• Save
ICT and quality assurance to support ubiquitous access to distance education:  Promises, realities, and recent breakthroughs
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

ICT and quality assurance to support ubiquitous access to distance education: Promises, realities, and recent breakthroughs






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



3 Embeds 16

http://www.slideshare.net 10
http://www.eden-online.org 5
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

ICT and quality assurance to support ubiquitous access to distance education:  Promises, realities, and recent breakthroughs ICT and quality assurance to support ubiquitous access to distance education: Promises, realities, and recent breakthroughs Presentation Transcript

  • Insung Jung International Christian University, Tokyo, Japan
    • ICT and quality assurance to support ubiquitous access to distance education:
    • Promises, realities, and recent breakthroughs
    A keynote speech Fifth EDEN Research Workshop Organized by EDEN in collaboration with CNED & UNESCO 20-22 OCTOBER, 2008 Paris, France
  • I nternational C hristian U niversity Tokyo, Japan Liberal Arts College About 3,000 students from 40 countries 158 full-time faculty Accredited by MOE (Japan) and the American Academy for Liberal Education (AALE, USA) Blended learning
  • My experiences
    • Korea National Open University
    • Ewha Woman’s University, Multimedia Education Institution
    • Distance Education/E-learning field/ICT use – UNESCO, WB, APEC consultant
    • Research –policy, quality assurance, evaluation, instructional design, Asian distance education
    • Teaching – instructional design, distance education, e-learning research, media literacy
    • http:// epiaget.com (homepage)
    • Latchem, C. & Jung, I.S. (2009). Distance and blended learning: Opening up Asian education and training. New York & London: Routledge (Distance Education Series).
  • Today’s Presentation
    • ICT integration in Distance Education
      • Background changes
      • Promises
      • Realities
    • Recent breakthroughs
    • Conclusion
    • 1. Technology development
    • Psychological changes
    • Social, behavioral changes
    • Changes in learning paradigm
    Why ICT integration in DE? ICT Integration E-learning
  • 1. Technology development Why ICT integration in DE? Source - http://www.weboma.com/internetic-world-in-the-year-2015/
  • 1. Technology development Why ICT integration in DE? Source - http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
  • 1. Technology development
      • Internet users (Least developed countries)
    Why ICT integration in DE? Countries Internet Users    Dec/2000 Angola    30,000 100,000 233% Benin    16,000 150,000 900% Afghanistan 1,000 580,000 57,900% Cambodia   6,000 70,000 1,066% Internet Users Latest Data Internet Users Latest Data Source - http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
  • 1. Technology development Why ICT integration in DE? Source - http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/ict/index.html
  • 2. Psychological changes Why ICT integration in DE?
    • Computers aren’t new technology anymore.
    • The Internet is better than TV
    • Reality is no longer real - more than one identity
    • Multitasking, a way of life
    • Typing is preferred to handwriting
    • Web, indispensable
    • Zero tolerance for delays
    • Consumer and creator are blurring
    • Network-enabled mobile phones become necessity
    • Sources - Oblinger, 2002; Jung, 2003
  • 3. Social, behavioral changes Why ICT integration in DE?
    • Teens
    • - Over 90% Use the Internet for new information
    • - Over 70% use instant messaging to keep in touch
    • - Over 50% contact strangers on the net
    • - Over 40% post own information online to be contacted
    • - Over 30% experienced cyberbullying
    • Overall
    • - 25% of retail stock trades on the Internet
    • - Over 90% Internet users, online shopping
    • (Korea, UK, Germany, Japan, US)
    • - 87% of print journalists connected to the Internet
    • Sources - Lenhart, Simon & Graziano, 2001; Jung, 2003; 2007 Pew/Internet research; 2008 Nielsen
  • 4. Changes in learning paradigm Why ICT integration in DE? Formal Schooling Lifelong Learning Society Fact/Information/ Answers Knowledge/Wisdom/ Solutions Teacher-centered Learner-centered ICT adoption ; E-learning development Singapore: Thinking School, Learning Nation Korea: Edutopia Germany: Lifelong education for everyone
  • 3) Ubiquitous access 2) Quality improvement 1) Pedagogical innovation 4) High market value Promises
  • 1) Pedagogical innovation From teacher-centered to learner-centered “ A truly learner-centered approach to education will be realized.” “The teacher will facilitate learning. ” Social constructivistic learning environment “ Learning would be engaged in authentic tasks or real world problem solving situations.” “New knowledge will be constructed collaboratively.” Global learning community building “ Learning communities will be formed to create knowledge.” Full of multimedia resources (Bates, 1995; 2005; Harasim, 1993; Khan, 1997; Zemsky & Massy, 2004)
  • Improved teaching quality “ Application of learner-centered instructional design; best teaching practices” “ Better adaptation to individual needs.” “ Better management of learning processes.” Improved learning effectiveness “ Communication will be improved.” “ Students will be more actively engaged in learning.” “ Higher level skills will be acquired.” Improved support “ 24/7, individualized support.” “ Added values - ICT skill improvement, collaboration, efficiency….” 2) Quality improvement
  • Ubiquitous access “ People would be able to learn anywhere, any time.” Expanded learning opportunities “ There will be a boom in adult education.” “ Lifelong society will be realized.” Bridging the Gap “ Quality education will be delivered to remote areas, underdeveloped regions” “ ICT can lessen the gender gap in education.” “ E-learning will bring about educational equity.” 3) Ubiquitous access
  • Improved cost-efficiency “ It is a cost-efficient approach to education.” “ Economies of scale will be achieved.” Revenue-generating; profit-making potentials “ E-learning market opportunity will grow drastically.” “ It would generate revenue for an organization.” “ There is a global market for e-learning.” 4) High market value
      • Achievements
      • Mega Universities
        • From 10 (1996) to over 20 Mega Universities
      • Cross-border DE
        • Australia, UK, USA, and Canada (Exporting Countries) - China, India, Malaysia and Singapore (Importing Countries in Asia)
        • Indira Gandhi National Open University - Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah, Doha, Kuwait and Sultanate of Oman, Maldives, Mauritius and Seychelles, Vietnam, Myanmar and Singapore
    Realities – Access Daniel, 2003; Jung & Latchem, 2007
      • Rise of Virtual Universities
        • Jones International University , University of Phoenix Online
        • U2 1Global, Cardean University, Global University Alliance
        • Open University of Catalonia
        • Finnish Virtual University
        • Virtual University of Pakistan
        • Syrian Virtual University, Arab Open University
        • Mexico’s ITESM Virtual University by Tecnológico de Monterr ey
          • Master’s degrees and doctorate programs
          • Mexico, other Latin countries, USA and Canada
          • from 29,887 in 1999 to 85,000 in 2008
        • Korea’s 17 Virtual Universities since 2001
          • Undergraduate, totally online
          • from 6,220 in 2001 to 23,550 in 2006
    Realities – Access Studies in the Context of the E-learning Initiative: Virtual Models of European Universities http://www.elearningeuropa.info/extras/pdf/virtual_models.pdf
      • E-learning in Conventional Universities
        • 68 e-colleges in China ;
        • Over 80 % universities in USA
        • Europe (UK, Spain, Finland, France, Germany and more), Asia (Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Japan…)
      • Consortia
        • Sweden Net University ; Le Campus Numérique
        • Thailand Cyber University
      • For-Profit DE Providers
        • Global - Thomson Learning (U21Global), Apollo International (India & China)
        • Local - Kenichi Omae Graduate School of Business in Japan ; Online cram school industries
    Realities – Access
    • Overall,
    • Most e-education has taken place within national borders.
    • 2) Digital Divide
    • - within country; between countries
    • - Gender gap; Generation gap
    • 3) Lack of Regulatory Mechanism
    • - Quality issues ; Mutual Recognition issues
    Realities – Access
        • Achieved
        • Resource sharing
        • High level of mutual support among students
        • Greater dialogue when shared perspectives
        • Sense of community and lower attrition rates
        • when support interactivity, reflection, and sharing
        • when careful instructional design applied
        • Learning by doing; e-moderating
    Realities - Pedagogy Bakardjieva and Harasim, 1999; Bonk, 2002; Harnishfeger, 2003 ; Jung, 2008; Salomon, 2002; Shank, 2001; many others
        • Examples
        • 1. Innovative teachers
        • - Microsoft Innovative Teachers Network http:// www.innovativeteachers.com /
        • - UNESCO ICT in Education Awards http:// www.unescobkk.org/index.php?id =6359
        • 2. Case-based, project-based, resource-based
        • - Case-based e-learning group Univ of Georgia http:// projects.coe.uga.edu/cbel /
        • 3. Competency-based/story-based e-learning program
        • - Kumamoto University in Japan http://www.gsis.kumamoto-u.ac.jp /
        • 4. Simulations/virtual lab experiments
        • - Virtual Tel-Aviv University http://virtual2002.tau.ac.il/NewLoginFrames.asp?TopLang=1&lang=1
    Realities - Pedagogy Nachmias, Ram, & Mioduser, 2006; Suzuki, 2006
  • Realities - Pedagogy
            • Underperformed/failed
            • Time-honored instructional model prevails
            • Still teacher-centered – Focus on information dissemination
            • Text-based, online versions of lectures, textbooks and notes
            • 70% providing BBS, but not integrated, closed, meaningless..
            • Personal learning style, not accommodated
            • Limited interaction due to lack of interaction design skills, faculty overload, cultural/personal factors
    Latchem & Jung, 2009
            • Contrasting findings
            • Favorable responses –
            • “ motivating and interesting”
            • Negative responses –
            • “ impersonal, isolating and frustrating”
            • Improved learning gains –
            • “ full of resources, sharing ideas”
            • Not substantial changes –
            • “ instructional models are same”
    Realities – Quality improvement Latchem & Jung, 2009
    • Some politicians and media complain of ‘declining educational standards’ and attribute these to the new ideologies and methods.
    • In an era of globalization and competition for strategic gains and resources, even the longest-established and most successful institutions must safeguard their positions through continuous improvement.
    • DE providers and advocates of ICT integration need to sell the story of their successes.
    QA Concerns Emerged Realities – Quality improvement Jung & Latchem, 2007
  • Realities – High market value Success stories 1) University of Pheonix Online Campus 2) University of Maryland University College 3) Canada’s Athabasca Univ. Online MBA 4) Online testing services (SAT; TOEFL) 5) Online cram schools (Megastudy, Korea) 6) Some MBA programs --- Owe more to past market success/brand image than to ICT integration Zemsky & Massy, 2004; Latchem & Jung, 2009
  • Realities – High market value Underperformed/failed 1) Fathom and NYU online gone 2) UK e-University failed 3) Not enough students in most programs --- Some generating revenue; but not making profit Garrett, 2004; Zemsky & Massy, 2004
  • Realities – High market value
    • Underperformed/failed
    • Over-estimate the market potential and under-estimate the educational and logistical challenges
    • Ignore the realities of ICT infrastructure, access and costs
    • Over-estimate learner readiness for e-learning
    • Embark on large-scale online learning programs and projects without initial try-outs
    • Be insensitive or slow in responding to customers’ expectations
    • Not obtain accreditation
    • Not meet the quality expectations of learners, particularly in regard to learner support
    • Not provide incentives for continuous private sector involvement in the partnerships
    Latchem & Jung, 2009
  • Over a decade experience - Learned from successes and failures - Now….
  • Cataloguing lessons learned (cases, empirical research) Starting small and strategically Diversifying partnerships Blended approaches M-learning Quality assurance and accreditation Recent breakthroughs
  • Recent breakthroughs
    • Cataloguing lessons learned (cases, empirical research – cultural, contextual considerations) Commonwealth of Learning http:// col.org Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia http:// www.cemca.org EuroPACE http:// www.europace.org UNESCO Bangkok ICT in Education http:// www.unescobkk.org UNESCO Asia Pacific Knowledge Base on ODL http://asiapacific-odl.oum.edu.my
    • e-ASEM Network for ICT and lifelong learning http:// asem.knou.ac.kr
  • Recent breakthroughs
    • Cataloguing lessons learned (Online journals)
    • Asian Journal of Distance Education http:// www.asianjde.org /
    • European Journal of OD & E-learning
    • http:// www.eurodl.org
    • Indian Journal of Open Learning http://www.ignou.ac.in/IJOL/Link%201a.htm
    • International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT, http:// ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//index.php
    • The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning http:// www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
    • The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education http:// tojde.anadolu.edu.tr /
    • Starting small and strategically ICT/e-Learning as a strategic and reform tool - “Authentic learning” Student Olympic Magazine (Schools in UK, Hong Kong & China) http:// clc.esf.edu.hk/GroupHomepage.asp?GroupID =37650 Start with one department/program - Kumamoto Univ. Japan – Graduate Program Instructional Systems Need-based programs only – MBA; Education; Health-related; ICT
    Recent breakthroughs
    • Diversifying partnerships Singapore Institute of Management (SIM) and UKOU Commonwealth Executive Master of Business Administration and Public Administration --- AIOU, BOU, INGOU, OUSL and Wawasan Open University in Malaysia Saudi Arabia ’s National Centre for E-Learning and Distance Education -- Open University of Malaysia Arab Open University (AOU) and UKOU Schools in Nepal & New Zealand: LearnZ --- strategic; one-to-one; one-to-few; regional partnerships
    Recent breakthroughs
    • Blended approaches Blending online and F2F education - Indira Gandhi National Open University Virtual Campus - Open University of Malaysia MEd program - Anadolu Univ. English Language Teaching Program - Blended Tutoring Blending old and new technologies - Print & Broadcast programs and M-learning - Conventional DE programs and synchronous technologies (Skype, e.g.) or Web 2.0 technologies (Blogs, wikis)
    Recent breakthroughs
    • M-learning Asia - one billion of the world’s 2.7 billion mobile users Cambodia - the first country to have more mobile phone than fixed line subscribers ; has the world’s highest ratio of telephone users using wireless University of the Philippines Open University Shanghai Jiaotong University , China Kanebo Cosmetics , Japan City University of Hong Kong --- Bypassing online learning
    Recent breakthroughs
    • Quality assurance and accreditation Cast study and Surveys – QA in DE/E-learning institutions in the AP region (2004 - 2007) 2009 – quality from learner perspective Discussions / Research evolving From Quality vs Access to Access through Quality Quality culture spread QA system development – early stage - QA/accreditation guidelines for DE/ICT use - QA approaches emerging
    Recent breakthroughs
    • QA and Accreditation Guidelines for DE
    • India,
    • Distance Education Council
    • “ Handbook of ODL”
    • US,
    • Commission of Institutions of Higher Education
    • “ Best Practices for Electronically Offered Degree and Certificate Programs”
    • UK,
    • Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
    • “ Distance Learning Guidelines”
    Quality, QA & Accreditation
    • QA and Accreditation Guidelines for DE
    • European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area”
    • EADL’s Quality Standards and Code of Conduct
    • UNESCO/Asia Pacific Quality Network (APQN)
    • “ O pen and Distance Learning Knowledge Base”
    • “ Regulating the Quality of Cross-Border Education”
    • National Association of Distance Education Organizations of South Africa (NADEOSA)
    • “ Quality Criteria for Distance Education in South Africa”
    Quality, QA & Accreditation
  • Five Approaches (not mutually exclusive)
    • conforming to the standards applied to conventional education
    • fitness for purpose
    • meeting customers ’ needs
    • continuous improvement
    • compliance with international standards and requirements
    Quality, QA & Accreditation
  • 1. QA as conforming to the standards applied to c onventional education
    • Same criteria and standards are applied in judging the quality of ODL and conventional institutions’ management, teaching, resources and outcomes
    • China, Thailand, Taiwan, Japan and Hong Kong
  • 2. QA as fitness for purpose
    • Quality is measured by how well institutions, programs or services fulfill their intended purposes.
    • - India, Korea and Turkey
  • 3. QA as Meeting Customers’ Needs
    • The institutional mission statements, policies and procedures focus on the learners ’ characteristics, needs and circumstances.
    • - ISO9001 ( UT , OUM , some Korean Cyber Univ.)
  • 4. QA as continuous improvement
    • The emphasis shifts to input, implementation, output and back to input.
    • - UT, OUUK
  • 5. QA as Compliance with international standards and requirements
    • give students greater confidence in the courses and awards and enable their studies to be recognized
    • Athabasca and USQ from USA
    • UT (ICDE)
    • UNISA (USA)
  • Three guiding stars for integrating ICT and QA system in ODEL to supporting ubiquitous access Conclusions
  • #1. QA as an essential tool QA as an essential tool for educational development and ubiquitous access to ODEL There should be no distinction between QA in ODEL and conventional education , but there should be specific guidelines, criteria and methods for judging the various modes of delivery. The national level QA for ODEL/ICT use should be as strong as (not softer than) that of higher education. There should be a ‘culture of quality’ that is shared willingly by all managers and staff, links internal and external accountability, builds capacities in QA and involves open, transparent management and communication.
  • #2. Promoting research Research is essential for improving understanding and practice, assuring and improving quality, informing and influencing policy-making and ensuring that ODEL is recognized as scholarly activity in its own right.
  • #3. Changes in practice ODEL environments need to be conceived such that the technology does not simply provide an information repository but serves as a platform for student-centered, teacher-facilitated and collaborative knowledge building . The instructional design (ID) needs to fully exploit the potential of ICT. There is also need for ID models for constructivistic learning environment design.
  • Thank you!