Aapb 2007 Oral Paper Session 3 Sowder,Gevirtz,Shapiro - Presentation Transcript
Erik Sowder, PhD, BCIAC Richard Gevirtz, PhD, BCIAC Warren Shapiro, MD, FAAP California School of Professional Psychology at Alliant International University, San Diego, CA in collaboration with Kaiser Permanente/ Southern California Permanente Medical Group HRV Biofeedback for Patients with Recurrent Abdominal Pain
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Man should strive to have his intestines relaxed all the days of his life
Moses Maimonedes , AD 1135-1204
A good set of bowels is worth more to a man than any quantity of brains.
Josh Billings ( Henry Wheeler Shaw ), AD 1818-1885
Epidemiology
10-30% of children and adolescents have recurrent abdominal pain.
5-15% of middle school and high school students have symptoms consistent with IBS
Approx 5% of middle and high school students note dyspeptic symptoms.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
More than one third of children complain of pain lasting 2 weeks or longer.
15% of U.S adults report symptoms that are consistent with the diagnosis of the irritable bowel syndrome.
IBS is the most common diagnosis made by gastroenterologists in the US and accounts for 12% of visits to primary care providers
School Age children who had complained of at least 3 episodes of pain severe enough to affect their activities over a period longer than 3 months. JOHN APLEY
The Irritable Bowel Syndrome accounts for an estimated $8 billion in direct medical costs and $25 billion in indirect costs annually in the US
OVER THE PAST 2 DECADES THER HAS BEEN A TENFOLD INCREMENT IN MEDLINE CITATIONS ABOUT IBS.
International Index of Sophistication
The more sophisticated the country,the more little bellyachers will it have. JOHN APLEY
A deficient freedom of relaxation in some part of the intestinal canal. JOHN HOWSHIP: Surgeon To St George’s infirmary. London 1830
Intestinal neuroses diminish in frequency as we descend the social scale. HAWKINS 1906.
SYMPTOMS IN SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN WITH RECURRENT ABDOMINAL PAIN OFTEN MEET THE ROME CRITERIA FOR FUNCTIONAL ABDOMINAL PAIN IN ADULTS.
Neurotransmitter Imbalance
5% of serotonin is located in the CNS
95% is in the GI tract.
Serotonin release results in intestinal secretions and the peristaltic reflex.
Patient with IBS may have increased serotonin levels in plasma and the rectosigmoid colon
OVER THE PAST 2 DECADES THERE HAS BEEN A SHIFT FROM
Disease based Reductionistic Model with a single underlying biological etiology
TO
Integrated biopsychosocial model of illness: altered motility,enhanced visceral sensitivity,brain gut dysregulation all modified by sociocultural and psychosocial influences .
Psychosocial Factors Altered Motility Distension Spasm Visceral Hypersensitivity Pain Bloating Urge to defecate Pathophysiologic Factors in the Development of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Epidemiology of Functional Abdominal Pain [Recurrent Abdominal Pain (RAP) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)]
The most Common GI disorders in Primary Care
11%-20% 0f US population (Drossman,1993, Talley et al., 1992)
25% seek care
12%-19.5% of Primary Care visits (Longstreth & Wolde-Tsadik,1993)
$8 Billion annually in direct medical costs ($742 vs $429 Annual costs, Gralnek, 1998)
Research over the past 10 to 15 years suggests that RAP is associated with
family illness behavior
increased somatic and emotional distress
increased anxiety and depression in parents and children
the supporting evidence remains inadequate and inconsistent for any particular model ( Fritz et al., 1997 )
Autonomic dysfunction appears to be a promising etiological factor
Gastrointestinal motility changes such as a decreased vagal activation of gastric motility and regulation of tone and compliance of the gastrointestinal tract may be due to alteration in autonomic output (Mayer, 1999).
Dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system may be reflecting changes occurring in sympathetic output to the small and large intestine.
IBS
Dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system is a component of IBS
(Aggarwal et al., 1994; Karling et al., 1998; Smart & Atkinson, 1987; Lee et al., 1998).
Aggarwal et al. (1994) studied variability in pulse rate, through use of a continuous electrocardiogram (EKG) strip measuring the R-R interval (RRI) to demonstrate that the parasympathetic system is less efficient at achieving homeostasis in IBS sufferers.
These researchers used the RRI to calculate vagal response, a measure of vagal dysfunction.
ANS as a mechanism in RAP/IBS
Literature on RAP/IBS
Deficit in ANS recovery to stress
Enhanced behavioral and subjective response to pain
Most currently empirically validated treatments make use of this hypothesis to some extent.
Karling et al. (1998) found autonomic dysregulation in IBS sufferers by using a spectral analysis of low and high frequency activity.
(Gupta V, Sheffield D, Verne GN., 2002)
Evidence for autonomic dysregulation in the irritable bowel syndrome.
(Iovino P, Azpiroz F, Domingo E, Malagelada JR., 1995)
The sympathetic nervous system modulates perception and reflex responses to gut distention in humans.
Waring WS, Chui M, Japp A, Nicol EF, Ford MJ.
Autonomic cardiovascular responses are impaired in women with irritable bowel
Previous studies (Gevirtz, 2000; Whitehead, 1992; Bassotti & Whitehead, 1994) have shown biofeedback to be successful in the treatment of IBS.
Figure 1. Visual Analog scale from daily pain diary records, pre & post treatment, by group (Humphreys, Gevirtz, & Jacobs, 1999) Pre = Pre-treatment Post = Post-treatment 4 component = fiber+biofeedback+cognitive restructuring+parental support 3 component = fiber+biofeedback+cognitive restructuring 2 component = fiber+biofeedback
Figure 2. Parent observation rating of pain, pre & post treatment, by group (Humphreys, Gevirtz, & Jacobs, 1999) Pre = Pre-treatment Post = Post-treatment 4 component = fiber + biofeedback + cognitive restructuring + parental support 3 component = fiber + biofeedback + cognitive restructuring 2 component = fiber + biofeedback
Objectives
1) Clinically investigate the efficacy of a treatment protocol for RAP that focuses on autonomic balance.
2) Investigate autonomic function as a mechanism of RAP.
RAP Patients and Healthy Control Participants
RAP
Inclusion Criteria
RAP diagnosis
Ages 5-17
Female and male
Exclusion Criteria
Lactose Intolerant
Urinary tract infections
Recent head trauma
Medications that could interfere with treatment
Current medical treatment for RAP
Recent/ related surgical procedure before/ during biofeedback
Remarkable mental status
Healthy Control
Inclusion Criteria
Healthy
Ages 5-17
Female and male
Exclusion Criteria
Medications
Remarkable mental status
Procedures
RAP group (n=20)
Reviewed patients’ medical records at Kaiser/Children’s Specialists
Recruited participants (verbal / flyers) during well-checks at Kaiser / Children’s Specialists
2 sessions ambulatory HRV monitoring
Pre/Post Assessment: VivoMetrics, Inc. LifeShirt,tm
The first non-invasive, ambulatory monitoring system that continuously collects, records and analyzes a broad range of cardiopulmonary parameters.
Made it possible to monitor children in their natural environments over a full day.
Procedures
Healthy Control Group
Attend Kaiser or Children’s Specialists for 2 30-minute sessions (8 weeks apart) to connect LifeShirt
Non-invasively monitored during 4 to 8 hours of daily activities both occasions.
Total participating time, including explanation of the study and forms, ambulatory monitoring sessions, and answering any questions, was approximately 9-17 hours.
Procedures
HRV Biofeedback for RAP group
Patients diagnosed with RAP by a pediatric gastroenterologist and referred for Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Biofeedback.
Patients seen by 1 of 3 pre-doctoral interns at Kaiser Permanente Pediatric Gastroenterology Department or Children’s Specialists of San Diego for an average of 6 sessions.
All sessions were conducted in a treatment room or medical office at Kaiser Permanente or Children’s Specialists of San Diego.
Psychophysiological aspects of Treatment
Sympathetic disruption of the gut
Parasympathetic influences
Using aspects of heart rate variability to create autonomic homeostasis (Lehrer, Vaschillo, et al, 2001)
Valley Pacer set at 7.0 bpm Respiration Heart Rate Peak= 79 Valley= 63
Typical Home Biofeedback Practice Regimen
Daily Homework Assignments (Reviewed in weekly sessions)
Takes 20 minutes/day
Patients keep daily pain/stress diaries and practice logs
Patients use self-monitoring practice tools
Measures
Pain severity:
visual analogue scale completed by the participants.
Symptom frequency:
number of episodes per week.
Autonomic regulation:
Low frequency to high frequency ratio (sympatho-vagal balance)
Percent low frequency during resonant frequency breathing
Exploratory Measures
NN50
High frequency activity
Very low frequency activity
LF/HF ratio
Data Preparation
IBIs visually screened for ectopic beats and interpolated values inserted
Respiration rate, tidal volume and movement partialled out using regression analyses
Remaining IBIs submitted to Biosignal software analyses
Additionally, nominated 5 minute segments with even respiration, tidal volume, and no movement and measured peak valley differences
0
RAP
RAP
0
0
0
Summary
Many previous studies have established autonomic dysregulation (including low vagal tone) as a component of IBS.
(Gupta et al. 2002, Aggarwal et al., 1994; Karling, 1998; Smart & Atkinson, 1987; Lee 1998)
As an example, Waring et al., (2004) examined adult IBS patients in comparison to healthy controls and found a significantly lower vagal tone in the IBS patients, as indicated by their significantly higher LF: HF and lower HF level.
The results in the present study appear to support those found by Waring et al., (2004), in a pediatric RAP patient population.
The present study also shows LF: HF to be significantly higher at time one in RAP patients than in healthy controls, which supports the hypothesis that the RAP group would have lower vagal tone at time one.
These findings provide evidence for autonomic dysregulation as being a potential causal factor for RAP.
Previous studies (Gevirtz, 2000; Whitehead, 1992; Bassotti & Whitehead, 1994) have shown biofeedback to be successful in the treatment of IBS.
Similarly, the present study’s hypothesis was supported in that HRV biofeedback appeared to be a very effective way to reduce pain.
In the present study,
75% of children with RAP
significant reduction in pain intensity and frequency
20% of children with RAP
total elimination of pain
Treatment Efficacy
The average RAP child prior to HRV biofeedback
fairly severe pain 4 to 5 times/ week
(e.g., severity rating of 7 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10=most severe)
The composite average child after HRV biofeedback
mild level of pain severity 1 to 2 times/ week
(e.g., severity rating of 2)
A positive correlation was found between decreased self-reported pain scores and decreased LF:HF in children with RAP.
Summary
1) Mechanism
ANS dysregulation may be a mechanism in etiology & maintenance of RAP.
RAP group had more autonomic dysregulation at baseline versus non-RAP
2) Outcome
ANS may be a mediator for improvement in RAP
HRV biofeedback treatment improved RAP symptoms in correlation with improved ANS function
0 comments
Post a comment