• Save
FKFT Early adoption of FOSS
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

FKFT Early adoption of FOSS

on

  • 979 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
979
Views on SlideShare
979
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    FKFT Early adoption of FOSS FKFT Early adoption of FOSS Presentation Transcript

    • Early adoption of Free and Open Source Software in a Higher School of Education: students' views in the academic and future professional contexts Nelson A. F. Gonçalves Maria P. Figueiredo ESEV + CEETS/IPV
    • Overview of presentation portuguese context • our school context • the study • results • – participants: software usage – arguments for choosing software • final thoughts
    • Portugal - Viseu • minimum wage = 400€ • Windows Vista Home Basic = 219€ • Windows Office 2007 Basic (student) = 160€
    • Polytechnic Institute of Viseu: Higher School of Education • oldest higher school of education • one of the biggest polytechnic • undergraduate and postgraduate programs in Teacher Ed., Plastic Arts and Multimedia, Media Studies, Cultural Animation, Social Education, Sports and Physical Activity and Environmental Ed. • 1200 students and 75 teachers • every program: at least one ICT course • six computer labs = classrooms + one student lab
    • Higher School of Education of Viseu (HSEV) FOSS landmarks - 2008 2005 – Moodle server for HSEV • 2006 – Polytechnic buys WebCT • 2008 – HSEV refuses shifting to WebCT • ✔ Moodle as official e-learning platform for HSEV ✔ ICT courses that mainly use FOSS: Blender, Open Office, Kompozer, Gimp, Cinelerra, Audacity, Gcompris, ... ✔ FOSS, CC and Open Access as learning topics in some courses (residual) ✔ Final projects using FOSS (Arts and Teach. Ed.)
    • Higher School of Education of Viseu (HSEV) FOSS landmarks - 2008 Teachers and students involved in the debate about usage of FOSS in HSEV: •spread ideas behind the potential of FOSS •bring students and teachers to a dimension of debate where software choices aren't based only in: economic cost – software features – marketing strategies – brand awareness – ... – •raise important ethical issues: software choice as a statement about the world we live in and how we choose to live in it
    • Higher School of Education of Viseu (HSEV) FOSS landmarks - 2008 Stated goals: • raise awareness about the range of choices and criteria for choosing software (promote freedom of choice) • foster the debate about a possible transition to FOSS adoption by the school (official policy and/or school identity) • engage members of the school in the development of FOSS tools and Open Content • “spread the word” and provide support for the local system of education's adoption of FOSS (CD from the M. Ed. + PC w/ Open Office)
    • Purpose of research • document the ongoing process, it's development and results – provide useful information to devise strategies of intervention – produce knowledge about change in higher education institutions – enable sharing of experience
    • Methodology • field notes and informal interviews: – decisions, arguments, views, debates, critical incidents, official policies, ... • questionnaires: – patterns of software usage – arguments for choosing software – opinion about the importance of FOSS in the academic context – opinion about the importance of FOSS in future professional contexts
    • Methodology: questionnaires • 2 questionnaires same dimensions, different future scenarios: – Teacher Education version – Multimedia and Plastic Arts version • specifically designed + hosted online • tested with 6 students • invitation via Moodle + teachers
    • Data analysis • descriptive statistic + content analysis: • is FOSS used? • how is FOSS interpreted by students? – in their current academic context – in their future professional practice • is the ethical dimension relevant for software decisions? • differences between the 2 programs?
    • snapshot of the programs... • Arts • Teach. Ed. – 3 yrs. – 4 yrs. (new 3+1) – 40% ICT related – 2 or 3 ICT courses – ICT as a learning + – ICT as a learning + creation tool teaching tool
    • snapshot of the programs... • Arts • Teach. Ed. – usage of FOSS tools in 3 – usage of FOSS tools in 2/3 courses ICT courses – final projects w/ Blender, – final projects w/ Audacity, Cinalerra, Processing, Evolvotron, Squeak, Gimp TuxPaint (w/ children)
    • Results: participants + OS 90% M & P Art s Ed u cat ion 80% Population 51 190 70% 1º 0 17 60% 2º M 7& P Art s Ed u cat ion 80% 19 3º 13 10 50% Fem ale 62 70% 4º Male 29 3 40% 10 M & P Art s Ed u cat ion 60% # Responses 20 20 65 65 30% # Responses Desktop PC outside school50% Have a 85% 81% 39% 34% 20% Have Laptop/notebook 80% 88% 40% 10% Have Internet access outside school 90% 78% 30% 0% 20% Win XP Win Vista Ubuntu XP+Vista XP+Ubuntu Win 98 10% 0% Licensed Unlicensed
    • Results: top 10 used apps • Arts • Teach. Ed. – Adobe Photoshop (90%) – Microsoft Word (85%) – Macromedia Flash (60%) – Microsoft Powerpoint (68%) – Internet Explorer (50%) – Internet Explorer (66%) – Microsoft Word (50%) – Microsoft Paint (62%) – Corel Draw (40%) – Microsoft Excel (38%) – Mozilla Firefox (40%) – Kompozer (32%) – Adobe InDesign (35%) – Adobe Photoshop (25%) – Adobe Illustrator (30%) – Microsoft MovieMaker (20%) – Adobe Audition (30%) – Open Office Writer (11%) – AutoDesk Maya (25%) – Mozilla Firefox (11%)
    • 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Adobe Photos hop Adobe/Macromedia Flas h Internet Explorer Micros oft Word CorelDraw Mozilla Firefox Adobe InDes ign Adobe Illus trator Adobe Audition Autodes k Maya Results: nature of copies (arts) Licensed Unlicensed Don't know
    • 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Micros oft Word Micros oft Powerpoint Internet Explorer Micros oft Paint Micros oft Excel Kompozer Adobe Photos hop MS MovieMaker OpenOffice Writer Mozilla Firefox Results: nature of copies (t. ed.) Licensed Unlicensed Don't know
    • Results: reported use of FOSS Do you usually use FOSS? 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% No 50% Don't know Yes 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% M & P Arts Education
    • Results: reported use of FOSS installed applications • Arts • Teach. Ed. – Blender (70%) – Kompozer (46%) – Mozilla Firefox (40%) – Nvu (34%) – Nvu (50%) – Firefox and Writer (22%) – 2 students have none – 26% students don't have or don't know if they have any FOSS installed – all 17 listed are installed at – 15/17 listed FOSS are installed at least one time least one time
    • Results: criteria for choosing software (present) • Arts • Teach. Ed. – Efficiency (31%) – Appropriate to task (29%) – School work (23%) – Usability (20%) – Usability (15%) – Efficiency (11%) – Appropriate to task (12%) – Whatever comes w/PC (11%) – Other: – Someone else chooses (5%) • Price – Don't know (5%) • FOSS – Other: • Fashion • Price • Whatever • FOSS • Fashion • Windows
    • Results: criteria for choosing software - future professional scenarios no restrictions faced w/illegal situation lack of financial resources what would you do? why?
    • Results: criteria for choosing software - future professional scenarios no restrictions ARTS TEACH. ED. 65% (prop) 26% (???) “the best” proprietary 15% 38% 10% 18% FOSS ✔ habit ✔ efficiency ✔ “standard” ✔ habit ✔ usability (for children)
    • Results: criteria for choosing software - future professional scenarios faced w/illegal situation ARTS TEACH. ED. “no problem” 10% 28% buy proprietary 50% 18% 25% 42% FOSS ✔ 34% ethical ✔ 50% afraid ✔ 22% afraid ✔ 50% ethical (FOSS when ethical)
    • Results: criteria for choosing software - future professional scenarios lack of financial resources ARTS TEACH. ED. available prop copy 20% 28% buy proprietary 30% 18% 50% 42% FOSS ✔ habit ✔ 57% money ✔ efficiency ✔ 17% free ✔ 11% ethical ✔ money ✔ ethical
    • Results: criteria for choosing software - future professional scenarios strongest arguments TEACH. ED. ARTS efficiency 26% financial 31% afraid ethical 17% 23% 15% 17% habit efficiency COMBINED legal 35% financial 25% 20% efficiency
    • Results: in 12 months, will you use FOSS? FOSS OS 100% 80% FOSS 60% 100% 40% 80% 20% 60% 0% 40% None Low High 100% 20% 0% None Low High 100%
    • Results: strongest ideas Teach. ed. - very little awareness of software choices - basic software usage - sensible to ethical issues and financial arguments - concerns about future usage of children (usability, “standard”, best educational software) - “doorway” to school system
    • Results: strongest ideas Arts - very little awareness of software alternatives - complex software usage but emphasis on tools not on artistic processes - sensible to efficiency demonstrations and financial arguments - concerns about industry
    • Our future settings... Multimedia Lab > art students ICT courses – only foss >all programs Create content > teach. ed. students and teachers Projects w/ children > teach. ed. students continue to include foss topics in courses invite other teachers to join foster school identity – foss establish partnerships, social networks (other projects, groups) FOSS Day > school community free Open Office + FOSS workshops >local community and teachers
    • Early adoption of Free and Open Source Software in a Higher School of Education: students' views in the academic and future professional contexts Nelson Gonçalves - nelson@intervir.net Maria P. Figueiredo - maria@intervir.net http://www.intervir.net/maria ESEV + CEETS/IPV