Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
368
On Slideshare
368
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1.  
  • 2. Why?
  • 3. 10.45 Coffee and Registration 11.00 Introduction 11.10 Survey of Hopes for and Fears of considering Quality in Public Engagement 11.20 How others define and embed quality in practice (presentation) QA in teaching and learning (Gordon McDougal, UoE) GLO – (Susanne Spicer, Manchester Beacon for Public Engagement) Summary of: NVQ’s, EVAL, Funders, Heritage Lottery Fund, Learning Outside the Classroom (Dan Hillier, ROE) 12.20 Personal Reflections 12.30 The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (breakout groups) The Good – things we can use from previous examples The Bad – things we want to avoid, can learn from The Ugly – things that aren’t covered 13.15 Lunch Programme - AM
  • 4. 14.00 What is Quality in PE? (Breakout groups) 14.45 How can we embedd quality? (breakout groups) 15.30 Coffee available Review questions raised from hopes and fears 15.45 Next steps (whole group discussion) 16.15 Wrap up 16.30 Close Programme - PM
  • 5. Survey of your Hopes and Fears in Considering Quality in Public Engagement
  • 6. How others define and embed quality in practice:
      • QA in teaching and learning
      • (Gordon McDougall, University of Edinburgh)
      • GLO (Suzanne Spicer, Manchester)
      • Summary of other approaches
      • (Dan Hillier, Royal Observatory)
  • 7. Personal reflections
      • From your own experience, what are your three key examples of recognising/embedding quality in public engagement.
      • 3 post-it notes per person.
      • Please write one example per post-it note.
  • 8. The Good, the Bad, the Ugly.
      • The Good: things we can use from previous
      • examples of embedding quality in practice
      • The Bad: things we want to avoid, can learn from
      • The Ugly: things which weren’t covered
  • 9. The Good, the Bad, the Ugly.
      • Discuss and record your thoughts (15 MINUTES at first station)
      • Move clockwise to next station
      • Read previous group’s comments. Annotate, agree, disagree, add different perspectives (10 MINUTES)
      • Move clockwise to final station. Annotate, agree, disagree, add different perspectives (5 MINUTES)
  • 10. What is Quality in Public Engagement?
      • from the perspective of
      • Public Engagement Practitioners
      • Public Engagement Activities
      • Public Engagement Programmes
      • 3 breakout groups, each group focuses on one of the above perspectives (30 MINUTES).
      • Summary from each group
  • 11. How can we embed quality?
      • at practitioner level
      • at programme level
      • at institutional level
      • 3 breakout groups, each group focuses on all of the above perspectives (30 MINUTES).
      • Summary from each group
  • 12. Coffee (phew!!!) Review the questions raised from hopes and fears
  • 13. Next steps Whole group discussion
  • 14. And finally…..
  • 15. A big thank-you to you all from the Edinburgh Beltane Evaluation Working Group.