• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Online Advertising & Branding Issues on the Evolving Internet
 

Online Advertising & Branding Issues on the Evolving Internet

on

  • 2,037 views

Presentation at ITECHLAW 2012 Conference by Erik M. Pelton: Recent developments in internet law affecting:

Presentation at ITECHLAW 2012 Conference by Erik M. Pelton: Recent developments in internet law affecting:
Copyrights, Trademarks, Social Media Accounts, Keywords, and Legislation.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,037
Views on SlideShare
1,874
Embed Views
163

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

3 Embeds 163

http://www.erikpelton.com 161
http://mail.atmlc.com 1
https://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Online Advertising & Branding Issues on the Evolving Internet Online Advertising & Branding Issues on the Evolving Internet Presentation Transcript

    • ®Online Advertising & Branding Issues on the Evolving Internet 2012 World Technology Law Conference ® by Erik M. Pelton © 2012 Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.
    • ®Online Advertising Issues in the United States Recent developments in internet law affecting: • Copyrights • Trademarks • Social Media Accounts • Keywords • Legislation
    • ® CopyrightViacom International, Inc. v YouTube, Inc.,10-3270-cv, 2012 WL 1130851 (2d Cir. April 5, 2012)• Litigation revived: Viacom won appeal which overturned District Court finding that YouTube was protected under DMCA• Issues are somewhat moot: case began 5 yrs ago; copyright owners now have access to “Content ID” system• Opens some potential holes in DMCA §512(c) safe harbors, which court says would protect YouTube from both direct and secondary infringement• YouTube satisfied most of the 512(c) elements, but if found to have failed on one, the defense fails
    • ® Copyright continuedPinterest• Fast growing social media network• Already number 3, after Facebook and Twitter?• Dealing with complaints from copyright owners that the site/service makes it too simple for users to misuse or share copyrighted works – Quickly created a tool to allow a site to block users from sharing on Pinterest – Quickly updated the “Terms of Use” and policies
    • ® TrademarksAs the types of media grow… so too do the ways in which trademarks are affected • Social media user names • Mobile application names » see Justin Bieber v. Joustin’ Beaver (RC3, Inc.)Domain names • 2011: .XXX • 2012: “.brand” and “brand.TLD” • How will brand owners enforce their trademarks?
    • ® Social Media Accounts• Who owns an account when an employee leaves? – Social media network? Employer? Employee? – Employment law? – Terms of Use? – Many potential causes of action• PhoneDog v. Kravitz, No. C 11-03474 MEJ (N.D. Cal.) – Former employer sued employee for keeping Twitter account after the employee left – Claims that survived Defendant’s motions to dismiss: • intentional interference with prospective economic advantage • negligent interference with prospective economic advantage • conversion • misappropriation of trade secrets
    • ® Keyword AdvertisingRosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google, Inc., No. 10-2007 (4th Cir. April 9, 2012) – Appeals court overturned denial of Rosetta Stone’s claims of direct trademark infringement, contributory infringement, and dilution – Remanded to district court for further proceedings regarding these claims – Likely to create a new wave of actions against Google – Though many experts still believe it is very unlikely that Google will be found liable for trademark infringement – Key question in keyword cases: is it a “use in commerce”?Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced System Concepts, Inc.,2011 WL 815806 (9th Cir. March 8, 2011) – Network Automation sought Declaratory Judgment of non-infringement – Defendant counterclaimed and rec’d injunction preventing purchase of keyword advertising for “Active Batch” – Court said that buying keywords is a trademark “use in commerce” – Ninth Circuit reversed preliminary injunction and remanded to District Court, noting that keyword purchase was not inherently a trademark infringement
    • ® Legislative IssuesAfter SOPA & PIPA (PROTECT IP ACT), what is next? Congress was truly surprised by the attention and resistance received Congress likely to re-visit issue: helping brand and website owners combat infringements and counterfeits in a quicker, cheaper manner than litigation New bill: CISPA However, election year in US
    • ® Conclusion:• Expansion and growth of online media continues to bring new challenges intellectual property law• 2012 will continue be another active year for developments related to online advertising www.ErikPelton.com NOT INTENDED AS LEGAL ADVICE © 2012 Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.