• Save
SPED420_ch3_lect
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

SPED420_ch3_lect

on

  • 1,120 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,120
Views on SlideShare
1,120
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

SPED420_ch3_lect SPED420_ch3_lect Presentation Transcript

  • CHAPTER THREE ASSESSING STUDENTS FOR INSTRUCTION
  •  
  • Assessing Students for Instruction
    • The basic goal of assessment practices is to collect data to determine the effectiveness of instruction so that appropriate instructional modifications can be made.
    • To aid instructional programming, assessment should provide information in two areas.
      • First, information is needed to help the teacher select what to teach the individual student.
      • Second, information is needed to help the teacher determine how to teach the student.
  • Formal and Informal Evaluation
    • Categorized according to four specific assessment purposes:
      • Screening
      • Diagnosis
      • Progress monitoring
      • Evaluating student outcomes
  • Individualized Programming
    • Individualized programming refers to an instructional program that enables the student to work on appropriate tasks or content over time under conditions that motivate.
      • Seatwork
      • Small groups
      • Peer teaching
      • Large groups
    • The teacher matches the learner, the task, and instructional interventions to ensure optimal student growth.
      • RTI (Response to Intervention)
  • Response to Intervention
    • Response to intervention (RTI) models have received substantial attention since the reauthorization of IDEA in 2004. The law states that a local education agency is not required to use discrepancy formulae to identify a student with a learning disability, but may use, instead, a process that determines if the student responds to interventions that typically are effective (i.e., scientifically based methods and strategies) (Mercer & Pullen, 2009).
  • Response to Intervention
    • Tier 1 includes quality instruction in the general education classroom.
    • Tier 2 is designed to provide more intensive support and ongoing progress monitoring.
      • General education classroom teacher provides instruction in a small-group setting.
    • In Tier 3, students receive intensive intervention, often in a one-on-one format.
  • Four Steps of Individualized Programming
    • Assess to identify target skill or content
      • List
    • Determine factors likely to facilitate learning
    • Plan instruction
    • Begin daily data-managed instruction
      • Four options
  • Stages of Learning
    • Acquisition Stage
    • Proficiency Stage
    • Maintenance Stage
    • Generalization Stage
    • Adaption Stage
      • One line about each & example
  • Monitoring Student Performance for Determining What to Teach
    • Data-based instruction, a major principle of RTI
    • Curriculum-based assessment (CBA)
    • Curriculum-based measurement (CBM)
  • Curriculum-Based Assessment
    • CBA refers to any approach that uses direct observation and recording of a student’s performance in the school curriculum as a basis for obtaining information to make instructional decisions (Deno, 1987).
  • Using Curriculum-Based Measurement
    • CBM is used to establish performance standards, measures are developed from the school curriculum and administered to all the students in a target group (e.g., all fourth graders in a school or district).
    • Components:
      • material selection
      • test administration
      • performance display and interpretation
      • decision-making framework (Tindal & Marston, 1990).
  • Test Administration
    • Administration procedures include using standardized formats and scoring performance in terms of rate correct per minute.
    • Sample reading administration format:
      • Randomly select a passage from the goal-level material.
      • Place it in front of and facing the student.
      • Keep a copy for the examiner.
      • Provide directions.
      • Have the student read orally for 1 minute.
      • Score the student’s performance in terms of number of words read correctly, and note errors for instructional purposes.
      • **It is helpful to administer two or three passages and record the average score.
  • Individually Referenced Data Systems
    • Direct Measurement
      • Focuses on relevant classroom behaviors (e.g., oral reading rate or math computation rate).
    • Repeated Measurement
      • Requires that a behavior be counted and recorded over a period of time.
  • Observational Recording Techniques
    • event recording
    • interval recording
    • time sampling
    • duration recording
    • latency recording
    • anecdotal recording
    • permanent product recording
  • Graphing Data
    • Creating a visual display so that raw data can be analyzed
      • line graph, bar graph, ratio graph
    • Kerr and Nelson (2010) report that graphs serve three important purposes:
      • (1) they summarize data in a manner that leads to daily decision making,
      • (2) they communicate intervention effects, and
      • (3) they provide feedback and reinforcement to the learner and teacher.
  • Graphing Data
    • Data must be converted into a form that allows for consistent graphing. Basically, this involves reporting three types of data:
      • number correct
      • percentage (the number of correct responses divided by the total number of responses and then multiplied by 100)
      • or rate (the number correct divided by the time).
  • Individually Referenced Data Systems
    • direct measurement
    • repeated measurement
    • graphing data
    • long-range goal performance monitoring
    • short-range goal performance monitoring
    • data analysis
    • instructional decisions
      • One line for each and example…..
  •  
  •  
  • Monitoring Student Performance
    • Instruction is most successful when:
      • The teacher initially counts only priority behaviors.
      • The teacher identifies strategies to facilitate timing and recording behaviors.
      • The teacher evaluates the recorded data frequently.
      • The teacher uses probes or curriculum-referenced testing.
      • The system remains a tool for teaching rather than a “cause” and is only used as long as it helps the student.
  • Strategies to Facilitate Timing and Recording Behaviors
    • The teacher can take group timings, especially on written activities. Some teachers, for example, time 1-minute handwriting samples, 1-minute math fact sheets, and 1-minute spelling activities.
    • Students can record time stopped and started. This can be done easily with a rubber stamp of a clock on the students’ worksheets.
    • A kitchen timer or prerecorded tape can be used to time sessions.
    • Students can work together and time and record data for one another. This works well with flash-card drills.
    • Students can read into a tape recorder or computer to create an audio file. Teachers later can document correct and error rates for either samples of behavior or the total session.
  • Strategies to Facilitate Timing and Recording Behaviors (cont’d)
    • Mechanical counters can be used. Single-and dual-tally counters as well as beads and golf score counters are available.
    • Counting should be done for a fixed period of time each day. Counting for different intervals confuses the data pattern because such factors as endurance, boredom, and latency of response may enter into the data analysis.
    • One-minute timings can be used because they are easy to chart and no rate plotter is necessary.
    • Aides, peers, student teachers, and volunteers can be trained to help develop materials and to count and record behaviors.
  • Assessment for Determining How to Teach
    • Formats:
      • Systematic observation
      • Formal assessment
      • Criterion tests
      • Rating scale
      • Numerical scale
      • Graphic scale
      • Charting
      • Alternative assessment
        • One line for each
  • Assessment Areas for Determining How to Teach
    • The first step in determining how to teach is to identify the major areas of assessment.
      • expectation factors –
      • stimulus events –
      • response factors
      • subsequent events
  • Expectation Factors
    • Expectation refers to an individual’s orientation to the learning situation
      • Learner Expectations
      • Teacher Expectations
      • Peer Expectations
      • Parental Expectations
  • Stimulus Events
    • Stimulus (or antecedent) events include an array of materials, instructional methods, and classroom settings that set the stage for the student to respond.
      • Physical setting
      • Instructional Arrangements, Techniques, and Materials  
  • Response Factors
    • Tasks usually require students to make a motor or verbal response, or both.
    • Selecting the type of response (such as pointing, making gestures, or writing) for an instructional activity can be crucial in the activity’s design.
    • Response time also deserves attention.
  • Subsequent Events
    • Consequences greatly influence behavior and can be used to motivate students and manage their behavior.
    • Some positive consequences frequently used to reinforce, and thus influence, student behavior:
      • Social praise
      • special activities and privileges
      • evaluation marks
      • positive physical expression
      • awards, tokens, and tangible objects
  • Grading
    • Results of a national survey of classroom grading practices of general education teachers indicate that teachers find certain grading adaptations (such as pass/fail grades, portfolios, multiple grades, and grading for effort) to be helpful for students both with and without disabilities (Bursuck et al., 1996).
  • Grading (cont’d)
    • The following types of grading alternatives have been used to accommodate the special needs of students in inclusion classes (DeBoer, 1994; Salend, 2008; Wood, 2006): one line about each
      • Individualized educational program grading approach
      • Pass/fail systems
      • Mastery level/criterion systems
      • Point systems
      • Contract grading
      • Multiple grading
      • Shared grading
      • Student self-comparison
      • Level grading
      • Descriptive grading
  • Guidelines for Developing an Effective Grading System
    • Determine grades on the basis of course objectives
    • Use multiple evaluation methods
    • Teach students to understand the grading system
    • Monitor the performance of students frequently and give feedback
    • Remember that an effective grading system is a motivational tool
    • Determine whether district-wide grading procedures exist
    • Use alternative grading systems for students with learning problems.
  • Testing Modifications for Teacher-Made Tests
  • Standardized Tests Accommodations, Modifications, Adaptations
    • Presentation format —Braille editions of test, use of magnifying equipment, large-print edition of test, oral reading of directions, signing of directions, and interpretation of directions
    • Setting of test —alone in a test carrel, with small groups, at home, and in special education class
    • Response format —mark response in test book, use template for responding, point to response, give response orally, give response in sign language, use typewriter for responding, use computer for responding, and receive assistance and interpretation with responses
    • Timing of test —extended time, more breaks during testing, and extending testing sessions over several days
  • Recordkeeping
    • BENEFITS:
      • Students often enjoy participating in recording their progress.
      • Teachers can gain satisfaction from having documented student progress.
      • Teachers can target learning difficulties and make timely interventions.
      • Teachers can share the progress of students with parents, principals, and other school personnel.
      • The data can be used to help make program and placement decisions.