EcoCity 7: Tiwari paper

796
-1

Published on

Published in: Technology, Real Estate
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
796
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
24
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

EcoCity 7: Tiwari paper

  1. 1. Sustainable Eco-city Learning from Urban Traditions of Kathmandu Valley
  2. 2. Urban Sustainability • Town system consists of Society, Settlement and Nature – Has a innate tendency to cause distancing from each other with ‘development’ leading to unsustainabilty – Has a concentration of people and economic activities • With material and energy inputs and waste outputs also dense and concentrated • In an open continuum with the hinterland ( urban/rural) • Town needs to be seen – as a social entity – as a economic entity – as a ecological entity in the scheme of Nature
  3. 3. Eco-sustainability of Urban System • Urban system is not closed, it can’t sustain by itself – Because of Its resource dependence on ‘hinterland’ (basically for food, water and energy), whose extent is ever increasing with time! – Its waste environment that pervades into water, air and land around (fire/thermal and ether/space also?!) • In addition to Resource and Waste environments, Urban eco- sustainability has to consider – Socio-cultural environment (understanding and set up for sharing) • Current as well as Future generations • Unsustainable urban system DECAYS! • Urban ecological unsustainability happens when it decays or causes decay in one or all of its environments – Physical, Economic or Social > go to urban ecology schema
  4. 4. Urban Culture: Urban Ecology NATURE: Physical Environmental Chains SOCIETY: ECONOMY: Social set up Resources & for Sharing/ Waste Chains Competition
  5. 5. Urban Decay • Decay in urban systems occur due to – Failure of the supporting capacity (a sum total of resources and regenerative gains) – Failure of the assimilative/recycling capacity of Nature (a sum total of waste disposed) – Failure of distribution of wealth: urban poverty and social degeneration – Social order: fragmentation and loss of community behavior
  6. 6. Lessons of History • Kathmandu Valley has a long history of sustained urban settlements • Kathmandu Valley is almost a closed eco- system (micro-global character) • Towns of Kathmandu in History would have also faced threats of social, economic or physical unsustainability. – Review experimentations/technologies in successful approaches towards sustainability – Social agreement/ dialogues in urban culture – Nature and extent of individual/community behavior over the ‘period of sustenance’ – Social/cultural/human foresight
  7. 7. Kathmandu: Natural Characteristics • Bowl shaped topography, valley 25 Km across and 1.5 Km deep on average. – Lake deposits, high fertility soil – Rain fed, all rivers originate within the valley – Single drain off outlet • Water and Land sub-systems at Micro- equilibrium > go to Valley outline map
  8. 8. Legendary City: MANJUPATTAN Budanilkantha Manichur Jamacho Ichangu Legendary City: Narayan HANDIGAON BISHAL NAGAR Guhyeswori Svayambhu Changu Narayan Kathmandu PASHUPATINATH Sankhamul Patan Bhadgaon Chandagiri Shikhanarayan Bisankhu Phulchoki N Narayan
  9. 9. Kathmandu: Urban Peculiarities • 2000 years old tradition of Dense settlements • Towns as old and continuously Lived-in – Always located on Higher Grounds within the Valley > go to Bhaktapur picture – With a pond at its Higher Level > go to Gahanapokhari picture – Public Water Supply System of Pit Conduits – Temples at Street Crossings > go to Nyatapola/Jaisidewal pictures
  10. 10. Cross Roads Marker of Kirat days from Jaisideval/ Tegvala
  11. 11. Kirat make a start at Urbanism! • The idea of a Settlement – Sitting on fallow ground in a fertile valley – Served by pit conduit water supply system fed by a reservoir pond at its highest level – Dense and contained within a defined boundary – With Cross-road spaces marked for Urban socialization • Was basically of the Kirats (before 78 CE) • And Not of the Lichchhavis (78 -879 CE) – Who came from Gangatic plains with the classic Vedic/Hindu/Buddhist ideals and know-how of planning – Riverbank flatland pattern of settlements – Well system
  12. 12. Eco-urbanism of the Kirat • Dense and bounded settlements on high ground: Preservation of economic base/agricultural land • Integration of nature, economy and society – Dyochhe, pith and norms of social behavior > go to pics of d/p • Pith located at ecologically sensitive spot such as Water holes, Springs, Land humps, Clump of trees – Divine presence = ecological variance • Festivals – sharing resources and recognizing the urban/rural continuum – Imprint the rules in the minds of people – Carry the rules over time/ future generations – Socio-cultural nurturing of the hinterland > go to schema
  13. 13. Pigan Festivals (Mar-Apr) display Social Agreements on Natural Ecology and Settlement Economy & Ritually Mediate the agreements over space and generations
  14. 14. A pith: Numinous Stones, Family of Siva
  15. 15. On to 2nd Cultural Period • Population increases – Resource base is expanded – Towns reach out to valley foothills for Water supply sources – Social/cultural mediation of new ecological realities, understandings and responsibilities – Town Festivals extend out to the resource locations. • Settlements get enlarged – Andipringga > Bishal Nagar – X8 to 1 sq. km. in extent – Lichchhavi image the town as a Vedic microcosm, geometrically as well as philosophically – Vaastushastra and Environment of the five elements > go to schema >go to Lichchhavi pattern >go to Daxinkoligram pattern
  16. 16. Everything consists of Pancha-tatwa, the five transformation modes/elemental Earth principles. With the sense Water (bhuta) of Sound, Touch, Fire Air Form, Taste and Smell, the Ether fifteen characteristic quality-nature (guna) of elements are formed – that is universal (nitya). … There should be no tampering of the tatwa Environment – This has to be the universal ecological imperative.
  17. 17. Lichchhavi Pattern • Daxinakoligram • Dandaka pattern • Ikhapokhari Jalasayanarayan? • Onde Narayan • Ikha Narayan • Chikanmugal N • Makhan N
  18. 18. IKHA POKHARI IKHANARAYAN JALASAYINARAYAN CHIKAMUGAL NARAYAN JAISIDEVAL HYUMATNARAYAN ONDENARAYAN
  19. 19. Eco-urbanism: 2nd Cultural Period • Guthi: a community based management – Surplus Private wealth as “Public Endowment” – Community ownership and operation of land – Community engagement in maintenance of services • Recognition of water supply as a urban service – Socio-cultural mediation of urban rural continuum – Closing the ‘urban-hinterland distancing’ – Playing out interdependencies – Festivals extend out to sub-regions – Become almost global by 10th century ( eg Matsendranath) >go to wastewater treatment
  20. 20. Moderating Water Pollution • Lichchhavis start septage/waste water recycling • The reeds garden (Natapata vatika of the Lichchhavis) south-east outfall and treatment area
  21. 21. Departures of the 2nd Period • Imaging the city: visioning • Surplus private wealth to public service • Community ownership and operation of land • Circular regenerative track:diffusing concentrative system • Regulating mechanism spanning current and future generations: Framing universal rules/ reaching agreements on values
  22. 22. On to 3rd Cultural Period • Towns become still larger: Bhaktapur is laid out for 12000 houses at start of 13th century – Social heterogeneity of the town increases • Urban Ecological problem build up – Economic competitiveness for ‘plenty and surplus’ and disparities in sharing of gains, developing urban poverty – Over-exploitation of resources – Heavy waste generation/little assimilation/ land and water pollution and towns spilling boundaries – Further distancing of man from Nature. – Towns are drier and warmer
  23. 23. Eco-city: 3rd Cultural period • Development through a Mix of – Kirat ecological prototype > to schema – Lichchhavi’s urban planning principles • Eco-sensitive ritual bounding and structure – Bounded urban development, Dune and Pine >to schema – Ritual/Social mediation of Wider urban-rural continuum (resource base) – Tole sectorization, homogeneous neighborhood >to schema
  24. 24. Eco-city: 3rd Cultural period • Responding to 'micro-heat, dry regime & waste sub-structure’ – Capitalizes positive aspects of 'new nature‘ – Potentially mitigates negative results • Micro-heat: – High Density/Low rise dev.: warmer micro-climate – tight layout with small courtyards > Itum Bahal – predominance of paved streets/ heat gain > Itum Bahal – "No-Greenery-inside” – Was this a wrong move? – Lachhi – setback for a sunny spot in narrow lanes – Lung space: peripheral Khyos
  25. 25. Eco-city: 3rd Cultural period • Responding to 'dry regime’ – Use of water-accepting technologies – Pervious paving, open joints – Surface collector drains separated from deep drains – irrigating the dula or recharging kuwa – Use of wells inside tole and pit conduits between neighborhoods > recharge through own waste water > protecting from pollution >go to well
  26. 26. Eco-city: 3rd Cultural period • Responding to 'waste sub-structure’ – Communal toilet streets, night soil collection and raw sewage manure agri-practice- ‘output-input’ > Schema – Waste management:garbage and Sagah • Capitalization of micro-heat: composting • Health hazard management: periodic cleaning through seasonal rituals: Lukumadyo/Pasachahre (Chait) >go to pic – Sithi: Cleaning and maintaining water supply systems in the driest season (Baisakh/Jeth) • Water for seeding – Sithi: Maintaining other ‘urban services’ – public buildings • Lean agricultural season
  27. 27. v]tsf]] k]6df k]6sf] v]tdf sf Recycling Through Use FARM FOOD of Extra Urban Heat * MANURE WASTE Compost and Sagah
  28. 28. Eco-region: 2nd 3rd Cultural period • Eco-region goes ‘global’ or valley-wide • Further away, agricultural land and forested hillocks protected and preserved. • Watershed areas and sources of rivers given religious image as a preservation primer • Ecological responses cover PES environment and actors MSN in totality
  29. 29. Lessons of History • Setting up the new motives and evolving ethical behavior: ritually mediated plan • Cities planned and patterned after a perceived image of cosmos/ use mediated by rituals • Accommodating growth but remaining complete and balanced at all times as a mental construct • Plan in the mind of the user • Exploiting human ethics, individual faithfulness and emotionally guided inner discipline
  30. 30. Lessons of History • The Target of Future Generation • In contemporary society with notoriously shortsighted present/ development paradigm centered on the present man • ‘Future generation’ is not a fixed ‘time span’. • Plans of indefinite time frame/process objectivity: karma, dharma and philosophy of rebirth: rolling present and future into infinite time/one entity. • Buddhism and material frugality, 'virtuous behavior and observance of social order' as a life-principle in Confucianism
  31. 31. Lessons of History • Bounded but Interacting Urban and Rural systems • Kathmandu Towns conceived as bounded entities with set of perimeter gods and goddesses defining physical boundary: taboo to build outside • Towns of Kathmandu on less irrigated tar: Utility of bounding mundane: save the economic base. • Distinct and protected hinterland for ecological sustainability
  32. 32. Lessons of History • Rethink the urban metabolism • Reverse the concentrative, dry and hot by Use of diffusive, localized, water accepting and heat using technologies and techniques and Keep the earth • Moist • Nourished and • Green!
  33. 33. Lessons of History • Managing Dependencies • Urban-rural linkage/ two inter-dependent systems managing dependencies – Containing overexploitation of resources, exclusive exploitation and consequent deprivation of the rural area and lack of commensurate return of the benefits or other inputs back to the hinterland. – Interacting activities seeking participation of both the dwellers of the city and the hinterland in preserving and maintaining the resource • Festivals: ritual play or exercises in regionalism, preservation and citizen participation
  34. 34. Lessons of History • Land Donated in Perpetuity/ Community ownership • Effective tool of building sustainability through community participation • Creation, maintenance and operation of elements and processes of providing public good/ decentralized participatory management • Appeal to philanthropic instincts to canalize individual wealth into community good. • Most precious and permanent of properties/ healthy association of land and community
  35. 35. Lessons of History • Social cohesion in Multicultural society and the town • Saving sustainability in societal heterogeneity • Efforts at making pockets of homogeneity. • Sustainability of cultural diversity within multi- cultural societies: Mosaic scenario & not religious neighborhoods • Well within tole & Conduit between toles! Graded community behavior? • Other defined acts/ Karma and process objectivity

×