations<br />Meaningful use of HIT<br />All providing opportunities to incorporate shared decision making<br />Also<br />
  13. 13. State Policy and Reform<br />
  14. 14. States Explore Shared Decision Making<br />Bridget M. Kuehn <br />JAMA. 2009;301(24):2539-2541.<br />
  15. 15.
  16. 16. Common Elements<br /><ul><li>Preference-sensitive conditions
  17. 17. Platform for pilot projects
  18. 18. Certification/quality standards
  19. 19. Professional training
  20. 20. Evaluation</li></li></ul><li>Implementing Shared Decision MakingBuilding a Foundation of Learning Partners<br />
  21. 21. Supporting the Concept<br /><ul><li>Patient decision aids work
  22. 22. Both patients and physicians support it
  23. 23. Models are demonstrating value/benefit</li></ul>O’Connor et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009<br />
  24. 24. Foundation Demonstration Sites<br />A diverse group of provider organizations<br />Academic and community-based<br />Primary care and specialty care<br />Developing proof of concept that DAs and shared decision making can be efficiently and effectively incorporated into clinical practice<br />Utilizing a common data set aggregated by the Foundation<br />19<br />
  25. 25.
  26. 26. Implementation Tasks<br />
  27. 27.
  28. 28. System-wide implementation for 12 elective surgical procedures<br />Patient portal viewing<br />New EPIC Smart Phrases to document informed consent<br /> – pre and post decision aid conversation<br />Tracking Outcomes:<br />Decision aid viewing on Web and DVDs<br />Patient satisfaction <br />Procedure rates<br />Overall health care use of patients (# visits, hospitalizations, Rx)<br />Cost of health care for patients<br />Cost of decision aid implementation and delivery<br />Impact of SDM implementation on providers and staff<br />State Legislated Demonstration Project<br />
  29. 29. Demonstrating and Understanding Value<br />
  30. 30. Decisions, Decisions<br />Doctors are using new tools to help patients make choices about treatment options.<br />Urologist and surgeon <br />Thomas Stormont, M.D.<br />“It’s made my job easier,” he says, “and the patients feel more empowered and in control of their cancer.”<br />
  31. 31. Shared Decision Making and Targeted Communities<br />
  32. 32. What We Know<br /><ul><li>Older and less educated – less confident in ability to participate in medical decisions
  33. 33. Greater need for extra information/support
  34. 34. With info/support in place – benefit at least as much as others</li></li></ul><li>Education<br />Rovner and colleagues<br /><ul><li>Effects of BPH decision aid
  35. 35. Men who attended college and men who did not
  36. 36. Less educated start with less knowledge/readiness
  37. 37. Post PDA comparable increases</li></li></ul><li>Age<br />Dartmouth – Routine Decision Aids<br />65+ score as high or higher in<br /><ul><li>knowledge
  38. 38. desire to be involved
  39. 39. recommending others use PDAs</li></li></ul><li>Low Numeracy<br />Galesic<br /><ul><li>Compared poorly designed vs. well designed presentations of risk
  40. 40. Relative risk with no visual support vs. 100 person graphs with absolute risk
  41. 41. With poor design – LL 60+ - almost no questions correct/University students-close to half
  42. 42. Well designed form-older students score almost as high as University students</li></li></ul><li>
  43. 43. “Patient Engagement”a la Google Images#1<br />
  44. 44. “Patient Engagement”a la Google Images#2<br />
  45. 45. “Patient Engagement”a la Google Images#3<br />
  46. 46. “Patient Engagement”a la Google Images#4<br />
  47. 47. Summary<br /><ul><li>Evolving innovations in technology and policy support a robust and comprehensive approach to informed decision making.
  48. 48. Experience is demonstrating value to both patient and provider.
  49. 49. Disparities are key targets for enhanced information and support for decision making.</li></li></ul><li>The Great Prostate Mistake <br />By RICHARD J. ABLIN<br />Published: March 9, 2010 <br />EACH year some 30 million American men undergo testing for prostate-specific antigen, an enzyme made by the prostate. Approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1994, the P.S.A. test is the most commonly used tool for detecting prostate cancer…<br />“I never dreamed that my discovery four decades ago would lead to such a profit-driven public health disaster.”<br />
  50. 50.
  51. 51. Thank You!lpaget@fimdm.org<br />
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×