Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply



Published on

Testing compilation information

Testing compilation information

Published in: Education, Technology

1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Assessment, testing and evaluation Enrique Arias Castaño
  • 2. What is evaluation?
    • Evaluation is the process of determining significance or worth, usually by careful appraisal and study.
    • Evaluation is the analysis and comparison of actual progress vs. prior plans, oriented toward improving plans for future implementation.
    • It is part of a continuing management process consisting of planning, implementation, and evaluation; ideally with each following the other in a continuous cycle until successful completion of the activity.
  • 3. What is evaluation? 2
    • Evaluation is the process of determining the worth or value of something. This involves assigning values to the thing or person being evaluated.
    • Function  Here are some functions of evaluation: 
    • Answers the question "How well did we do?" (Qualitative evaluation)
    • Answers the question "How much did we do? (Quantitative evaluation)
  • 4.
    • Kinds  Here are some kinds of evaluations: 
    • Internal evaluation
    • External evaluation
    • Preliminary evaluation
    • Formative evaluation
    • Summative evaluation
  • 5. What is qualitative evaluation?
    • Qualitative evaluation is an assessment process that answers the question, "How well did we do?“
    • Examples  Here are some examples of qualitative evaluations in several areas of literacy: 
    • Content, quality, and relevance of a program
      • What was learned?
      • Are the learners using their new knowledge? If so, how?
    • Attitudes and achievements of the learners
      • What do the learners think about the classes, the teachers, and the materials?
      • Do they think the literacy classes made a difference in their lives? If yes, what kind of difference?
    • Selection, training, attitude, and ability of teachers and other literacy personnel
      • Did the teachers do a good job of communicating the new information?
      • Did they respect and support the learners?
  • 6. What is qualitative evaluation? 2
    • Quality of resources (including literacy materials)
      • Do people in the community like the materials?
      • Do they think the materials accurately portray the local culture?
      • Do they think the materials are appropriate for each group of learners?
      • Do the materials communicate information they want to learn?
    • Efficiency of strategies and activities
      • Do people in the community think the literacy program is successful?
      • Do they think the teachers and writers are trained properly?
      • Which activities do they think are good? Which activities do they think are not good?
    • Costs in relation to what was achieved
      • Do people in the community think the results of the literacy program are worth the cost and energy that were necessary to get the program started and to keep it going?
  • 7. What is quantitative evaluation?
    • Quantitative evaluation is an assessment process that answers the question, "How much did we do?“
    • Examples  Here are some examples of quantitative evaluations in several areas of literacy: 
    • Numbers of students, classes, and materials produced
      • How many people were in the target group?
      • How many started the course? How many completed the course? How many dropped out?
      • How many schools were started? How many are still operating?
      • How many books were produced?
  • 8. What is quantitative evaluation? 2
    • Student performance
      • Test scores
      • Reading, writing, and numeracy skills
    • Costs
      • In relation to number of students, books, and teachers
      • Program costs
  • 9. What is formative evaluation?
    • Formative evaluation is a method of judging the worth of a program while the program activities are forming or happening. Formative evaluation focuses on the process (Bhola 1990).
  • 10. Examples
    • Here are some examples of formative evaluation: 
    • Testing the arrangement of lessons in a primer before its publication
    • Collecting continuous feedback from participants in a program in order to revise the program as needed
  • 11. Steps
    • Follow these steps to do formative training evaluation: 
    • Observe trainee behavior.
    • Have informal talks about the training activity with the trainees.
    • Give short tests to trainees.
  • 12. What is pretraining evaluation?
    • Pretraining evaluation is a method of judging the worth of a program before the program activities begin.
  • 13. What is summative evaluation?
    • Summative evaluation is a method of judging the worth of a program at the end of the program activities. The focus is on the outcome (Bhola 1990).
    • Examples  Here are some examples of summative evaluation: 
    • Determining attitudes and achievement related to using a primer after it has been used in a training course
    • Collecting data on the impact of a program operating in a community for a period of time
  • 14. Steps
    • Follow these steps to do summative training evaluation: 
    • Have the trainees conduct demonstration lessons.
    • Have others observe trainees' behavior.
    • Give comprehensive tests to the trainees.
    • Gather impressions of trainers and trainees through questionnaires and interviews.
    • Answer the following questions:
      • Did you meet the training objectives?
      • Will you need to improve and modify some areas?
      • Should you conduct the training activity again?
      • How can you help the trainees attain further training?
  • 15. Methods of evaluation and testing
    • Choosing a method that you can use for evaluation and testing depends on factors such as the following: 
    • What you are evaluating or testing.
    • The purposes of the evaluation.
    • The resources available.
    • Other factors unique to each situation and culture.
  • 16.
    • According to Bhola, "evaluation is a process of judging the merit or worth of something." Evaluation is not a single occurrence, but gives information for planning purposes, as well as adjustments or revisions that may be needed in a literacy program. 
    • Some types of testing done during the planning, development, and implementation phases of a literacy program include the following: 
        • Needs assessment
        • Base-line survey
        • Learner assessment
        • Achievement and attitude testing
        • Curriculum evaluation
        • Personnel evaluation
        • Impact evaluation
  • 17. Types of Evaluation Pre-training Evaluation Formative Evaluation Summative Evaluation
  • 18. Evaluation Assessment Testing
  • 19. Assessment Types of assessment: Peer-assessment: Classmates’ conceptual evaluation Self-assessment: autonomous evaluation HETERO-assessment: teachers’ evaluation
  • 20. Tests
    • Any procedure for measuring ability, knowledge, or performance:
      • CLOZE TEST
      • PLACEMENT TEST (diagnostic test)
      • TOEFL TEST
  • 21. Characteristics of testing
    • Reliability
    • Reliability relates to the consistency of an assessment. A reliable assessment is one which consistently achieves the same results with the same (or similar) cohort of students. Various factors affect reliability – including ambiguous questions, too many options within a question paper, vague marking instructions and poorly trained markers. Traditionally, the reliability of an assessment is based on the following:
  • 22.
    • Validity
    • A valid assessment is one which measures what it is intended to measure. For example, it would not be valid to assess driving skills through a written test alone. A more valid way of assessing driving skills would be through a combination of tests that help determine what a driver knows, such as through a written test of driving knowledge, and what a driver is able to do, such as through a performance assessment of actual driving. Teachers frequently complain that some examinations do not properly assess the syllabus upon which the examination is based; they are, effectively, questioning the validity of the exam.