Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Point of Entry masal 2011
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Point of Entry masal 2011

559

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
559
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. POINT OF ENTRY: CULTIVATING A STRATEGIC LIBRARIAN-FACULTY PARTNERSHIP: A CASE STUDY Elizabeth Bucciarelli Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters Saginaw Valley State University March 11, 2011
  • 2. Introduction <ul><li>Discuss the ways to identify and connect with </li></ul><ul><li>non-liaison faculty members in order to create innovative projects and partnerships </li></ul>
  • 3. Vision <ul><li>Alter my role with the subject departments in order to become more of a collaborator, as well as a collections manager </li></ul><ul><li>Engage in non-traditional library work </li></ul><ul><li>Become active in the teaching curriculum </li></ul><ul><li>Engage in work outside of the physical library building </li></ul>
  • 4. Identifying Potential Partnership Opportunities <ul><li>Identify areas of need across the institution, department, or program </li></ul><ul><li>Identify people with shared interests, values, and goals </li></ul><ul><li>What are these people invested in? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Students (listen what the students say) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Specific research area </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Initiate conversations about those common goals, and possible ways to achieve those goals </li></ul><ul><li>From Passive to Pervasive: Changing Perceptions </li></ul><ul><li>of the Library’s Role Through Intra-Campus </li></ul><ul><li>Partnerships. (Gilman & Kunkel, 2010) </li></ul>
  • 5. Teaching Philosophy <ul><li>Passionate about teaching </li></ul><ul><li>Passionate about their specialty </li></ul><ul><li>Treat students and colleagues respectfully </li></ul><ul><li>Professionally current in teaching strategies and theories </li></ul><ul><li>Technologically engaged and current </li></ul><ul><li>Fearless about trying new ideas in the classroom </li></ul>
  • 6. Personality Characteristics <ul><li>Respected by the departmental faculty that you respect </li></ul><ul><li>Ethical </li></ul><ul><li>Forthright </li></ul><ul><li>Honest </li></ul><ul><li>Friendly </li></ul><ul><li>Fair </li></ul><ul><li>Adventuresome </li></ul><ul><li>Curious </li></ul><ul><li>Open to new ideas </li></ul><ul><li>Enjoy change </li></ul><ul><li>Seek partnerships </li></ul><ul><li>Professional manner </li></ul>
  • 7. Strategic Engagements <ul><li>University Committees </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Writing Across the Curriculum – basic & advanced </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Information Literacy involvement & training </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>General Education Committee </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Academic Service Learning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Faculty Senate </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Departmental Committees </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Curriculum Committee </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Accreditation Committee </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assessment Committee </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Personnel Evaluation Committee </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Professional organizations – local, state, national </li></ul><ul><li>Research areas </li></ul><ul><li>Publications </li></ul>
  • 8. Conditions for Successful Collaboration <ul><li>Clarity about the purpose, objectives, responsibilities </li></ul><ul><li>Role clarification </li></ul><ul><li>Address power differences </li></ul><ul><li>Share leadership </li></ul><ul><li>Share work equitably </li></ul><ul><li>Open communication </li></ul><ul><li>Mutual trust </li></ul><ul><li>Accept that a partnership evolves over time </li></ul><ul><li>Have a sense of humor </li></ul>
  • 9. Case Study: Products of the Primary Partnership Research Instruction -Introduction to Professional Nursing Skills I Creation of Assgs* Learning Objectives Nursing Research Tutorial* Teaching @ Remote Sites* CINAHL/ PubMed Camtasia Tutorial Scaffolded Research Instruction Incorp. of Immersion Content APA Workshop Proposal to a Nursing Ed Conf
  • 10. Case Study: Secondary Products of the Primary Partnership 3-Tier Scaffolded Research Instruction in Nursing Nursing Research Introduction to Professional Nursing Skills II Video for Offsite Classes “ Great Debates” EBP Advanced Searching Law Searching 3-Tier Scaffolded Research Instruction in Occupational Therapy Intro to OT Philosophy Of OT OT Research Tutorial OT Research Methods Avoiding Plagiarism Avoiding Plagiarism EBP
  • 11. Other Significant Projects <ul><li>Creation of assignments </li></ul><ul><li>Writing Across the Curriculum </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Developed learning objectives </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Writing Center </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>APA Workshop </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Graduate writing assistants </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Discussing assessment s </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Submitted abstracts to a nursing conference </li></ul><ul><li>“ Great Debates” panel judge </li></ul><ul><li>Incorporation of Immersion content into classes </li></ul>
  • 12. Unexpected Outcomes <ul><li>Reputation spreads </li></ul><ul><li>Connections to faculty with similar interests or reticent </li></ul><ul><li>Students respect my expertise, and refer others to me which correlates with an increase in the number of one-on-one research sessions with students </li></ul><ul><li>Culminating projects outcome invitations </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Panel member on the “Great Debates” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Invited to capstone project poster sessions </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Letters for tenure and promotion documents </li></ul><ul><li>Frequent contributor of anonymous student work for IL analysis and survey distributor </li></ul>
  • 13. References <ul><li>Buddy, J.W. (2007). Using personality traits and effective </li></ul><ul><li>communication to improve collaboration. School Library Media </li></ul><ul><li>Activities Monthly, 23 , 26-29. www.schoollibrarymonthly.com </li></ul><ul><li>Gaspar, D.B., & Wetzel, K.A. (2009). A case study in collaboration: </li></ul><ul><li>assessing academic librarian/faculty partnerships. College & Research </li></ul><ul><li>Libraries , 70, 578-590. crl.acrl.org </li></ul><ul><li>Gilman, I. & Kunkel, M. (2010). From passive to pervasive: changing </li></ul><ul><li>perceptions of the library’s role through intra-campus partnerships. </li></ul><ul><li>Collaborative Librarianship, 2 , 22-32. www.collaborativelibrarianship.org/ </li></ul><ul><li>Staub, R.E. The primacy of courage in partnering with others. Journal for </li></ul><ul><li>Quality and Participation, 23 , 16-18. asq.org/pub/jqp/ </li></ul><ul><li>Vangen, S. & Huxham, C. Nurturing collaborative relations: building trust in </li></ul><ul><li>interorganizational collaboration, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39 , 5- 31. doi: 10.1177/0021886303253179 </li></ul>

×