Athens, Shibboleth, The Uk Access Management - Single sign-on for your Web site

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    2 Favorites & 2 Groups

    Athens, Shibboleth, The Uk Access Management - Single sign-on for your Web site - Presentation Transcript

    1. Athens, Shibboleth, the UK Access Management Federation, OpenID, CardSpace and all that Single sign-on for your Web site
    2. Athens
      • single sign-on to Web resources
        • typically ‘external’ collections and services
      • initially deployed in 1996
      • established as the SSO mechanism to protected online resources in HE and the NHS
      • 4 million users in 100 countries
      • access to resources from around 180 leading service providers
      • delivered over 99.9999% availability since 1998
      • ~10,000,000 authentications per month
    3. Shibboleth
      • an open SAML-based architecture
      • single sign-on to Web resources
      • developed by the Internet2 middleware group
      • supports the secure exchange of authentication and attributes (e.g. affiliation / id / targettedid / entitlement) between institution (IdP) and service provider (SP)
      • multiple software implementations available
      • federations used to create a “trust environment” for organisations that want to access a set of resources
    4. The UK Access Management Federation
      • UK academic community currently in transition to federated approach (Shibboleth)
      • a (the) UK federation for education and research - a “trust environment” for UK academia
      • delivers shared policy and WAYF
      • WAYF service puts SP in touch with IdP
      • ‘ gateways’ to connect to/from Athens
      • institutions encouraged to support Shibboleth and join the federation
      • note that this can be done in-house or thru an outsourced identity provider (e.g. OpenAthens)
    5. Why should I care?
      • single sign-on across institutions and external services
      • institutions acting as both identity providers and service providers
      • sharing institutional resources with others
      • standards
      • several implementation options
        • though note interoperability issues
      • but… still some confusion
        • costs, requirements, gateway funding, …
    6. % of institutions planning to join 47% of respondents are undecided 100 institutions, May 2007
    7. When would you like to join the Federation? 32% plan to join the Federation before July 2008 56% don’t know when they will join
    8. OpenAthens
      • new standards based access and identity management framework – software and services
      • outsourced ‘shared’ solution
      • enables institutions to participate in the Federation
      • maintains access to Athens resources
      • accommodates a range of IdP and SP options
      • provides choice
        • support for multiple identity and access management standards
        • support for multiple federations
    9. OpenID – key features
      • the identifier is a URI (typically a URL)
        • e.g. mine is http://andypowell.myopenid.com/
      • this is convenient for a number of reasons, but especially because it removes the need for a WAYF service
        • the OpenID directly provides the location of the OpenID Provider
      • issues to be solved
        • around phishing (spoofing the OpenID Provider)
        • trust issues – which OpenID Providers do I trust?
      • still a work in progress, see http://openid.net/
    10. OpenID example
    11. Microsoft CardSpace
      • a client-side Windows application for managing multiple user-centric identities…
        • and implementing the protocol transactions needed to inter-work with server-side (Web) applications
      • sits within high-level open framework known as the ‘Identity Metasystem’
      • perceived as a more open replacement for MS’s failed ‘passport’ initiative
      • builds on WS- stack – so not lightweight
      • but some commitment between MS and OpenID leading players to work together
    12. Why should I care?
      • OpenID and CardSpace indicative of general move towards ‘user-centric’ identity management
        • users arriving at university with an existing online identity
        • reduced value of university-specific identity in the context of lifelong learning
        • c.f. current situation with email
        • but… significant trust issues
      • identity management technology is a (fast) moving target
        • shared outsourcing vs. shared open source vs. commercial user-group approaches to sustainability
    13. Questions and discussion

    + eduservfoundationeduservfoundation, 3 years ago

    custom

    2783 views, 2 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    A presentation for one of the parallel sessions at more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 2783
      • 2783 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 2
    • Downloads 74
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events