Legal Framework and Related Results on eAccessibility: A     Legislation Review                            Robert Huffaker...
LINK TO PAPER:http://bit.ly/LegRevHuff
ABSTRACT– Examine the way governments implement  and augment the state of eAccessibility– Review the eAccessibility legisl...
SCOPE          Websites   SSTs   Mobile appsUNCRPDEUSPAINIRELAND
INTRO– How people with disabilities  use ICT– What is MeAC? Measures  tech and policy
UNCRPD: Conclusions– Websites, SSTs and mobile apps: UNCRPD most  relevant
European Union: Conclusions– Supporing websites, not so much with SSTs  and mobile apps– SSTs seen from built environment ...
Ireland: Conclusions– Below EU average on every policy  implementation score– For technology scores Ireland scored above  ...
Spain: Conclusions– MeAC: dipped below the EU average only  twice, for ATM technology and vending  machine technology.– Ab...
Overall Conclusions– Websites: more enforcement– SSTs: ICT, not just built environment– Mobile Apps: how to create binding...
Thank you!       Robert Huffaker  rhuffaker@technosite.eses.linkedin.com/in/robhuffaker     Skype: robhuffaker  www.robert...
Legal Framework and Related Results on eAccessibility: A Legislation Review
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Legal Framework and Related Results on eAccessibility: A Legislation Review

413 views

Published on

Presentation given at the University of Maastricht in January 2013

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
413
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Legal Framework and Related Results on eAccessibility: A Legislation Review

  1. 1. Legal Framework and Related Results on eAccessibility: A Legislation Review Robert Huffaker Marie Curie Fellow at DREAM Programme Technical Officer at Technosite External PhD Student at NUIG CDLP DREAM Training Event Maastricht University - January 2013
  2. 2. LINK TO PAPER:http://bit.ly/LegRevHuff
  3. 3. ABSTRACT– Examine the way governments implement and augment the state of eAccessibility– Review the eAccessibility legislation framework via UNCRPD, EU, and Member State (Ireland and Spain) level– Websites, Self Service Terminals and mobile phone apps.
  4. 4. SCOPE Websites SSTs Mobile appsUNCRPDEUSPAINIRELAND
  5. 5. INTRO– How people with disabilities use ICT– What is MeAC? Measures tech and policy
  6. 6. UNCRPD: Conclusions– Websites, SSTs and mobile apps: UNCRPD most relevant
  7. 7. European Union: Conclusions– Supporing websites, not so much with SSTs and mobile apps– SSTs seen from built environment aspect– Directive on the Accessibility of Public Sector Bodies Websites
  8. 8. Ireland: Conclusions– Below EU average on every policy implementation score– For technology scores Ireland scored above the EU average only twice: in urban environment and for all technology indicators– Curious: low scores and lots of legislation
  9. 9. Spain: Conclusions– MeAC: dipped below the EU average only twice, for ATM technology and vending machine technology.– Above EU average on every other technology case and also for every policy case analysed..
  10. 10. Overall Conclusions– Websites: more enforcement– SSTs: ICT, not just built environment– Mobile Apps: how to create binding legislation?
  11. 11. Thank you! Robert Huffaker rhuffaker@technosite.eses.linkedin.com/in/robhuffaker Skype: robhuffaker www.roberthuffaker.com

×