The world towards a new middle age


Published on

Published in: News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

The world towards a new middle age

  1. 1. THE WORLD TOWARDS A NEW MIDDLE AGE? Fernando Alcoforado * The world today is moving towards a new Middle Ages? Many authors such as Umberto Eco, Furio Colombo, Francesco Alberoni and Giuseppe Sacco, with texts collected in the book La Nueva Edad Media, published by Alianza Editorial in 2010, consider the prospective hypothesis a regression of civilization to a new middle age. Umberto Eco, for example, seeks causes the dissolution of social ties in the privatization of power and conflicts between competing groups. Umberto Eco points out, for example, the parallels between medieval Europe and contemporary society, such as the feeling of insecurity, marginalized sects, the visual character of culture, the principle of authority and love of formalism in intellectual reflection. Umberto Eco says it is certain that the medieval period is characterized by its wildness both a personal and social level. However, it is certain that barbarism in our time is of degrading many aspects such as corruption in politics and the business world, the spread of drugs at international level, trafficking of women, abortion, etc. According to Umberto Eco, we live an obscure time of moral and spiritual point of view. The difference with the former Middle Ages is that the men then found solace in religion. Today, however, the philosophy of despair with nothing in their creed is the ideology of the new prophets shift prevails. Umberto Eco also analyzes the Apocalypse Project of Giuseppe Vacca based on the degradation of large systems typical of the technological age that is too vast and complex to be coordinated by a central authority and also to be controlled individually by an efficient steering apparatus, are doomed to collapse, and by reciprocal interactions, produce a throwback to the whole industrial civilization. Vacca said that at this time we are living in full feudal structure. Alliances between local authorities will rely on the commitment and not the laws, individual relationships will be based on aggression, the alliance of friendship or community of interest, and reborn elementary customs of hospitality to the passer. Today living civilizations, cultures at different stages of development. In turn, in the book La Nueva Edad Media, Furio Colombo describes technological concentrations that begin to compete with the state attributes of power and advance features that will clothe life in new feudal territories. Francesco Alberoni examines the bleak prospects that await the industrialized countries in the process of decay. Giuseppe Sacco makes reflection on the possibilities for change through an appropriate policy of regional development, the disruption towards consensus, social fragmentation and multiplication of cultural identities and codes of conduct trends. In early modern princes and states clamored for their independence against the claims of the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire. Two arguments dominated the thinkers of this time: 1) The argument of Machiavelli, Hobbes and Bacon, for example, that states and rulers were in a relationship of "state of nature" with each other, not restricted by obligations of law or society and were free to use whatever means possessing to achieve its objectives, as evidenced by the concept of reason of state; and, 2) The argument that the princes and states could be subject to a worldwide central government to ward off the "state of nature" which was advocated by Immanuel Kant in Perpetual Peace.
  2. 2. Just as in ancient Middle Ages, the new middle age is an anarchic society. Hedley Bull said in his Sociedade Anárquica (The anarchical society) by IMESP published in 1970 that the international order with respect to a pattern of or disposition of international activities that support incremental goals. These objectives are, first, the preservation of the system itself and the society of states. Second, in order to maintain the independence or external sovereignty of individual states. Thirdly is the goal of peacekeeping. And in fourth place is common to all social life goals: life, truth and property. With this image, this evoked a chaotic context marked by insecurity and violence, Hedley Bull synthesized lines for which tended to international political order. Bull intuited when the international order was still bipolar (United States and Soviet Union), that something new was emerging as the twilight of sovereignty exercised exclusively by national states, technological unification of the world and the revival of private international violence. A view of the scene, which in many respects already saw the future, if we look at what happened after 1989, but also to the current international instability, for economic and financial globalization and the globalization of terrorism, which threatens spread everywhere. Bull says the Hobbesian traditions (realistic), Kant (universalist) and Grotian (internationalist) compete. Each of these traditional models incorporates a description of the nature of international politics and a set of requirements on the conduct of states. The call Grotian or internationalist tradition of Hugo Grotius stands between Hobbes realism and idealism of Kant. He bet on the possibility of cooperation rather than all-out war of Hobbes or Kant's perpetual peace. Believe coordination, ie, sharing common interests and values between states. It is a mixture of conflict and cooperation, arising from the possibility of channeling interests that are not always exclusive. Grotius defended the thesis that states and rulers together form a society. Even with the independence of central governments, sovereign states are not in a "state of nature", but are part of an international community, and form a society among them, even in a rudimentary way: what Bull called anarchic society or society without government. The company is present in the current world order [See Grotius e as Relações Internacion (Grotius and International Relations) posted on the website < 66>] . Otherwise can institutionalize Kant Perpetual Peace, we must avoid the "state of nature", that is, the Hobbes war of everybody against everybody promoting the humanization of international relations according to the design of Grotius. * Alcoforado, Fernando, engineer and doctor of Territorial Planning and Regional Development from the University of Barcelona, a university professor and consultant in strategic planning, business planning, regional planning and planning of energy systems, is the author of Globalização (Editora Nobel, São Paulo, 1997), De Collor a FHC- O Brasil e a Nova (Des)ordem Mundial (Editora Nobel, São Paulo, 1998), Um Projeto para o Brasil (Editora Nobel, São Paulo, 2000), Os condicionantes do desenvolvimento do Estado da Bahia (Tese de doutorado. Universidade de Barcelona,, 2003), Globalização e Desenvolvimento (Editora Nobel, São Paulo, 2006), Bahia- Desenvolvimento do Século XVI ao Século XX e Objetivos Estratégicos na Era Contemporânea (EGBA, Salvador, 2008), The Necessary Conditions of the Economic and Social Development-The Case of the State of Bahia (VDM Verlag Dr. Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2010), Aquecimento Global e Catástrofe Planetária (P&A Gráfica e Editora, Salvador, 2010), Amazônia Sustentável- Para o progresso do Brasil e combate ao aquecimento global (Viena- Editora e Gráfica, Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo, São Paulo, 2011) and Os Fatores Condicionantes do Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (Editora CRV, Curitiba, 2012), among others.