Culture, Economy, Community: A Cultural Plan for Chatham-Kent

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Event

    Culture, Economy, Community: A Cultural Plan for Chatham-Kent - Presentation Transcript

    1. Culture, Economy, Community: A Cultural Plan for Chatham-Kent Jointly funded by the Municipality of Chatham-Kent, Community Futures Development Corporation of Chatham-Kent Federal Department of Cultural Arts and Heritage To view the complete document visit chatham-kent.ca
    2.  
    3. Municipality of Chatham-Kent
      • Amalgamated in 1998
      • 23 incorporated towns, villages and townships into one
      • 256 elected officials to 18
      • Second largest municipal land mass – 2,494 sq. kilometres, 105 kms x 72 kms
      • One hour from Windsor, Sarnia and London
      • 56 internal business units, not including PUC and C-K Energy
      • Inventory of 825 bridges
      • Our mission: We work in partnership with business, all levels of government and the community at the large, to actively promote, encourage and facilitate community economic development in Chatham-Kent
      • Federally funded by Industry Canada, Fed Nor
      • Serving rural communities of less than 40,000 population
      • 61 CFDC’s in Ontario (5 are Native)
    4. C F D C’s
      • Small business loans of up to $150,000
      • Community economic planning and development with some grant funding NOTE: CFDCCK financed the first business plan for the Capital Theatre project. The Board championed the pursuit of doing the Cultural Masterplan and contributed $20,000.00 to the project
      • Goal is to create job opportunities
      • Incorporated not for profit, volunteer Board of Directors
    5. Decision to Embark
      • Strategic Planning –
      • CFDC’s mandated by Industry Canada to do strategic planning. Initial consultation with Board identified Culture/Tourism and Agriculture as a projected focus of activities
      • The Discovery - Municipal Cultural Forums
      • The Promotion - Selling the idea to pursue a formal process of cultural mapping
      • Grant opportunity – ‘go for it!’ – NOTE: Council would not have pursued the Cultural Mapping process without partnership funding
    6. Why Now in C-K
      • After 10 years with great progress in meeting infrastructure needs i.e. roads, water, sewer, energy, bridges we have no identity
      • 2 logos, no branding
      • Need to come together for a common goal
      • Loss of local community identity and pride
      • Economic Development issues (Smokestacks!)
    7. The Reality
      • Grant approval came before Council’s strategic planning sessions
      • Buy in from the bottom up
      • Budget concerns override strategic priorities
      • Many ‘don’t get it!’ – not only cultural planning but strategic planning
      • Breaking down the silos difficult, internal and community wide
    8. The Difference of our Cultural Mapping Project
      • Had to be concrete, focus on ‘economy’
      • Second consultant, Steven Thorne, assessed C-K for cultural tourism opportunities
      • “Culture-nomics”
    9. Challenges of the Process
      • More staff time required than anticipated
      • IT/GIS department not included in RFP
      • Summertime
      • Volunteer vs. staff, who is going to be responsible in the long term to implement
      • Buy in from senior management and Ec Dev
      • Working in silo’s internally and externally, volunteer and public sector, will require leadership
      • Concept not truly understood by majority
    10. Desired Outcomes
      • Identity, branding, signage – a process has begun to address signage issues
      • Tourism strategy, Steven Thorne, implement ideas for market development of tourist opportunities – Council has funded a product development person to begin to implement suggestions contained in the report
      • Develop a culture of thinking strategically and implement accordingly, proactive vs. reactive – new CAO in place as of Nov. 1, changes are in the works
      • Establish a non-political mechanism for Communities to work together while maintaining their individuality – Project Coordinator in the process of forming Create CK and CAT’s
      • Council buy-in with $$$$ - asked for 150,00 in ’08 received half
      • Create solid partnerships between business, the not-for-profit sector and funding partners to build a community movement to implement Cultural Plan – slowly forming
    11. Create C-K
      • 3 Part Program
      • Create C-K Consortium
      • 5 Regional Action Teams – CATs
      • Create C-K Strategic Summit
    12. Cultural Action Teams - CATS
      • The following regional titles were generated to mitigate the stigma of a forced amalgamation. The areas boundaries would be fluid and based on historical development of the region and their culture
        • Syndenham
        • Thames-St. Clair
        • Land Between the Lakes
        • Erie Ridge
        • Upper Thames (Fairfield
    13. Ongoing Challenges
      • Keeping momentum - Leadership
      • Beaurocracy – governments move too slowly for the volunteer sector
      • Politics – keeping focussed on the big picture
      • Resources – continued financial support for staff (based on a political budget process)
      • Perception of Culture – ‘elitism’ vs. ‘culture-nomics’
    14. “Low Hanging Fruit’
      • ‘ ArtSpace’ - new artist co-op in downtown Chatham, joint partnership of Thames Art Gallery, CFDC, a local entrepreneur and artist’s
      • ‘ Tecumseh Parkway’ – a 1812 legacy project
      • ‘ Promised Land’ – a 5 year, 5 million dollar research project on Black History
      • Heritage Tax relief bylaw; Church inventory
      • Ridgetown rejuvenation committee based on cultural assets
      • ‘ White Paper’ Cultural Symposium – Feb.
    15. If I had to do it all over again….
      • Formed a strong cross departmental team ie. Oakville
      • Worked harder on educating Council
      • Appointed members to interim committee prior to the end of the project ie. Oxford
      • Found corporate partners in the beginning
      • Had a communication person (volunteer or staff) educating and promoting the concept
      • Had Ec-Dev firmly on side before going forward
    16. Recession = Opportunity
      • Acting strategically, using a Cultural Masterplan, municipalities have an opportunity to ‘re-tool’ their economic base
      • “Quality of life is good economics, focus on the real fundamentals that make your community attractive to corporations.” Dr. Mark Partridge, Swank Professor in Rural-Urban Policy, Ohio State University
    17. Thank you. Anne Gilbert [email_address] Chair, Community Futures Development Corporation of Chatham-Kent Councillor, Ward 6, Chatham Municipality of Chatham-Kent 519-676-4333

    + Emily RobsonEmily Robson, 12 months ago

    custom

    891 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation delivered by Anne Gilbert, Councilor, more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 891
      • 891 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 7
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories