Rehash dichotomous pedagogy


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Rehash dichotomous pedagogy

  1. 1. 1 Professor Robin Alexander Alexander´s earlier research and writing included the books The Self-Evaluating Institution (1982), Primary Teaching (1984), Change in TeacherEducation (1984), Changing Primary Practice (1989), Versions of PrimaryEducation (1995), Policy and Practice in Primary Education: local initiative, nationalagenda (1997), and Learning from Comparing: new directions in comparativeeducation research Vol I (1999) and Vol 2 (2000). This corpus includes work on policy, pedagogy, curriculum, evaluation,international comparative and cultural studies, teacher education and, especially,primary education. Subsequently, his Culture and Pedagogy: internationalcomparisons in primary education (Blackwell 2001) won top education book prizeson both sides of the Atlantic and led to Essays on Pedagogy (2008), Education for All,the Quality Imperative and the Problem of Pedagogy (2008) and to his extensive andcontinuing work on classroom talk reform and the advancement of dialogic teaching(Education as Dialogue, 2006 and Towards Dialogic Teaching: rethinking classroomtalk, 4th edition 2008).Information taken from:
  2. 2. 2Author´s goals Re-conceptualizingpedagogy and curriculum through criticizing how the teaching act has been atomized in factors to study the phenomenon from a causality approach (method X allow student to learn Y) and highlighting the failure of integrating once again such factors to as a coherent and recognizable events located in time and space. Problematizing the reductionism with which teaching has been conceived. Especially the proliferation of certain models as, for instance, script teaching and bipolar models of pedagogy. Scripted teaching or scripted instruction refers to commercial reading programs that have highly structured lessons, often with specific time allotments for teaching specific skills, and often word-for-word scripts of what the teacher is to say. Scripted instruction has often been advocated for schools where teachers have had inadequate teacher training and is also seen as way to standardize the quality of instruction. Critics say that such programs stifle teachers creativity, undermine teachers expertise, and fail to provide for the diverse needs of many classrooms. Advocates see it as the easiest way to provide teachers with the essential elements of effective reading instruction. Scripted instruction has also been applied to preparation of lessons in many other subject matter areas. Retrieved from: Bipolar models of pedagogy… Examples of bipolar models: Student center vs. teacher center, or process vs. productAuthor’s claimDeveloping a science for teaching acts based on a comparative inquiry to incorporate political andconceptual spaces in re-conceptualizing curriculum and pedagogy.Methodological approachConceptualizing teaching based on a comparative model (5 countries –England, France, Russia, USA,and India-, and working hard against ethnocentrism (bias in favoring one culture/country)becauseterms are culturally and linguistically situated.
  3. 3. 3Theoretical model Pedagogy encompasses that act together with purposes, values, ideas, assumptions, theories and beliefs, which inform, shape, and seek to justify it. Teaching is cultural act, which means such act is a group of coherent and recognizable events that ensue in time and space, and also involves discourses (systems of values and ideas). Three levels of data analysis: state/school/classroom:ConclusionIn integrating teaching acts (frame/form/act) and discourses of pedagogy (systems of values) emergesthe complex relationship between theories and practices. Such relationship is not linear, becauseteaching practices embrace contradictory thinking and mixed messages: teaching can be traditional andprogressive at the same time (bipolar pedagogy models are not useful).Research implicationsThe focus of research on teaching is not the effectiveness; instead, teaching acts should be conceived ascomplex relationships between mixed values and observable practices (Frame/ Form/ Act).