Enlighten: integrating a repository with University systems and processes

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Enlighten: integrating a repository with University systems and processes - Presentation Transcript

    1. Enlighten: integrating a repository with University systems and processes Morag Greig Advocacy Manager- Enlighten University of Glasgow UKCoRR meeting 14/08/09
    2. Background
      • Mature and well established institutional repository service at Glasgow (2001-)
      • A hybrid repository with over 5500 records for published research outputs (>2100 full text)
      • Publications policy approved by University Senate in June 2008 (‘mandate’)
      • Policy established Enlighten as both the institutional repository AND the central publications database
      • Key Library engagement and participation in the RAE and the REF Pilot
      • Strong relationships between the Library’s repository managers and the University academic community and research office
      • Recognition that the repository cannot exist as a disconnected data silo
    3. Aims
      • To develop a comprehensive central publications database (2001-) across the University
      • To develop deposit procedures that will enable departments to provide publications data on a regular and ongoing basis
      • To encourage all staff to comply with the Publications Policy and to deposit full text
      • To join up systems and processes so that deposit is easy and data can be re-used for many purposes
    4. Initial visits to departments
      • Initial meetings with Heads of departments/research champions
      • Establish current procedures for collecting publications data
      • Establish how best the department can engage with Enlighten
    5. Multiple sources of publications data and update schedules Reference Manager EndNote Word files Access In-house databases Web pages Monthly Bi-annually Rarely!
    6. Deposit options Self-deposit (two departments) Mediated – some large faculties Proxy – most small to medium sized departments
    7. Training for administrative staff
    8. Enlighten deposit manual
    9. Further visits to departments
      • Presentations at departmental meetings, including demonstrations and time for questions – addressing issues, e.g. versions, permissions etc.
      • Presentations at Faculty level research meetings
      • Presentations are ongoing
    10. Data back filling
      • Data being added for publications back to 2001
      • Some data being entered manually (extra staff trained to do this)
      • Bulk of data being imported from REF databases (records will require some details to be added)
      • Staff numbers being added retrospectively to older records in Enlighten
    11. Repository enhancements
      • HR database – staff numbers (in place)
      • Single sign-on (institutional integration)
      • Statistics
      • Reporting
      • Automated publications lists (institutional integration with content management system)
      • Two way link-ups with the research system (institutional integration)
      • Deposit alerts
      • More granular editorial roles etc.
    12. Automated publications lists
    13. Integration with research systems
      • Two way links between Enlighten and the Research System (auto-complete and look-up features)
      • Automated alerts from the Research System which highlight to researchers that they must deposit their papers in an appropriate repository, in line with their grant conditions
      • Reports showing Projects/Funders and associated publications
    14. Key elements for success
      • Relationships Strong relationships between repository managers and staff at all levels are vital in supporting the deposit of content.
      • Systems and Processes Technical and administrative processes needed to join-up the existing elements of the research lifecycle which will facilitate the ease of deposit.
      • Policies Management and monitoring of both the University’s Publication Policy and those of our funders to ensure compliance.
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + enlightenrepositoryenlightenrepository Nominate

    custom

    108 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation by Morag Greig at UKCORR (United Kingd more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 108
      • 108 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 3
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories