Loading...
Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view slideshows. We have detected that you do not have it on your computer.To install it, go here
 
Post to Twitter Post to Twitter
Myspace Hi5 Friendster Xanga LiveJournal Facebook Blogger Tagged Typepad Freewebs BlackPlanet gigya icons
« Prev Comments 1 - 1 of 1 Next »
Add a comment If you have a SlideShare account, login to comment; otherwise comment as a guest.
    SlideShare is now available on LinkedIn. Add it to your LinkedIn profile.

    Libraries and the Hive Mind: Folksonomies and Tagging

    From ellyssa, 5 months ago Add as contact

    Given to the Metropolitan Library Council on June 17, 2008.

    1059 views | 1 comments | 4 favorites | 0 downloads | 2 embeds (Stats)

    Categories

    Technology

    Groups/Events

    Embed in your blog options close
    Embed (wordpress.com) Exclude related slideshows Embed in your blog

    More Info

    This slideshow is Public
    Total Views: 1059 on Slideshare: 1032 from embeds: 27
    Most viewed embeds (Top 5): More
    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate

    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this slideshow as inappropriate.

    If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Slideshow Transcript

    1. Slide 1: Libraries and the Hive Mind Folksonomies & Tagging Ellyssa Kroski Metropolitan New York Library Council June 17, 2008
    2. Slide 2: Tagging on the Web
    3. Slide 3: Tag Pronunciation: tăg Transitive verb: 1. To categorize content online. 2. To add descriptive keywords, categories, or labels to online objects for future retrieval or findability. Inflected forms: tag·ging, tags
    4. Slide 4: Motives • For Future Retrieval – Personal filing system – Keywords to describe one bookmark out of 500 • For Public Findability – Blog Posts – Photographs – Videos
    5. Slide 5: Basic Tagging • Web 2.0 • Participatory Web • Read/Write Web • One of the most basic ways that Web users can contribute to their own online experience • DIY cataloging
    6. Slide 6: Tagging Websites • Social Media Websites – Flickr, YouTube • Social Bookmarking Websites – del.icio.us, CiteULike • Listmakers and Social Cataloging Websites – 43 Things, LibraryThing • Blogs – 75 million blogs – Nearly all blogging software supports tagging
    7. Slide 7: del.icio.us
    8. Slide 9: flickr
    9. Slide 10: 43 Things
    10. Slide 12: blogs
    11. Slide 13: Tag Cloud
    12. Slide 14: My Tag Cloud
    13. Slide 15: + = My Tags Everyone Else’s Tags A Folksonomy
    14. Slide 17: How popular is tagging? • 28% of online Americans have tagged content such as photos, news stories, or blog posts on the Web. (Pew Internet & American Life). • As of Feb 2007, 35% of all blog posts or 230 million were tagged according to Technorati. • LibraryThing has over 384,000 users who have created 32 million tags. • Flickr users have created over 10 million tags.
    15. Slide 18: Mainstream Tagging • Major Media Websites – New York Times • Tag Cloud
    16. Slide 20: Mainstream Tagging • Major Media Websites – New York Times • Tag Clouds – Parenting Magazine • Tag Clouds
    17. Slide 22: Mainstream Tagging • Major Media Websites – New York Times • Tag Clouds – Parenting Magazine • Tag Clouds – New York Observer • Tag Clouds • Head Cloud
    18. Slide 25: User-Tagging & Major Media
    19. Slide 26: User-Tagging & Major Media
    20. Slide 27: Amazon User-Tagging
    21. Slide 28: Amazon User-Tagging
    22. Slide 29: Gmail “Labels”
    23. Slide 30: Facebook Tagging
    24. Slide 31: RSS Feeds for Tags
    25. Slide 32: RSS Feeds for Tags
    26. Slide 33: Tag Searches
    27. Slide 34: Tag Searches
    28. Slide 35: Tagging Tools
    29. Slide 36: Tagging Tools
    30. Slide 37: Enterprise Tagging • Behind the Firewall • Intranet Bookmarking • Dogear – IBM social bookmarking community – 6,000 employees – Over 100,000 bookmarks
    31. Slide 38: Dogear
    32. Slide 39: Dogear
    33. Slide 40: Dogear
    34. Slide 41: Library Tagging
    35. Slide 42: Danbury Public Library
    36. Slide 43: Ann Arbor District Library
    37. Slide 44: Ann Arbor District Library
    38. Slide 45: Vanderbilt University Library
    39. Slide 46: Carl A. Pescosolido Library
    40. Slide 47: Tag Clouds on Library Websites
    41. Slide 48: Subject Area Tagging
    42. Slide 49: Subject Area Tagging
    43. Slide 50: PennTags • Community for students, faculty, and staff of Upenn. • Bookmarks may include any Web content, OPAC records, items from SFX menu, items from video catalog, e-resources. • Users can make their bookmarks private or public. • Over 800 users, 13,000 bookmarks
    44. Slide 51: PennTags
    45. Slide 52: MTagger
    46. Slide 53: LibMarks
    47. Slide 54: Tags for Subject Guides
    48. Slide 55: Tags for Subject Guides
    49. Slide 56: ALA2007
    50. Slide 57: ALA2007
    51. Slide 58: ALA2007
    52. Slide 59: Class Tags
    53. Slide 60: Class Tags
    54. Slide 61: Advantages?
    55. Slide 62: Complementary Navigation
    56. Slide 63: Inclusiveness Lift Elevator
    57. Slide 64: Inclusiveness Newsagent News Stand News Newspapers
    58. Slide 65: Currency • Instantaneous Results • Changes and/or additions to the taxonomy are added to the whole as quickly as they are made by the individuals.
    59. Slide 66: Discovery Potential
    60. Slide 67: Insight into User Behavior
    61. Slide 68: Community • The social nature of tagging engenders a sense of community. • People have a common goal of cataloging their own information, but also sharing it with others. • Offers a chance to view what people have tagged with a word, also how others categorized a particular resource. • Involves the user and gets them invested in a website or brand.
    62. Slide 69: Low Cost • Low/No Cost alternative to a traditional taxonomy for cataloging Web-based resources. • Massive rate of publication online between mediums such as blogs, wikis, etc. make a controlled vocabulary impossible. • Library of Congress collection consists of 130 million items. • The blogosphere alone produces more than 1.3 million items in the form of new blog posts every day. • Flickr has a million photos uploaded every day.
    63. Slide 70: Usability
    64. Slide 71: Usability
    65. Slide 72: Usability
    66. Slide 73: Limitations?
    67. Slide 74: Lack of Synonym Control
    68. Slide 75: Lack of Hierarchy • Folksonomies are flat, there are no parent- child relationships, no sub-categories. • Makes for a less robust classification system than the traditional taxonomy. • This limits the ability to add context to tags.
    69. Slide 76: Lack of Precision • Discovery Systems • Folksonomies don’t have any hierarchical relationships, making searches less precise.
    70. Slide 77: Lack of Recall • Recall: the ability of a system to return all resources related to a topic. • Because of lack of synonym control, a search of a folksonomy will not effect a complete results list because of the use of similar tags. • A search for cat will usually not retrieve resources which have been tagged with kitten, feline, or tabby.
    71. Slide 78: Susceptible to Spam • Because these systems are open, spammers and/or unethical users out to corrupt a system could propagate bad tags.
    72. Slide 79: The Future of Tagging Tag Clusters Tag Bundles Faceted Tags
    73. Slide 80: Tag Clusters & Synonym Control
    74. Slide 81: Tag Bundles & Personal Hierarchy
    75. Slide 82: Faceted Tagging & Hierarchy
    76. Slide 83: Next Gen Tagging • Geographic Metadata • Mobile Metadata which enables interaction with the world around us • 2 D Barcode Tags
    77. Slide 84: Flickr’s GeoTagging
    78. Slide 85: Socialight’s Mobile Metadata
    79. Slide 86: Semapedia
    80. Slide 88: http://winksite.com http://semacode.com
    81. Slide 89: Ellyssa Kroski ellyssakroski@yahoo.com Blogs: http://oedb.org/blogs/ilibrarian http://infotangle.blogsome.com http://www.slideshare.net/ellyssa