Food Crisis - Is Regional Trade the Answer: The Case of COMESA

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Food Crisis - Is Regional Trade the Answer: The Case of COMESA - Presentation Transcript

    1. FOOD CRISIS – IS REGIONAL TRADE THE ANSWER: THE CASE OF COMESA Cris MUYUNDA, PhD Senior Agricultural Advisor, COMESA
    2. OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
      • COMESA OVERVIEW : MARKET PARAMETERS
      • STATE OF AGRICULTURE & FOOD SECURITY SITUATION
      • MAJOR ISSUES OF CONCERN OVER FOOD PRICES
      • RESPONSE FROM COMESA and NEPAD
      • MALAWI FOOD SECURITY SUCCESS STORY
      • A CASE FOR EXPANDING REGIONAL TRADE
      • KEY TRANSPORTATION AND RELATED ISSUES
      • CONCLUSIONS-IS REGIONAL TRADE THE ANSWER?
    3. COMESA OVERVIEW : KEY PARAMETERS
      • FORMED IN 1994 FROM PTA, itself est. 1982
      • POPULATION : 400 million – big potential market
      • 19 Member States: 9 Landlocked; 4 are Island (3 very small)
      • Intra-COMESA trade: US$7.5 billion (2007); Extra-COMESA exports: US$90 billion ; total trade US$160 billion
      • US$3.4 billion (about 40%) of intra COMESA-trade is food and agricultural raw materials
    4. AGRICULTURE IN COMESA
      • 32% of COMESA GDP
      • 65% of Raw Materials for Industry: Agricultural commodities are major drivers for growth in intra-COMESA trade.
      • 80% of employment
    5. COMESA AGRICULTURAL SECTOR CHALLENGES TECHNOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS MARKET RELATED CONSTRAINTS POLICY RELATED CONSTRAINTS Low Productivity
    6. SITUATION ON THE GROUND IN COMESA
      • Low Yields characterize COMESA agriculture
      • Biggest Customer of the WFP
      • Low Value, Uncompetitive Agriculture
    7. (1) PER CAPITA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IS FALLING
    8. (2) TRADE VALUE AS % OF GDP HIGH (62%) BUT WORLD SHARE OF TRADE LOW (2%)
    9. (3) NET RESULT: HUNGER MAP
    10. FOOD SECURITY SITUATION IN COMESA
      • DISCOUNTING EMEGENCY FOOD AID DUE TO UNFORESEEN ISSUES:
      • 2004/2005: 11 MEMBER STATES WERE IN FOOD DEFICITS AND REQUIRED EXTERNAL FOOD
      • 2005/2006: 5 MEMBER STATES EXPERIENCED FOOD DEFICITS, BUT THE WHOLE REGION HAD A SURPLUS OF 550,000 MT.
      • 2006/2007: 2 MEMBER STATES EXPERIENCED FOOD DEFICITS, BUT WHOLE REGION HAD A SURPLUS OF 1,500,000 MT.
      • 2007/2008: …….(assessments ongoing, about 5 will need external support)
      • OVERALL: MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE / DISTRIBUTION CHALLENGE
    11. NEGATIVE IMPACT OF HIGH PRICES
      • AFFECTS POVERTY LEVELS (Studies indicate 10% increase in food prices leads to 2.3% increase in poverty in COMESA)
      • HAS IMPACT ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF THE CONTINENT WHERE ALREADY SOME 200 MILLION PEOPLE ARE CHRONICALLY MALNOURISHED
      • HAS IMPACT ON POLITICAL SITUATION NATIONALLY, REGIONALLY
      • COULD AFFECT PEACE AND SECURITY SITUATION
    12. POSITIVE IMPACT OF HIGH PRICES
      • HIGH FOOD PRICES BRING ECONOMIC GROWTH IN AGRICULTURAL LED ECONOMIES: AGRICULTURE is 32% of COMESA GDP
      • GROWTH REDUCES POVERTY: 1% INCREASE IN OVERALL GROWTH ELIMINATES 6 MILLION PEOPLE OUT OF POVERTY
    13. MAJOR FOOD SECURITY SUCCES STORY : MALAWI
      • 2004/2005: SERIOUS FOOD DEFICIT: 800,000 MT; INTERNATIONAL FOOD APPEAL
      • 2005/2006: 400,000 MT FOOD SURPLUS
      • 2006/2007: 1,200,000 MT FOOD SURPLUS
    14. MALAWI: MAJOR CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO LAND LOCKED COUNTRY “SUCCESS”
      • FERTILISER SUBSIDY PROGRAM
      • POLICY FOCUS: BUDGET IS ON THE INCREASE
      • COMPREHENSIVE FOCUS: IRRIGATION, FERTILIZER, MARKETING (ACTIVE COMMODITY EXCHANGE)
    15. COMESA RESPONSES
      • HASTEN REGIONAL INTEGRATION : FREE TRADE AREA; CUSTOMS UNION (2008)
      • CAADP: FOUR PILLAR FOCUS TO COMPREHENSIVELY DEVELOP AGRICULTURE (Land/water, Markets/Infr, Tech)
      • SPECIFIC FOOD PRICE CRISIS ACTIONS:
      • JOINT REGIONAL PLAN: (i) Inputs supply to accelerate food commodity production – similar to NEPAD response (ii) Improved risk management and vulnerability analysis, and (iii) Enhanced regional market access and easing of modalities for doing business in staple crops.
      • ACTESA (Independent Institution: Main Medium to Long Term Action): Staple Crops: MAIZE, RICE, CASSAVA, BANANA, BEANS: POLICIES, SERVICES, COMMERCIALIZATION
      • Development Corridors; NOT JUST TRANSPORT CORRIDORS
    16. KEY ELEMENTS OF ACTESA – THE REGIONAL MEDIUM TO LONG TERM PLAN FOR STAPLE CROPS DEVELOPMENT:
      • POLICIES
      • SERVICES
      • COMMERCIALIZATION
    17. CAADP PILLARS
      • LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT
      • TRADE AND MARKETING INFRASTRUCTURE
      • FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY
      • AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION
    18. THE CASE FOR ENHANCED REGIONAL TRADE IN COMESA
      • ANNUAL COMESA MAIZE IMPORTS OVER THE PERIOD 2004 – 2007:
      • TOTAL: $500 - $850 million
      • AMOUNT SOURCED FROM WITHIN COMESA: $30 - $40 million
      • HENCE BIG OPPORTUNITY AND SCOPE TO EXPAND
      • REGIONAL TRADE
      • CURRENT COMMERCIAL FOOD DEMAND IN AFRICA’s URBAN
      • MARKETS: $50 billion
      • By 2025, this is expected to be: $150 billion
      • WILL NEED COMPETITIVENESS IN MOVING FOOD WITHIN THE
      • REGION FOR REGIONAL STABILITY
      • REGIONAL TRADE ALSO KEY FOR PROVIDING MARKET OUTLET
      • FOR RURAL PRODUCERS
    19. KEY TRANSPORTATION/RELATED ISSUES ISSUES
      • LANDLOCKED COUNTRIES, 9 out of 19 countries (up to 55% of commodity costs)
      • TRANSPORT DELAYS, World Bank Study (each delayed day at the border is equivalent to 600 -1,000 km of covered distance)
      • ISLAND NATIONS, Net Importers of Food – food prices affecting them
      • POOR INTEGRATION FOCUS: EXPORT BANS
    20. Additional Transport Challenges
      • Lack of diversified transport systems based on inter and multi modal transport corridors comprising road, rail, water and air transport.
      • Poor physical connectivity: number of kilometers of paved road per million people is about 60.
      • Compare with Brazil and India: over 1,000 km per million .
      • Developed World, the kilometers of paved road per million people is about 20,000 .
      • Additional cross cutting challenge : Sources of energy: need to aggressively explore hydro-power, bio-fuels and nuclear energy given the abundant resources in the region.
    21. POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS/CONCLUSIONS
      • HARMONIZED ROAD TRANSIT SYSTEMS, COMESA CARRIER’S LICENCE, AXLE LOADING AND MAXIMUM LOADING DIMENSIONS, COMESA YELLOW CARD INSURANCE
      • COMMON INVESTMENT AREA , RECOGNISES
      • COMESA INVESTOR – REDUCED COST OF
      • DOING BUSINESS
      • DEVELOPMENT CORRIDORS, not just transport corridors
      • CAADP: INCREASED INVESTMENT: 10% by Govt: development of LAND AND WATER, MARKETS/INFRASTRUCTURE, FOOD/NUTRITION SECURITY, TECHNOLOGY/EDUCATION
      • PPPs are key: In COMESA good examples are Alliance for Commodity Trade (ACTESA), Livestock (RELPA), Policy for Markets (AAMP). We need to forge more real impact PPPs
    22. IS REGIONAL TRADE THE ANSWER?
      • PARTLY YES, BUT COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSES MUST GO
      • BEYOND CREATING INSTRUMENTS FOR TRADE AND ENSURE:
      • GOOD POLICIES (Trade, Investment, Specific Sectors)
      • SERVICES TO FARMERS (Financial services,
      • Contract/Arbitration Services, Grading/Standards, Market
      • Information, etc)
      • COMMERCIAL INTEGRATION OF PRODUCERS
      • (STRENGTHEN PRODUCER ASSOCIATIONS, TRADERS);
      • Education/Training in marketing, new technologies uptake
      • In Short CAADP implementation, as part and parcel of
      • trade promotion, to de al with the suppy-side constraint.
      • THANK YOU

    + Euforic TeamEuforic Team, 2 years ago

    custom

    1335 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation given by Cris Muyunda (COMESA) at the more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1335
      • 1335 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories