Adaptive and Plastic User Interfaces: A review of the State of the Art.

1,678 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,678
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Adaptive and Plastic User Interfaces: A review of the State of the Art.

  1. 1. Adaptative User Interfaces A review of the state of the art Eduardo CastillejoDeustoTech - Deusto Institute of Technology, University of Deusto October 16, 2012
  2. 2. OutlineUI AdaptationAdaptative User Interfaces 2 / 34
  3. 3. OutlineUI AdaptationWeb UI AdaptationAdaptative User Interfaces 2 / 34
  4. 4. OutlineUI AdaptationWeb UI AdaptationServices adaptationAdaptative User Interfaces 2 / 34
  5. 5. OutlineUI AdaptationWeb UI AdaptationServices adaptationReferencesAdaptative User Interfaces 2 / 34
  6. 6. OutlineUI Adaptation [Calvary 2001 I] [Repo 2004] [Nilsson 2006] [Hallsteinsen 2004] [Lehtonen 2002] [Stuerzlinger 2006] [Stuerzlinger 2006] SummaryWeb UI AdaptationServices adaptationReferencesAdaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 3 / 34
  7. 7. [Calvary 2001 I] Based in Context migrations. Each change activates a trigger that launches the best suitable interface selection process.Adaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 4 / 34
  8. 8. [Calvary 2001 I]Adaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 5 / 34
  9. 9. [Repo 2004] Based on a middleware which manages the adaptation process. The platform detects the user’s device (1), queries its capabilities (3), and returns the corresponding user interface taking into account the selected service and the current device (4).Adaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 6 / 34
  10. 10. [Nilsson 2006] [Hallsteinsen 2004] The applications are built to support the creation of variants which fit with the different requisites that may appear during its use. The adaptation middleware creates and manages an acceptable configuration of the applications.Adaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 7 / 34
  11. 11. [Lehtonen 2002] The adaptation process is based on some configuration files (Product Configuration Files) which define the interface appearance and stores the user’s parameters. The designed UI are based on Bean Markup Language (a language oriented to UI) and Java Beans. BML is directly runnable, so it is possible to be launched at runtime.Adaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 8 / 34
  12. 12. [Lehtonen 2002]Adaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 9 / 34
  13. 13. [Stuerzlinger 2006] It’s focused on the adaptation of desktop applications and the re-configuration of the current window interfaces by a User Interface Facades system.Adaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 10 / 34
  14. 14. [Stuerzlinger 2006]Adaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 11 / 34
  15. 15. Summary Solution Paradigm Adaptation Dynamic process Platform [Calvary 2001 I] Prologue-Action-Epilogue Based on context Yes Mobile [Calvary 2001 II] Prologue-Action-Epilogue Based on context Yes Mobile [Repo 2004] Middleware (*) No Mobile [Nilsson 2006] Middleware Based on context Yes Mobile [Hallsteinsen 2004] Middleware Based on context Yes Mobile [Lehtonen 2002] Document assembly Based on user parameters Yes Mobile [Stuerzlinger 2006] User Interface Facades Based on direct interaction ¸ No Desktop* Although they make references to context, it is its own change which launches the adaptation process, but it is notlaunched by its current parameters or values. Adaptative User Interfaces UI Adaptation 12 / 34
  16. 16. OutlineUI AdaptationWeb UI Adaptation [Safi 2011] [Malandrino 2010] [Domingues 2011] ` [Paterno 2010] SummaryServices adaptationReferencesAdaptative User Interfaces Web UI Adaptation 13 / 34
  17. 17. [Safi 2011] XHTML server that applies a specific CSS based source code to the web page and allows the adaptation of the requested web pages to heterogeneous mobile devices. Some extra parameters (e.g. device OS, screen resolution and size, available font styles...) are taken into account to enhance the adaptation process.Adaptative User Interfaces Web UI Adaptation 14 / 34
  18. 18. [Safi 2011]Adaptative User Interfaces Web UI Adaptation 15 / 34
  19. 19. [Malandrino 2010] Based on the same idea of [Safi 2011], adding context to the equation.Adaptative User Interfaces Web UI Adaptation 16 / 34
  20. 20. [Domingues 2011] The web page is modified with some dynamic and automatic changes in the web browser. Problem: it is necessary to include an AJAX script to be run in the client side. This script requests the corresponding adaptation requests and renders the adaptation output.Adaptative User Interfaces Web UI Adaptation 17 / 34
  21. 21. [Domingues 2011]Adaptative User Interfaces Web UI Adaptation 18 / 34
  22. 22. `[Paterno 2010] The client request is analysed similarly to the previous solutions by using a middle side server. The web page’s HTML logic and the associated CSS files are extracted by a reverse engineering process. Next, these files are sent to a module which main purpose is to redesign the web page for the client device. Some of the graphic interface elements or views are substituted by others which are semantically equivalent.Adaptative User Interfaces Web UI Adaptation 19 / 34
  23. 23. `[Paterno 2010]Adaptative User Interfaces Web UI Adaptation 20 / 34
  24. 24. Summary Solution Paradigm Use of context Used capabilities [Safi 2011] Adaptation server (XHTML + CSS) - Device’s [Malandrino 2010] Adaptation server Network architecture; User’s current activity; User’s preferences; Device’s and user’s [Domingues 2011] Adaptation server - - ` [Paterno 2010] Middle side server - -Adaptative User Interfaces Web UI Adaptation 21 / 34
  25. 25. OutlineUI AdaptationWeb UI AdaptationServices adaptation [Camara 2009] [Moser 2008] [Kongdenfha 2006]ReferencesAdaptative User Interfaces Services adaptation 22 / 34
  26. 26. [Camara 2009] A tool (ITACA) which supports generative adaptation, starting from the already existing automatic description interface behaviour model extraction. It supports the specification and validation of adaptation agreements, it automatizes the protocols generation and relates the proposed abstract model with implementation languages. Problem: The agreements specification may need human participation.Adaptative User Interfaces Services adaptation 23 / 34
  27. 27. [Camara 2009]Adaptative User Interfaces Services adaptation 24 / 34
  28. 28. [Moser 2008] VieDAME, a platform based on the substitution of semantically equivalent elements, assuring that, intercepting SOAP messages and suffering from a very little performance penalty and by using a vision based on aspects, it is capable of substitute services at runtime in BPEL environments.Adaptative User Interfaces Services adaptation 25 / 34
  29. 29. [Moser 2008] The ”VieDAME core” includes the monitoring, service selection and message transformation, and it provides services as the storage and access to data and data planning and configuration. ”VieDAME engine adapters”.Adaptative User Interfaces Services adaptation 26 / 34
  30. 30. [Moser 2008]Adaptative User Interfaces Services adaptation 27 / 34
  31. 31. [Kongdenfha 2006] A framework to manage the service adaptation based on AOP to interact with independent service protocols and operation. A taxonomy of a possible incongruence between interfaces is identified . To work with this incongruences some adaptation templates are used.Adaptative User Interfaces Services adaptation 28 / 34
  32. 32. [Kongdenfha 2006]Adaptative User Interfaces Services adaptation 29 / 34
  33. 33. OutlineUI AdaptationWeb UI AdaptationServices adaptationReferencesAdaptative User Interfaces References 30 / 34
  34. 34. References [Nilsson 2006] E. G. Nilsson, J. Floch, S. Hallsteinsen, y E. Stav, “Model-based user interface adaptation”, Computers & Graphics, vol. 30, num. 5, pp. 692–701, 2006. [Schilit 1995] W. N. Schilit, “A system architecture for context-aware mobile computing”, Columbia University, 1995. [Dey 2001] A. K. Dey, “Understanding and using context”, Personal and ubiquitous computing, vol. 5, num. 1, pp. 4–7, 2001. [Calvary 2001 I] G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, y D. Thevenin, “Supporting context changes for plastic user interfaces: a process and a mechanism”, People and Computers, pp. 349–364, 2001. [Calvary 2001 II] G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, y D. Thevenin, “A unifying reference framework for the development of plastic user interfaces”, Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 173–192, 2001. [Calvary 2002] G. Calvary, J. Coutaz, D. Thevenin, Q. Limbourg, N. Souchon, L. Bouillon, M. Florins, J. Vanderdonckt, y others, “Plasticity of User Interfaces: A Revisited Reference Framework”, in In Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design, 2002. [Repo 2004] P. Repo, “Facilitating user interface adaptation to mobile devices”, in Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, 2004, pp. 433–436. [Hallsteinsen 2004] S. Hallsteinsen, E. Stav, y J. Floch, “Self-adaptation for everyday systems”, in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT workshop on Self-managed systems, 2004, pp. 69–74. [Stuerzlinger 2006] W. Stuerzlinger, O. Chapuis, D. Phillips, y N. Roussel, “User interface facades: towards fully ¸ adaptable user interfaces”, in Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 2006, pp. 309–318. [Marmolin 1995] H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad, K. Schmidt, y others, “Medium versus mechanism: Supporting collaboration through customisation”, in ECSCW’95: proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 10-14 September 1995, Stockholm, Sweden, 1995, vol. 8, p. 133.Adaptative User Interfaces References 31 / 34
  35. 35. References [Weerawarana 2001] S. Weerawarana, F. Curbera, M. J. Duftler, D. A. Epstein, y J. Kesselman, “Bean Markup Language: A composition language for JavaBeans components”, in Proceedings of the 6th conference on USENIX Conference on Object-Oriented Technologies and Systems-Volume 6, 2001, pp. 13–13. ´ [Lehtonen 2002] M. Lehtonen, R. Petit, O. Heinonen, y G. Linden, “A dynamic user interface for document assembly”, in Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Document engineering, 2002, pp. 134–141. [Watanabe 1999] T. Watanabe, “Document Analysis and Recognition”, IEICE transactions on information and systems, 1999. [Gu 2006] X. D. Gu, J. Chen, W. Y. Ma, y G. L. Chen, “Visual based content understanding towards web adaptation”, in Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, 2006, pp. 164–173. [Safi 2011] Q. G. K. Safi, T. Nawaz, S. M. A. Shah, y T. Mahmood, “Intelligent Device Independent UI Adaption for Heterogeneous Ubiquitous Environments”, IJCSNS, vol. 11, num. 11, p. 75, 2011. Global Mobile Statistics 2012: Mobile browsing v desktop browsing. [Malandrino 2010] D. Malandrino, F. Mazzoni, D. SRiboni, C. Bettini, M. Colajanni, y V. Scarano, “MIMOSA: context-aware adaptation for ubiquitous web access”, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 14, num. 4, pp. 301–320, 2010. [Domingues 2011] M. A. Domingues, “Exploiting multidimensional data for web site automation”, AI Communications, vol. 24, num. 3, pp. 289–290, 2011. ` ` [Paterno 2010] F. Paterno y G. Zichittella, “Desktop-to-mobile web adaptation through customizable two-dimensional semantic redesign”, Human-Centred Software Engineering, pp. 79–94, 2010. [Camara 2009] J. Camara, J. A. Martin, G. Salaun, J. Cubo, M. Ouederni, C. Canal, y E. Pimentel, “Itaca: An integrated toolbox for the automatic composition and adaptation of web services”, in Software Engineering, 2009. ICSE 2009. IEEE 31st International Conference on, 2009, pp. 627–630. [Moser 2008] O. Moser, F. Rosenberg, y S. Dustdar, “Non-intrusive monitoring and service adaptation for WS-BPEL”, in Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, 2008, pp. 815–824.Adaptative User Interfaces References 32 / 34
  36. 36. References [Kongdenfha 2006] W. Kongdenfha, R. Saint-Paul, B. Benatallah, y F. Casati, “An aspect-oriented framework for service adaptation”, Service-Oriented Computing–ICSOC 2006, pp. 15–26, 2006. [Benatallah 2005] B. Benatallah, F. Casati, D. Grigori, H. Nezhad, y F. Toumani, “Developing adapters for web services integration”, in Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 2005, pp. 415–429.Adaptative User Interfaces References 33 / 34
  37. 37. All rights of images are reserved by theoriginal owners*, the rest of the content is licensed under a Creative Commons by-sa 3.0 license. * [Calvary 2001 I], [Calvary 2001 II], [Repo 2004], [Nilsson 2006], [Lehtonen 2002], [Stuerzlinger 2006], [Safi 2011], [Malandrino 2010], ` [Domingues 2011], [Paterno 2010], [Camara 2009], [Moser 2008], [Kongdenfha 2006]
  38. 38. Adaptative User Interfaces A review of the state of the art Eduardo CastillejoDeustoTech - Deusto Institute of Technology, University of Deusto October 16, 2012

×