0
Untangling child welfare disparities: Adoption outcomes for Black children with disabilities Elspeth Slayter, Ph.D. School...
Adoption in 2003… Slayer Slayter
Disparate adoption outcomes <ul><li>Race and ethnicity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Multiethnic Placement Act, 1994, 1996 </li></...
Slayer Slayter
Guiding conceptual framework: Intersectionality <ul><li>Kimberlee Crenshaw  </li></ul><ul><li>Multiplicity of oppression <...
Group comparisons Slayer
Research questions Slayer
Slayer
Sample and comparison groups Slayer
Definitions of disability Slayer
Aim 1: Age and gender <ul><li>Age: </li></ul><ul><li>Black youth with disabilities  -  older   than non-Black counterparts...
Aim 1: Types of disability <ul><li>Multiple disability :  </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilitie...
Aim 1: Diagnosis of  ‘emotionally disturbed’ <ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities  27% less likely  (38% vs...
Slayer Aim 2: Time between termination of parental rights and adoption Group comparison Mean (Standard deviation) t All Bl...
Aim 3: Adoptive family structure <ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities  </li></ul><ul><li>3.4 times more lik...
Aim 3: Black adoptive families <ul><li>Mixed support for hypothesis </li></ul><ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disab...
Aim 3: Pre-adoptive relationship <ul><li>Kin :  Mixed support for hypothesis </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Black youth with vs. wi...
Aim 3: Post-adoption funding <ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities  more likely to receive  any Federal or s...
Aim 3: Post-adoption funding <ul><li>Black youth with vs. without disabilities  2 times more likely to receive subsidy  (9...
Discussion <ul><li>Characteristics </li></ul><ul><li>Equal proportions of adoptees by gender – role of subsidy?  </li></ul...
Discussion <ul><li>Adoptive families </li></ul><ul><li>MEPA after-effects? </li></ul><ul><li>Black single parents more lik...
Future research <ul><li>Which Black foster children with disabilities remain in foster care awaiting adoption? </li></ul><...
Acknowledgements <ul><li>Sheron Adair , MSW &  Evenns Semerzier , MSW, Graduate Research Assistants </li></ul><ul><li>Nati...
Slayer Removal from family (imminent risk of abuse, neglect) Return to family within 22 months with concurrent planning Wo...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Slayter Untangling Adoption Disparities For Children With Disabilities

213

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
213
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Intersectionality, as discussed by Kimberle Crenshaw, is a contemporary social and legal framework used to assess the ways in which intersections of race, ethnicity, class, gender, or other “axes of difference” (e.g. disability status, stigmatized involvement in the child protective service system) may impact health (Crenshaw, 2004). Contextualizing the “multiplicity of oppression,” this framework allows for the illumination of the complex relationships and interactions between, for example, race, gender and disability, and the ways in which these factors can impact or structure the realities of vulnerable populations.
  • AFCARS disability definition : Physical, visual, hearing, mental retardation or major medical condition
  • H 1 : Black adoptees with disabilities - longest wait
  • STATE AGENCY REACH OUT TO FAMILIES OF COLOR PLEASE ADOPT – INFORM COMMUNITY ABOUT THESE DATA – GIVING THEM CHOICES ABOUT BECOMING INVOLVED FIRST, STEPS, GUARDIANSHIPS, MENTORING TO ADOPTION OR PRAY FOR A CHILD = CONGREGATION TAKE ON CHILD BLACK ORGS AND COMMUNITY AGENCIES NOT ONLY THE CHURCH BEING IN THE COMMUNITY WITHOUT ASKING FOR ANYTHING MIGHT HELP TOO – STREET CRED.
  • Transcript of "Slayter Untangling Adoption Disparities For Children With Disabilities"

    1. 1. Untangling child welfare disparities: Adoption outcomes for Black children with disabilities Elspeth Slayter, Ph.D. School of Social Work Salem State College July 16, 2009 2 nd National Conference on Child and Family Programs and Policy Slayer
    2. 2. Adoption in 2003… Slayer Slayter
    3. 3. Disparate adoption outcomes <ul><li>Race and ethnicity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Multiethnic Placement Act, 1994, 1996 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Age </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Older children </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Gender </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Boys and young men </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Disability </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Special needs” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Subsidies </li></ul></ul>Slayer
    4. 4. Slayer Slayter
    5. 5. Guiding conceptual framework: Intersectionality <ul><li>Kimberlee Crenshaw </li></ul><ul><li>Multiplicity of oppression </li></ul><ul><li>Axes of difference </li></ul><ul><li>Complex interactions impact reality </li></ul><ul><li>Interconnectivity in producing/perpetuating systems of oppression </li></ul><ul><li>Potential for interconnectivity </li></ul><ul><li>in adoption from foster care </li></ul><ul><li>Age x gender x race x disability ? </li></ul>Slayer
    6. 6. Group comparisons Slayer
    7. 7. Research questions Slayer
    8. 8. Slayer
    9. 9. Sample and comparison groups Slayer
    10. 10. Definitions of disability Slayer
    11. 11. Aim 1: Age and gender <ul><li>Age: </li></ul><ul><li>Black youth with disabilities - older than non-Black counterparts (7 ½ vs. 7, t=3.86***) </li></ul><ul><li>Gender: </li></ul><ul><li>Hypotheses not supported </li></ul><ul><li>Black youth with disabilities – more likely to be male than non-Black counterparts (55% vs. 53%, OR=1.1*) </li></ul>Slayer
    12. 12. Aim 1: Types of disability <ul><li>Multiple disability : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities almost 2 times more likely (1.4% vs. 0.8%, OR=1.65**) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>‘ Mental retardation’ : </li></ul><ul><li>Less likely among Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities (9.4% vs. 12.1%, OR=0.75***) </li></ul><ul><li>More likely among Black boys with disabilities (9.7% vs. 9.0%, OR=1.03***) </li></ul>Slayer
    13. 13. Aim 1: Diagnosis of ‘emotionally disturbed’ <ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities 27% less likely (38% vs. 44%, OR=0.73***) </li></ul><ul><li>Black youth with vs. without disabilities 36.4 times more likely (38% vs. 2%, OR=36.4***) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Black boys with disabililties 17% less likely than Black girls with disabilities (37% vs. 40%, OR=0.83**) </li></ul></ul>Slayer
    14. 14. Slayer Aim 2: Time between termination of parental rights and adoption Group comparison Mean (Standard deviation) t All Black youth All Non-Black youth 1.98 (0.02) 1.41 (0.01) t=21.2*** All Black boys All Black girls 2.37 (0.26) 1.60 (0.02) t=4.0*** Youth with disabilities Youth without disabilities 1.81 (0.02) 1.60 (0.01) t=7.70*** Black youth with disabilities Non-Black youth with disabilities 1.87 (0.29) 1.63(0.01) t=12.7*** Black youth with disabilities Black youth without disabilities 1.91 (0.03) 2.06 (0.02) t=4.1*** Black boys with disabilities Black girls with disabilities 1.91 (0.04) 1.90 (0.05) NS
    15. 15. Aim 3: Adoptive family structure <ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities </li></ul><ul><li>3.4 times more likely adopted by single, vs. two-parent families (33% vs. 15%, OR=3.40***) </li></ul><ul><li>Black youth with vs. without disabilities 35% less likely to be adopted by single parents (33% vs. 47%, OR=0.65***) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Black boys vs. girls 23% less likely (30% vs. 36%, OR=0.77***) </li></ul></ul>Slayer
    16. 16. Aim 3: Black adoptive families <ul><li>Mixed support for hypothesis </li></ul><ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities 54 times more likely (53% vs. 2%, OR=54.4***) </li></ul><ul><li>Black youth with disabilities vs. without 46% less likely (53% vs. 72%, OR=0.54***) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Black boys vs. girls with disabilities 18% less likely (50% vs. 55%, OR=0.82**) </li></ul></ul>Slayer
    17. 17. Aim 3: Pre-adoptive relationship <ul><li>Kin : Mixed support for hypothesis </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Black youth with vs. without disabilities 43% less likely (12% vs. 20%, OR=0.57***) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Foster parent : 13%-22% less likely </li></ul><ul><li>Non-relative, non-foster parent : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities 3 times more likely (33% vs. 15%, OR=2.77***) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Black youth with vs. without disabilities 1.3 times more likely (17% vs. 12%, OR=1.32***) </li></ul></ul>Slayer
    18. 18. Aim 3: Post-adoption funding <ul><li>Black vs. non-Black youth with disabilities more likely to receive any Federal or state subsidy (93% vs. 91%, OR=1.30***) </li></ul><ul><li>Receive equal $ state subsidies compared to non-Black youth with disabilities in most states ($1,452 vs. $1,001, t=4.09***) </li></ul>Slayer
    19. 19. Aim 3: Post-adoption funding <ul><li>Black youth with vs. without disabilities 2 times more likely to receive subsidy (93% vs.87%, OR=1.97***) </li></ul><ul><li>Receive larger $ subsidies than Black youth without disabilities ($1,452 vs. $1,001, t=4.09***) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>No gender differences among Black youth with disabilities </li></ul></ul>Slayer
    20. 20. Discussion <ul><li>Characteristics </li></ul><ul><li>Equal proportions of adoptees by gender – role of subsidy? </li></ul><ul><li>Need to understand who is left behind </li></ul><ul><li>Waiting time </li></ul><ul><li>Disparities among youth with disabilities </li></ul><ul><li>Within group gender effect </li></ul><ul><li>Role of subsidy in shorter waiting time among Black youth? </li></ul>Slayer
    21. 21. Discussion <ul><li>Adoptive families </li></ul><ul><li>MEPA after-effects? </li></ul><ul><li>Black single parents more likely to adopt? </li></ul><ul><li>Kin findings mirror guardianship trends - any disability stigma? </li></ul><ul><li>Post-adoption supports </li></ul><ul><li>Subsidy </li></ul><ul><li>Few apparent disparities </li></ul><ul><ul><li>State-specific issues? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Promise of subsidies for all children? </li></ul>Slayer
    22. 22. Future research <ul><li>Which Black foster children with disabilities remain in foster care awaiting adoption? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>More disabled? Older at removal? Sibling groups? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Role of subsidies in decision-making? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Existing research suggests subsidy as commodity in divorce proceedings </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Possible racial disparities in subsidy disbursement in some states? </li></ul></ul>Slayer
    23. 23. Acknowledgements <ul><li>Sheron Adair , MSW & Evenns Semerzier , MSW, Graduate Research Assistants </li></ul><ul><li>National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect (NDACAN) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (Children’s Bureau) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>NDACAN, Cornell University and their agents or employees bear no responsibility for these analyses or interpretations </li></ul></ul>Slayer
    24. 24. Slayer Removal from family (imminent risk of abuse, neglect) Return to family within 22 months with concurrent planning Work toward reunification (in most cases) Initiation of termination of parental rights proceedings after 15/22 months Parental rights terminated Adopted LT foster care or waiting for adoption Federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1996 (ASFA) *Safety *Permanency *Well-being Federal, state-specific subsidies, programs, resources
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×