Method and fieldwork in a hermeneutical perspective
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Method and fieldwork in a hermeneutical perspective

on

  • 397 views

A look at what scientific method and scientific theory means

A look at what scientific method and scientific theory means

Statistics

Views

Total Views
397
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
397
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Method and fieldwork in a hermeneutical perspective Method and fieldwork in a hermeneutical perspective Presentation Transcript

    • Method and Fieldwork in aHermeneutical Perspective Espen Suenson Åbo Akademi 13.2.2012
    • 1 stpoint:Science is argumentation. We argue to convince
    • Science is argumentation•  Numbers can’t speak for themselves•  We need to know when planning an experiment what the numbers are for
    • Science is argumentation•  What is written in the grant proposal has an influence on the subsequent research
    • Science is argumentation•  Perelman & Olbrecths-Tyteca (1958): Convincing yourself is a special case of convincing others
    • Science is argumentation•  Gadamer (1960): All thought is directed by application•  For a scientist, the application is to convince other scientists
    • Science is argumentation•  Latour & Woolgar (1979): empirical demonstration that the natural sciences are as much about argumentation as any other
    • 2nd point:The scientific argument
    • The scientific argumentA point we wish to make + form + evidence
    • The scientific argument•  Example (Heidenberg, Nåls, Porres 2008: Statechart features and pre-release maintenance defects, p. 465)•  Quote: “The understandability points ratio and the assessed difficulty for changeability are the two major indicators that ModelA was easier to understand and change.”
    • “The understandability points ratio and the assesseddifficulty for changeability are the two major indicatorsthat ModelA was easier to understand and change.”•  Form: enthymeme•  Major premise: understandability points ratio and assessed difficulty indicate ease of understanding and changing•  Minor premise: “in Table 4 we can see that ModelA generated better values for all four data points.”•  Conclusion: ModelA is easier to understand and change
    • “The understandability points ratio and the assesseddifficulty for changeability are the two major indicatorsthat ModelA was easier to understand and change.”•  Point we wish to make: It is easier to understand models written using a better design style
    • “The understandability points ratio and the assesseddifficulty for changeability are the two major indicatorsthat ModelA was easier to understand and change.”•  Evidence: Paired sample t-test comparing Model1 – ModelA.
    • The scientific argument•  This kind of rhetorical analysis can be done with different choices of base unit size: sentence, paragraph, section, article, book …
    • 3rd point:scientific evidence depends on interpretation
    • Scientific evidence•  Evidence that cannot be understood is useless
    • Scientific evidence•  We can always get more evidence, hence interpretation is important, not quantity
    • Scientific evidence•  Evidence and interpretation is linked by the point that we’re trying to make•  This point is: the research goal
    • 4 thpoint:What does this have to do with fieldwork?
    • Fieldwork•  Fieldwork is a method for gathering evidence
    • Fieldwork•  Basic idea: talk to people, see what they’re doing
    • Fieldwork•  You have to solve problems and adjust your method as you go along•  People are unpredictable. If you knew what they’re going to say there would be no point in talking to them
    • 5 point: thSo method is collection of evidence. What is theory?
    • Scientific theory•  Gadamer: No understanding can take place without prejudice•  Prejudice: what we expect to see
    • Scientific theory•  Theory is prejudices written down, so they can be discussed and checked
    • Scientific theory•  Can we write down all our prejudices, i.e. all we know? Of course not. Hence, theory presents a certain perspective, determined by application
    • Final point:Scientific method is a dialogue with evidence
    • Science as dialogue•  ‘Dialogue’ is a metaphor
    • Science as dialogue•  Why a metaphor?•  Makes is easier to remember, easier to understand
    • Science as dialogue•  Why is it a good metaphor?•  In science, as in dialogue, it is important to ‘listen’ to the evidence
    • Science as dialogue•  To select a method and stick to it no matter what the observations show is like a person that only talks about himself and asks questions without listening to the answers
    • Conclusion:Why is this stuff important? Because it makes your lifeharder if you’re not aware of what you’re doing.