Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Health Care Reform: Minnesota and the Nation

on

  • 1,242 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,242
Views on SlideShare
1,242
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Health Care Reform: Minnesota and the Nation Health Care Reform: Minnesota and the Nation Presentation Transcript

  • Health Care Reform: Minnesota and the Nation Julie Sonier Director, Health Economics Program Minnesota Department of Health September 22, 2009
  • Objectives
    • How are health reforms in Minnesota similar to and different from national efforts?
    • Describe Minnesota’s recent reform activities and goals
  • Minnesota starts from a reasonably good place
    • Insurance coverage:
      • Among the nation’s lowest uninsurance rates
        • Strong employer base
      • MinnesotaCare subsidized insurance program (since 1992, pre-SCHIP)
        • Subsidized coverage for parents and kids to 275% FPG
        • Single adults and childless couples to 250% FPG (effective July 2009)
  • Minnesota starts from a reasonably good place
    • Consistently ranked as one of the healthiest states
    • History of collaboration and innovation to improve health care
      • Largely non-profit environment
      • Collaboration around best practices, quality measurement
  • The Context for Health Reform Discussions in Minnesota
    • In spite of our relatively good starting point:
      • Rising health care costs in the state are unsustainable
      • Our health care system has misaligned incentives
        • Large variations in quality – inversely related to cost
        • We pay for volume, not value
      • Private insurance has eroded, and the number of uninsured has increased
      • Unhealthy behaviors have created high and rising costs of preventable disease
    • Similar problems exist at the national level
  • Total health care spending in Minnesota up nearly 70% between 2000 and 2007 Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Economics Program
  • Health insurance cost growth far exceeds growth in incomes and wages Note: Health care cost is MN privately insured spending on health care services per person, and does not include enrollee out of pocket spending for deductibles, copayments/coinsurance, and services not covered by insurance.. Sources: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Economics Program; U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
  • Historical Perspective: Health Care Spending Growth is Not a New Problem
  • U.S. Health Care Spending as a Share of Gross Domestic Product *Projected. Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Historical spending estimates as of January 2009; projections as of February 2009.
  • Misaligned Incentives: Higher Payment for Lower Quality
  • Minnesota Diabetes Care: Improving but only 1 in 7 receive optimal care Source: MN Community Measurement Health Care Quality Report
  • Sources of Insurance Coverage in Minnesota, 2001 and 2007 Source: Minnesota Health Access Surveys, 2001 and 2007
  • Minnesota Uninsurance Rates by Income Source: Minnesota Health Access Surveys, 2001 to 2007
  • Minnesota Uninsurance Rates by Age Source: Minnesota Health Access Surveys, 2001 to 2007
  • Minnesota Uninsurance Rates by Race and Ethnicity Source: Minnesota Health Access Surveys, 2001 to 2007
  • Trends in Overweight/Obesity in Minnesota Normal Weight Overweight Obese Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey
  • Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 1990 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14%
  • Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 1994 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19%
  • Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 1998 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20
  • Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 2004 No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25% (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)
  • Impact of Rising Obesity on Health Care Costs
    • Increasing prevalence
    • Widening gap between health care spending for obese vs normal weight population
    • One national study found that obesity-related health spending accounted for 27% of inflation-adjusted per capita health spending increases from 1987 to 2001
      • 41% of the rise in heart disease spending
      • 38% of the rise in diabetes-related spending
    Source: Thorpe et al., “The Impact of Obesity on Rising Medical Spending,” Health Affairs, October 2004.
  • Public and Private Cost Pressures
    • Cost of private coverage rising faster than incomes, inflation
      • Likely a contributing factor to recent erosion in private insurance coverage
    • Public programs face dual sources of cost pressure:
      • Rising enrollment
      • Rising cost per person
    • So, in addition to cost and access problems, we have a sustainability problem
    • Which problem to address first?
  • Approaches to Health Reform
    • Massachusetts approach: address coverage first, cost later
    • Minnesota: expanded coverage too, but greater focus on reforms that improve quality/cost to ensure sustainability
    • National debate: mostly focusing on coverage
  • 2007-2008 Minnesota Health Reform Plans
    • Health Care Transformation Task Force (Governor appointed)
      • Charge from legislature included reducing health care expenditures by 20%
    • Health Care Access Commission (Legislative)
    • Both reports included recommendations for comprehensive reform, with much common ground
  • Overview of Health Reform Bill Key Elements
    • Public health improvement
    • Health care coverage/affordability
    • Chronic care management
    • Payment reform and price/quality transparency
    • Administrative efficiency
    • Health care cost measurement
  • Public Health Improvement
    • Invests in community-based efforts to reduce rates of obesity and tobacco use
    • Builds on current CDC-funded pilots
    • Total of $47 million in grants to communities
  • Health Care Coverage and Affordability
    • Expanded eligibility for MinnesotaCare for adults without children to 250% of the poverty level
      • Outreach efforts, streamlined enrollment
    • Tax credits for uninsured to purchase private coverage
    • Employers with more than 10 employees required to establish “section 125” plans if they don’t offer health insurance coverage to employees
  • Payment Reform: Why Is It Needed?
    • Current system: based on individual services
      • Few incentives for prevention, care coordination/management, quality improvement, innovation, or value
      • Few consumer incentives to choose provider based on quality or cost
      • Limited information on price and quality of care
      • Provider incentives to invest in profitable services and to avoid unprofitable services
  • Payment Reform: Chronic Care Management
    • Promotes use of “health care homes” to coordinate care for people with complex/chronic conditions
    • MDH and DHS to develop standards of certification for health care homes
    • Care coordination payments to health care homes
      • Public and private purchasers, beginning July 2010
  • Other Payment Reforms and Price/Quality Transparency
    • Establish a set of common quality measures and incentive payments for quality
    • “ Peer grouping” of providers on relative cost, quality, and resource use
      • Public and private purchasers will use this tool to strengthen member incentives to use high-quality, low-cost providers
    • Promotes transparency and innovation by establishing bundled pricing for 7 commonly defined “baskets of care”
  • Administrative Simplification
    • Health care providers must have electronic health records by 2015, and they must be interoperable
    • Electronic prescribing by 2011
    • Study of ways to reducing claims adjudication costs for health plans and providers
  • Concluding Thoughts
    • Expanding coverage:
      • Relatively easy to explain why this is important
      • Given political will (and money), path is fairly straightforward
    • Quality/cost/value:
      • Much more complex – difficult to engage policymakers and the public
      • No magic answers to the problem, but some promising ideas
    • All of these issues must be addressed to make the system more equitable and sustainable
  • Contact Information: Julie Sonier [email_address] (651) 201-3561 Health Reform Website: www.health.state.mn.us/healthreform