The Changing Role of Librarians in a Networked, Digital Environment
by epistemographer on Jan 24, 2010
- 2,183 views
Gave this talk as the Dorothy M. Cooper Lecture in May 2009 at the Pratt School of Information & Library Science
Gave this talk as the Dorothy M. Cooper Lecture in May 2009 at the Pratt School of Information & Library Science
Accessibility
Categories
Upload Details
Uploaded via SlideShare as Apple Keynote
Usage Rights
© All Rights Reserved
Statistics
- Likes
- 2
- Downloads
- 0
- Comments
- 1
- Embed Views
- Views on SlideShare
- 2,162
- Total Views
- 2,183
1–1 of 1 previous next
- libraries as institutions are deeply structured around needs of paper management
- On one hand, libraries were a necessary consequence of needs of paper (scholars aggregated around books, and universities followed)
Most advanced in academic libs; landscape about to shift dramatically with google books
Traditionally, libraries purchased books and other materials in a straightforward transaction.
- Because information and its medium have been disentangled (binary code as electrons on a disk isn’t like ink on a page)...
- We enter into licensing agreements to access the information; standard property law doesn’t apply.
- IP != property; we have laws to try to make it seem that way, but it just isn’t (if I take a book from you, you don’t have the book anymore. If I take a file from you, you still have the original unless you delete it.
- Kindle is great example - closed distribution chain, proprietary device, no owner rights (all contract law)
(DMCA prohibition on cracking DRM)
Serious work to be done to figure out how to reconcile licensing regime with long-term preservation.
problem is managing ubiquity, not scarcity
Now, while the difference here is easily summed up with a facile sort of Yahoo vs. Google comparison, there’s actually something much deeper going on. We could just as easily be talking about:
We’ve moved from this very active engagement with the overall universe of items to a new paradigm, which reduces the card catalog to a single search box.
Simply, it’s a shift from spatial to algorithmic modes of discovery.
Based on formal features of the texts, not metadata. More data, the better...
What search does is to decontextualize, drilling down quickly and deeply to the micro level without giving you a chance to see where the individual results fit within the whole.
if search is based on full-text, and we’re licensing those materials, do we even need to bother with cataloging?
FRBR - the borges map of the world that lays over the real geography.
- we increasingly lease rather than own our collections
- the systems that actually present our collections to users are proprietary, closed and usually not interoperable
- our users are drowning in information, and think that a google search is all they need
Simply teaching people how to find and use the resources already licensed.
2.0 talk is usually kind of precious - tool-focused
Exploit tools to engage users.
- Digital can’t just be in the “digital group” silo; it *must* permeate organization.
- Actively permissive policy - yes until no, rather than no until yes
- Systems need to weave together collections and curation
- Erica Firment
- Need for new job categories within libraries to actually hire this talent, supporting more tailoring to local audiences (UX design, user analysis, production)