e-Research 2.0: Taking the measure of Web 2.0 in e-Research

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    e-Research 2.0: Taking the measure of Web 2.0 in e-Research - Presentation Transcript

    1. e-Research 2.0 Taking the measure of Web 2.0 in e-Research Eric T. Meyer, Lucy Power, Ralph Schroeder discussing work of the Oxford e-Social Science (OeSS) Node of NCeSS Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Oxford e-Social Science Project
    2. Overview
      • Science 2.0/Open Science
      • GeoVue
      • JOVE
      • Science Blogging
      • The Pynchon Wiki
      • Science 2.0 and e-Research
    3. Open Science / Science 2.0
    4. Open Science / Science 2.0
    5. GeoVUE Virtual London Image Source: Hudson-Smith, Digital Urban Blog at http://digitalurban.blogspot.com/2007/08/ordnance-survey-and-google-statements.html
    6. GeoVUE
    7.  
    8. MapTube
    9.  
    10.  
    11. JOVE Characteristics
    12. Geographic Distribution
    13. Geographic Distribution
    14. Science Blogging
    15. Science Blogging Scienceblogs.com Researchblogging.org Postgenomic.org 100% 335 100 135 100 # of posts 9% 31 6% 6 1% 1 24% 24 Photo-Multimedia 3% 9 3% 3 3% 4 2% 2 Other 14% 46 8% 8 18% 24 14% 14 Blog response 5% 17 10% 10 1% 2 5% 5 Own work 7% 23 11% 11 5% 7 5% 5 Academia 22% 73 16% 16 23% 31 26% 26 Academic 41% 136 46% 46 49% 66 24% 24 News Totals Researchblogging Postgenomic ScienceBlogs Coding
    16. The Pynchon Wiki
      • A Wiki for annotating a contemporary American novel
      • A 1085 page novel is annotated between November 2006 and early 2007
      • The equivalent single author annotation in book form takes longer than a decade
      • A flexible, highly motivating, distributed collaborative effort – a model for other forms of online collaboration?
    17. The Pynchon Wiki
      • A notoriously reclusive novelist;
      • Author of
        • Gravity’s Rainbow, annotated in book form
        • Against the Day, annotated in Wiki form
        • Arcana integral to story-lines
    18.  
    19.  
    20. The Pynchon Wiki: Charting Pynchon Online Activity Anticipation Annotation And what’s next?
    21. Weisenburger vs . the Wiki on Pynchon Comparison of book and wiki annotation efforts Annotation Size (no. of words) Entries (topical + alphabetical + page-by-page) Contibutors Book Form Annotation: Weisenburger’s Gravity’s Rainbow 162000 904 1 (22) Wiki: Against the Day 455057 120 + 1358 + 4067 235
    22. The Pynchon Wiki: Wiki Edits over Time
    23. The Pynchon Wiki
      • A race to finish the ‘detective work’
      • Encouraging amateur contribution and learning from other contributors
      • A model for self-organized collaboration?
      • ‘ Finalization’ of reference work or endless discussion?
      • Reshaping how scholarly resources are distributed, and how we collaborate
    24. Science 2.0 and e-Research
      • Technology affordances for generativity
        • Generativity in this context includes content creation, flexible use, accessibility, ability to distribute
      • Institutional ties are generally weakened
      • Enhancing existing information and behavioural patterns or building analogues is much easier than expecting profound changes in outlook and behaviour
        • Easier to hook into existing communities in ways they understand to make their work easier, better, faster, cooler, more accessible, more widely distributed, more measurable, more sharable, more collaborative, more community-oriented
      • Ability to generate research materials towards a shared resource on the side of input
      • Output is online, accessible and open to revision or more input
      • Off-the-shelf technology is used and only informal ‘institutions’ are generated or involved
      • Contributions, technology and dissemination are thus bottom-up and ‘open’, including outside academia
      Science 2.0 and e-Research
    25. Science 2.0 and e-Research Outlook: Benefits and Challenges
      • Bottom-up driven e-Research generated by user needs
      • Large-scale involvement by research communities, including non-academics
      • ‘ Open’ research, harnessing the ‘wealth of networks’ (user-generated content)
      • Lack of recognition for tool development and contributions to resources
      • Blurring boundaries between science and non-science and lack of quality control
      • Diffuseness of ‘research’, visibility in the midst of attention deluge
    26.  
    27. Oxford e-Social Science (OeSS) Node of NCeSS @ Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Eric T. Meyer Research Fellow [email_address] http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/meyer Lucy Power DPhil Student [email_address] http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/power/ Ralph Schroeder James Martin Research Fellow [email_address] http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/schroeder Oxford e-Social Science Project

    + Eric MeyerEric Meyer, 2 years ago

    custom

    749 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Paper presented at Oxford e-Research 08, Sept 11-13 more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 749
      • 749 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 5
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories