Purje Juha, Inspecta Tarkastus (Suomija), „Visagino VAE projektas. Techniniai reikalavimai, naudojant ASME ir PED 97/23/EC kombinaciją). I dalis“
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Purje Juha, Inspecta Tarkastus (Suomija), „Visagino VAE projektas. Techniniai reikalavimai, naudojant ASME ir PED 97/23/EC kombinaciją). I dalis“

on

  • 647 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
647
Views on SlideShare
647
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Purje Juha, Inspecta Tarkastus (Suomija), „Visagino VAE projektas. Techniniai reikalavimai, naudojant ASME ir PED 97/23/EC kombinaciją). I dalis“ Purje Juha, Inspecta Tarkastus (Suomija), „Visagino VAE projektas. Techniniai reikalavimai, naudojant ASME ir PED 97/23/EC kombinaciją). I dalis“ Presentation Transcript

  • ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code vs. PED and EN-standards and nuclear safety requirements Juha Purje Inspecta Tarkastus Oy1
  • Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) or ASME2
  • The PED shall be applied to all pressure equipment to be used in European Union except such pressure equipment that are critical to nuclear safety, they are excluded from PED Article 1 Scope and definitions … 3. The following are excluded from the scope of this Directive: …. 3.8. items specifically designed for nuclear use, failure of which may cause an emission of radioactivity; Such equipment should be designed and manufactured in accordance with a specific code like – ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III – French RCC-M – German KTA3
  • Nuclear island Conventional island Many pressure equipment Equipment subject to PED critical to nuclear safety4
  • ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code is an extensive set of rules on the design, manufacturing and operation of boilers and pressure vesselsI Rules for Construction of Power BoilersII Materials Part A — Ferrous Material Specifications Part B — Nonferrous Material Specifications Part C — Specifications for Welding Rods, Electrodes, and Filler Metals Part D — PropertiesIII Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components ( incl. 10 subsections)IV Rules for Construction of Heating BoilersV Nondestructive ExaminationVI Recommended Rules for the Care and Operation of Heating BoilersVII Recommended Guidelines for the Care of Power BoilersVIII Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels Division 1 Division 2 — Alternative Rules Division 3 — Alternative Rules for Construction of High Pressure VesselsIX Welding and Brazing QualificationsX Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Pressure VesselsXI Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant ComponentsXII Rules for Construction and Continued Service of Transport Tanks 5
  • Differences between European and American legal systems concerning pressure equipmentEurope• The PED (Pressure Equipment Directive) is the law for all European Union member states• The Essential Safety Requirements of PED are often rather general but some requirements are very specific and those specific requirements shall be met.• Pressure Equipment which conform to the harmonized standards is presumed to conform to the Essential Safety Requirements of PED.• To follow the harmonized standards is the preferred method to show compliance to the PED but they are not mandatory. The manufacturer may follow any set of rules or standards for design and manufacturing on condition that the Essential Safety Requirements are met.USA• The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code is not a law but construction standard generally accepted in USA and in many other countries. 6
  • Most important harmonized standardsFor products:EN 13445:2009 Unfired pressure vessels – Parts 1 to 8(with latest amendments)EN 13480:2012 Metallic industrial piping - Parts 1 to 8For welding procedures:EN ISO 15614-1:2004 Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic(with amendments) materials - Welding procedure test - Part 1: Arc and gas welding of steels and arc welding of nickel and nickel alloysFor personnel qualification:EN 287-1:2011 Qualification test of welders - Fusion welding - Part 1: SteelsEN 473:2008 Non-destructive testing - Qualification and certification of NDT personnel - General principles 7
  • 8
  • PED and ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code There are many fundamental differences between PED and ASME Code. The PED does not set any specific calculation equations, therefore the design calculation may also be based on the equations of a ASME Code. – The allowable stress specified in PED is often different from the allowable stress of ASME Section II D ASME Code allows that the manufacturer may perform many activities by himself in accordance with his quality manual, PED requires the involvement of a recognized third-party organisation in categories II, III and IV The major differences between the essential safety requirements of PED and ASME Code are – acceptable materials – material properties and material certification – approval of welding procedures – approval of and welders and NDT-personnel Other differences – hazard analysis is required in PED – pressure vessel test pressure – PED requires that the manufacturer must prepare the operating instructions and supply them with the pressure equipment to the user9
  • PED and ASMEASME Code is mandatory in USA and Canada, a pressure vessel that will be used inUSA or Canada shall be code stamped. This requires the involvement of an AuthorizedInspection Agency and certification by an Authorized Inspector.Many other countries have also accepted ASME Code. In these countries the ASMECode is applied in many different ways, only seldom to the full extent of ASME Code. – the manufacturer does not have the ASME Certificate of Authorization – there is no involvement of ASME AIA or AI, therefore no ASME stamp – only design calculations are made in accordance with the ASME code, and this is because the designer has suitable software.There are many manufacturers and also some notified bodies who think that 1. The ASME Code has been widely used for many decades 2. Pressure vessels that have been designed and manufactured in accordance with ASME Code have been proven to be safe  As they have been proven to be safe they meet the essential safety requirements of PEDThis is not true. The PED is European Union law that shall be followed to the letter.10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • ASME material specifications are not harmonized material standards. The suitability of such a material shall be assessed as Particular Material Appraisal.General rule :Material that has been supplied in accordance with the minimum requirements of ASME-material specification does not meet the essential safety requirements of PED.– A certificate of specific product control is not a mandatory requirement for many ASME-materials.– The organization responsible for material certification may also be other than material manufacturer.– Material traceability is endangered because the ASME material specification may not require the products to be marked with heat or batch number.– Many ASME pressure vessel carbon steel specifications do not have any requirements for minimum impact energy and even if it is specified the required value is less than 27 J.– The tensile strength properties at elevated properties are not specified in the material specification. There are even some ASME material specifications that do not specify any minimum tensile strength properties.– ASME-material specifications often allow such high amount of C, P and S that at the extreme high- quality welding would be difficult and impact strength non-existent.If the pressure equipment manufacturer specifies an ASME material he shall set supplementaryrequirements when purchasing the material like:– A requirement for the certificate of specific product control (EN 10204:2004 3.1 or 3.2)– A requirement that only material manufacturer may certify the material– A requirement of material markings to guarantee traceability with the certificate– To specify properties that are stricter than the minimum requirements of ASME material specification like manufacturing methods or limitations for the amount of C, P and S 15
  • ASME vs. EN Chemical composition of some common carbon steels Steel Rp (N/mm²) Rm (N/mm²) C max(%) P max(%) S max(%) SA-105 250 480 - 0,35 0,035 0,040 SA-106 Grade B 240 415 - 0,30 0,035 0,035 SA-234 WPB 240 415 - 585 0,30 0,050 0,058 SA-333 Grade 6 240 415 - 0,30 0,025 0,025 SA-516 Grade 70 260 485 - 620 0,30 0,035 0,035P280GH EN 10222-2 255 460 - 580 0,20 0,025 0,015P265GH EN 10216-2 265 410 - 570 0,20 0,025 0,020 S235 EN 10253-1 235 360 - 500 0,16 0,030 0,025 P265NL EN 10216-4 265 410 - 570 0,20 0,025 0,020P295GH EN 10028-2 290 460 - 580 0,20 0,025 0,01016
  • Design calculation The theory of stress and strain is similar everywhere but practical applications are somewhat different depending of the code. Minimum wall thickness of cylindrical shell is defined in the following equations ASME Section VIII Div.1 EN 13445-3 t or e = minimum thickness P = design pressure R = inside radius of shell (R = Di / 2) Di = inside diameter of shell (Di = 2•R) E or z = weld efficiency factor or joint coefficient S or f = stress value = maximum allowable membrane stress17
  • Allowable stress of ferritic steelASME Section VIII Division 1 PED and EN-standards• Allowable stress is specified in ASME The smaller of the values Section II D Table 1A • 2/3 Re/t , yield limit at design temperature• The maximum allowable stress value is or the smaller of • 5/12 Rm/20 , ultimate strength at + 20 °C – the specified minimum tensile strength at room temperature divided Strength values at room temperature and by 3.5 at elevated temperatures are specified in – two-thirds of the yield strength at the applicable harmonized material temperature standard. Those values are to be• The ASME-material specifications considered as guaranteed values but specify the minimum strength values at tensile testing at elevated temperature is room temperature only. not mandatory – The yield strength at elevated temperature is based on statistical values, those values are not guaranteed minimum values18
  • Allowable stress of similar steels, ASME vs. EN ASME Section VIII Division 1 steel SA-516 Grade 70 EN 13445-3 steel P295GH EN 10028-2 350 N/mm² 300 250 Rm / 2,4 200 Rp0,2 P295GH N/mm2 Rm / 3,5 150 P295GH PED SA-516 Grade70 100 50 0 20 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Degrees C Rp0,2 P295GH 290 280 264 244 225 206 189 175 160 P295GH PED 191 191 176 163 150 137 126 117 107 SA-516 Grade70 138 138 138 138 138 138 135 129 10119
  • Yield strength of steel ASME SA-106 B (N/mm²) in accordance with Section II D Table Y-1 vs. similar European steel specifications or previous approvals 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 20 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 A106B NGS 141 240 229 215 202 185 164 144 127 115 106 St 45.8 DIN 17175 245 195 175 155 135 130 125 P265GH EN 10216-2 265 235 226 213 192 171 154 141 134 128 A106B ASME Y-1 241 235 221 214 207 199 188 177 167 15820
  • NOTES TO TABLE Y-1(b) The tabulated values of yield strength values are those which the Committee believesare suitable for use in design calculations. At temperatures above room temperature, theyield strength values correspond to the yield strength trend curve adjusted to the minimumspecified room temperature yield strength. The yield strength values do not correspondexactly to ”minimum” as this term is applied to a statistical treatment of a homogenous setof data. Neither the ASME Material Specifications nor the rules of Section I, Section III, orSection VIII require elevated temperature testing for yield strengths of production materialfor use in Code components. It is not intended that results of such tests, if performed, becompared with these tabulated yield strength values for ASME Code acceptance/rejection purposes for materials. If some elevated temperature test results on productionmaterial appear lower than the tabulated values by a large amount (more than the typicalvariability of material and suggesting the possibility of some error), further investigation byretest or other means should be considered.21
  • ASME vs. PED in manufacturing ASME PEDAuthorized manufacturer required not requiredQuality Manual required in modules D, E, HQualification and approval manufacturer Third party in categoriesof welding procedures in accordance with II, III and IV in accordanceand welders ASME Section IX with EN-standardsApproval of manufacturer or Third party in categoriesNDT-personnel NDT-subcontractor in III and IV in accordance accordance with SNT-TC-1A with EN 473Materials Listed in ASME Section II Listed in harmonized or standards or "recertification" particular material appraisalMaterial certificates required for plates required for all materials for other types of materials typically EN 10204 3.1 and the marking as specified in material manufacturer shall material standard is sufficient operate a quality system22
  • 23
  • PED Annex I Essential Safety Requirements3.1.2. Permanent joining For pressure equipment, permanent joining of components which contribute to the pressure resistance of equipment and components which are directly attached to them must be carried out by suitably qualified personnel according to suitable operating procedures. For pressure equipment in categories II, III and IV, operating procedures and personnel must be approved by a competent third party which, at the manufacturers discretion, may be: - notified body, - a third-party organization recognized by a Member State as provided for in Article 13. To carry out these approvals the third party must perform examinations and tests as set out in the appropriate harmonized standards or equivalent examinations and tests or must have them performed.3.1.3. Non-destructive tests For pressure equipment, non-destructive tests of permanent joints must be carried out by suitable qualified personnel. For pressure equipment in categories III and IV, the personnel must be approved by a third-party organization recognized by a Member State pursuant to Article 13. A problem for manufacturers outside of European Union : The notified bodies or third-party organisations are far away ! 24
  • Transfer of Welding Procedure Qualification RecordsASME IX: When a manufacturer or contractor is acquired by a new owner, the PQRs and WPSs may be used by the new owner without requalification, provided that the new owner takes responsibility for the WPSs and PQRs and the source of the PQRs is identified as being from the former manufacturer.EN 15614-1: A qualification of a pWPS by a welding procedure test obtained by a manufacturer is valid for welding in workshops or sites under the same technical and quality control of the manufacturer. – Welding is under the same technical and quality control when the manufacturer who performed the welding procedure test retains complete responsibility for all welding carried out to it.25
  • Welder QualificationThe principles of welder qualification in ASME Section IX and EN 287-1 arethe same.Each welder or welding operator shall be qualified for each welding processand material to be used in production welding.There are some variations in the test pieces and in the range ofqualification.EN 287-1 is a general welder qualification standard. It may be applied inany industry, not only for welding pressure equipment.The PED sets the additional requirement that the welder’s test shall bewitnessed and approved by a notified body or by a recognized third-partyorganization.26
  • EN 287-1 Annex C (informative) Job knowledgeThe test of job knowledge is recommended, but it is not mandatory.However, some countries can require that the welder undergoes a test of jobknowledge. If the job knowledge test is carried out, it should be recorded on thewelder’s qualification test certificate.This annex outlines the job knowledge that a welder should have to ensure thatprocedures are followed and common practices are complied with. The job knowledgeindicated in this annex is only pitched at the most basic level.Owing to different training programmes in various countries, it is only proposed tostandardize general objectives or categories of job knowledge. The actual question usedshould be drawn up by the individual country, but should include questions on areascovered in C.2, relevant to the qualification test of welders.The actual tests of a welder’s job knowledge can be given by any of the followingmethods or combinations of these methods:a) written objective tests (multiple choice);b) oral questioning following a set of written questions;c) computer testing;d) demonstration/observation testing following a written set of criteria.The test of job knowledge is limited to the matters related to the welding process used inthe test.27
  • Expiration of Welder QualificationASME IX The qualification of a welder is valid without time limit on condition that – he has welded on that process during a period of 6 months – there is no reason to question his ability to weldEN 287-1 The welders qualification test certificate is valid for a period of two years on condition that the employer can confirm every six months that the welder has been welding within the range of qualification with satisfactory results. Welders qualification test certificates can be prolonged every two years by the examiner or examining body.28
  • ASME vs. EN Non-destructive testing of weldsThe amount of non-destructive tests depends of the welding efficiency factorused in design calculations E or z ASME Section VIII Div.1 PED EN 13445-5 1,0 longitudinal transversal NDT and destructive longitudinal transversal 100 % spot tests to confirm 100 % 25 - 100 % that no significant defects exist 0,85 spot spot longitudinal transversal longitudinal transversal min. 1 test 10 - 25 % 2 - 10 % per 15 m 0% 0,7 0% 0% 0%29
  • Pressure test ASME vs. PEDASME Section VIII Div.1 PED and EN 13445-51,3 • maximum allowable pressure Higher of the values − 1,43 • maximum allowable pressure – In most cases the specified materials do not influence the − 1,25 • maximum allowable pressure • test pressure fa is the nominal design stress of the material at the test temperature; fTd is the nominal design stress of the material at design temperature Typical test pressure for a pressure vessel that is designed to operate at elevated temperature is 1,5 – 2,0 • maximum allowable pressure 30
  • ASME Section VIII Div. 1 vs. EN 13445 / PEDASME Section VIII Div. 1 EN 13445+ Cheaper materials + Meets the PED requirements+ Extensive selection of materials, short + In most cases less material is required delivery times + No quality manual is required in module G.+ Plenty of calculation programs The manufacturing may begin if the+ Proven and familiar code, simple welding procedures and personnel are determination of test pressure qualified.+ The manufacturer qualifies his welding + Many notified bodies procedures, welders and NDE- + The manufacturer may inspect and certify personnel the products by himself in modules A, A1,+ Cheaper costs of NDE C1, D, D1, E, E1 and H without direct involvement of the third party31
  • ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code vs. Pressure Equipment Directive (PED)• If a boiler or pressure vessel is to be delivered to European Union it shall be manufactured in accordance with PED and CE-marked.• If a boiler or pressure vessel is to be delivered to USA or Canada it shall be manufactured in accordance with ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code and ASME-stamped.• Both rules are in practice mandatory in their own area, there is no possibility for a compromise. The manufacturer shall accept the customer’s requirements.32
  • 33