Patient-initiated Online Support Groups: Motives for Initiation, Extent of Success and Success Factors [4 1530 Aud Van Uden Kraan]

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Event

    Patient-initiated Online Support Groups: Motives for Initiation, Extent of Success and Success Factors [4 1530 Aud Van Uden Kraan] - Presentation Transcript

    1. Van Uden-Kraan, C. et al.: Patient-initiated Online Support Groups: Motives for Initiation, Extent of Success and Success Factors
      • This slideshow, presented at Medicine 2.0’08 , Sept 4/5 th , 2008, in Toronto, was uploaded on behalf of the presenter by the Medicine 2.0 team
      • Do not miss the next Medicine 2.0 congress on 17/18th Sept 2009 ( www.medicine20congress.com )
      • Order Audio Recordings (mp3) of Medicine 2.0’08 presentations at http://www.medicine20congress.com/mp3.php
    2. Nelly van Uden-Kraan, Stans Drossaert, Erik Taal, Mart van de Laar & Erwin Seydel Patient-initiated online support groups: motives for initiation, extent of success and success factors Medicine 2.0 Toronto, 2008
    3. Support groups
      • Support groups
      • People in stressful circumstances often turn to support groups
      • Support groups can offer:
      • Understanding and emotional support
      • Personal experiences
      • Social comparison
      • “ Helper therapy” principle
    4. Online support groups
      • Increase in use of the Internet
      • 85% of the Dutch households have an Internet connection
      • 47% of the Dutch prefer to receive medical information by means of the Internet
      • Types of online support groups
      • Internet discussion groups
      • Chats
      • E-mail groups
    5.  
    6.  
    7. Introduction (1)
      • Online patient support groups are currently mushrooming
        • No sophisticated technical skills needed
        • Limited costs
      • Types of online support groups
        • Professionally led support groups: groups initiated by health care providers or researchers
        • Lay-expert groups: groups initiated by patients or patient organizations
      • Little is known about the motives and goals of people who voluntarily initiate an online group
    8. Introduction (2)
      • Successful versus unsuccessful groups
      • Successful groups versus groups that never get off the ground or bleed to death at a later stage.
      • Success factors
      • Initiation stage
        • The period before the online support group goes online.
      • Evolution stage
        • The evolution stage starts the moment the group goes online and is ongoing.
    9. Objectives
      • To explore the motives and goals of webmasters who initiated their own online patient support groups.
      • To learn more about how webmasters of online support groups define success, and if they were of opinion that their own groups were a success.
      • To explore the factors that according to the webmasters determine the success of online patient support groups.
    10. Methods (1)
      • Criteria online support groups
      • Dutch public and private online support groups
      • Webmasters of online support groups included
      • Breast cancer: 8 webmasters
      • Fibromyalgia: 8 webmasters
      • Arthritis: 7 arthritis
    11. Methods (2)
      • Semi-structured interview schedule
      • Measures:
        • Demographics
        • Characteristics of the online support groups
        • Motives for starting a group and goals of the group
        • Webmasters’ definitions of success
        • Success factors in the initiation stage and in the evolution stage
    12. Methods (3)
      • Procedure
        • 19 interviews at the webmasters’ home
        • 4 interviews at another place preferred by the webmaster
      • Length of the interviews
        • Between 1 and 2,5 hours
    13. Methods (4)
      • Data analysis
      • “ Inductive analysis”
        • Identifying themes that emerge from the data
      • Two coders
        • Independently reading transcripts interviews
        • Developing thematic framework
        • Independently coding transcript on the basis of the thematic framework
        • Discussing results to reach consensus
    14. Demographic characteristics webmasters
      • Sex
        • 20 women and 3 men
      • Mean age
        • 46 years (24 to 65 years)
      • Education
        • 4 lower level of education
        • 10 secondary level of education
        • 9 higher level of education
      • Diagnosis
        • 21 patients
        • 2 spouses of patients
    15. Characteristics online support groups
      • Initiation
        • Between 1999 and 2007
      • Activity
        • Between several hundreds of messages and no messages at all
      • Access
        • 13 private groups
        • 10 public groups
      • Embedding
        • 18 stand-alone groups
        • 5 groups of official Dutch patient associations
    16. Motives for initiation and goals of the group
      • Altruistic motives and goals
        • Creating a meeting place where support and experiences can be exchanged
        • Providing information (for patients and for the general public)
        • Empowering patients in various ways (focus on doctor-patient relationship, social well-being or increased optimism and control)
        • Public goal (create understanding for patients suffering from illness among the general public)
    17. Motives for initiation and goals of the group
      • Intrinsic motives and goals
        • Hobby
        • Extension of existing website about illness
        • Advertisement for a book about illness
    18. Definition and extent of success
      • Success can be defined as the fulfillment of the goals the webmasters had in mind at the moment the group was initiated.
      • “ I wanted to create a meeting place for people with breast cancer. And in the hope that it will give people support and recognition, whatever. And it does!”
    19. Definition and extent of success
      • Success can be defined as the fulfillment of the goals the webmasters had in mind at the moment the group was initiated.
      • 18 webmasters were of opinion that their groups were a success
      • 5 webmasters were of opinion that their groups were no success (anymore)
      • “ It has become more of a social club than a place to really exchange information and experience. Not that you have to complain about rheumatism all the time, but it is our aim after all to be a source of information with lay experts.”
    20. Definition and extent of success
      • Success can be defined as the fulfillment of the goals the webmasters had in mind at the moment the group was initiated.
      • 18 webmasters were of opinion that their groups were a success
      • 5 webmasters were of opinion that their groups were no success (anymore)
      • Strikingly, the number of the participants on the forum or the level of activity was not related to the webmasters’ opinion about their groups’ success
    21. Success factors in the initiation stage
      • Overview decisions in the initiation stage:
      • Access
        • Public versus private
      • Embedding
        • Stand-alone versus embedded in an organization
      • Content
        • Chit chat allowed versus chit chat not allowed
        • Medical experts present versus no medical expert present
      • Design
        • Structure into categories versus bulletin board
        • Free software versus paid software
    22. Success factors in the evolution stage (1)
      • Overview decisions in the evolution stage:
      • Promoting the online support group
      • Financing the online support group
      • Keeping the group alive
      • Extent of moderation
      • Organizing meetings and creating rituals
      • Input of the participants
    23. Success factors in the evolution stage (2)
      • Keeping the group alive
      • Respond to questions of participants quickly
      • Start new topics frequently
      • New participants should keep joining the group
      • Make new participants feel at home (e.g., by sending special welcome messages)
      • Providing new members promptly with an explanation of how the forum works (e.g., how do I post a personal message)
      • Pay adequate attention to the new participant’s story
      • New participants should be supported by experienced participants
      • Experienced participants should be cherished for their role in the group
    24. Conclusion (1)
        • Overall conclusions decisions initiation stage:
        • Decisions taken in the initiation stage should be in line with the goals of the group.
        • Decisions taken during the initiation stage should be considered carefully.
        • Not all decisions taken during the initiation stage can be reversed.
    25. Conclusion (2)
      • Overall conclusions decisions evolution stage:
        • Managing an online support groups will occupy much energy and time.
        • Having one webmaster responsible for the group is a risk for continuation.
        • Webmasters should (constantly) monitor participants’ whishes.
    26. Limitations
      • Retrospective study
        • Webmasters themselves reported which factors contribute to the success of their online patient support groups
      • Small sample size
        • Unknown to what extent these results are representative for groups aimed at patients with either a mental illness or dominated by male participants
    27. Financers
      • This project is financed by:

    + eyseneysen, 2 years ago

    custom

    703 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 703
      • 701 on SlideShare
      • 2 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds
    • 2 views on http://www.medicine20congress.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 2 views on http://www.medicine20congress.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags

    Groups / Events