Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation                                   Designer Babies    ...
Introduction(1)We‟re smart and intelligent… But we still have problems
Introduction(2)You might want to choose..       Blue Eyes???                      World Star???                        Non...
Introduction(3)Are we to play God??
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation                                   Designer Babies    ...
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견1 ;질병을 고칠 수 있는 이득이 있다Arguments #1 ForThere are ben...
Poll  Many parents want to  choose for their child‟s  traits
PGD?(Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis)    It takes place before implantation   To search for genetic mutations   that cou...
List of disorders that could be treated using PGD
Phone call with Lisa Nash        Lisa Nash
Which lifestyle would you wishyour children to have?
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견1현재 맞춤아기 기술은 질병치료에 사용하기는 부족하다Against 1It is too ea...
No technique that guarantees 100%     Genetic diseases are   Usually determined by                                        ...
No technique that guarantees 100%As a result of probability calculation, manyhealthy babies would be dead               Pr...
No technique that guarantees 100%Genetic disease is not caused by onlyone gene     Dangerous!                             ...
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견2 ;기술적인 문제는 해결될 수 있다.Arguments #1 ForTechnical pro...
Example of Amazing Technical Improvement     Who could imagine we could     throw an object to thousands     kilometers aw...
Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #1
Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #2
Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #3     Human Genome Project
Cost required to sequence individual human genome
We will provideGenome Analysis for5000 dollars.
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation                                   Designer Babies    ...
What if the technology      develops?If it becomes available?
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견2맞춤아기는 계급의 발생을 초래한다 – 사회적 측면Designer babies lead t...
Movie GATTACA (1997)
Movie GATTACA (1997)
Hierarchy Generation                       Negative Cycle
Gap Between ClassesThe gap in society as it exists today will get wider
Cost required to sequence individual human genome
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견3경제적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 발전해야 한다Arguments #3 ForFrom the e...
Cost of PGD vs Cost of medicaltreatmentPGD is more economical than medical treatment
Cost of PGD vs Cost of medicaltreatment                 PGD                Medical treatment     • IVF ($ 10,000)         ...
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견3윤리학적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 실행될 수 없다.Against #3.From an ethi...
Money vs. Life(1)       Do you really think that the economic       advantages overwhelm the value of lives?
Money vs. Life(2)                           We must not try to   Life is much valuable                           compare l...
Designer Baby as an Accessory   Parents expect their child as a product   or accessory for their tastes.
Disposal of Designer Babies
8 Stage cell is not a LifeImplantation is even not occurred.We do not consider it as a baby.     Numerous 8 stage cells di...
41
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견4장애인들이 현재보다 더 소외될 것이다.Against #4.The disabled will...
ProcessThe disabled will become even more isolated and discriminated upon.       Be more                 National         ...
The disorder problem would not be changed.                                             Consumer Reports                   ...
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견5자식에게 좋은 조건을 제공해주는 것은 부모의 당연한 책임이다.As parents, it ...
Parents do For their kid..Parents do their best for their Offspring  Mencius  : N. 맹자  Like that!
Parents‟ Mind ; Mencius mother 3-times movingParents do their best for their Offspring  Mencius Mother  : N. 맹모  Mencius M...
Designing is ReasonableDesign their baby is parent‟s authority
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견5아이들도 자신의 인생을 선택할 권리가 있다.Against #5.The children, ...
Video Clip – My Sister‟s Keeper (2009)
Deaf Choose Deaf?                    Story of Lesbian couple                    with hearing disorder                    D...
Fundamental rightDesigner baby ignore the most fundamental right for human
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation                                   Designer Babies    ...
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견6진화론적으로 생물의 다양성을 감소시킨다.Against #6.The diversity of...
Evolution Aspects(1)Designer Baby would be design to have contemporary goodgenetic character       Why am I           Gene...
Evolution Aspects(2)This Unstable gene pool would cause extinction orbottleneck effect                                    ...
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견6보기 좋은 떡이...Designer baby is real evolution배재완
Which world do you want?             VS
Which world do you want?             VS
Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal PresentationCONCLUSIONYes or No?강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,배재완, ...
Arguments   FOR             PGD                  Technological prospect                     Economic benefits             ...
Arguments   AGAINST     Unreliable technology                           “Class” society                          Babies = ...
Yes? No? => Need for boundaries       YES                        NO
What‟s Your Verdict?65
KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation
KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

1,303 views
1,105 views

Published on

KAIST 2011 가을학기 Revolution of Science and Technology - Designer Baby Debate 관련 발표자료입니다.

Published in: Health & Medicine, Technology
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,303
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
12
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
29
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

KAIST 2011 Fall semester_REVST_Designer Baby presentation

  1. 1. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation Designer Babies Yes or No?강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
  2. 2. Introduction(1)We‟re smart and intelligent… But we still have problems
  3. 3. Introduction(2)You might want to choose.. Blue Eyes??? World Star??? Non-Smoking???
  4. 4. Introduction(3)Are we to play God??
  5. 5. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation Designer Babies Yes or No?강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
  6. 6. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견1 ;질병을 고칠 수 있는 이득이 있다Arguments #1 ForThere are benefits of being able tocure disease정수황
  7. 7. Poll Many parents want to choose for their child‟s traits
  8. 8. PGD?(Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis) It takes place before implantation To search for genetic mutations that could develop into a chronic disease.
  9. 9. List of disorders that could be treated using PGD
  10. 10. Phone call with Lisa Nash Lisa Nash
  11. 11. Which lifestyle would you wishyour children to have?
  12. 12. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견1현재 맞춤아기 기술은 질병치료에 사용하기는 부족하다Against 1It is too early to apply current „designerbaby‟ technology for medical purposes강성민
  13. 13. No technique that guarantees 100% Genetic diseases are Usually determined by Hard to distinguish not Y/N problems not static properties diseased embryo (ex. Hormones) Distributed properties or
  14. 14. No technique that guarantees 100%As a result of probability calculation, manyhealthy babies would be dead Probability Would be dead Calculation
  15. 15. No technique that guarantees 100%Genetic disease is not caused by onlyone gene Dangerous! gene2 gene1 gene3 Genetic Disease Some tests are dangerous Not caused by one gene
  16. 16. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견2 ;기술적인 문제는 해결될 수 있다.Arguments #1 ForTechnical problems can be resolved구태균
  17. 17. Example of Amazing Technical Improvement Who could imagine we could throw an object to thousands kilometers away?
  18. 18. Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #1
  19. 19. Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #2
  20. 20. Technological foundations to create „designer babies‟ #3 Human Genome Project
  21. 21. Cost required to sequence individual human genome
  22. 22. We will provideGenome Analysis for5000 dollars.
  23. 23. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation Designer Babies Yes or No?강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
  24. 24. What if the technology develops?If it becomes available?
  25. 25. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견2맞춤아기는 계급의 발생을 초래한다 – 사회적 측면Designer babies lead to a discriminative “class-oriented” society 이남일
  26. 26. Movie GATTACA (1997)
  27. 27. Movie GATTACA (1997)
  28. 28. Hierarchy Generation Negative Cycle
  29. 29. Gap Between ClassesThe gap in society as it exists today will get wider
  30. 30. Cost required to sequence individual human genome
  31. 31. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견3경제적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 발전해야 한다Arguments #3 ForFrom the economic perspective, designerbabies should be developed발표자 ; 배재완
  32. 32. Cost of PGD vs Cost of medicaltreatmentPGD is more economical than medical treatment
  33. 33. Cost of PGD vs Cost of medicaltreatment PGD Medical treatment • IVF ($ 10,000) • Antibiotic treatment • ICSI ($ 1,500 ~ 2,500) • Gene therapy • Embryo biopsy • Chest therapy ($ 1,500 ~ 2,500) • Drug • • • • • •
  34. 34. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견3윤리학적인 측면에서 맞춤아기는 실행될 수 없다.Against #3.From an ethical perspective, „designer babies‟should not be permitted..권동욱
  35. 35. Money vs. Life(1) Do you really think that the economic advantages overwhelm the value of lives?
  36. 36. Money vs. Life(2) We must not try to Life is much valuable compare life w/ than Money money
  37. 37. Designer Baby as an Accessory Parents expect their child as a product or accessory for their tastes.
  38. 38. Disposal of Designer Babies
  39. 39. 8 Stage cell is not a LifeImplantation is even not occurred.We do not consider it as a baby. Numerous 8 stage cells died naturally (not intended) It‟s just a material for research.
  40. 40. 41
  41. 41. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견4장애인들이 현재보다 더 소외될 것이다.Against #4.The disabled will become even moreisolated and discriminated upon.유태선
  42. 42. ProcessThe disabled will become even more isolated and discriminated upon. Be more National Overall condition minor class Support will for the disabled decrease gets worse
  43. 43. The disorder problem would not be changed. Consumer Reports : N. 소비자고발 Disorder (90% is acquired)
  44. 44. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견5자식에게 좋은 조건을 제공해주는 것은 부모의 당연한 책임이다.As parents, it is a dutiful responsibility to provide theirchildren with the best possible conditions.전승제
  45. 45. Parents do For their kid..Parents do their best for their Offspring Mencius : N. 맹자 Like that!
  46. 46. Parents‟ Mind ; Mencius mother 3-times movingParents do their best for their Offspring Mencius Mother : N. 맹모 Mencius Mother 3- times Moving : 맹모삼천지교 Like that!
  47. 47. Designing is ReasonableDesign their baby is parent‟s authority
  48. 48. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견5아이들도 자신의 인생을 선택할 권리가 있다.Against #5.The children, too, have the rights tomake their own decisions.성영제
  49. 49. Video Clip – My Sister‟s Keeper (2009)
  50. 50. Deaf Choose Deaf? Story of Lesbian couple with hearing disorder Deaf not obstacle
  51. 51. Fundamental rightDesigner baby ignore the most fundamental right for human
  52. 52. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation Designer Babies Yes or No?강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
  53. 53. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation반대의견6진화론적으로 생물의 다양성을 감소시킨다.Against #6.The diversity of living organisms willdecrease from an evolutionary perspective김승민
  54. 54. Evolution Aspects(1)Designer Baby would be design to have contemporary goodgenetic character Why am I Genetically looks so fat? Recombine SLIM FAT SLIM SLIM Now
  55. 55. Evolution Aspects(2)This Unstable gene pool would cause extinction orbottleneck effect Only Fat People would survive in glacial epoch Glacial Epoch FAT SLIM FAT SLIM
  56. 56. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal Presentation찬성의견6보기 좋은 떡이...Designer baby is real evolution배재완
  57. 57. Which world do you want? VS
  58. 58. Which world do you want? VS
  59. 59. Revolutions in Science & Tech. Professor Mina ParkFinal PresentationCONCLUSIONYes or No?강성민, 성영제, 유태선, 이남일, 김승민, 권동욱,배재완, 정수황, 전승제, 황대희, 구태균
  60. 60. Arguments FOR PGD Technological prospect Economic benefits Parents‟ rights to choose World full of perfect people! :)
  61. 61. Arguments AGAINST Unreliable technology “Class” society Babies = product EYES Handicap discrimination FACE BODY Child‟s freedom restrained IQ EQ
  62. 62. Yes? No? => Need for boundaries YES NO
  63. 63. What‟s Your Verdict?65

×