The Future of Research (Science and Technology)

The Future of Research (Science and Technology) Carole Goble [email_address] University of Manchester, UK OMII-UK British Library Board Awayday 23rd September 2008

Acknowledgements
David De Roure
Michael McLennan
Noshir Contractor
Christine Borgman
Tony Linde
Cameron Neylon
Duncan Hull
Geoffery Fox
Malcolm Atkinson
Jean Claude Bradley
Anne Trefethen
Graham Cameron
Phil Bourne
Bertram Ludaescher
Tim Wess
Roger Barga
Paul Fisher
Jane Hunter
Jeremy Frey
Tony Hey
Jim Hendler
Bob Jones
Liz Lyon
Juliana Friere
Domenico Talia
Michael Nielsen
Marco Roos
Doug Kell
Anthony Finkelstein
Peter Murray-Rust
Robert Tansley
Michael Wilson
Rob Tansley

Trypanosomiasis in Africa http://www.genomics.liv.ac.uk/tryps/trypsindex.html Andy Brass Steve Kemp Paul Fisher

Hypothesis driven research Now we add Data driven Simulation / prediction driven Automated experiments Open “as you go” communication Team research New types of research output

Data intensive Science Data from observations Data from predictions through simulations and computer models Industrialised science

1070 databases, Nucleic Acids Research Jan 2008 (96 in Jan 2001)
Proteomics
Genomics
Transcriptomics
Protein sequence prediction
Phenotypic studies
Phylogeny
Sequence analysis
Protein Structure prediction
Protein-protein interaction
Metabolomics
Model organism collections
Systems Biology
Epidemiology ….

Growth of data, regardless of discipline
Raw, predicted, derived, combined, aggregated
Curated to be annotated and enriched manually or automagically
Interlinked

Large Hadron Collidor [Norbert Neumeister]

Why Data intensive Science?
New high throughput experimental methods (microarrays, combinatorial chemistry, sensor networks, earth observation, sky surveys, heroic experiments ….)
Increasing scale, diversity and complexity of digital material processed separately and in combination.
Commons based production
über accessibility
Heterogeneous, Autonomous and Volatile

Why Data Intensive Science?
Small data.
Spreadsheets.
Personal lab books.
Privately held.
Increasingly publicly shared.
Through the web
Millions of them.
Born digital.

Raw and Interpretive Data
What is fact?
Revision is constantly occurring. Even primary data can be revised.
Science is interpretation
Much of scientific data is secondary datasets of interpretative, information.
Primary Data Primary Data Primary Data Secondary Curated Data Processed Data Secondary Curated Data Secondary Data Integrated data Processing details Capture details Update revise Update revise revise revise

Data collection management
Large scale community-wide global data centres – EBI, DDBJ, NCBI, NCI, CERN
Institutional data centres and labs and individuals – precarious and uncertain.
Role for data stewardship and preservation on behalf of the community
Cloud data
[email_address]

Not the end of theory!
The prevalence of data and the rise of data intensive science and data driven science adds to the pool of hypothesis driven and theory driven research.
It doesn’t replace it.
Data Theory Prediction Hypothesis

200 Genotype Phenotype Metabolic pathways Literature [Paul Fisher]

Large scale data collection from multiple sites throughout the world.
The team’s own data and personal data sets.
Analytical pipelines and automated workflows with intelligent intervention.
Literature auto found and mined
If manual: its logged
If automated: faster, systematic, repeatable, reduced bias, auto-logged, explicit, shareable
Born digital

Automated processing of library content
PubMed contains ~17,787,763 articles to date
Manually searching is tedious and frustrating
Can be hard finding links between data and articles
Conclusion? Machines will be reading the library.
Link between cholesterol , patient trauma and parasite resistance in cattle revealed.
http://www.myexperiment.org/workflows/172 Paul Fisher

Data driven research
Was:
Hypothesis to experiment to analyse the data
Now:
start with the data. There is so much data that is accessible.
Ideas Data Synthesis / Induction Hypothesis Analysis / Deduction [Kell and Oliver]

Published. Eventually.

Reproducible, or rather “fully supported” Transparent science, Composite research components Methods Lab Books Preprints Data Video Blogs Podcasts Codes Algorithms Models Presentations Ontologies Intermediate Results Related Articles Comments & Reviews Plans Models

Reproducible, or rather “fully supported” Transparent science, Composite research components Methods Lab Books Preprints Data Video Blogs Podcasts Codes Algorithms Models Presentations Ontologies Intermediate Results Related Articles Comments & Reviews

Reproducible Science means context, quality, trust means easy access to the sources

Methods are Scientific commodities
Scripts, workflows, simulations, experimental plans statistical models, ...
Repeatable, reproducible, comparable and reusable research.
Sharing to propagates expertise and build reputation.
, http://myexperiment.org

120 Simulation tools 1,200 Seminars, podcasts, etc. 77,000 Users worldwide 550 Contributors Developed by the NSF Network for Computational Nanotechnology Online since October 2002 [Michael McLennan] http://nanoHUB.org

[Jean-Claude Bradley] http://usefulchem.wikispaces.com/

BioLit
Seamless integration between data and publications
From the Public Library of Science people.
1. A link brings up figures from the paper 0. Full text of PLoS papers stored in a database 2. Clicking the paper figure retrieves data from the PDB which is analyzed 3. A composite view of journal and database content results 4. The composite view has links to pertinent blocks of literature text and back to the PDB 1. 2. 3. 4. The Knowledge and Data Cycle http://biolit.ucsd.edu [Phil Bourne]

ICTP Trieste, December 10, 2007 [Phil Bourne]

[Phil Bourne]

The reproducible and interactive research documents* Mixed stewardship research documents The recombinant, compound research documents The virtual research document Multi-versioned, dynamic research document *Papers, Books, whatever. 2020

Data, image, model, process, workflow, podcast, slideset* Finding, citation, peer review, preservation, identity, versioning, security, privacy, copyright management, format authority Authority on metadata descriptions Propagation of descriptions * Insert new research commodity type here 2020

What does this mean for library services? Seamless interlinking of data, literature and other research commodities Integrated search across external resources Selective quality curation Hell is other people’s (lack of) semantic metadata 2020

Supporting Paul, The Scientist Search/Discover Serendipitous Finding Collaborative Searching Structural Search Keeping Current Gather Collecting Manage Organizing Create Annotating Review & Rate Describe Write Share Publish Sharing Rights Integrated search Automatic paper download Continual queries Paper recommendation Alert Project and Personal Internal search Refereed and Grey literature Tag, annotate, rate Templates Multi-author authoring Bibliography management Version management Copyright tools (CC and SC) Linking up data, models and other components [Roger Barga]

Collaboration

(Virtual) Team Research
Research increasingly team-based
Teams produce more highly cited research
Team science is increasingly composed of co-authors located at different universities.
“ virtual communities of scholars” produce higher impact work than comparable co-located teams or solo scientists.
True for all fields and team sizes.
Studies of 19.9 million research articles over 5 decades as recorded in the Web of Science database, and an additional 2.1 million patent records from 1975-2005. Using the Web of Science database to analyze the collaboration arrangements of over 4,000,000 papers over a 30 year period Sources: Wuchty, Jones, and Uzzi Noshir Contractor

Distributed [Helen Hulme]

Distributed and Collaborative .....skills-rich and time-poor Biologists, Geneticists, Bioinformaticians, Immunologists, Microarray specialists, Computer Scientists, Mathematicians, Physicists..... [Helen Hulme]

Personal: log books and spreadsheets, file stores
Group: shared data, methods, protocols, information, failures, insights, observations, know-how
Born digital but not very digitally processable.
[Helen Hulme]

Virtual Research Environments 1 Collaboration Environments Science Gateways to data and computing grids Multi-authored document preparation

Multi-disciplinary
Proteomics
Classical Genetics / QTL studies Animal Experts Transcriptomics Parasite Experts Statistical modelling Text Analysis Image analysis Health Epidemiology

Crossing boundaries Interdisciplinary Support
Expert finding
Complementary experts swarming around a problem
Transferring data, methods and know-how from one discipline to another
e.g. astronomy image analysis applied to cancer tissue microarrays
How do you find relevant material that uses a different jargon in a different discipline organised to only suit its experts?
Overlay and virtual journals are few and far between – e.g. the Virtual Journal of Quantum Information.
Where is the overlay library?

Virtual Research Environments 2 Social Professional Networking Expert finding

[Roger Barga]

The BL’s Research Information Centre

Open Science Collective Intelligence Researcher participation Commons based production Sharing Accelerated dissemination Embedded in the researchers environment and work practices

“ Long Tail” Science. “Hypo” Science
Increased scale and diversity of scientific participation
The small research team.
Niche experts.
The citizen.
Easier to work with, and get hold of, digital output.
Better tools.
Scaling effects of peer review, social working and community curation.

Open content, services and software. Social tools for the social process of science.

Publicly available data
Open services and software tools.
Science Commons, open access journals, open data and linked data*, PLoS, ...
Open notebook science
Recent US funding agencies declarations on open access
* formerly known as Semantic Web

Anyone can be a publisher as well as a consumer.
Social tools for the social process of science.
Wikis, (micro)blogs, instant messaging.
Accelerate research and reduce time-to-experiment.

Community collective intelligence network effects
Share information and know-how
Tag resources for finding
Socially curate resources
Openly review and debate
Recommendations based on usage and opinion.

http://www.wikipathways.org/

[Duncan Hull]

Growth of open access scientists digital natives, always online, hybrids catalysts for change [Phil Bourne]

Cameron Neylon’s chemistry notebook

Sharing reusable methods Paul Jo

Competitive advantage. Academic vanity. Reputation. Adoption. Scrutiny. Being scooped. Misinterpretation. New Reward Schemes Rewards Fears

What is the role of the library? Trusted curator Trusted data manager Quality arbiter Knowledge disseminator Format authority Add value content provider Metadata / controlled vocabulary provider Add value service provider 2020

Services Embedding into the Researchers Workflow The Cloud

Personal Scientist-centric tooling
We don’t come to the library, it comes to us.
We don’t use just one library or one source.
We don’t use just one tool!
Library services embedded in our toolkits, workbenches, browsers, authoring tools.
Zotero Firefox plug-in

Hypothesis Construction from the Literature Marco Roos, Scott Marshall , University of Amsterdam

Towards Automated Science Inspired by Jean-Claude Bradley Human Human Human Machine Machine Machine Quality Trust Ease Ubiquity We are here

Combining information on the web
DIY mash ups
As the pieces become easy to use, researchers bring them together in new ways and ask new questions.
Boundaries are shifting, practice is changing.
Based on the ease of assembly and automation.
Allen Brain Atlas

http://info.scopus.com/scsearchapi/geoCitations/index.html

Take a PubMed search result
Combine it with a Google Scholar search for number of citations
Mash the results into the PubMed results with a link to Google Scholar

What does this mean for library services? With not For Opening up to researcher’s tools and research environments for discovery, management and curation of research commodities Enabling and encouraging new services and new content to add new value Remove obstacles to interoperate and share Collaborate, don’t control

Give researchers tools and access to content
They control their own software/data apparatus and their experiments.
They are creative
Pervasive devices and the mixing up of virtual and real worlds

Prior to leaving home Paul, a Manchester graduate student, syncs his IPhone with the latest papers, delivered overnight by the library via a news syndication feed. On the bus he reviews the stream, selecting a paper close to his interest in HIV-1 proteases.
The data shows apparent anomalies with his own work, and the method, an automated script, looks suspect.
Being on-line he notices that a colleague in Madrid has also discovered the same paper through a blog discussion and they Instant Message, annotating the results together.
By the time the bus stops he has recomputed the results, proven the anomaly, made a rebuttal in the form of a pubcast to the Journal Editor, sent it to the journal and annotated the article with a comment and the pubcast.
Based on an original idea by Phil Bourne

Questions? http://research.microsoft.com/towards2020science/

Extras

Other References
Duncan Hull, Steve Pettifer, Doug Kell, Defrosting the digital library: bibliographic tools for the next generation web to appear in PLoS Computational Biology
Michael Nielsen, The Future of Science http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448
Philip Bourne Will a biological database be different from a biological journal, PLOS Computational Biology 1(3) www.ploscompbiol.org
James A. Evans Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship Science 18 July 2008: Vol. 321. no. 5887, pp. 395 - 399 http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/321/5887/395
James Hendler Reinventing Academic Publishing, Editorials for IEEE Intelligent Systems http://www.mindswap.org/blog/2007/08/14/reinventing-academic-publishing-%E2%80%93-part-i/ http://www.mindswap.org/blog/2007/11/23/reinventing-academic-publishing-%E2%80%93-part-ii/ http://www.mindswap.org/blog/2008/01/03/reinventing-academic-publishing-%E2%80%93-part-iii/
Cameron’s suggested open science blogs
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/07/online-researchers-have-acces s-to-more.html
http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2008/07/electronic_publication_and_the.php
http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2008/07/an_open_access_partisans_vi ew.php
http://openwetware.org/wiki/Science_2.0/Brainstorming
http://sciencex2.org/en/user/113/track

http://research.microsoft.com/towards2020science/

http://efoundations.typepad.com	94
http://med.libraryrose.com	76
http://scilib.typepad.com	66
http://rafaelsidi.blogspot.com	47
http://mndoci.com	27
http://www.slideshare.net	19
http://blog.espol.edu.ec	6
http://paper.li	3
http://future.springer.com	3
http://library.infoupdate.csiro.au	2
http://infoupdate.csiro.au	1
url_unknown	1
http://www.typepad.com	1
https://bb4dev.utc.edu	1
http://127.0.0.1:8795	1

The Future of Research (Science and Technology)

by Duncan Hull on Sep 26, 2008

Accessibility

Categories

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

15 Embeds 348

Statistics

The Future of Research (Science and Technology) — Presentation Transcript