Change
the world
Change
Education
Yiannis Laouris
1. Do we all agree that we
should change Education?
2. Do we all know what
Education we envision?
ReinventDemocracy.info
Engaging >1000 young leaders in
global activism
Global Education Futures Moscow:
29 Feb – 2 Mar 2016
• Increase youth participation and
collaboration in decision making processes
• Empower young people invent innovative
act...
IdeaPrism
• IdeaPrism is a mobile App that
runs on Apple and Android
devices, which allows participants
to enter their ide...
The voice of the crowd??
COMPUTATIONAL AGE MAKES POSSIBLE
 Direct Democracy is a threat
 Direct, real-time participation in
deliberations AND als...
The majority is
NOT always right
35: Lack of
understanding
privacy issues
42: Difficulty to cope
with privacy and
security issues
Does 35 worsen 42
A YES, ...
Factor 47: LACK OF
USER FRIENDLINESS
Factor 9: EXISTENCE OF SOCIAL
INEQUALITIES
Factor 10: LOW EDUCATIONAL
LEVEL
Factor 30...
Global Scope
• The initiative has a global scope
The UNDEF contract foresees the
involvement of more than 1000 young
chang...
Implementing Organization
Regions
European Initiative
Australasia Initiative
African Initiative
Middle Eastern Initiative
American Initiative
Indige...
Core Participants
Key actors of the project
• 20 per Region, i.e. total >100
Shadow Participants
Each Core Participant must
identify 10 individuals who
meet similar criteria to
participate as Shadow
...
Peer
Empowerment
and Support
Mentors in
Digital
Communication
Strategy
Mentors in
SYSTEMS
Science
The Network between one Mentor and
her Core Participants
Each Core Participant is supported by
10 Shadow Participants
Liaisons
• This role is for Civil Society
or other regional or national
organizations interested to
liaison and/or organiz...
Activists
This role is especially for young
or young-in-spirit activists
interested to replicate the core
activities:
• Or...
Project Promoters
• Many individuals, authorities and
organizations are supporting the
project in many ways:
• Placing the...
Endorsements
• Many individuals, authorities and
organizations are endorsing the
project by placing it under their
auspice...
Researchers
• Researchers and scientists may join in
order to collect data and study the
process or products.
Policy Advisors
• Many people involved in policy commit to
promote its ideas and products in their
respective circles
Political Endorsement
• Individual politicians may endorse the project
and commit to promote its ideas and products
in the...
Science of Dialogic Design
From Facebook  Idea Prism
IDEAS have properties
 They are Responses to a Triggering Question
 Have a Father/mother
 Co...
 CREATE a dialogue
 INVITE “friends”/others to join
 CONTRIBUTE ideas
 FAVOUR Ideas (like!)
 Request CLARIFICATIONS (...
The Talking Point
It is unethical to change a social system without the
authentic engagement of those whose lives will be
influenced by the ...
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center

262 views

Published on

Laouris Yiannis at GEF Moscow

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
262
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Laouris Yiannis. Future Worlds Center

  1. 1. Change the world Change Education
  2. 2. Yiannis Laouris
  3. 3. 1. Do we all agree that we should change Education? 2. Do we all know what Education we envision?
  4. 4. ReinventDemocracy.info
  5. 5. Engaging >1000 young leaders in global activism Global Education Futures Moscow: 29 Feb – 2 Mar 2016
  6. 6. • Increase youth participation and collaboration in decision making processes • Empower young people invent innovative actions to reinvent democracy Key Objective
  7. 7. IdeaPrism • IdeaPrism is a mobile App that runs on Apple and Android devices, which allows participants to enter their ideas, clarifications and short videos online
  8. 8. The voice of the crowd??
  9. 9. COMPUTATIONAL AGE MAKES POSSIBLE  Direct Democracy is a threat  Direct, real-time participation in deliberations AND also in decisions
  10. 10. The majority is NOT always right
  11. 11. 35: Lack of understanding privacy issues 42: Difficulty to cope with privacy and security issues Does 35 worsen 42 A YES, is result of great majority A YES is an influence relationship support
  12. 12. Factor 47: LACK OF USER FRIENDLINESS Factor 9: EXISTENCE OF SOCIAL INEQUALITIES Factor 10: LOW EDUCATIONAL LEVEL Factor 30: INADEQUATE PUBLIC PROMOTION OF ITS IMPORTANCE Level IV Level III Level II Level I Factor 26: FEAR OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES Factor 40:TECHNO-PHOBIA, THE FEAR OF TECHNOLOGY Factor 7: ABSENCE OF SPECIFIC SERVICES ORIENTED TO USER NEEDS Factor 2: LACK OF INFRASTRUCTURE Level V Level VI Factor 78: LACK OF OPEN DESIGN INTERFACES Factor 24: LACK OF USER PARTICIPATION IN ICT DESIGN Factor 41: THE TOO BIG POWER OF TECHNOLOGISTS Factor 48: POOR INTERFACE DESIGN Factor 35: INADEQUATE GOVERNMENT POLICIES ON SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC Factor 33: WEAKNESS OF REGULATORY IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK Factor 74:LACK OF STANDARDIZATION OF QUALITY ISSUES Factor 67:SPAM Factor 72:LACK OF THE NEED TO DEFINE CITIZENS DIGITAL RIGHTS Factor 4: LOW LEVEL OF DIGITAL LITERACY Factor 36: LOW INDIVIDUAL INTEREST ABOUT THE CONTENT AVAILABLE ON BROADBAND Factor 11: HIGH COST OF SERVICE Factor 63: TECHNOLOGICAL DETERMINISM Factor 17: THE OBSTACLES FOR THE NEW EASTERN AND CENTRAL EU MEMBERS ARE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE OF THE OLD MEMBERS Factor 16: SOCIAL RESISTANCE TO PAY THE COSTS OF BROADBAND TECHNOLOGY Factor 45:MORAL PANIC REGARDING THE INTERNET Factor 39: RESISTANCE TO LEARN NEW PRACTICES Factor 58: NON USE AS A DELIBERATE LIFESTYLE Factor 1: INADEQUATE DEFINITION OF UNIVERSAL SERVICE Factor 32: LACK OF LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON BROADBAND ISSUES Factor 18: LACK OF INTEREST Factor 82: ETHICS Factor 29: INABILITY TO PREDICT BENEFITS FOR INDIVIDUALS Factor 12: LACK OF DIGITAL CONTENT IN MOTHER LANGUAGE Factor 76: LACK OF INTEROPERABILITY BETWEEN SYSTEMS Factor 57: TELECOM FOCUSING ON 3G, WHEREAS PEOPLE ON WIFI Factor 52: FEAR OF BEING WATCHED BY THE BIG EYE Factor 15: LACK OF COMPETENCE TOWARDS ICT Factor 19: FEAR OF INTRUSION AND RISK OF FALSIFICATION OF PERSONAL DATA
  13. 13. Global Scope • The initiative has a global scope The UNDEF contract foresees the involvement of more than 1000 young change makers from across the world in a global exercise to re-invent and re-design systems of governance for the digital era. • In addition to the five Structured Democratic Dialogues, the project team invites other global, regional, or national initiatives to join with their own funding and/or with funding secured jointly in order to expand the scope to more regions and more people.
  14. 14. Implementing Organization
  15. 15. Regions European Initiative Australasia Initiative African Initiative Middle Eastern Initiative American Initiative Indigenous Peoples Initiative
  16. 16. Core Participants Key actors of the project • 20 per Region, i.e. total >100
  17. 17. Shadow Participants Each Core Participant must identify 10 individuals who meet similar criteria to participate as Shadow Participants, i.e. >1000
  18. 18. Peer Empowerment and Support Mentors in Digital Communication Strategy Mentors in SYSTEMS Science
  19. 19. The Network between one Mentor and her Core Participants
  20. 20. Each Core Participant is supported by 10 Shadow Participants
  21. 21. Liaisons • This role is for Civil Society or other regional or national organizations interested to liaison and/or organize any related activities such as: • Organizing local events associated with the vision of the project • Organizing local and/or theme specific Structured Democratic Dialogues
  22. 22. Activists This role is especially for young or young-in-spirit activists interested to replicate the core activities: • Organize local events associated with the vision of the project • Organize local and/or theme specific Structured Democratic Dialogues
  23. 23. Project Promoters • Many individuals, authorities and organizations are supporting the project in many ways: • Placing the project logo in their website • Disseminating the call for participants • Disseminating the newsletters • Disseminating the Project Deliverables
  24. 24. Endorsements • Many individuals, authorities and organizations are endorsing the project by placing it under their auspices.
  25. 25. Researchers • Researchers and scientists may join in order to collect data and study the process or products.
  26. 26. Policy Advisors • Many people involved in policy commit to promote its ideas and products in their respective circles
  27. 27. Political Endorsement • Individual politicians may endorse the project and commit to promote its ideas and products in their respective circles.
  28. 28. Science of Dialogic Design
  29. 29. From Facebook  Idea Prism IDEAS have properties  They are Responses to a Triggering Question  Have a Father/mother  Coded with a Number  Have CONTENT  Search for similarities: Belong to CATEGORIES  Have short clarification  No idea LOST (Documentation)  Ideas GROW (when discussed)  Search for influence of one idea on another
  30. 30.  CREATE a dialogue  INVITE “friends”/others to join  CONTRIBUTE ideas  FAVOUR Ideas (like!)  Request CLARIFICATIONS (force ideas to grow to become more specific, to sharpen in meaning)  Mark ideas for DELETION as irrelevant  CLUSTER ideas (micro-clustering)  EVALUATE ideas for importance, impact, desirability, feasibility, short/mid/long term, Possibility of happening without institutional support etc.  ADOPT ideas (people supporting ideas) Anyone can
  31. 31. The Talking Point
  32. 32. It is unethical to change a social system without the authentic engagement of those whose lives will be influenced by the change If we try to change it without engaging its stakeholders in designing it we will fail Let’s stop analyzing the past and consciously design our futures laouris@futureworldscenter.org

×