Presentation1

287 views
223 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
287
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Presentation1

  1. 1. Several slabs were subjected to different curing techniques, from “just nothing” to a curing mat, membranes with solvent, water-based curing compounds, and Lithium<br />
  2. 2. Crack density (m/m2)<br />Slabs with Lithium had the largest crack density (except for slabs with no curing)<br />
  3. 3. Crack width (mm)<br />Did not score well either on crack width<br />
  4. 4. Slab 4, lithium cure<br />
  5. 5. Slab 4, lithium cure<br />
  6. 6. Slab 15, lithium cure<br />
  7. 7. Slab 15, lithium cure<br />
  8. 8. Slab 18, lithium membrane<br />
  9. 9. Slab 18, lithium membrane<br />
  10. 10. Slab 34, lithium membrane<br />
  11. 11. Slab 34, lithium membrane<br />
  12. 12. Rolling wire brush to test surface abrasion<br />
  13. 13. Test specimens<br />
  14. 14. Test specimens<br />

×