Culture, Economy, Community: A Cultural Plan for Chatham-Kent

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Event

    Culture, Economy, Community: A Cultural Plan for Chatham-Kent - Presentation Transcript

    1. Culture, Economy, Community: A Cultural Plan for Chatham-Kent Jointly funded by Municipality of Chatham-Kent Community Futures Development Corporation of Chatham-Kent Federal Department of Cultural Arts and Heritage To view the complete document visit chatham-kent.ca
    2.  
    3. Municipality of Chatham-Kent
      • Amalgamated in 1998
      • 23 incorporated towns, villages and townships into one
      • 256 elected officials to 18
      • Second largest municipal land mass – 2,494 sq. kilometres, 105 kms x 72 kms, 12 th largest in Canada
      • One hour from Windsor, Sarnia and London
      • 56 internal business units, not including PUC and C-K Energy
      • Inventory of 825 bridges, 15,000 plus culverts
    4. Boring or Beautiful Its Authentic
      • Our mission: We work in partnership with business, all levels of government and the community at the large, to actively promote, encourage and facilitate community economic development in Chatham-Kent
      • Federally funded by Industry Canada, Fed Nor
      • Serving rural communities of less than 40,000 population
      • 61 CFDC’s in Ontario (5 are Native)
    5. Decision to Embark
      • Strategic Planning –
      • CFDC’s mandated by Industry Canada to do strategic planning. Initial consultation with Board identified Culture/Tourism and Agriculture as a projected focus of community economic development activities
      • The Discovery - Municipal Cultural Forums
      • The Promotion – Cultural planning makes economic sense for a community in transition – focus on quality of life and development will follow as a logical outcome
      • Grant opportunity – ‘go for it!’ – NOTE: Council would not have pursued the Cultural Mapping process without partnership funding
    6. Why Now in C-K
      • After 10 years with great progress in meeting infrastructure needs i.e. roads, water, sewer, energy, bridges – limited dollars spent on quality of life issues
      • Loss of local community identity and pride
      • 2 logos, no branding, no common identity
      • Post amalgamation - need to come together for a common goal
      • Culture is a unifier
      • Economic Development issues (Smokestacks! Perceived Union mentality)
    7. Initial Challenges
      • Grant approval came before Council’s strategic planning sessions
      • Buy in from the bottom up, management not convinced
      • Budget concerns override strategic priorities
      • Many ‘don’t get it!’ – not only cultural planning but strategic planning
      • Breaking down the silos difficult, internal and community wide
    8. The Difference of our Cultural Mapping Project
      • Had to be concrete, focus on ‘economy’
      • Second consultant, Steven Thorne, assessed C-K for cultural tourism opportunities
      • “ Culture-nomics” – Culture Led Economic Development
      • Completed Mapping and a comprehensive Cultural Masterplan
    9. Challenges of the Process
      • More staff time required than anticipated
      • IT/GIS department not included in the onset
      • Volunteer vs. staff, who is going to be responsible in the long term to implement
      • Buy in from senior management and Ec Dev
      • Leadership
      • Concept not truly understood by majority
    10. Desired Outcomes
      • Solve Identity, branding, signage
      • Tourism strategy, Steven Thorne, implement ideas for market development of tourist opportunities
      • Develop a culture of thinking strategically and implement accordingly, proactive vs. reactive
      • Establish a non-political mechanism for Communities to work together while maintaining their individuality
      • Create solid partnerships between business, the not-for-profit sector and funding partners to build a community movement to implement Cultural Plan
      • Recognition from Economic Development Department that Cultural development is economic development
    11. Create C-K
      • 3 Part Program
      • Create C-K Consortium
      • 5 Cultural Action Teams – CATs
      • Create C-K Strategic Summit
      • Design your organization to fit your individual needs
    12. Ongoing Challenges
      • Leadership - keeping momentum
      • Beaurocracy – governments move too slowly for the volunteer sector
      • Politics – keeping focussed on the big picture
      • Resources – continued financial support for staff (based on a political budget process)
      • Perception of Culture – ‘elitism’ vs. ‘culture-nomics’
    13. “ Low Hanging Fruit’
      • ‘ ArtSpace’ - new artist co-op in downtown Chatham, joint partnership of Thames Art Gallery, CFDC, a local entrepreneur and artist’s
      • ‘ Tecumseh Parkway’ – a 1812 legacy project
      • ‘ Promised Land’ – a 5 year, 5 million dollar research project on Black History
      • Heritage Tax relief bylaw; Church inventory
      • Ridgetown Rejuvenation Committee
      • Capital Theatre funding secure
      • Signage strategy – consultant hired
      • CATS – organized and active
    14. If I had to do it all over again….
      • Formed a strong cross departmental team i.e. Oakville
      • Worked harder on educating Council
      • Appointed members to interim committee prior to the end of the project i.e.. Oxford
      • Found corporate partners in the beginning
      • Had a communication person (volunteer or staff) educating and promoting the concept
      • Had Ec-Dev firmly on side before going forward
    15. Recession = Opportunity
      • Acting strategically, using a Cultural Masterplan, municipalities have an opportunity to ‘re-tool’ their economic base
      • “ Quality of life is good economics, focus on the real fundamentals that make your community attractive to corporations.” Dr. Mark Partridge, Swank Professor in Rural-Urban Policy, Ohio State University
    16. Thank you Anne Gilbert [email_address] Chair, Community Futures Development Corporation of Chatham-Kent Councillor, Ward 6, Chatham Municipality of Chatham-Kent 519-676-4333

    + Emily RobsonEmily Robson, 7 months ago

    custom

    608 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation delivered by Anne Gilbert, Councillor, more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 608
      • 608 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories