Open Source Systems for Libraries: A New Approach to Resource Sharing

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Open Source Systems for Libraries: A New Approach to Resource Sharing - Presentation Transcript

    1. Open Source Systems for Libraries: A New Approach to Resource Sharing Eric H. Schnell Prior Health Sciences Library The Ohio State University [email_address] Copyleft – 2001
    2. “ Free” Software
      • Free as in freedom (and as a free kitten)
      • Little to do with price. It is about freedom
      • A program is free software, if there is:
        • freedom to run the program, for any purpose
        • freedom to modify the program to suit needs
        • freedom to distribute modified versions of the program, so that the community can benefit from your improvements
    3. Open Source
      • A philosophy of software development where:
        • a community comes together to create computer programs
        • systems are developed out of mutual need and for economic advantage
        • informal networks are formed to create and support these applications
    4. Why Open Source in Libraries?
      • Commercial developers respond slowly
      • Niche vendors gain monopoly
      • Commercial product lifelines uncertain
      • Release date teasers
      • Program code is customizable
      • Helps reduce annual software costs
      • No software maintenance “fees”
    5. Why Open Source in Libraries?
      • Reduce service implementation timetable
      • Reallocate funds to other needs
      • Break away from the library system paradigm
      • Creation of new resource sharing networks and consortiums
    6. Library Networks
      • National - OCLC, RLG
      • Statewide - OhioLink
      • Regional - NNLM, CIC
    7. Library Networks
      • Purchasing discounts
        • Monographs
        • Serials
        • Database access
        • E-Journals
      • Interlibrary loan
      • Special collections
    8. Library Networks
      • Libraries choose to participate in a given network:
        • based on their interest
        • on their ability to contribute
        • to gain administrative advantage
        • To gain economic advantage
    9. OSLN – Open Sources Library Networks
      • Open source networks reflect the traditional values and philosophy of library networks
      • OSS and OSLN networks build relationships because they share common goals
      • Both support development of software products that support the unique needs of a specific user group
      • Both use a peer-review system of development
    10. OSLN – Open Sources Library Networks
      • MyLibrary (North Carolina State)
      • Prospero (Ohio State)
      • Free Reserves (Southern Illinois University)
      • BioMail (SUNY Stonybrook)
      • Internet Station Manager (Grand Rapids, MI PL)
    11. OSLN vs. Homegrown
      • Individual libraries often lack all the human elements to create scalable and portable systems ( coding, testing, troubleshooting, user ed )
      • A network of libraries has a greater chance of assembling a development team with a full complement of skills
    12. OSLN vs. Homegrown
      • When the programmer of a homegrown system leaves employment the system gradually falls apart and dies
      • OSLN community takes over the management responsibilities of the most viable systems and they continue to evolve
    13. OSLN vs. Homegrown
      • Homegrown systems are often created in isolation with minimal external feedback and support
      • The foundation of OSLN is a system of peer review that is missing from most homegrown projects
    14. Getting Involved
      • Libraries are always developing applications (delivering dynamic Web content, interactive reference services, or image archive systems)
      • Many of these applications are kept in-house even though they may be useful to other libraries
      • Libraries developing innovative solutions need to consider becoming active open source developers
    15. Getting Involved
      • By distributing OSS the library community is able to benefit from a library's experience, resources, and expertise
      • A library’s OSS project could benefit from the community’s experience, resources, and expertise
      • New library networks and consortiums need to be developed to support such initiatives
    16. Developer Support
      • Install an existing program
        • play with it
        • evaluate it
        • provide feedback. Constructive and critical feedback is vital
        • Report errors and problems
        • helps clarify misconceptions users and potential users have about the application
    17. User Support
      • Documentation
        • installation manuals
        • user guides
      • Instructional materials
        • tip sheets
        • how-to guides
      • Conference presentations
        • local, regional, national meetings
      • Write journal and newsletter articles
    18. Development Support
      • Programming
        • system security
        • memory usage
        • file permissions
        • error reports
        • suggest and construct technical solutions
        • create new features
        • create plug-in modules
        • create derivative programs
    19. Barriers to Participation
      • Limited understanding
      • Underestimating personal skill set
      • Projects may not proactively recruit
      • Time
      • Administration support
    20. Why OSS Projects Die
      • Burn out
      • Inability to acquire a critical mass of users
      • Loss of the leading developer
      • Forking
      • Establishment of library open source resource sharing networks will allow more libraries to provide high quality electronic patron services when they are needed…..
      … .. not when the technology becomes commercially available

    + Eric SchnellEric Schnell, 8 months ago

    custom

    200 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 200
      • 200 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 3
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories