Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Ed overcrowding
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Ed overcrowding

2,412

Published on

Isra Al Lawati

Isra Al Lawati

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,412
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
78
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • In situations where there were more sick patients than hospital beds to accommodate them, it was cheaper and easier to house supernumerary patients in the ED than to devise appropriate inpatient solutions, so this became an accepted practice for almost all Canadian health care facilities
  • -where privacy, and access to basic clinical resources (cardiac monitor, oxygen, suction, call button etc) is absent
  • : (1) emergency care; (2) unscheduled urgent care; and (3) safety net care
  • Sudden influx in ill patients Example: Influenza Season
  • Phase 2 Several factors affect throughput times during this phase, including the cohesiveness of patient care teams, physical layout of the ED, nurse and physician staffing ratios, efficiency and use of diagnostic testing (eg, laboratory, radiology), accessibility of medical information, quality of documentation and communications systems, and availability of timely specialty consultation
  • One hospital activated reserve personnel as needed during the viral epidemic season, reducing the waiting time by 15 minutes and the rate of patients leaving without being seen by 37%.76
  • Transcript

    • 1. ED Overcrowding Isra Al-Lawati R3
    • 2. Outline
      • Objective
      • Introduction
      • Definition
      • Markers of Overcrowding
      • Source of Crowding in ED
      • Solutions
      • Summery
    • 3. Objective
      • Familiarize you with crowding concept
      • Tackle major cause of crowding in our departments compered to international causes
      • Explore the most efficient solutions
    • 4. Introduction
      • Emergency department (ED) overcrowding  significant problem
      • Major barrier to receiving timely emergency care
        • Increased health care costs
        • Raised stress levels among staff and patients
        • Adversely affecting patient outcome.
      Forecasting Models of Emergency Department Crowding Lisa M. Schweigler, MD, MPH, MS, Jeffrey S. Desmond, MD, Melissa L. McCarthy, ScD, ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2009
    • 5.
      • Effects
        • Adverse Outcomes
          • Patient Mortality
        • Reduced Quality
          • Transport Delays
          • Treatment Delays
        • Impaired Access
          • Ambulance Diversion
          • Patient Elopement
        • Provider Losses
          • Financial Effects
    • 6. History
      • Described in 1980s
        • Aging population
        • Rising infectious disease rates e.g. AIDS
        • Substance abuse
        • Psychiatric illness
        • Effects of poverty on health
        • Hospital bed and staffing shortages
      CAEP - canadian association of emergency physicians: - emergency department overcrowding - position statement 2003
    • 7.
      • Early 1990s strategies to address overcrowding were developed  little or no action
      • Easier and cheaper to House the ED  wide acceptable
      • Late 1990s problem peaked
        • Aging population
        • Fewer hospital beds and fewer Eds
        • Raising patient volumes and acuities
      CAEP - canadian association of emergency physicians: - emergency department overcrowding - position statement 2003
    • 8. Kellermann AL . Crisis in the emergency department . N Engl J Med 2006 Sep 28 ; 355 ( 13 ): 1300 – 1303 . ED visits 26%, # ED 9% 198000 closed bed
    • 9. Definitions
      • The ACEP Crowding Resources Task Force
      • “ A situation in which the identified need for emergency services outstrips available resources in the ED”
        • More patients than staffed ED treatment beds
        • Waiting times exceed a reasonable period.
        • Pts being monitored in non-treatment areas (eg, hallways)
        • Inability to appropriately triage Pt
      www.acep.org/workarea/downloadasset.aspx?id=8872
    • 10. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians
      • “ Situation in which demand for service exceeds the ability to provide care within a reasonable time, causing physicians and nurses to be unable to provide quality care.”
        • Monitoring waiting times & time to be seen by the ED physician
        • Time to be seen by a consultant
        • Time to admitted patient to an inpatient bed.
    • 11. Australian collage of emergency Medicine (ACEM)
      • “ Situation where emergency department function is impeded primarily because the number of patients waiting to be seen, undergoing assessment and treatment, or waiting for departure exceeds either the physical bed and/or staffing capacity of the emergency department”
    • 12.
      • Ambulance Diversion:
        • Ambulances are diverted to other, less-crowded hospitals
      • Inpatient Boarding:
        • Patients remain in the ED after already being admitted to the hospital
      • Destination Control:
        • Use of internet-accessible operating information to redistribute ambulances
    • 13.
      • ED crowding is a system problem not an ED problem
      • Measure of health system performance
      • Examine ED crowding in the context of the entire delivery system by using reliable methods to understand, measure, and monitor system capacity
    • 14. Markers of Overcrowding
      • Inability to offload ambulance patients and a resultant loss of capacity in the local emergency response in the community.
      • Inability to place critically unwell patients in an appropriate treatment space when required.
      • Patients undergoing clinical management in a non-treatment area.
      • Admitted patients receiving a lesser standard of care than that applying in their destination unit.
    • 15. Reasons
      • 1. Macro level – This perspective examines the forces of the national and regional levels that drive ED crowding, such as the federal and state government health programs, and other regulatory bodies.
      • 2. Micro level – This perspective examines the forces that affect EDs on a local and institutional level.
    • 16. Micro Level
      • Conceptual model of ED crowding:
        • • Input: any condition, event, or system characteristic that contributes to the demand for ED services.
      • Sources and aspects of patient inflow
        • • Throughput: the processes of care within the ED
        • • Output: The movement of pt out of the ED to another care site
      180. ‐ 173 42(2): 2003; Med. Emerg. Ann crowding. department emergency of model conceptual A al. et KV, Rhodes DJ, Magid BR, Asplin 1
    • 17. Input
      • 3 general categories of care delivered in the ED
      • (1) emergency care
        • Seriously ill and injured patients may be increasing.
        • Referral of patients with emergency conditions.
      • (2) unscheduled urgent care
        • Lack of capacity for unscheduled care in the ambulatory care system
        • Desire for immediate care
      • (3) safety net care
        • Vulnerable populations (eg, Medicaid beneficiaries,the uninsured)
    • 18.
      • Non-Urgent Visits
      • Low-acuity ED PT.
        • Present even in hospitals with dedicated fast-track systems.
        • Reasoning:
          • Insufficient access or/ and Untimely access to PC.
      • Account for a small portion of total ED volume.
    • 19.
      • Frequent Flyers
      • 4 or more annual visits to the ED
        • 8-14 % total ED visits
        • Non-urgent complaints
        • Chronic illness, drug seeking patients, malingers
      • 29% of these visits might have been
      • appropriate for primary care .
      Hoot & Aronsky Systematic Review of Emergency Department Crowding Volume 52 NO2 : August 2008 Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • 20. Throughput
      • Identifies patient length of stay in the ED as a contributing factor .
      • Highlights the need to look internally at ED care processes & modify them a to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
      • 2 Phases
        • phase I : triage, room placement, and the initial provider evaluation
        • Phase II: diagnostic testing and ED treatment ( Majority time)
    • 21. Output
      • Inefficient disposition of ED patients
      • board admitted pt ED’s capacity to care for new patients
      • Boarding of inpatients in the ED cited as the most important determinant of overcrowding & ambulance diversion.
      • Boarding consume nursing & physician resources and delay evaluation of new patients.
    • 22.
      • Inpatient Boarding:
        • 1/2 of American ED’s have extending boarding times.
        • A point-prevalence study 22 % ED pts were boarded patients.
      • Factors ?!!
      • Andrulis DP, Kellermann A, Hintz EA, et al. Emergency departments and crowding in United States teaching hospitals. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:980-986.
      • Schneider SM, Gallery ME, Schafermeyer R, et al. Emergency department crowding: a point in time. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:
      • 167-172.
    • 23.
      • Once Discharge :
      • The availability of timely follow-up appointments in the ambulatory care system once again may create capacity problems
      • Time spent by ED providers arranging appropriate follow-up
      • If outpatient follow-up care cannot be made, EP are more likely to admit patients to the hospital
    • 24. 180. ‐ 173 42(2): 2003; Med. Emerg. Ann crowding. department emergency of model conceptual A al. et KV, Rhodes DJ, Magid BR, Asplin 1
    • 25. Solutions
      • Acknowledge it a SYSTEM problem.
      • Look in each component and find modifiable factors
    • 26. Increased Resources
      • Ways that have been shown to effectively decrease ED stays:
        • Permanent increase in ED physician staffing.
        • length of stay by 35 minutes
        • Activation of reserve personnel during peak times. e.g. : Influenza Season
      Rondeau KV, Francescutti LH. Emergency department overcrowding: the impact of resource scarcity on physician job satisfaction. J Healthc Manag. 2005;50:327-340.
    • 27.
      • Observation Units
        • Reduced LOS for patients with chest pain and asthma exacerbation.
      • Acute Care Units (ED managed)
        • Reduced ambulance diversion by 40 percent.
        • Decreased boarded patients from 14 to 8 during a 2 year period.
      • Acute medical Unit
        • Reduce Boarding time
      • Point-of-care Laboratory Testing
        • Shown to decrease length of stay by 41 minutes.
    • 28.
      • Fast Tracks
      • Improve waiting time but Not the crowding
      • Improve Bed Access and Management
      • Most promising interventions in terms of permanently reducing ED Crowding
      • Additional Solutions
        • Bedside Registration
        • Physician Triage
        • Cancelling Elective Surgeries
    • 29.
      • “ NOT” Effective Solutions
        • Ambulance Diversion
        • ED Expansion
        • Employ hospitalists to coordinate patient care
      American College of Emergency Physicians. Emergency Department Crowding: High-Impact Solutions. April 2008.
    • 30. Summary
      • Crowding Is not the Volume its Available recourse
      • It’s a System problem not ED
      • Conceptual model
      • Conjoint efforts to solve the problem
    • 31. Thank You ??

    ×