Slideshow transcript
Slide 1: July 2008 Does metadata matter? Andy Powell, Eduserv Foundation andy.powell@eduserv.org.uk www.eduserv.org.uk/foundation
Slide 2: or… should we be interested in metadata and, if so, why? Does metadata matter? July 2008 2
Slide 3: I’m going to try to deliver 130 slides in 30 minutes Does metadata matter? July 2008 3
Slide 4: then you can ask questions (yes… I really did say “130 slides”) Does metadata matter? July 2008 4
Slide 5: non-technical Does metadata matter? July 2008 5
Slide 6: metadata jargon Does metadata matter? July 2008 6
Slide 7: first, some history… Does metadata matter? July 2008 7
Slide 8: Does metadata matter? July 2008 8
Slide 9: Does metadata matter? July 2008 9
Slide 10: metadata is… Does metadata matter? July 2008 10
Slide 11: machine-readable Does metadata matter? July 2008 11
Slide 12: descriptive Does metadata matter? July 2008 12
Slide 13: for the purposes of… Does metadata matter? July 2008 13
Slide 14: resource discovery Does metadata matter? July 2008 14
Slide 15: resource management Does metadata matter? July 2008 15
Slide 16: delivery / access control Does metadata matter? July 2008 16
Slide 17: use / re-use Does metadata matter? July 2008 17
Slide 18: long term preservation Does metadata matter? July 2008 18
Slide 19: Does metadata matter? July 2008 19
Slide 20: MARC - Machine-Readable Catalogue Does metadata matter? July 2008 20
Slide 21: Does metadata matter? July 2008 21
Slide 22: Does metadata matter? July 2008 22
Slide 23: still the predominant metadata standard (in the library world) Does metadata matter? July 2008 23
Slide 24: Does metadata matter? July 2008 24
Slide 25: a distributed search standard called… Z39.50 so that multiple library catalogues can be searched from one place Does metadata matter? July 2008 25
Slide 26: AACR2 currently being replaced by… RDA (more generic – i.e. not just books!) Does metadata matter? July 2008 26
Slide 27: Z39.50 supplemented by SRW and SRU (Web-friendly variants) Does metadata matter? July 2008 27
Slide 28: FRBR Does metadata matter? July 2008 28
Slide 29: none of which needs bother you… Does metadata matter? July 2008 29
Slide 30: other than to note that… Does metadata matter? July 2008 30
Slide 31: metadata tends to get more complicated the longer you think about it Does metadata matter? July 2008 31
Slide 32: 1994 Does metadata matter? July 2008 32
Slide 33: Does metadata matter? July 2008 33
Slide 34: Does metadata matter? July 2008 34
Slide 35: a few 10s of 1000s of pages Does metadata matter? July 2008 35
Slide 36: but recognised that finding stuff was going to start getting difficult Does metadata matter? July 2008 36
Slide 37: people (mainly librarians) began trying to catalogue it by hand Does metadata matter? July 2008 37
Slide 38: Does metadata matter? July 2008 38
Slide 39: Does metadata matter? July 2008 39
Slide 40: http://www.intute.ac.uk/ Does metadata matter? July 2008 40
Slide 41: meanwhile… Does metadata matter? July 2008 41
Slide 42: AltaVista (first major Web search engine – circa 1995) Does metadata matter? July 2008 42
Slide 43: people began to realise that the metadata they embedded into Web pages might be important Does metadata matter? July 2008 43
Slide 44: hang on… did I just say “metadata embedded into Web pages”? Does metadata matter? July 2008 44
Slide 45: <html> <head> <title>A web page</title> </head> <body> … </body> </html> Does metadata matter? July 2008 45
Slide 46: <html> <head> <title>A web page</title> <meta name=“keywords” content=“some, key, words” /> <meta name=“description” content=“a summary” /> </head> <body> … Does metadata matter? July 2008 46
Slide 47: birth of the SEO industry Does metadata matter? July 2008 47
Slide 48: then came Google Does metadata matter? July 2008 48
Slide 49: and the rest, as they say, is history Does metadata matter? July 2008 49
Slide 50: Google takes note of links between pages Google PageRank Does metadata matter? July 2008 50
Slide 51: but places less emphasis on embedded metadata Does metadata matter? July 2008 51
Slide 52: metaspam <meta name=“keywords” content=“coca cola” /> Does metadata matter? July 2008 52
Slide 53: metacrap <title>put your title here</title> Does metadata matter? July 2008 53
Slide 54: despite that, work continued on embedded metadata most notably in the form of… Does metadata matter? July 2008 54
Slide 55: Dublin Core (circa 1995) Does metadata matter? July 2008 55
Slide 56: initially 15 metadata elements a.k.a properties a.k.a. attribute/value pairs Does metadata matter? July 2008 56
Slide 57: contributor coverage creator date description format identifier language publisher relation rights source subject title type Does metadata matter? July 2008 57
Slide 58: embedded into Web pages Does metadata matter? July 2008 58
Slide 59: or encoded using XML Does metadata matter? July 2008 59
Slide 60: intention was to improve indexing by search engines Does metadata matter? July 2008 60
Slide 61: but people forgot about… Does metadata matter? July 2008 61
Slide 62: “metaspam” and “metacrap” Does metadata matter? July 2008 62
Slide 63: the search engines didn’t! Does metadata matter? July 2008 63
Slide 64: and so, by and large, search engines still ignore embedded metadata Does metadata matter? July 2008 64
Slide 65: despite that, there has been fairly widespread adoption in policy terms Does metadata matter? July 2008 65
Slide 66: particularly in e-Government (e.g. UK eGMS) Does metadata matter? July 2008 66
Slide 67: but also in other areas – education, health, environmental agencies, libraries, cultural heritage sector, … Does metadata matter? July 2008 67
Slide 68: growth of rules around metadata content (i.e. cataloguing rules) (everyone’s rules are different) Does metadata matter? July 2008 68
Slide 69: and growth in use of additional elements for particular communities (and everyone’s additions are different) Does metadata matter? July 2008 69
Slide 70: such usage documented in the form of “application profiles” Does metadata matter? July 2008 70
Slide 71: Dublin Core Metadata Initiative coordinating “standards” body (note again: growing complexity over time) Does metadata matter? July 2008 71
Slide 72: meanwhile… Does metadata matter? July 2008 72
Slide 73: the W3C developed the Resource Description Framework (RDF) (circa 1999) Does metadata matter? July 2008 73
Slide 74: the standard for the “Semantic Web” Does metadata matter? July 2008 74
Slide 75: Tim Berners-Lee’s vision for a machine-readable Web of data Does metadata matter? July 2008 75
Slide 76: allowing software to navigate and reason about Web content automatically Does metadata matter? July 2008 76
Slide 77: a Web of “Linked Data” Does metadata matter? July 2008 77
Slide 78: RDF, RDFS, OWL, FOAF, … (but also Microformats, RSS, …) Does metadata matter? July 2008 78
Slide 79: meanwhile… Does metadata matter? July 2008 79
Slide 80: elearning community was busy developing its own standards Does metadata matter? July 2008 80
Slide 81: IEEE LOM (Learning Object Metadata) Does metadata matter? July 2008 81
Slide 82: same as DC …but different! (different elements, different syntax) Does metadata matter? July 2008 82
Slide 83: <cough /> Does metadata matter? July 2008 83
Slide 84: a brief aside Does metadata matter? July 2008 84
Slide 85: identifiers are important Does metadata matter? July 2008 85
Slide 86: URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) is the identifier system of the Web Does metadata matter? July 2008 86
Slide 87: but some issues… e.g. around persistence Does metadata matter? July 2008 87
Slide 88: to cut a long story short Does metadata matter? July 2008 88
Slide 89: it turns out that ‘http’ URIs (a.k.a. URLs) are the worst kind of Web identifier… Does metadata matter? July 2008 89
Slide 90: …apart from all the others Does metadata matter? July 2008 90
Slide 91: (not everyone agrees with that!) Does metadata matter? July 2008 91
Slide 92: <breath /> Does metadata matter? July 2008 92
Slide 93: repositories Does metadata matter? July 2008 93
Slide 94: Does metadata matter? July 2008 94
Slide 95: Does metadata matter? July 2008 95
Slide 96: but arXiv was not the only repository Does metadata matter? July 2008 96
Slide 97: recognised need for aggregating metadata from different repositories into a single place so that it could be searched Does metadata matter? July 2008 97
Slide 98: OAI-PMH (a protocol for metadata harvesting) Does metadata matter? July 2008 98
Slide 99: harvesting metadata into repository search engines of which OAIster is best known (but it isn’t really used much) Does metadata matter? July 2008 99
Slide 100: and the major search engines like Google don’t support the OAI-PMH Does metadata matter? July 2008 100
Slide 101: because it isn’t mainstream enough (and because of “metaspam” and “metacrap”) Does metadata matter? July 2008 101
Slide 102: and so to 2008… Does metadata matter? July 2008 102
Slide 103: political agenda around institutional repositories Does metadata matter? July 2008 103
Slide 104: in order to store, manage and disclose… Does metadata matter? July 2008 104
Slide 105: institutional assets research papers learning objects research data Does metadata matter? July 2008 105
Slide 106: exposing metadata about these things using the OAI-PMH to search services Does metadata matter? July 2008 106
Slide 107: which services? err… OAIster :-( Does metadata matter? July 2008 107
Slide 108: what kind of metadata? typically DC Does metadata matter? July 2008 108
Slide 109: or a variant of DC because simple DC is really too simple to be very useful Does metadata matter? July 2008 109
Slide 110: but unfortunately… Does metadata matter? July 2008 110
Slide 111: …DC variants tend to be more complex and therefore metadata can’t be created very easily by ordinary researchers Does metadata matter? July 2008 111
Slide 112: but that’s another story! Does metadata matter? July 2008 112
Slide 113: ok… Does metadata matter? July 2008 113
Slide 114: why are we interested? Does metadata matter? July 2008 114
Slide 115: are we interested? Does metadata matter? July 2008 115
Slide 116: metadata is everywhere Does metadata matter? July 2008 116
Slide 117: Does metadata matter? July 2008 117
Slide 118: Does metadata matter? July 2008 118
Slide 119: Does metadata matter? July 2008 119
Slide 120: Does metadata matter? July 2008 120
Slide 121: Does metadata matter? July 2008 121
Slide 122: Does metadata matter? July 2008 122
Slide 123: metadata in sites like the Science Museum is mostly locked away within the site Does metadata matter? July 2008 123
Slide 124: can expect growing pressure to expose it on the Web for others to “mash up” Does metadata matter? July 2008 124
Slide 125: in HE, we are operating in an “institutional repository” political environment Does metadata matter? July 2008 125
Slide 126: we (should?) have an interest in repositories of research publications and research data particularly research data Does metadata matter? July 2008 126
Slide 127: metadata comes to the fore in scenarios where content is non-textual (e.g. data) and where required information can’t easily be derived from textual content (e.g. author name) Does metadata matter? July 2008 127
Slide 128: thank you Does metadata matter? July 2008 128
Slide 129: OK I lied… …it was 128 slides Does metadata matter? July 2008 129
Slide 130: unless you count these last two Does metadata matter? July 2008 130




Add a comment on Slide 1
If you have a SlideShare account, login to comment; else you can comment as a guest- Favorites & Groups
Showing 1-50 of 22 (more)