Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Experimental BIM Use Comparison on Stanford Hospital Cath Labs

934

Published on

This presentation is a cost comparison between three nearly identical projects where the only variable is the use of BIM. The first cath lab was delivered using a traditional CAD approach, the second …

This presentation is a cost comparison between three nearly identical projects where the only variable is the use of BIM. The first cath lab was delivered using a traditional CAD approach, the second cath lab used industry standard BIM (modeling objects down to 2"), and the third cath lab modeled everything including studs and outlet boxes. The change order rates dropped to practically nothing but the costs were a bit surprising.

Published in: Design, Business, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
934
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
29
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Quarter million $ saved on Cath 9
  • Transcript

    • 1. Stanford Cath Labs 7, 9, & 10Numeric results of CAD vs. BIM to 2” vs.full BIMJason David Eric PeabodyHolbrook Denysenko
    • 2. 7910
    • 3. Experimental ControlsExperimental Variables BIM Use Area* Start** ArchitectCath Lab 7 CAD 720 SF 2006Cath Lab 9 2” 1,173 SF 2009 StandardCath Lab Everything 1,060 SF 201010*Results expressed per SF to normalize this variable**Cost values escalated to 2010 relative value to normalize this variable
    • 4. What’s supposedly in it for me?Save up to 23% on project costsComplete project 35% fasterDrop change order rate to <0.1%44% fewer RFIsThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 5. What’s supposedly in it for me?23% less $Complete project 35% fasterDrop change order rate to <0.1%44% fewer RFIsThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 6. What’s supposedly in it for me?Save up to 23% on project costs35% fasterDrop change order rate to <0.1%44% fewer RFIsThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 7. What’s supposedly in it for me?Save up to 23% on project costsComplete project 35% fasterChanges to <0.1%44% fewer RFIsThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 8. What’s supposedly in it for me?Save up to 23% on project costsComplete project 35% fasterDrop change order rate to <0.1%44% fewer RFIsThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 9. Cath Lab 7CAD OnlyThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 10. 7
    • 11. Cath Lab 7: Siemens Biplane Cath Lab Project Area: 720 Gross Square Feet Construction Start: 2006Procedure Room: 600 Net Square Feet BIM Use: None
    • 12. (E) CAD V.I.F. (N) CAD ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 13. (E) CAD V.I.F. (N) CAD ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 14. (E) CAD V.I.F. (N) CAD ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 15. (E) CAD V.I.F. (N) CAD ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 16. The delay was caused…by the over-head structural and M/E/P/FP not being coordinated. The majority of the overhead had to be re-designed. DPR ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 17. Cath Lab 9BIM to 2”The Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 18. 9
    • 19. Cath Lab 9: Siemens Biplane Hybrid OR Project Area: 1,173 Gross Square Feet Construction Start: 2009Procedure Room: 821 Net Square Feet BIM Use: Model to 2”
    • 20. 3D Scan (E) Model (N) Model ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 21. 3D Scan (E) Model (N) Model ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 22. 3D Scan (E) Model (N) Model ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 23. 3D Scan (E) Model (N) Model ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 24. Cath Lab 10BIM EverythingThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 25. 10
    • 26. Cath Lab 10: Siemens Biplane Pediatric Cath Lab Project Area: 1060 Gross Square Feet Construction Start: 2010Procedure Room: 717 Net Square Feet BIM Use: Model Everything
    • 27. 3D Scan (E) Model (N) Model ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 28. 3D Scan (E) Model (N) Model ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 29. 3D Scan (E) Model (N) Model ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 30. 3D Scan (E) Model (N) Model ConstructionThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 31. ResultsThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 32. Construction Cost BIM Use % from CADCath Lab 7 CADCath Lab 9 2” Standard -15.0%Cath Lab Everything*All figures in 2010 Relative Value -4.1%10Change Order Cost BIM Use % of TotalCath Lab 7 CAD 12.4%Cath Lab 9 2” Standard 8.1%Cath Lab Everything <0.1%10*All figures in 2010 Relative ValueThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 33. ConstructionSchedule BIM Use Construction Days/SF % from CADCath Lab 7 CAD 8.40 mo 0.23 D/SFCath Lab 9 2” Standard 8.50 mo 0.15 D/SF -34.8%Cath Lab Everything 8.45 mo 0.16 D/SF -30.4%10All Costs Survey All Construction Margin** Total Services* $Cath Lab 7 18.5% 18.5%Cath Lab 9 1.6% 27.3% (15.0%) (22.0%) (23.3%)Cath Lab 10 1.6% 18.5%*All design professional fees, including non-BIM fees (4.1%) (18.6%) (17.9%)**Cath lab contribution margin of ~$8,000 per dayThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 34. ConclusionsSave up to 23% on project costsComplete project 35% fasterDrop change order rate to <0.1%44% fewer RFIsThe Design Partnership LLP Architects + Planners
    • 35. Thanks. Questions?Jason David Eric Peabody eric@dpsf.comHolbrook Denysenkojholbrook@stanfordmed.or ddenysenko@stanfordmed. 415 777-3737g org650 721-1928 650 736-7546

    ×