West and Central Africa 2009 Regional Result Management Plan
Presentation Outline <ul><li>Regional Overview </li></ul><ul><li>Structural Characteristics of the Regional Portfolio & Pr...
Regional Overview of West and Central Africa <ul><li>24 countries of which: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>5 represent the lowest r...
Regional Overview of West and Central Africa <ul><li>550 million people (Oct. 2006) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>52% women </li><...
Rural and Rural Poor Populations in West and Central Africa <ul><li>Majority  of people in WCA live in rural areas: 350 Mi...
Structural Characteristics of the Regional Portfolio <ul><li>50 financed projects  in  20 countries.  </li></ul><ul><li>To...
Project Implementation Performance <ul><li>Of the  40 projects rated,  33 were classified as Not At Risk (NAR), 3 as Poten...
IFAD’s Vision for the Region <ul><li>“ West Africa is enabled to lift itself out of poverty and hunger”   </li></ul><ul><l...
Loan and Grant Programme Priorities in WCA <ul><li>Support the building of inclusive value chains and rural enterprises in...
Divisional Management Plan <ul><li>Better programme design </li></ul><ul><li>Better project design </li></ul><ul><li>Bette...
Better Programme Design <ul><li>4 result based COSOPs to be designed in 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Use the CPMT approach to pr...
KPI: Country Programme Design 24 1 11 0 #  Countries with CPMT #  Draft proposal for a regional tracking and reporting sys...
KPI: 2009 Objective for COSOP in quality <ul><li>% of COSOP rated satisfactory or better at entry-------------------------...
Better Project Design <ul><li>7/8 projects to the board in ’09 </li></ul><ul><li>Currently 11 projects in the pipeline at ...
KPI: Country Project Design 80% 75% 0% 0% %  of new project rated satisfactory or better on likely impact on poverty agreg...
Better Project Implementation <ul><li>Areas of focus </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Reduction and eventual removal of projects  at ...
Better Project Implementation <ul><li>Improve development effectiveness by: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Taking over supervision ...
KPI: Country project implementation <ul><li>Average time from project effectiveness to approval---------------------------...
KPI: On Human Resource Management <ul><li>% of positions filed within 3 months from close of vacancy----------------------...
Knowledge  Management  and Innovation <ul><li>Expected Results: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Mainstreaming of KM in country progr...
Knowledge  Management  and Innovation: Expected Results Continued… <ul><ul><li>Strengthening Fidafrique and linking to ES ...
Partnerships <ul><li>Within IFAD </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Closer cooperation with PF (Fidafrique, NEPAD, market access) </li>...
Risk Management <ul><li>Civil Strife </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Increase project pipeline to ensure delivery </li></ul></ul><ul...
Expanding Country Presence and Proposed CPM Out Posting X X Senegal X Nigeria X Mali X Guinea X Ghana X X DR Congo X Camer...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

WCA Regional Result Management Plan

542
-1

Published on

IFAD, West and Central Africa - 2009 Regional Result Management Plan, by Mohamed Beavogui, IFAD (Douala - january 2009)

Published in: Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
542
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

WCA Regional Result Management Plan

  1. 1. West and Central Africa 2009 Regional Result Management Plan
  2. 2. Presentation Outline <ul><li>Regional Overview </li></ul><ul><li>Structural Characteristics of the Regional Portfolio & Project Implementation Performance </li></ul><ul><li>IFAD’s Vision for the Region </li></ul><ul><li>Divisional Management Plan </li></ul>
  3. 3. Regional Overview of West and Central Africa <ul><li>24 countries of which: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>5 represent the lowest rankings in the Human Development Index </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>13 are in the bottom 22 in the Human Development Index </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>5 countries face civil war or conflict </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3 are only just emerging from conflict </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1/3 rd of the area of WCA is located in the arid or semi-arid zone: drought and famine are common </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Regional Overview of West and Central Africa <ul><li>550 million people (Oct. 2006) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>52% women </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>More than 70% live in rural areas </li></ul></ul><ul><li>High annual population growth rates: </li></ul><ul><li>2% - 3.5% </li></ul><ul><li>Agriculture provides more than 70% of the basic needs and incomes of rural people </li></ul>Source: FAOSTAT 2006
  5. 5. Rural and Rural Poor Populations in West and Central Africa <ul><li>Majority of people in WCA live in rural areas: 350 Million, 2006 </li></ul><ul><li>More than 70% of the rural population of WCA suffer from acute poverty (less than 1$/day) </li></ul><ul><li>Agriculture is the primary source of income in the region. </li></ul>Source: Rural Population, FAOSTAT, Rural Poverty Rates, INSD, EPCV, ESAM, CLSS, HCLS, ENBC & National Household Surveys
  6. 6. Structural Characteristics of the Regional Portfolio <ul><li>50 financed projects in 20 countries. </li></ul><ul><li>Total financing about US$729 million, with cofinancing of about US$313 million. </li></ul><ul><li>The regional grant portfolio amounted to US$21.24 million: 15 large regional grants (US$18.49 million) and 19 small grants (US$2.75 million). </li></ul><ul><li>Cofinancing mobilized increased by 12% from US$291 million to US$313 million </li></ul>
  7. 7. Project Implementation Performance <ul><li>Of the 40 projects rated, 33 were classified as Not At Risk (NAR), 3 as Potential Problem Projects (PPPs) and 4 as Actual Problem Project (APPs). </li></ul><ul><li>There are currently 7 projects ‘at risk’ compared to 9 from the previous review period. </li></ul><ul><li>Low disbursement rates represent the most significant portfolio constraint </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Share of projects with disbursement lag over 40% down to 22% from 27%. </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. IFAD’s Vision for the Region <ul><li>“ West Africa is enabled to lift itself out of poverty and hunger” </li></ul><ul><li>Achieved through promotion of innovative and effective programmes and support to policies to ensure expanded agricultural and rural development growth </li></ul>
  9. 9. Loan and Grant Programme Priorities in WCA <ul><li>Support the building of inclusive value chains and rural enterprises including access of the rural poor to technology and innovations to promote sustainable agricultural productivity and food security. </li></ul><ul><li>Access of rural households and enterprises to financial services and local, regional and international input-supply and output markets </li></ul><ul><li>Access to natural resources (especially land and water) and maintaining the quality of the resource base for agriculture in the context of climate change </li></ul><ul><li>Institutional development and capacity-building </li></ul>
  10. 10. Divisional Management Plan <ul><li>Better programme design </li></ul><ul><li>Better project design </li></ul><ul><li>Better project implementation </li></ul><ul><li>Knowledge management and innovation </li></ul><ul><li>Partnership within & outside IFAD </li></ul>
  11. 11. Better Programme Design <ul><li>4 result based COSOPs to be designed in 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Use the CPMT approach to produce high quality COSOPs in harmony with the Paris declaration </li></ul><ul><li>Contribute to national and regional policy generation and transformation through partnership (IFPRI, FAO, OECD, etc.) </li></ul>
  12. 12. KPI: Country Programme Design 24 1 11 0 # Countries with CPMT # Draft proposal for a regional tracking and reporting system developed  for PRS Proactive engagement in PRSP design and implementation to increase focus on agriculture and rural poverty 4 1 # RB-COSOPS presented to the board Year Target Baseline Divisional KPI CMR 1: Better Country Programme Design
  13. 13. KPI: 2009 Objective for COSOP in quality <ul><li>% of COSOP rated satisfactory or better at entry------------------------------------------80% </li></ul><ul><li>% of COSOP rated satisfactory or better during implimentation according to client survey----------------------------------------80% </li></ul><ul><li>% of Country programmes rated satisfactory or better on adherence to Paris Aid Effectiveness according to Paris Declaration monitoring Group----------80% </li></ul>
  14. 14. Better Project Design <ul><li>7/8 projects to the board in ’09 </li></ul><ul><li>Currently 11 projects in the pipeline at varying stages of design </li></ul><ul><li>Three criteria to determine the entry of new projects into the portfolio & design </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Ensure robustness & quality of projects at entry </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Maximum utilization of PBAS </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Progressive reduction of number of projects in the regional portfolio to match resources: maximum of 1 project per country per PBA cycle </li></ul></ul>
  15. 15. KPI: Country Project Design 80% 75% 0% 0% % of new project rated satisfactory or better on likely impact on poverty agregate for 2008/9 % of project rated satisfactory or better at completion (c0mpletion reports 80% 80% 0% 0% % of project designs rated satisfactory or better for quality at entry % of large grants rated good or better for quality at entry Year Target Baseline Divisional KPI CMR 2: Better Project Design
  16. 16. Better Project Implementation <ul><li>Areas of focus </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Reduction and eventual removal of projects at risk </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Reduction of implementation problems, especially relating to: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Disbursement rating </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Counterpart funds </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>M&E </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Project management </li></ul></ul></ul>
  17. 17. Better Project Implementation <ul><li>Improve development effectiveness by: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Taking over supervision of projects: 3 projects directly supervised in 2006, 12 in 2007, 23 in 2008, 35 in 2009, all projects in 2010 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Increasing the country presence </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Outposting of CPMs (starting with Senegal and Ghana in 2009; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Newly established portofolio suport unit </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Divisional dashboard to monitor portfolio performance </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. KPI: Country project implementation <ul><li>Average time from project effectiveness to approval-----------------------------13 months </li></ul><ul><li>% of projects with supervision rating satisfactory or better (sup. Reports---80% </li></ul><ul><li>Pro-activity index--------------------------70% </li></ul><ul><li>Project at risk -----------------------25% max </li></ul>
  19. 19. KPI: On Human Resource Management <ul><li>% of positions filed within 3 months from close of vacancy---------------------------95% </li></ul><ul><li>Ratio of GS to Professional staff------70% </li></ul><ul><li>Staff survey showing improvement of staff moral-----------------------------Improvement </li></ul><ul><li>360 degre introduced ------------------100% </li></ul><ul><li>% of staff attendind training-----------100% </li></ul>
  20. 20. Knowledge Management and Innovation <ul><li>Expected Results: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Mainstreaming of KM in country programmes and projects starting with new projects and at mid-term review </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Improving M&E (M&E regional grant) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Learning from field experiences (Scouting innovations through supervision) </li></ul></ul>
  21. 21. Knowledge Management and Innovation: Expected Results Continued… <ul><ul><li>Strengthening Fidafrique and linking to ES Africa </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Improving the effectiveness of knowledge grants (Knowledge Grants: IITA Grants, Microfinance, Future focus on Rice, R&T, Millet/Sorghum) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Improving the skills of IFAD staff and partners in supervision, implementation support, innovation and KM </li></ul></ul>
  22. 22. Partnerships <ul><li>Within IFAD </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Closer cooperation with PF (Fidafrique, NEPAD, market access) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Systematized cooperation through joint programmes with FC, EC, EO (project information management, support implementation performance, policy) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>External Partners </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Professional organizations and Private Sector </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Co Financers (AfDB, WB, BSF, OPEC, BOAD, IsDB, BADEA) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Policy support (OECD, IFPRI) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>All above: within the context of the Paris Declaration </li></ul></ul>
  23. 23. Risk Management <ul><li>Civil Strife </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Increase project pipeline to ensure delivery </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Poor resource management </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Enforce submissions of project audit </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Introduce continuous audit processes where risk is high </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Include component on corruption in project design </li></ul></ul>
  24. 24. Expanding Country Presence and Proposed CPM Out Posting X X Senegal X Nigeria X Mali X Guinea X Ghana X X DR Congo X Cameroon X Burkina Faso X Benin 2010 2009 2010 2009 New proposed CPM Out Posting New Proposed Country Presence Existing Country Presence Countries
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×