• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Leveraging Web 2.0 tools to create a collaborative PLE
 

Leveraging Web 2.0 tools to create a collaborative PLE

on

  • 1,128 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,128
Views on SlideShare
1,048
Embed Views
80

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 80

http://diy-ple.blogspot.com.es 79
http://www.lmodules.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Leveraging Web 2.0 tools to create a collaborative PLE Leveraging Web 2.0 tools to create a collaborative PLE Presentation Transcript

    • Leveraging Web 2.0 tools to establish a collaborative Personal Learning Environment (PLE)
      Professor Eric Tsui
      KMRC, HKPolyU
    • Knowledge ManagementVsPersonal Knowledge Management
    • Personal Meta Competences
      Retrieving Information
      KM Process
      Locate / capture
      PKM Skills
      Problem Solving
      Evaluation Information
      Communication
      Organising Information
      Transfer / Sharing
      Apply
      Creativity
      Collaborating Information
      Analysis
      Create
      Analysing Information
      Learning
      Organisational Performance
      Mental Agility
      Presenting Information
      External Information Awareness
      Reflection
      Securing Information
      Internal Knowledge Dissemination
      Effective Decision Architecture
      Organisational Focus
      Continue Innovation
      PKM Research Model(Ricky Cheong & Eric Tsui)
    • Global Survey on Personal KM
      Respondent’s Profile
      • Locations
      • Africa: 4.1%
      • Americas: 36%
      • Asia: 35.5%
      • Europe: 20.3%
      • Oceania: 4.1%
      • Stage of Adoption (Roger, 1962)
      • Knowledge Stage: 23.9%
      • Persuasion Stage: 5%
      • Decision Stage: 8%
      • Implementation Stage: 28.2%
      • Confirmation Stage: 21.6%
    • Findings from global PKM survey
      The research findings provide empirical evidence for the PKM Framework by Avery et al. (2001)
      Personal Knowledge Management plays important roles in KM Processes
      Personal Knowledge Management contributes to individuals’ competences
      Personal Knowledge Management contributes to an organisation’s competences
      The values of PKM for individuals directly affect the values of PKM for an organisation. Individual knowledge workers are key agents for organisational learning (Argyris & Schon 1978)
    • A PKM 2.0 model(Source: R. Cheong and E. Tsui (2010); The roles and values of personal knowledge management: An exploratory study, to appear in VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems.)
    • Traditional Learning Environment Vs Personal Learning Environment (PLE)
    • Some challenges in a PLE/VLE
      Information Overload
      Sustainability & quality of contributions
      Knowledge Classification & Navigation
      Content authoring by the masses
      Development & tracking of personal competencies

    • Information Overload & its consequences
    • Use of RSS feeds and tagging to create a co-learning environment
      • Selective RSS feeds, filters & aggregators to supplement static content
      • Tagging & annotation of articles
      • Sharing, searching & navigation of articles by tags
      • Knowledge Classification & Navigation via shared tags
    • Some challenges in a PLE/VLE
      Information Overload
      Sustainability & quality of contributions
      Knowledge Classification & Navigation
      Content authoring by the masses
      Development & tracking of personal competencies

    • Structure & how it affects the contribution and quality of Knowledge
      +
      Quality
      Clustered
    • Using a Wiki for forum discussions
    • Experiment with a ‘Clustered Wiki’
      Group 1
      Group 2
      Group 3
      Group 4
    • Experiment with a ‘Clustered Wiki’
      Edit
      Read and Compare
    • Result of the ‘Clustered Wiki’ experiment
      18.96
      4.67
      1%
      60%
    • Quality of knowledgeSource : Lila Rao et al, Toward Defining knowledge dimension of knowledge systems, 2009
      Accuracy
      Consistency
      Currency
      Interoperability
      Degree of Context
      Degree of Details
      Degree of Importance
      Sharing
      Usefulness
      Volatility
    • Some challenges in a PLE/VLE
      Information Overload
      Sustainability & quality of contributions
      Knowledge Classification & Navigation
      Content authoring by the masses
      Development & tracking of personal competencies

    • Use of Social Bookmarking and Mashups to enhance knowledge navigation
    • Collaborative
      tagging
      tools
      Internal
      External
      TaxoFolk algorithm
      Taxonomy
      Temple Street got an OPERA
      Can visit a BEACH at here
    • Some challenges in a PLE/VLE
      Information Overload
      Sustainability & quality of contributions
      Knowledge Classification & Navigation
      Content authoring by the masses
      Development & tracking of personal competencies

    • RAPIDS (Rapid Authoring Platform for Instructional Design of Scenarios)
    • Using RAPIDS for scenario authoring
      Reusable Artefacts
      Real and imaginary scenes, characters, icons
      Rapid Authoring
      Ease of Creation
      Competency profiling with Quizzes & Scorecard
      Mix & Match different scenes to compose a new scenario
    • Integration of RAPIDS into WebCT
    • Key Observations
      PKM values and competencies are directly related to organisational performance
      PKM is rapidly gaining interest but most of the existing frameworks are still based on the traditional Web
      Web 2.0 and social software enable knowledge workers to set up a PLE/VLE in a pervasive and ubiquitous environment
      Quality of knowledge, sustainability of contributions, mass authoring & ability to combat information overload are crucial
      Significant research is still needed for ‘fusing’ personal and enterprise knowledge