What it's like to do a Master's thesis with me (Ted Pedersen)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

What it's like to do a Master's thesis with me (Ted Pedersen)

on

  • 598 views

Some thoughts on what it's like to do a Master's thesis with me, including general ideas about research, my research interests, and a few suggestions as to what will lead to success

Some thoughts on what it's like to do a Master's thesis with me, including general ideas about research, my research interests, and a few suggestions as to what will lead to success

Statistics

Views

Total Views
598
Views on SlideShare
598
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    What it's like to do a Master's thesis with me (Ted Pedersen) What it's like to do a Master's thesis with me (Ted Pedersen) Presentation Transcript

    • What it's like to do a Master's thesis with me (Ted Pedersen) tpederse@d.umn.edu http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse September 16, 2013
    • Outline ●What is research? ●What are my interests? ●What do you need to do to succeed? ●A little bit about previous students ●Comments on reading I've provided
    • Research
    • What is research? Asking questions about the world where the answers are interesting, whether they are positive or negative
    • Interesting? ● Can I implement this algorithm? – Important and interesting to you, but not that significant to the rest of us ● Can I improve this algorithm to run in linear time (rather than exponential) – Great if you succeed, but if you fail...? ● Can I show this problem is inherently exponential and can't be improved upon? – Might be a winner, assuming that this answer is still unknown and problem is of general interest
    • Interesting? ● My method is 67% accurate. Their method is 62% accurate. – Hurrah! Yawn. Nice but incomplete. – What do we now know about the world because of this? ● I've reimplemented Smith's method and added to it a new kind of feature. This has improved Smith's result by 5%. ● Plausible, assuming we can clearly show improvement is due to the new feature
    • Interesting! ● Does knowing the part of speech of preceding words help us predict the meaning of a word? –Yes. Tells us that syntax and semantics are connected, and that syntactic clues are important to semantics. –No. Suggests that syntax and semantics are disconnected. ● Imagine that this is the feature we added to Smith's method
    • What is research? ● We develop interesting questions to answer ● We call these hypotheses ● We then figure out the best way to answer those questions ● In our work, answers are found experimentally –Just like in many sciences, except we use computers to conduct the experiments (and a lot of other sciences use computers to do experiments too) ● Could also be more theoretical, but that's not usually what we do
    • This is Science ● I'm a Scientist ● We do some engineering to build systems to conduct experiments, but ours goals are scientific ● We want to answer questions about the world, in particular human language ● Any engineering is a means to an end –The end is an answer to our question –A nicely built system is not science, it's the laboratory in which you can begin to do your science –The department is called Computer Science, and your degree will be a Master of Science
    • What is a Master's Thesis? ● It presents an interesting and original question (hypotheses) ● It shouldn't matter if the answer is positive or negative (otherwise you force the results one way or the other) ● You must persuade your audience that the question is indeed interesting and worth answering ● You must present an argument that supports your answer ● Our arguments are nearly always experimental ● They are based on a series of well formed clearly explained experiments that can be replicated by others ● Questions do not need to be incredibly difficult or time consuming to pursue, but they should be interesting and to some extent unanswered or needing confirmation
    • My interests
    • What questions interest me? ● Natural Language Processing – making computers better able to process human language (written form) ● Computational Linguistics – understanding the nature of language better by studying it with computational techniques
    • What kinds of language interest me? ●General text ● News articles, web search results ●Medical text ● Clinical records, patient-centered social networks ●Most often in English ● Sometimes other languages ● I don't work on translation
    • NLP● Word sense disambiguation (WSD) ● Assigning meanings to words based on the context in which they occur –The boy fishes from the bank –The bank gave me a loan ● Assume meanings are already defined, for example in a dictionary ● Many of our recent questions concern the role of semantic coherence in allowing us to determine meanings of words ● http://senserelate.sourceforge.net ● http://search.cpan.org/dist/UMLS-SenseRelate/
    • NLP ● Word sense discrimination ● Assumes you don't know the possible meanings ahead of time –Goal is to discover them ● Group occurrences of a word together based on contextual similarity ● Label the discovered groups (clusters) with a definition or description ● Many interesting questions about the role of surrounding context in determining and defining meaning ● http://senseclusters.sourceforge.net
    • NLP & CL ● Collocation discovery ● Identify combinations of words (in large samples of text) that tend to occur together and carry some additional meaning –Toaster oven, kick the bucket, card carrying member ● Often use statistical measures of association or networks of word co-occurrences to identify ● Necessary step in some approaches to word sense disambiguation and discrimination ● A frequent question is whether a particular technique can identify a certain kind of expression (and why or why not) ● http://ngram.sourceforge.net
    • CL ● Semantic Similarity and Relatedness ● ranking or comparing concepts based on their similarity –Is a dog more like a cat or a house? –Is corn more related to a farmer or an astronaut? ●http://wn-similarity.sourceforge.net –Is blood more like a tissue or a bone? –Is aspirin more related to a headache or a vaccination? ●http://umls-similarity.sourceforge.net ● Many questions about how to use information from ontologies or corpora to replicate human performance, and the significance of this to other NLP tasks
    • Experimental methods ● Statistical and data driven ● Clustering approaches, supervised learning ● Knowledge based ● WordNet – general English ● UMLS – medicine, biology, anatomy, etc.
    • What you need to do to succeed
    • Keys to success ●Desire to conduct science, not just engineering ● Enthusiasm for asking and answering interesting questions –Going beyond just implementing things –Results do matter, and we'll form our questions such that we don't require a certain answer, but we must get concrete results that lead to an answer ●Ability to express technical ideas, questions, etc. in writing ●Mature work habits ● Willingness to stay involved, and maintain steady rate of work over 4 semesters ● Email as a key channel of communication ●Willingness to program and learn what you don't know ● Previous projects have used Perl, MySQL, Java ● APIs increasingly important
    • Key values ●Experimental research ● Ask and answer questions (hypotheses) ●Publish when we can ● A “good” Master's thesis should result in publishable work ●Open source ● Free and frequent distribution of code ● Allows for replication of results ●Documentation of code ● User should be able to install, run, and understand results based on our documentation ● Allows for replication of results
    • My typical schedule ● Develop a very detailed proposal in first semester (with concrete deadlines specified) – typically there are 2-3 main research questions (hypotheses) that we will address ● During second semester we develop baselines based on known answers to our questions that will be basis for comparison ● During third semester we conduct 1-2 experiments designed to answer 1-2 of our questions – we measure how well (or not) those answers worked out and report on that ● During fourth semester we do one more set of experiments to answer our remaining question – again measuring how well (or not) that worked out and reporting on that ● Do not generally work too much with students in summer due to other constraints and demands on time
    • My expectations of you ● We write the thesis AS WE GO, we do not do all the writing at the end ● We release software and data AS WE GO ● We often build off of previous student's work, so we need to be careful in separating your work from theirs, and also leaving behind a body of work that future students can build on ● We meet regularly (once every week or two) and communicate very regularly (sometimes daily or even more often) via email ● I do a lot of testing and verification of results, I also read and comment on documentation extensively ● This process needs to be iterative, and you need to be responsive to my concerns (not always agreeing, but at least acknowledging and discussing, and I will do the same for yours) ● I ask that your thesis be treated as equal in priority to your class work (not higher, but not less either)
    • A little bit about previous (successful) students
    • Former (successful) students http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse/masters.html ● Supervised 16 MS students ● 6 earned PhDs –CMU (3), Utah, Toronto, UM-TC ● 2 are pursuing PhDs –CMU and Toronto ● 2 earned second MS degree –Missouri and Pittsburgh ● Supervised 1 PhD ● UM-TC ● Topics? ● 5 in semantic similarity ● 5 in word sense disambiguation ● 3 in word sense discrimination ● 2 in collocation discovery ● 1 outside of NLP
    • Reading ●The paper I've suggested you read is from a highly competitive conference (ACL 2004) where it won the best paper award ●Since then it has had impact both in terms of citations and influencing the direction of NLP and CL ●I'm interested in how well you can understand this, and how interesting you find it. I would also like you to think about the hypotheses that likely motivated this work.
    • Thank you! http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse tpederse@d.umn.edu