in doing so push the market and benefit society generally
Technically and in liberalising the telecommunications market
NRENs should be considered a NATIONAL ASSET for DEVELOPMENT
Slide
MARNET the NREN of Macedonia (source: EARNEST Study 2007) Slide
GÉANT2 operated by DANTE on behalf of Europe’s NRENs Slide
GÉANT2 Facts and Figures
7th generation of pan-European research network infrastructure – continuation of a success story
Provision of network connectivity and services
Project partners include the EC, 30 of Europe’s national research and education networks (NRENs), DANTE and TERENA
Connects 34 European countries and serves over 3500 research and education establishments across Europe
Over 30 million users
Funded jointly by NRENs and European Commission
Project timescale September 2004 - spring 2009
Slide
Slide
GÉANT3
Proposal for GN3 project submitted to the EC in September 2008, expected start April 2009
Three more NRENs will be connected: MARNET, AMRES (Serbia) and MREN (Montenegro)
Extend success of GN2 in supporting e-Science (LHC, e-VLBI, DEISA) end-to-end, to become a dependable service component of the European e-Infrastructure for a wide range of scientific disciplines
Infrastructure, Network Services, such as security, end-to-end performance monitoring, AAI, RTD activities and support activities
Slide
Evolution of the Market Telecommunications Liberalisation Slide Relative Costs of Connectivity v Number of Suppliers Monopoly supply = High costs Markets open above 4 Evolution of Market Competitiveness GÉANT Offers 1996 – 2001 Note: LOGARITHMIC SCALE Changes are orders of magnitude Material from SERENATE Report, published TERENA 2003 – Acknowledgements to DANTE
Example – Hybrid Networking
Hybrid Networking
Flexibility of IP core with any-to-any routing
Large Traffic flows (e.g. Grids, Astronomic Data . . .) by-passes router cloud. Has an End-to-End optical path
Uses same underlying fibre infrastructure
Slide Traditional IP network Flexibility of IP core with any-to-any routing Large Traffic flows must traverse a path through all routers from end-to-end Costs of O-E-O conversion and bottlenecks
Example – Federations Slide Federation University B University A Student Resource
Federated Network Access - eduroam
eduroam = roaming for education
Federation of national eduroam federations
To provide network access between the institutions connected to eduroam
Using the same credentials they would use to get on-line at their home institution
First real test back in 2003
As part of a TF-Mobility test
Since 2005 eduroam is part of GÉANT2
Slide
Other Examples of Benefits
NRENs undertake applied research in a way the commercial concerns would find difficult.
Leads to testbeds, pilot services which lead to new services.
These find their way to commercial ISPs and benefit the public at large .
bring the benefits of collective buying power
provides savings for the community and the country as a whole
Internationally this is achieved by DANTE with GÉANT
Slide
Most Importantly
The independence of NRENs is a valuable asset for advising in the development of national policy on education, research and IT
NRENs occupy a position of trust in this respect and are called on to provide guidance uninfluenced by the pressures and demands of commercial business
Many NRENs are recognised as being a pool of expertise that is an asset to its country
Slide
Questions may be asked
Why is there a need for NRENs when commercial ISPs exist?
Need for central funding of the NREN, can’t the end users pay the bills themselves?
The existence of the NREN will distort the Internet market and take away market share?
Isn’t the NREN operating a public service and should it be regarded as a public operator conforming to the local legislation?
Slide
Why is there a need for NRENs when commercial ISPs exist?
NRENs are usually not-for-profit organisations that seek to support their community in the best possible way, technically and economically
Commercial ISPs exist to make a profit
NRENs are motivated to provide the innovation and new services needed by education and research
Slide
Why is there a need for NRENs to receive Government funding?
Government support essential to emerging NREN
Generally, a hybrid funding model may be beneficial
Government can take the longer term view funding start-up costs, innovation and upgrade.
Slide User/Client Funding SHORT TERM horizon Non-User /Client Funding LONG TERM horizon
The regulatory position of NRENs
NRENs offer their services to the well bounded and closed community of education and research users.
NRENs are not in the business of providing public services and hence should not be regarded as public network operators.
It makes good sense for NRENs to adopt best industry practice in the operation of their networks despite being a non-public network operator.
Slide
EU Regulatory Requirements for Data Collection and Retention Directive
NRENs operate advanced networks with complex topologies
Any requirement to provide complete accounting for, or filtering of, traffic on the backbone would therefore be likely to require the re-introduction of single points of failure or congestion
Cost – who will pay?
Slide
Possible Distortion of the Local Internet Market
The NRENs operate a network for a closed user group that have advanced requirements
These requirements are not generally satisfied by commercial offerings from ISP.
The NRENs do not compete with commercial ISPs, but offer a different level of service in parallel.
It is beneficial for both NRENs and ISP to develop collaborative links and work together
Slide
Summary of Arguments
NRENs occupy a special position outside of the commercial Internet market.
They operate as not-for-profit organisations serving a closed user group consequently there is a case for them to be designated as non-public networks.
National governments should regard their NRENs as a national asset to be fostered and supported by central contributions to a hybrid funding model.
0 comments
Post a comment