Prospero: A Web-based Document Delivery System - Presentation Transcript
Prospero: A Web-based Document Delivery System Eric H. Schnell Assistant Professor Head, Information Technology Prior Health Sciences Library The Ohio State University
Open Source or “Free” Software
Free as in “free”dom
Little to do with price
A program is free if there is freedom to:
run the program, for any purpose
modify the program to suit needs
distribute modified versions so that the community can benefit from your improvements
Brief History
ITS (the Incompatible Timesharing System MIT - 1967)
GNU (GNU’s Not Unix - 1984)
Linux (1991)
“ Open Source” (1998)
The Library Systems Paradigm
Software vendors do not sell software , they sell “Licenses”
Vendors control functionality and features
Maintenance fees are often not optional
Open Source and Libraries
Library Systems Paradigm
Libraries make significant investments to license, maintain, and train
Few switch once committed to a specific technology
Decisions often based on budgets
- Not patron needs
Services become available not when they are needed, but when software becomes commercially available
What is Prospero?
Electronic document delivery system
Originally designed to work with Ariel ®
Can be used as stand alone
Converts Ariel TIFF file to PDF
Places them on a Web site
Like Ariel, Prospero is a character in Shakespeare's “The Tempest”
Prospero Modules
Staff Interface
Installed on Windows PC
Uses Ariel directories
Can scan direct or import
Staff Interface
Prospero Modules
Staff Interface
Installed on Windows PC
Uses Ariel directories
Can scan direct or import
Patron Interface /Server Side
Install on Windows/ Unix-Linux server
Any Web server software
Patron Interface
Why Prospero?
Advisory Committee recommendation
Full-text journals online, why not ILL?
Shorten document delivery time
Any time, anywhere access
Commercial alternatives not economical or functional
Development Timeline
March 1999 – In search of existing systems
NLM’s DocView / DocMorph
DocView
DocMorph
Development Timeline
March ’99 – In search of existing systems
NLM’s DocView / DocMorph
ILLiad
ILLiad
Development Timeline
March ’99 – In search of existing systems
NLM’s DocView
ILLiad
Marshall’s WebEDD
Web-EDD
Development Timeline
March ’99 – In search of existing systems
NLM’s DocView
ILLiad
Marshall’s WebEDD
April ’99 – Create homegrown system
– Announcement of Yale’s EDD
Yale’s EDD
Development Timeline
April ’99 – Began Prospero development
May ’99 – Released Prospero 1.0
Feb ’01 – Released Version 1.37 ( 17 th Revision )
Development Team
Project Manager
Communications
Web site & message board
Contact for administrators / Prospero implementers
Programmer
Wrote code
Debugged problems
Development Team
Evaluators
Used beta code
Identified initial features
3 high use sites
40+ outside contributors
Time Commitment
Project Manager
60 hours initial Web site development and creation of support materials
< 4 hrs per week ongoing support
Programmer
~100 hrs initial development
8 hrs per week ongoing support
Evaluators
Feedback through regular use
Prospero Budget
$ 0
Development Costs
No direct software costs
No direct ongoing software maintenance costs
Used existing hardware
Staff time (~ $3500 1st year indirect cost)
Customer Service
Web site
Email / phone
Web discussion board
“ Users helping users”
Copyright Concerns
" I see no problems with using technology to provide interlibrary loan. The real crux to librarians is the compliance with the CONTU guidelines..."
- Laura Gasaway
(cni-copyright@cni.org 7/21/2000)
Copyright Concerns
Aware of open source
Prospero was first project reviewed
International distribution
Ohio State “ownership”
No warranties expressed or implied
Distributed “As Is”
Ohio State Legal Affairs
Copyright Concerns
Local interpretation of Copyright Law
National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyright Works (CONTU)
Authentication restricts access
Can restrict number of times viewed or number of days on system
Document Delivery Depts
Lessons
User expectations
Lessons
Implementation issues
Individual privacy (Open Source a safe haven?)
Systems security
Library system paradigm is alive
User expectations
Benefits
Established service when needed
Allowed others to establish similar services, cheaply
Staff are learning new skills
Creating a new “network” of library development partners
Breaking away from the library systems paradigm
Hidden Benefits
Over 300 organizational downloads from 17 Countries
Promote the Prior Library and The Ohio State University
Publication, presentation, and award opportunities
Local recognition
Current / Future Developments
Ariel <-> Prospero communications
Viewing and printing TIFFS
Color scanner support (compression!)
Replace text config files with database
OS-X support
Words of Advice
“ One can choose to go back toward safety or forward toward growth.”
-- Abraham Maslow
Words of Advice ?
“ The current trend is from locally-developed systems to vendor supplied systems, not the other way around.
What is different about the current open source movement that will enable the successful development and support of library automation systems from the earlier efforts that weren't sustainable? To use Eric Raymond's terms, is the ILS too much a cathederal (sic) to be build in a bazaar?”
Marshall Breeding posted on web4lib - 3/22/2001
Words of Advice ?
“ Without other incentives other than the joy of hacking and "vanity fair" a lot of worthwhile projects die because the initial author lost interest and nobody pick up the tag “
Nikolai Bezroukov http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue4_10/bezroukov/index.html
0 comments
Post a comment