Criticism
by eastgate on Jun 18, 2010
- 1,336 views
Computer scientists tend to reach first for usability testing and clinical evaluation when assessing hypertexts and hypertext systems. Other methods and approaches may yield better judgments
Computer scientists tend to reach first for usability testing and clinical evaluation when assessing hypertexts and hypertext systems. Other methods and approaches may yield better judgments
Accessibility
Categories
Tags
Upload Details
Uploaded via SlideShare as Apple Keynote
Usage Rights
© All Rights Reserved
Statistics
- Favorites
- 0
- Downloads
- 6
- Comments
- 0
- Embed Views
- Views on SlideShare
- 981
- Total Views
- 1,336
If the idea of literary hypertext seems strange to you, Diane Greco and I recently pulled together a volume of readings about Reading Hypertext.
A bad conference paper costs taxpayers and benefactors fifteen or twenty thousand dollars — and that assumes it’s not pernicious or misleading.
This has happened several times at this conference, where (after all) we don’t build bridges.
We insist that it be done, but it’s obviously not what we want to do. This is not determinative, but it is (I think) a hint.
Readers dont know what they want. They haven’t found it yet; that’s why they’re reading!
Others, instead, have turned to careful examination of actual hypertexts.
There is better work essentialism, but it has proven surprisingly difficult.
The academic term for the kind of antiformalism Kael promoted is "postmodernism."
But, absent form and power, it hasn’t been clear how Theory (with a capital T) can be wrong on the merits, not just the politics.