e-Research: A Social Informatics Perspective

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Group

    e-Research: A Social Informatics Perspective - Presentation Transcript

    1. e-Research: A Social Informatics Perspective Eric T. Meyer Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford 31 Oct 2008: Talk presented to the Rob Kling Center for Social Informatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA Oxford e-Social Science Project
    2. The Growth of Teams Source: S. Wuchty et al., (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science 316, 1036 -1039.
    3. Oxford e-Social Science Project
    4. GAIN: Genetic Association Information Network
    5.  
    6. 34 46 58 51 39 57 Data reqs
    7. GeoVUE Node & Legal Issues Virtual London Image Source: Hudson-Smith, Digital Urban Blog at http://digitalurban.blogspot.com/2007/08/ordnance-survey-and-google-statements.html
    8. GeoVUE Node Virtual London Image Source: Hudson-Smith, Digital Urban Blog at http://digitalurban.blogspot.com/2007/08/ordnance-survey-and-google-statements.html
    9. Open Science / Science 2.0
    10. MapTube
    11.  
    12.  
    13. JOVE Characteristics
    14.  
    15. The Pynchon Wiki: Charting Pynchon Online Activity Anticipation Annotation And what’s next? Source: Schroeder, R., & Besten, M. D. (2008). Literary Sleuths Online: e-Research collaboration on the Pynchon Wiki. Information, Communication & Society, 11 (2), 167 - 187.
    16. Weisenburger vs . the Wiki on Pynchon Comparison of book and wiki annotation efforts Source: Schroeder, R., & Besten, M. D. (2008). Literary Sleuths Online: e-Research collaboration on the Pynchon Wiki. Information, Communication & Society, 11 (2), 167 - 187. Annotation Size (no. of words) Entries (topical + alphabetical + page-by-page) Contributors Book Form Annotation: Weisenburger’s Gravity’s Rainbow 162000 904 1 (22) Wiki: Against the Day 455057 120 + 1358 + 4067 235
    17. Top-Down e-Infrastructure Meets Bottom-Up Research Innovation Fitting e-Social Science Visions to the Realities Eric Meyer & William Dutton Oxford e-Social Science Node of UK National Centre for eSocial Science Source: Meyer, Eric T. and Dutton, William H., “ Top-Down e-Infrastructure Meets Bottom-Up Research Innovation: Fitting e-Social Science Visions to the Realities " (Sept 1, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1262211. Submitted to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.
    18. Sample
    19. Bias of the Sample
    20. Bias of the Sample
    21. Bias of the Sample
    22. Bias of the Sample
    23. Type of Research
    24. Certainty Trough or Experience Technology
    25. Source: Dutton & Meyer 2008
    26. Evidence for Uncertainty Trough Source: Dutton, W.H. & Meyer, E.T. (2008). “e-Social Science as an Experience Technology: Distance from, and Attitudes Toward, E-Research“. Presentation for the 4th International Conference on e-Social Science, University of Manchester, 19 June 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1150422
    27. Certainty Trough or Experience Technology
    28. Evidence for an Experience Technology Source: Dutton, W.H. & Meyer, E.T. (2008). “e-Social Science as an Experience Technology: Distance from, and Attitudes Toward, E-Research“. Presentation for the 4th International Conference on e-Social Science, University of Manchester, 19 June 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1150422
    29.  
    30.  
    31. Researcher Clusters
    32. Types of Researchers
    33.  
    34. Types of Researchers
    35.  
    36. Use of Data Sets
    37.  
    38. Gauging the Impact of e-Research in the Social Sciences Eric T. Meyer Ralph Schroeder Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Meyer, E.T., Schroeder, R. (Submitted). Gauging the Impact of e-Research in the Social Sciences. Submitted to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.
    39. Publications in e-Research
    40. Publication Patterns by Discipline Social Sciences (n=175) Computer Science (n=749)
    41.  
    42. Fields, Citations and Authors
    43. Field intersection
    44. Publications and Interdisciplinarity Figure 3. Map showing number of articles by field, and article interdisciplinarity Source: Data retrieved from Scopus using sample search terms; image created with Microsoft Excel .NetMap plugin
    45. Title word clouds by discipline
    46. Transatlantic Digitisation
      • World Wide Web of Humanities project
    47. WWWoH Test Collections Source: Meyer, Madsen, Schroeder (2008).
    48. Usage and Impact Study of JISC-funded Phase 1 Digitisation Projects & Toolkit for the Impact of Digitised Scholarly Resources Eric T. Meyer, Kathryn Eccles, Christine Madsen, Ralph Schroeder, William H. Dutton, Mike Thelwall Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford
    49. Project 1 – Online Historical Population Reports (OHPR/Histpop)
    50. Project 1 – Online Historical Population Reports (OHPR/Histpop)
    51. Project 2 – British Library 19th Century Newspapers
    52. Project 2 – British Library 19th Century Newspapers
    53. Project 3 – British Library Sound Archive
    54. Project 3 – British Library Sound Archive
    55. Project 4 – British Official Publications Collaborative Reader Information Service (BOPCRIS): 18th Century Official Parliamentary Publications Portal 1688-1834
    56. Project 4 – British Official Publications Collaborative Reader Information Service (BOPCRIS): 18th Century Official Parliamentary Publications Portal 1688-1834
    57. Project 5 – Medical journals: the backfiles project
    58. Project 5 – Medical journals: the backfiles project
    59. Project 5 – Medical journals: the backfiles project
    60. TIDSR Toolkit
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
    61. Webometrics
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
      Analytics
    62. Analytics
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
    63. Log File Analysis
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
      Log File Analysis
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
      Log File Analysis
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
      Bibliometrics
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
      Content Analysis
    64. TIDSR Toolkit
      • Quantitative Measures
      • Webometrics
      • Analytics
      • Log file analysis
      • Scientometrics / bibliometrics
      • Content analysis of media coverage
      • Qualitative Measures
      • Stakeholder interviews (project & institutional personnel, user communities, subject specialists, funding bodies)
      • Resource surveys
      • User feedback analysis
      • Focus groups
      • Questionnaires
    65. WWWoH and TIDSR Release
      • Project ending event scheduled for 19 March 2009 in Oxford
      • Details will be provided on: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/project.cfm?id=51
      • Project URLs:
      • HistPop: http://www.histpop.org
      • Newspapers: http://www.bl.uk/collections/britishnewspapers1800to1900.html
      • British Library Sound archive: http://sounds.bl.uk/
      • BOPCRIS: http://www.bopcris.ac.uk
      • Medical backfiles: http://library.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_WTD037630.html
    66. Oxford e-Social Science Project
    67. Oxford e-Social Science Project
    68. Oxford e-Social Science Project
    69.  
    70. Online visibility and Gatekeeping Source: Meyer, E.T., Schroeder, R. (Submitted). The World Wide Web of Research and Access to Knowledge. Submitted to Social Science Computer Review.
    71.  
    72. OII Teaching
      • http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/teaching/
      • Summer Doctoral Programme
      • MSc in the Social Science of the Internet
      • DPhil in Information, Communication and the Social Sciences
    73. Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Eric T. Meyer [email_address] http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/meyer Slides available at: http://www.slideshare.net/etmeyer Oxford e-Social Science Project

    + Eric MeyerEric Meyer, 2 years ago

    custom

    626 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Talk on various e-Research projects given to the Ro more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 626
      • 626 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 14
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events