Integrating Technology in Education
In Mohammed Bin Hammed Secondary School for Boys
Views and Opinions of Teachers , Students, Administrators and Parents
Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
Purpose of the Study ……………………………………………………………………………1
Data Analysis (Stage 1)........................................................................5
Students' questionnaire data analysis………………………………………………….7
Problems the Researchers faced…………………………………………………..…….9
Lewbow"s Five Constructive Principles ………………………………………………11
It obvious that our world is witnessing a technological revolution that affects all aspects of our lives,
but in so many cases this revolution turned to be a Curse, because of the misusage. Technology of
education is defined as tools that might help in promoting student learning and may be measured in
how and why individuals behave. Educational Technology relies on a broad definition of the word
"technology." Technology can refer to material objects of use to humanity, such as machines or
hardware, but it can also include broader themes, such as systems, methods of organization, and
techniques. Some modern tools include but are not limited to overhead projectors, laptop computers,
and calculators. Newer tools such as "smart phones" and games (both online and offline) are beginning
to draw serious attention for their learning potential. Media psychology is the field of study that applies
theories in human behavior to educational technology.
Although so many people are trying to prove the opposite, technology can never replace teachers. The
traditional educational technology that teachers used to use in the classrooms such as real objects,
cassettes, videos, drawings and pictures proved to be effective in the hands of good teachers the
modern technology on the other hand, made things more complicated. This controversy among those
who believe in the intensive use of technology on the one hand and those who believe that over using
technology especially the most recent one is a waste of time for both teachers and students. The first
category believes that modern technologies provide greater opportunities to access information,
collaborate with peers and teachers, and create new types of content; students are more engaged and
have a stronger voice in their own education. Teachers are able to use actionable
information to personalize learning based on individual student's learning needs and styles. Modern
technologies provide a strong foundation for these efforts that include professional learning for teachers
and administrators, access to the right technology for their school district.
The second category believes that over using technology especially the most recent one is a waste of
time for both teachers and students, because they think that the educational situation can't handle the
use of that much of technology in a regular base. They also believe that these technologies can never be
a substitute for teachers. Students need to feel the presences of the teacher's creativity in the classroom.
They also think that some teachers tend to use so much of the technology such as power point
presentations, because they want to waste time. They strongly believe that technologies are needed
outside the classrooms, where students need to surf for further information. In this introduction I tried
to present the thought, ideas and opinions of some school teachers and administrators who attended a
conference about Educational Technologies entitled with (Educational Technologies Facts and
Challenges) that was held in Mohammed Bin Hamad Secondary School for boys in Fujairah on May
Purpose of the Study
My aim was to narrow the gap between the two controversial groups, because I believe that each group
has a point of view to argue for, and I also believe to some extent that both of them are correct .Those
who argue for the usage of Educational Technology have Certain points of strength in their argument
such as, students as well as teachers have the right to cope with the ever developing age of technology ,
sending and receiving information became easier and more attractive , students need to be more
informed and prepared for universities and above all technology is all around us ,so like it or not we are
all now in one way or another part of a global technological system.
Those who argue against don’t totally deny the importance of technology in our educational system,
but they say that some teachers and students are not mature enough to handle that strong flow of
technology. In the early stages students, students are required to know the ABCs of technology to be
able to use certain tools such as computers in a monitored and narrow scale. This group focused on the
most recent technologies such as laptops, disc tops, note pads and I pads. They also argue that the over
use of technology in the classrooms limits students ability to be effective in the classroom, and turn
teachers from real teachers in to just a machine operators a job that any normal person can do.
stood in the middle because I believe there is a point where the two groups can meeta researcher, IAs
and reach an agreement; I also wanted to convince the first group to use Educational Technology only
when needed and never let it dominate the whole period so as to leave a space for human interaction.
Moderate use of modern technology for certain purposes will be a good addition to the educational
process. At the same time I wanted to convince the second group that using modern technology every
now and then will change the atmosphere in the classroom; it will give the teaching learning process
more depth and a new dimension. This doesn’t mean that teachers are to ignore the traditional Teaching
Technology that they used to use in their classrooms such as pictures, real objects, wall charts and so
I formed a team five teachers including myself as a group leader, then we designed two
questionnaires for students and teachers to know exactly what they think about integrating technology
in Education .As for parents we went for teachers- parents meeting that was held in the school theater
. The majority of parents show great interest in the idea and expressed their readiness for any help
possible financially or morally .Students who are already indulged in technology believe that
integrating technology in education is not a matter of choice on the contrary ,it is a must since
technology invaded every aspect of their lives.
Y = yes N= no DN= don’t know
Dear colleague please answer the following questions to the best of your knowledge; your careful
answers will help us measure the effectiveness of modern technology integration in education.
Iam unable to produce educational multimedia.1
Iam unable to employ technology in education.2
I don’t feel like integrating in education.3
I feel that technology integration is not necessary.4
The school administration does not provide any training for
Iam not trained enough on the use of technology.6
The classroom does not contain any sort of technology.7
Students do not bear the use of technology.8
The school administration careless about education technology.9
The technological equipments need maintenance10
I don’t understand the language of instructions.11
The time of the lesson is not enough.12
Iam over loaded with extra duties that prevent me from using
I feel that PowerPoint presentations do not add anything to
students use computers for chatting ,playingMost15
Students lack the motive to learn, even when modern technology
The community is not aware of the importance of integration17
We still need time and effort to reach full technology integration.18
Our educational system is not yet ready for full technology
Y = yes N= no DN= don’t know
.Technology can never be a replacement for teachers.20
Are you a secondary school teacher?1
Do you like being a teacher?2
Do you see you self as an experienced teacher?3
Do think that full technology integration in education is necessary?4
Do you find it difficult to use modern technology in the classrooms?5
Have you ever attended training sessions or conferences on
Would you like to know more about technology integration in
Do you use computers efficiently?
Do you use a desk top or a lap top to prepare your lessons?
Do you find it difficult to deal with technological equipments?
Do think that the using of the above equipment is easier than
using a computer?
Have you ever used a T.V or a cassette recorder in your lessons?
Have you ever used an overhead projector?
Is there a computer or a data show in your classroom?
Do you usually refer to any websites for further information?
Do you use the internet to intercommunicate with your students
or your superiors?
Does school provide the necessary training for teachers
Are you willing to integrate new technologies in your classroom?
Does the school administration encourage technology integration
Do you need training in technology integration
Is there a computer lab in your school?
If the answer is yes , do often make use of this lab in education
Do you use the curriculum as a main source of information?
Are you ready to do whatever necessary to help your students?
Analyzing teachers responses to the first part of the questioner that includes
twenty statements; the research team could reach the results shown in the
S Y N DN S Y N DN
S1 40% 60% - S11 96% 4% -
S2 70% 30% - S12 90% 5% 5%
S3 80% 20% - S13 96% 4% -
S4 90% 7% 3% S14 97% - 3%
S5 50% 35% 15% S15 98% - 2%
S6 90% 10% - S16 95% 5% -
S7 75% 20% 5% S17 90% 6% 4%
S8 5% 10% 85% S18 85% 5% 10%
S9 45% 35% 20% S19 90% 7% 3%
S10 5% - 95% S20 100% - -
As for the second part of the questioner that includes twenty four question;
teachers answers were to some extant similar to their answers in the first part,
and they were as follows
Q Y N DN Q Y N DN
1 100% - - 13 95% 5% -
2 75% 25% - 14 85% 15% -
3 100% - - 15 - 95% 5%
4 - 95% 5% 16 - 95% 5%
5 80% 15% 5% 17 _ 75% 25%
6 5% 95% - 18 25% 65% 10%
7 35% 40% 25% 19 25% 50% 25%
8 85% 15% 5% 20 40% 50% 10%
9 45% 35% 20% 21 90% - 10%
10 75% 25% - 22 20% 80% -
11 35% 30% 35% 23 99% 1% -
12 99% 1% - 24 97% - 3%
Dear student please respond to the following statements to the best of your knowledge; your careful
answers will help us measure the effectiveness of modern technology integration in education
Y = Yes N = no DN = don’t know
Technology based lessons are more attractive1
I care more when the teacher uses technology to explain the lesson.2
I can surf the web easily.3
I have my own lap top and a free access to the net.4
Teachers explain lessons using technology in a regular bases.5
Teachers need more training on modern technology.6
I do my homework and research study using the internet.7
Teachers encourage students to surf the internet8
The ordinary curriculum is boring9
The school provides the necessary technology for teachers and students10
I can use my smart phone efficiently.11
Students get enough technology lessons.12
The school administration allows students to access the web anytime.13
Technology information is necessary for your future career.14
Students' questionnaire data analysis
Statistics show that students are aware of the importance of technology
integration in their educational system; they also show that students are to a
great extant involved in this sort of technology in their everyday life through
using various kinds of technological equipments such as smart phones, laptops,
iPods and I pads .Moreover the majority of the students' community have access
to the internet at home or even in their personal devices. So technology
integration in education should be priority for all those who work in the Ministry
of Education; teachers are on the top of this list.
S Y N DN S Y N DN
1 75% 10% 15% 8 25% 70% 5%
2 79% 9% 12% 9 85% 10% 5%
3 97% 3% - 10 90% - 10
4 95% 5% - 11 100
5 22% 78% - 12 27% 73% -
6 24% 15% 61% 13 85% 13% 2%
7 35% 20% 45% 14 95% - 5%
1 – Based on the data analyses of the two questionnaires , I carried out a staff meeting to shed
light on the problem and find an Intersection between the two parties.
2 – I asked the two parties to organize demonstration lessons that include the use of traditional
teaching technology and lessons that depend on modern technology
3 – After attending these lessons each group should prepare a feedback report showing the
advantages and disadvantages of each type of lessons.
4 – A week later, I conducted a follow up meeting to discuss the reports and write
Recommendations that were agreed upon in the follow up meeting were.
1 – Teachers who have problems dealing with the modern technologies such as Data
show, smart board and note pads etc. are required to join training courses.
2 – These training courses are to be held in the school and given by teachers who have
enough experience using this type of technology
3 – Since promoting students achievement is the main target in the whole educational
process, student should be involved in framing the way they would like to be taught; in this case student
are going to answer a questioner in which they will decide how effective new technologies in the
classroom are, and how can teachers and the school administration make the best use of that
4- Share the local community the responsibility in deciding how they want their children to
be taught through organizing scheduled visits to the school and choose a number of parents to
work with the school board on a regular bases.
5 – The school administration should solve certain technical problems such as electric sockets
and connections in the classrooms.
Problems that Researchers faced
concerns regarding how things should be done, so whenever a new idea a rises, you find
people who oppose it and try hard for this idea not to effective. In this particular case I faced
problems that I could overcome some of them e.g.
1 – Some employees lack the desire and the motive to develop their abilities in the field of
modern educational technology which is considered to be part of their PPD, simply because
they believe that it is of no use since it doesn’t add to the teaching learning process.
2 – The school building is not ready enough to cope with this kind of technology and its
accessories; relatively old school buildings with old electric connections always face problems
that lead to the disconnection of power supply.
3- The continuous collapse of the system itself due to certain technical failure or virus which
means that this Technology needs ongoing maintenance and updating which is very
4 – Lack of awareness and responsibility in some students who tend to sabotage the equipment
installed in their classroom.
5 – In certain cases this technology is misused or over used to an extent that the role of the
teacher is either cancelled or minimized which affects the interaction between. teachers and
6 – Some students and teachers disregard the fact that technology was developed to facilitate
the educational process, so they don’t take seriously.
7- The Ministry of Education does not organize training courses for the staff on new
technologies; teachers have to attend courses on their own which is an additional financial
burden that teachers are trying to avoid.
8 – Lack of experienced people in the field of Educational Technology.
The research question in this case study is , How do teachers , Students and parents feel about
integrating technology in education?
Studies show that Technology Integration in the educational system in the UAE is affected by
many factors. These factors range from confusion between the simple use of technology versus
true integration to professional development and training issues, teacher pedagogical decisions
based on both their own previous training as well the duties placed upon them to address
standardized assessments and standards-based expectations on their classroom performance.
Most teachers do not differentiate between using technology for personal purposes such as,
surfing the net or chatting with friends and using technology for pure educational purposes, so a
distinction needs to be made between ‘use’ and ‘integration . It seems that it is difficult to reach
full integration, since a large number of teachers believe in the insignificance of this integration in
education. So as to reach full integration, we need to change teachers' thoughts and beliefs
regarding this subject. The use of technology for itself does not lead to successful integration
(Koehler & Mishra, 2005, p. 132). Proper integration involves use of a technology in a way that
makes the technology a seamless, almost invisible part of the over-all learning environment,
similar to blackboards and chalk. It should be highlighted that technology is a mean to facilitate
the educational process and make more attractive and enjoyable, and not a target, so if the focus
of learning is on the technology itself then proper integration has not taken place. The improper
use of technology in the classroom might lead to undesired result such students' distraction and
poor achievement. It is that technology shapes the twenty first in every aspect; still we didn’t
reach the full and proper integration in education. Not because we don’t possess the right tools,
but because decision Makers Lake the determination and some teachers lake motivation and
Some teachers were Unwilling to adapt their classroom practices to more fully integrate technology
(Bai & Ertmer, 2008, pp. 94-95). Since integrating new technology requires exploring new ways of
learning. Teachers who are unwilling to modify their classroom methods will experience difficulties in
integration. The literature suggests that many new technologies such as computers and the Internet are
best integrated through student-centered methods, and teachers with more traditional beliefs face
greater degrees of change in their classroom practices when facing technology integration (Levin &
Wadmany, 2006, p. 160). If teachers are to accept new ways of thinking about education they may need
to be convinced hoping that they will modify their negative attitude towards the usefulness and
effectiveness of technology. Careful assessment of each teacher must be used to assure his or her
readiness to learn these new skills, their awareness of having the “skills, knowledge, and training
essential for success” in learning new ways of teaching. Whatever reasons that might determine some
teachers ' classroom practices, ideologies, or beliefs that require loyalty and conformity by its adherents
(Knowles et al, 2005, p. 68). One factor may hinge on the way that technology is viewed by these
teachers who might see technology simply as a means to deliver his or her instructions and might lack
the pedagogical sophistication to address technology as “tools to solve problems” (Morrison & Lowther,
2005, p. 25). Finding ways to help these teachers grow in their instructional practice is essential to
proper technology integration.
Lebow’s Five Constructivist Principles
1. Acknowledge that the classroom teacher faces the challenge of a “conflict-
faced” path where-in they are asked to compare and contrast their existing
entrenched model with a new model with which they have little or no
experience (Perkins, 1992, p. 162).
2. Some teachers-learners are better prepared for technology integration than
others. Guide the learner slowly from practices that are similar to their existing
practices along a scale toward those that are more in line with the models of
fully integrated practices. (Matzen & Edmunds, 2007, p. 419). Research
indicates that “teacher education needs to begin with these traditional beliefs
and subsequently challenge them through activity, reflection, and discourse in
both coursework and field work throughout the duration of the program”
(Fosnot, 2005, p. 264).
3. The course of each lesson should model the technology as supporting the
classroom teacher’s specific needs and course materials.
4. The technology that is being learned is used to model its own best practice
usage and encourages exploration of the technology’s capabilities. Model
technology as the medium for learning another subject not as the subject of
5. Support student-centered learning by helping the classroom teacher
develop skills and attitudes that enable him or her to assume increased
ownership for the developmental restructuring process. The teacher-educator
must constantly pay close attention to which aspects of the new technology
attract the learner’s interest and facilitate the learner’s pursuit of knowledge
through exploring that interest.
6. Encourage the exploration of errors. It helps for the technology mentor to
explain to the teacher-learner that they cannot break anything within the
technology while exploring, and to model common mistakes and how to
recover from them.
As a quick remedial procedure, an intensive four week training course should be
carried out in the school premises to educate teachers of the importance of
integrating technology in the classrooms and how will this integration impact the
teachers' performance and the students' achievement. The purpose of this training
course is modifying and adjusting teachers' thoughts and beliefs concerning
technology integration. After teachers' prospective is changed, yearlong Training
should be conducted in a school. Work Plan should consist of all the IT basics that
teachers need in their classrooms to reach full technology integration
Training sessions should include Whiteboard Basics, Word Processing, Blogging,
PowerPoint, Internet Research, YouTube/Video, Spreadsheet and many other
different topics that might be helpful for teachers to reach a reasonable level of
technological knowledge that enables them integrate easily. Photoshop, Graphics
and Subject Area Educational Software can be a good example.
The first training sessions the teacher-learners will attend are the four-week
intensive, that include training on the use of technology in integration model that
goes a long with the school's policy in teacher training program of the professional
development goals of the school. These training sessions must be held on a daily
bases for 2 hours and should include condensed exams of the process that are
required in developing lesson plans model to assure the integration of both
technology and subject area content, and help develop the underlying and
understanding of the overall process of technology integration. This includes an
understanding of when technology is appropriate and when one should cease.
The training then continues throughout the year with a new topic every two weeks.
Most of the time, topics are determined upon the participants' request
The first week should include a teacher-learner hour-long meeting during which
the trainee and the mentor discuss the progress achieved and the challenges that the
trainee might face during the PPD sessions and how to overcome them.
The main aim of these sessions is to provide trainees with instructions in the
use of various technologies, and ways to integrate that technology into their
classroom. Based on the trainees performance , their responses to the training
courses, and the trainers assessments , trainers should adjust their techniques
to meet the trainees' needs. Sessions should focus on how to use the identified
technologies within the teacher’s classroom setting ;they should concentrate on
exploring the use of technology within the teacher’s own content subject and
teach them who to combine the proper use of technology and the content so as
to reach the effective and useful integration .
The second week, trainees are required to present a demonstration lesson
during which the mentor will provide direct support for the teacher to integrate
materials and content from the Internet or other electronic sources and will assist
him in sessions will be technologically mentored. the session is to be held in the
school’s computer lab, media library or other technology facilities such as the
video production studio.
The sessions are planned for specific classroom areas because the sessions will
be video recorded for later review and assessment for each session. Collaborative
interaction with the technology mentor and the videotaping
provides the trainees with the necessary feedback on instructional practices and
integration while working alongside with both their own classroom students and
the technology mentor in developing these best practices for technology use. The
technology team’s teacher-educators will follow these six underlying
Constructivist principles for our technology curriculum, as adapted from
Asselin, M. (2003). Assessment Issues and Recommendations. Teacher
Librarian, 30(5), pgs. 52-53.
Bai, H., & Ertmer, P. (2008). Teacher Educator’s Beliefs and Technology
Uses as Predictors of Preservice Teachers Beliefs and Technology Attitudes.
Journal of Technology & Teacher Education,
Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward Technology Integration in the
Schools: Why It Isn’t Happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher
Education, 13(4), 519-546. Retrieved October 15, 2007,
Bradburn, F. B. (2007). A Program With Impact. T H E Journal, 34(1), 55-52.
Retrieved August 28, 2007, from EBSCO.
Christensen, C., Horn, M., & Johnson, C. (2008). Disrupting Class: How
Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns. New York, NY:
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by Doing: A
Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work. Bloomington,
IN: Solution Tree.
Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Teachers Construct Constructivism: The Center for
Constructivist Teaching/Teacher Preparation Project.
Glazer, E., & Hannafin, M. (2008). Factors That Influence Mentor and
Teacher Interactions During Technology Integration Collaborative
Apprenticeships. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
Higgins, B., Miller, M., & Wegmann, S. (2006). Teaching to the test …
Howard, P. (2006). The Owner’s Manual for The Brain: Everyday
Applications from Mind-Brain Research. Austin, TX: Bard Press.
Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (2005). The Adult Learner.
Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What Happens When Teachers Design
Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist Values for Instructional Systems Design:
Five Principles Toward a New Mindset.
Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A
longitudinal study. Computers & Education,
Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in
Technology-based Classrooms: A Developmental View. Journal of Research
on Technology in Education
Matzen, N., & Edmunds, J. (2007). Technology as a Catalyst for Change:
The Role of Professional Development. Journal of Research on Technology
Morrison, G., & Lowther, D. (2005). Integrating Computer Technology into
the Classroom (Third Edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson
Merrill Prentice Hall.
National Business Education Alliance
National Business Education Alliance. (2006). Handout Modules. The LoTi
Connection. Retrieved December 16, 2007, from
NC DPI Instructional Technology Division. (2006). Technology Facilitator
Perkins, D. N. (1992). What Constructivism Demands of the Learner
Rakes, G., Fields, V., & Cox, K. (2006). The Influence of Teacher’s
Technology Use on Instructional Practices. Journal of Research on
Technology in Education,
Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: new tools, new schools.
Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.